Whoever rejects grace will receive the law. In passing, I’ve noticed that whenever someone scans one of our community blogs via AI, that principle always gets noted in the summary if the writer actually believes it.
God deals with humans on two levels: family and others. Family is associated with the biblical concept of grace, while everyone else gets law. It’s a sort of paradox, because law should bring things close to what grace would provide, but humans who operate without the awareness of grace are ill-equipped to be as flexible as God meant law to be. People of grace understand that law is merely a representation, not God Himself. People of law cannot possibly grasp that; law is all they know about God. As far as they are concerned, law is God.
The truth is the reverse: God is the law. It was hard enough with Hebrew people whose language and culture were dominated by this paradigm. They had the advantage of a structure that presumed love and personal attachment. The West pretty much killed all of that. In the West, there is no moral reckoning in attachment; that’s regarded as mere emotion, sentiment. Western morality is reckoned in terms of material obligations, not personal attachment. In the Bible, everything is personal.
For the western mind, to “know” someone or something is bound by law; it’s a question of property ownership (from which we get the adjective “proprietary” marking sole ownership). In the biblical sense, knowing is a matter of personal interaction, a moral consideration of whatever is appropriate to the nature of the relationship. It presumes a personal regard and commitment to the welfare of everyone affected.
Thus, we say by grace that Creation is a living being with whom we must relate as a person. Every identifiable entity in Creation is also granted the same regard. Hebrew language treats nothing as a mere object, but imbues everything with some measure of personality, sentience and will. Western assumptions about reality serve to depersonalize even people, not to mention God.
It becomes a burden of our mortal existence to keep track of both systems. Divine love can be offered to everyone, but the circuit is not complete without reciprocity. If that love does not own you, then you exclude yourself. You define yourself as an object, as mere property, instead of family. Thus, we keep law at the ready for those who demand it.
We know before we get involved that law is flexible, while at the same time we know that people will not understand this. They will not like it. Sometimes we cannot help them. Much as it pains us to watch them suffer, there is nothing we can do about it. Worst of all is when we sense that someone is family, but refuses the full power of grace, preferring to labor under a false notion of law.
It gets even more complicated when we deal with people in the aggregate. Humans are political by nature, while we have been striving to kill that fleshly nature. The biggest blind spot in western society is the silly notion that everyone should be a king — calling it “individualism”. From this deeply perverted foundation, they go on to act on a tribal identity that is fiercely materialistic. Worse, they will assume multiple tribal identities — a sort of schizophrenia — and will respond to everything we do and say from that freakish perspective.
We may spend our whole lives trying to shed that idiocy in pursuit of grace.
At any rate, it is important to remind covenant people today that our tribulation is very different from what the first century Christians faced. The Roman government was only partly western, for one thing. Imperial Rome maintained a clear grasp of Ancient Near Eastern assumptions about reality and tolerated it officially. Our American culture and government refuses to understand, much less tolerate it.
Further, Rome was not materialistic the way the West is. The law by which believers handled the Roman imperial government and the various national and local authorities would naturally be quite different from the law we must use in the US. It’s our peculiar burden to discern the teaching in Scripture, rightly dividing between those things that were contextual and those which are universal. I doubt any two of us would end up with exactly the same set of answers.
It pays to say this again: In our community, you need not buy into everything I say as elder. You need only humor me for the sake community. When I’m gone and the Lord makes you elder, you’ll be in the same position. Your job will be to lead by building love and trust, not by dragging everyone with you.
There is more…
