Monthly Archives: March 2010

Seamonkey 2 on CentOS 5

Posted on March 31, 2010 by ehurst

I prefer Seamonkey to other web browsers. The generic tarball build offered for Linux on the Seamonkey website doesn’t work quite right on my machine. Currently I find no one building it for CentOS 5, and certainly not tracking the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

CentOS: Fixing Ugly KDE Fonts

Posted on March 30, 2010 by ehurst

On CentOS/RHEL 5 in particular, I found the fonts in KDE 3 were ragged, and unresponsive to efforts to clean them up via recompiling Freetype2 libs with bytecode hinting turned on. After reading up on it a bit, I decided … Continue reading →

Posted in computers | Tagged , | Comments Off on CentOS: Fixing Ugly KDE Fonts

Implications of the Decalogue: Conclusion

Posted on March 30, 2010 by ehurst

The Covenant of Moses was closed at the Cross. In that sense, God today holds no one accountable to the Law of Moses. We keep it around, referring to it historically, so that we may learn about His Laws in … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Implications of the Decalogue: Ten

Posted on March 29, 2010 by ehurst

You shall not covet your neighbor’s property. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is your neighbor’s. The Hebrew word “covet” carried more weight than … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Ten

Implications of the Decalogue: Nine

Posted on March 28, 2010 by ehurst

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. The Suzerain does not permit dishonesty. Since it would require more than one witness in court to meet the minimum evidence of a crime, it would invariably be collusion and conspiracy … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Nine

Implications of the Decalogue: Eight

Posted on March 27, 2010 by ehurst

You shall not steal. The word translated into English as “steal” covers a wide range of unjust takings, including frauds. It should be obvious how this inflicts harm on the community. The whole point of living in proximity of others … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Eight

Implications of the Decalogue: Seven

Posted on March 26, 2010 by ehurst

You shall not commit adultery. This is one commandment more honored in the violation than in the keeping. The Suzerain is not amused when people break faith. We are not animals operating with no moral compass, but bear a heavy … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Seven

Implications of the Decalogue: Six

Posted on March 25, 2010 by ehurst

You shall not kill. This has been worked over too often because certain folks like to play games with English translations. Our Suzerain here merely reiterates what He said back in the days of Noah: His domain shall not be … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Six

Implications of the Decalogue: Five

Posted on March 24, 2010 by ehurst

Honor your father and your mother, so that your days may be long upon the land which the LORD your God gives you. The Hebrew term “honor” means to reckon something very serious or grave; don’t take it lightly. It … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Implications of the Decalogue: Four

Posted on March 23, 2010 by ehurst

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God. You shall not do any work, you nor your son, … Continue reading →

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Four