We Shall See

Yesterday I was distracted by a very heavy sense of pressure. It has happened often enough that I recognized it as a moral burden, a potent sense of anticipation that great evil was coming to America. Furthermore, I was not alone. A couple of friends contacted me about the same thing bearing down on their conscious awareness.

I’ve written about this often enough; it’s part of mysticism. We are setting about intentionally trying to become aware of the Unseen Realm. We want to be a part of it. We are consciously preparing to take our place in Eternity and this world simply isn’t where things happen assertively, but is a mere reaction to things that originate somewhere else.

During those periods of pressure, I spend a lot more time in prayer and contemplation, striving to connect better to that other realm. Anyone close to me can tell I’m distracted, even if they don’t sense anything themselves. It’s rather like a calling, a bell ringing for my attention. It’s never processed intellectually, but it often results in moving me to do things differently. It’s not about data, but about persons and strong connections on a different level.

Some of my habits have already been changing, and in many ways such pressure confirms and gives focus to the resolve that moves me.

Let me give you some specifics of what has been moving already. I rarely use a graphical browser to read and research things on the Net. I use something called “elinks” quite a bit in a terminal window on Linux. It reduces the content clutter. Granted, there are whole sites where it doesn’t work at all, but most of the time it’s just fine. I get the data I’m seeking and don’t have to worry about the manipulative distractions common on most websites.

It’s not just the advertising; it’s the whole package of how color, shape and imagery are used to condition our thinking and receptivity to the content. For example, I’ve done some research on human awareness and how the media on the Net affects us as humans. I’m not going to link to the videos because, oddly enough, the videos themselves participate in the same manipulation they pretend to be warning about.

Do you realize just how much of what crosses the wires on the Net is not direct human communications? The majority of all traffic is generated by automatic processes — bots and algorithms talking to each other. We have created a whole generation of people whose creative efforts are entirely controlled by algorithms and what the service algorithms will promote. People seldom act on the interests of other people, being steered instead by how the algorithms promote or hide their output. The creative output serves profitability, not self-expression.

And content creators also must avoid censorship, that vast ugly effort to shape human perception.

Part of what I was facing in that pressure in my soul was about this very thing. I’m being called to change how I engage the Net because of how God is working among His people. Something awful is coming that will shut down opportunities I’ve enjoyed in the past. It’s not that my message will change, but that the means and methods will change.

Nor should you imagine that everything happened all at once yesterday. Rather, yesterday signaled to me a moment of turning, that the balance of things had finally shifted and decisions had to be made.

Don’t get hung up on the specifics; that’s not the point. The point is how God works in us. We are being steered by the Spirit, if we will listen. I’m doing my best to stay open. When we seek the Lord with passion, then that passion will burn more brightly at times. So, much of what happened yesterday was a shift in my heart on a moral plane, not a matter of mere facts and actions. The implications will play out in the future as my conscious awareness discovers what has changed in my convictions, bouncing my resolve off of circumstances.

We shall see what it means.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cause of Resistance

People send me a lot of junk by email. The motivations vary; I don’t mean to slam anyone for thinking something is worth my attention. Sometimes it actually is worth it. Even hucksters sometimes give away something useful in order to make their pitch.

Consider this video. At about 45 minutes, it’s a time sink. It will include toward the end promoting something I cannot support, solutions that I don’t believe will do much good.

For example, I believe that cryptocurrencies are useful only in the short term. They are more like weapons against centralized government. Once you leverage them for some immediate goal, trade them away. Their value will die suddenly when you least expect it. Think of them as expendable.

But the meat of the video is an insider’s revelation of things hidden by our wicked government officials. In summary, the story of the Salk Polio Vaccine is paired with some truly unconscionable “medical” testing of bio-weapons. This physician tells how we came to the place where Fauci was hiding “gain of function” testing in Wuhan, China. He warns that anything involving work with SV40 (a monkey virus) is guaranteed to promote cancer. And it’s quite intentional.

Thus, most new vaccines today are part of a long term campaign to generate millions of new cancer patients, which is where the real money is in industrial medicine. It’s not so much that they intend to kill you outright, but to turn you into a cancer patient so they can milk the system for profits.

You can work out the details of the history he offers in the first 30 minutes or so. I had to watch it twice because of the wealth of details. Then the talk turns to his political advocacy for things like cryptocurrencies and decentralized medical rights. Now, I’m certainly in favor of decentralized medicine, and I agree wholeheartedly with the message to resist any government mandated vaccines, but I don’t hold out much hope for changing the way western governments are doing things.

Rather, I suggest you will face a social and political siege in any future replays of the pandemic game. The next time, we will be forced to consider violence as the means to keeping medical toxins out of our bodies. If there is going to be an armed revolt in America, this will be the cause. Medical or climate based oppression is the best weapon the commies have.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

NT Doctrine — Hebrews 10

We were born trapped in our fleshly natures. There was no way we could have broken the bondage; the flesh must die. Jesus did that for us. His death on the Cross broke the bondage and set us free to walk in the Spirit. This is what the writer of Hebrews tells his fellow Jews in Rome.

The Covenant of Moses was just a shadow of the real thing. Mount Sinai was a promise of what was to come. Blood sacrifices spoke of the price, but were not that price. They could not break the bondage of the fleshly nature. Otherwise, once free, there would have been no need to keep making the sacrifices over and over again. Though commanded by God, these rituals and sacrifices were just the shadow of redemption.

God revealed that Himself. David in Psalm 40 prophesied the truth: It wasn’t a matter of those sacrifices, but of a firm commitment based on the promises of things to come. The Law of Moses was a promise of redemption. Moses himself said that what God really wanted has always been the same: our hearts. Thus, the Messiah’s submission to come and simply live the Father’s will was the promise of a New Covenant.

So, Jesus made the ultimate sacrifice once and for all, breaking the bondage of the flesh. Now He sits at the right hand of the Father, until such time as this New Covenant is fulfilled in His children. The New Covenant is not written in human language, but in the hearts of those children.

Following Christ to the Cross is the ultimate fulfillment of every command God had ever revealed to mankind. What the author indicates, but does not say, is his audience should stop whining about persecution in the flesh. It cannot change what Christ has done in your soul. He has broken the bondage of the flesh. Take up your cross of commitment and sacrifice, endure with patience, do His will in the face of sorrow and death. Encourage each other to endure and keep pulling together as a family. That’s what it means to follow Christ.

Now that the bondage is broken, you are free to walk away from sin and defilement. You would have to willfully seek out disobedience; there’s no further cleansing that can help you. Are you trying to provoke God’s wrath?

Back when these Hebrew Christians first came to Christ some decades ago, they were willing to endure some persecution in defiance of Jewish authorities. They understood being released from the bondage to this life and its trappings. Are they now going to fold under Roman persecution?

He quotes from Habakkuk 2 about how God operates on a different time frame, yet He never fails to act. When God comes to deliver, He will be searching for those who were faithful in waiting until He was ready to act. We get the feeling the writer sensed that the opportunity to slide back into the safety of the Talmud would end soon when Rome would destroy the Temple.

Don’t turn tail and hide in Judaism; Rome will destroy that, too. What’s left will never be the same.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Relax But Don’t Get Lazy

As is typically the case, Brandon Smith has a good grasp on the problem: Globalists Are Taking The Mask Off And That’s A Bad Sign…. Normally, I take issue with his solutions, but this time, he doesn’t offer one.

His main point is that the attempt to assert control via the false pandemic failed due to miscalculation on the oppressors’ part. They didn’t know just how loud alternative voices could be online. Thus, he warns they won’t make that mistake again. Whatever they try next will take into account the necessity of silencing us.

I’ll let you read it for yourself. I’m keeping an eye on the technology of the Net and ways people are approaching the issue of censorship. There’s really nothing new at the moment. Smith hints at things when he mentions remaining independent. That translates into learning how to avoid as much as possible giving someone else control over your online activities.

We’ve covered that here often enough: prefer Open Source software, consider using a VPN, avoid being pushed into situations that surrender control to outside agencies for anything that matters, avoid tracking online and off. I would add one thing: Don’t be afraid of sounding less than professional so that you depend on grammar software. That’s one area where Open Source is currently lacking. Spelling checkers are everywhere, but grammar checking is a lot harder. Don’t worry about typos and punctuation mistakes. There’s a very strong likelihood people who can read will get what you mean.

It’s a case of relaxing on things that don’t matter, and tightening up on things that do. The latter will cramp your convenience, for sure, but if your operational security is sloppy, you’ll be caught off guard by how the enemy will seize the advantage.

The time for physical violence is long past; if you are worried about the commies taking control, it’s too late. They have control. Right-wing death squads won’t do any good now. But the violence will come around again, and it will be quite different than what could have been done before. Right now, the emphasis is on information warfare.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who Could Leave?

If you can begin to absorb the Hebrew outlook on time versus the western emphasis on efficiency, then you will understand the seeming lack of hurry for most things in Scripture. And the few times you read “make haste” become all the more significant for their rarity.

The Hebrews didn’t suffer from the make-things-happen mindset. Their emphasis was staying faithful under testing. They were convinced far too much of their existence was in the hands of God, not in their own hands. It shows up best in how people with a spiritual-moral orientation are patient, particularly in their patience with people.

It’s one thing to say, “Time heals all wounds.” It’s another thing to get the focus off the goal of healing and onto the time and process as God’s management prerogative. As noted in Pageau’s explanation of time versus space, we learn that time cleanses and restores, instead of tapping our feet impatiently, in a hurry to get on with the things we believe we can change.

If you come under conviction that something in your life justifies praying about it, then giving God time is also justified. The anxiety of children about time and the fear of boredom are not fitting for servants of the Lord. People are the greatest treasure in this life, and giving God time to work in their hearts is not so different from waiting for fruit to ripen in season.

As you might expect, at any given time I am praying several people through the process of changing their outlook from the childlike western “let’s get this done” orientation into a more Hebraic spiritual orientation. They require time, but the goal is not in getting done, but in seeing them actually ripen and become treasured members of the family. As long as my spirit says they are worth it, I’ll put up with their chatter and challenges. We need them in the covenant family, and bearing spiritual children is no different from incubating literal children in that certain developmental tasks must finish.

Keep in mind that in Hebrew, there are only two verb tenses: actions completed, and those still in process. And if we are honest, is it any different as the Lord works with each of us? Have any of us advanced so far that we can leave the Father’s care?

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More Word, Less Image

A major element in what we consider child misbehavior is visual stimulation. This is well known, but seldom stated. The way the human brain works, visual stimulation is very much like any other stimulant — it becomes addictive.

If you want to see better behavior in children, reduce the cultural emphasis on visual stimulation. The faster, the more complex and bolder the colors, the more it affects them. This includes TV, all computer video, etc. And don’t imagine that you can escape as an adult. You can develop an addiction later in life. However, with children it’s rather like gaining an addiction in the womb; different aspects of the brain’s development continue throughout life, but the worst damage is done by about age 12.

Let me propose an experiment: Try reducing your own exposure to visual stimulation for a little while. The longer you do, the more your spiritual life will grow. Did you think we were kidding about the difference between western and Hebrew thinking? The Hebrew orientation is the one God designed for His people, and it’s not a visual orientation. It’s auditory; it’s not about intellectual ideals, but about moral authority. A part of this would be reducing the visual stimulation effect of things like smart phones.

I realize that we cannot simply force our world to comply with our demands. What I’m suggesting here is your own internal orientation. If you consciously resist the temptation to visual stimulation, you gain in spiritual strength. In the biblical approach to human morality, text and speech are everything. The flesh prefers visual stimulation; the spirit calls for less of that.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Message Priorities

Let me propose a thought experiment.

“This world is not my home.” Do you take that seriously? Our recent study in Hebrew versus western thinking should produce very real results. If the focus of your attention is morals, and your primary operation is via words, then it calls for some changes.

Let’s remind ourselves that spiritual warfare is primarily people changing themselves under God’s hand. Your biggest enemy is inside of you, as it were. The primary turf over which you battle the forces of Darkness is yourself. What are your priorities? The goal of our warfare includes in part the utter necessity of reaching people for the gospel message. Turning your life around to that purpose is a monumental task.

The way of warfare for the world is to destroy physical property. The world tends to view humans as simply movable property. What kind of target would we be? Would a missile strike stop you from gathering, from coming together to do whatever you do in this world? Would it silence the gospel? Does your gospel mission really depend on physical resources?

Further, do you really need to gather physically in order to promote the gospel message? Would you be an easy target that way?

Granted, I’ve said often enough that the Scripture encourages our emphasis on physical contact. Still, in the exigencies of today, could you get by without it, if that makes you vulnerable to Satan’s designs? Do we know how to love each other as Christ did, regardless of geographical displacement?

More importantly, can we come up with a transforming message that removes the dependence on written materials? Is it really necessary to have all the visual aids, or can we depend on the Holy Spirit to drive the Word home in us via our hearts?

Let’s pray and contemplate how we can transmit the germ of our message, what makes our path of faith unique. How can we get the most bang for the buck so that it requires less transmission? We should organize our message in layers. We should stop to consider what is truly the essence of what we should say, and then if time and resources permit, more layers of the message content based on the priorities of God.

Right now, we have generous opportunities. Let’s take advantage of this, because all too soon, things will get tight. We need to be ready. There is a tactical side to the gospel.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

HTCG Summary

Summary and Psychological Foundation of the Differences

Boman devotes these last few pages to restating his thesis that it is best to synthesize the Greek/western viewpoint and the Hebrew into something better than either — at least, that’s what he almost says. The summary is full of standard academic blather that tries to sound encouraging, and he really doesn’t add anything useful.

——–

It’s not as if we learned nothing useful from the book, but it was still rather disappointing. I’m not sure Boman understands the Hebrew culture and language as well as others I’ve read from. It’s actually pretty hard to judge because he isn’t as much a fan as he seems of the Hebrew epistemology. In the end, he remains a very western man who likes to imagine he’s open minded, as if that were something of great value.

Finally, I’m not sure I’d recommend you invest the money for it. I’ll keep my copy, but I’m not likely to open it again any time soon.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

NT Doctrine — Hebrews 9

The author lays out his core argument: The Covenant of Christ is an eternal covenant rooted in Heaven, not a national covenant rooted on earth, as the Covenant of Moses was.

Having just declared that a new covenant was necessary, he goes back and reviews how the old one worked. It had rules about rituals, the Tabernacle layout, furnishings, and those curtains. He runs through the basic design of things, including the Ark of the Covenant and what was in it. The rituals were required on a regular basis.

The author didn’t want to get bogged down in the details, but the priests only entered the main chamber on a regular basis, and the High Priest saw the actual holy place representing God’s throne room only once yearly. Even that single visit required offering blood for his own ritual purity, and then for the nation as a whole. And even with all that, the High Priest was at risk of dying from God’s wrath.

Keeping peace with God was a very solemn and fearful thing. All of those rituals only covered the unintentional sins, not any actual rebellion against God. The whole package presumed an honest heart in submission to Jehovah. It could not solve a bad attitude. If they had clear hearts, then it allowed them gain access to the covenant blessings God had promised for those at peace with Him. The way was not fully opened as long as the old system remained.

Christ stands as the Lord of a new covenant. There is no mass of rituals and veils; the way into God’s Presence and peace is opened — the blessings that were only hinted at by the symbols of the old. The Elect of old never had any kind of assurance that they would see Eternity. In Christ, the Elect can receive that assurance of adoption as children of the Father. Jesus wiped away the sense of doubt they had harbored under the Old Covenant.

The author then shifts to the imagery of an inheritance. The one who made the will must die before it is revealed. It’s just a proposal until then. Well, that first covenant was attested by death, and the bloodshed of ritual offering animals. Moses engaged in quite a rigmarole with the people to get their attention and encourage them to take it seriously. That blood was sprinkled on everything.

Just so, since the most ancient times of human memory, sin could not be covered without some bloodshed. Though as fallen creatures, we all deserved to die for our own sinful nature, God from the earliest times outside the Garden accepted the bloodshed of some proxy sacrifice as a symbol of just how grave this whole business was.

Well, the heavenly sacrifice Jesus made also included bloodshed, the final sacrifice for which all previous sacrifices were just a symbol. Approaching the actual throne of God in Heaven required a real sacrifice of genuinely innocent blood, someone who could carry the burden of the Fall.

It was an eternal sacrifice. Otherwise, we’d have the silly spectacle of Jesus having to die on the Cross again and again. The long period of symbolism is over; at the end of human probation, the final price has been paid once for all. When humans die, they face their individual judgment. When Christ returns, it will be the Final Judgment of all things. Are we not eagerly awaiting that day?

Note: For the Hebrews, the term “salvation” refers to the Covenant blessings. The blessings of the Old Covenant were merely a symbol of our Eternal blessings as Children of Resurrection in the final Promised Land.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HTCG 05

Chapter 5: Logical Thinking and Psychological Understanding

Section A: Logic and Psychology

Boman separates between logic (impartial and objective) and psychology (engaging sympathetically) in approaching reality — thinking versus understanding. But in actual experience, the two are inseparable. Still, he says, we must keep a theoretical distinction for the sake of scholarship.

Section B: The Warrant for the Two Viewpoints

He mentions Kant (logic) and Bergson (psychology) as two schools of thought debating on where to begin. What’s the foundation of knowing? Boman outlines the two approaches and concludes that they are both mistaken when they try to exclude the other.

He goes on to identify the Hebrew with the psychological and Greek as primarily logical. It would be a mistake to assume that the Hebrew approach is more primitive and less developed; it is simply different. Boman approaches the idea that the Hebrews were so focused on morals and moral reasoning that they considered systematic logic as a hindrance to human redemption.

Section C: The Independence of the Israelite Thinker

The genius of Hebrew writers was not in creativity as innovation. On the contrary, they always claimed to restore the ancient ways. This was carried into church theology with its claim to being apostolic. Rather, the genius was in absorbing foreign material and reworking it to remove idolatrous traces and confirm the singularity of Jehovah. Some sections of the Old Testament are clearly the product of very independent minds.

Unfortunately, it’s all spoiled again by Boman’s JEPD theory and partitioning of the text into primitive versus developed theology.

Section D: The Formal Peculiarity of Each Kind of Thinking

Boman reviews the Greek emphasis on thinking with their eyes, and contrasts it with the well established notion that Hebrews thought with their ears. Instead of visions of things, it was for the Hebrews the word spoken and heard.

The Greek concept of truth was something unveiled and seen clearly. For the Hebrews truth was a matter of being faithful and consistent to your calling. Hebrews were not interested in what can be verified as objectively accurate; they were interested in personal commitment to what was declared by higher authority.

In Greek, the word logos was derived from lego — “gather”. Thus, it meant collection and analysis of data. The Hebrew word for “understanding” is bin (literally: dismember, separate), from which root we gain the word binah — comprehension, discernment, insight. The image is to carve off the junk and keep the meat. Once the moral purpose is identified, nothing else matters.

I believe Boman misses when he tries to explain how parables are aimed at overcoming the initial psychological resistance people have to something they are told. It’s not about psychology, but moral truth in the heart. Parables are meant to point out something for exploration so that people will find the Lord in their own contemplations.

He’s correct when he identifies similar Hebrew words as ways of making a moral point, versus the Greek furnishing a proof. Boman mushes up the effort to explain the Hebrew use of the concept of “seeing” truth. In the Hebrew mind, the term “seeing” refers to recognition of someone or something you already know. When Hebrews argue, the point is that others “see” — recognize the character of God in their words.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments