Apparent Trend of Coups

In these modern times, the real take over comes in a series of coups d’état, versus one complete change.
I’m watching. It’s one thing to talk about some shadowy Illuminati as shorthand for some apparent group with an agenda to take over the world. It’s another thing to claim any actual detailed knowledge. Most of the crazies who claim to have some kind of inside line — Icke, Fulford, etc. — are reliably wrong on most of their prognostications. A few who did seem once to have some access appear to have lost it, and they are running on reputation alone. They all demand substantial payment for their output. All I’m doing is trying to match my limited history reading with what I see actually happening, and offering to let you compare notes. It beats whining and cowering in fear.
What I believe I see are several competing groups, each with their differing scheme for taking over the world. I suspect all the ones I see are working for someone/something higher up, perhaps human, but by no means humane. I’m utterly convinced most of what we see is not the agenda itself, but the means and method, and all of them are likely to bring similar results in the end.
Perhaps you are aware, for all intents and purposes, the Federal Reserve rules the US. That is, whatever the Fed wants, it gets, and no agency can tell them “no.” But you also have to understand the massive back channel planning and communication the Fed has with a large number of other folks and agencies. I’ve tried to follow that in the past, but it’s too complicated and murky, constantly shifting. The point is, the current trends in world human affairs is being steered by what amounts to plutocrat bankers.
Whether you want to imagine they are all Jews, Masons, Opus Dei, or whatever isn’t going to do anyone much good. Whatever robe they wear, it can be easily changed and they probably wear multiple different costumes in a single day, as it were. I can honestly report it seems they have used all of the different secret societies and various religious covers at different times for utterly cynical reasons. Yes, some Jesuits have been involved; some of what they do does seem to reflect Jewish Messianic Expectations; some of them have shaped what Freemasons teach. You’ll be wrong if you try to tie it to any one false front, because they also worked through Nazis, the Klan, and through certain Reformation figures. Today they are also working through a lot of Muslim fronts. Nothing is sacred to these people.
Current expectations? They are using national bank wobbles to take over non-democratically, so far. They’ve done it in Greece and Italy, and are working on it in the rest of the PIIGS. In the case of Arab Spring countries, it’s replacing one set of thugs with another. Meanwhile, they have long taken over various international monetary alphabet agencies. There is a trend where governments and banks themselves are the only agencies using credit, as all real business, and consumers especially, have been squeezed out of the market. Even the unions are being clobbered, by pulling their jobs and their economic leverage out from under them. The trends are clearly anti-democratic, and only by ignoramuses could those trends be imagined particularly communist or capitalist. TPTB are leveraging the mythical necessity of banking to simply take control over every democratic institution. Banks and governments are two edges of the same sword.
In each place they do this, the context is loaded with all sorts of fluctuating and varied details. You can make a case study of each one and it would not be the same everywhere, except in certain trends which seem to be present. Where the people are rowdy, TPTB simply wear them down while sidestepping them. Look for the Delphi Method writ large, by misdirecting most folks away from real issues, isolating the genuine rebels who understand, etc., disemboweling all significant resistance. Yes, it’s happening in the church, too, which is where I really began to understand it. There is no publication permitted of the idea “we have nothing left to lose.” Always give them just enough to survive, but make everything utterly dependent on system control. Give everyone possible a sense of dependency and fear, not willing to break out of the system, destroying any hope of self-reliance — destroy human nature in the mass of humans.
So in each country, the trend is to displace any democratic influence, to remove the people as an element in consideration. Wars and warfare are used to consume the strong, create impossible debt burdens, even while removing all economic productivity to nations already under cooperative tyrants. As a correlative, automate everything possible so fewer humans are needed for whatever is produced. And if they don’t die in warfare against others, then on their own streets over any number of social instabilities. Meanwhile, poison them slowly by co-opting every source of food production, every medical provision, every thing they touch and use. Make the masses superfluous.  Those who survive will be zombie worker ants, fleshbots.
Yes, radical depopulation is part of the plan, but TPTB are willing to let most things run the natural course of decline to get there.
None of this is surprising to anyone paying attention. Any victories we have against it are temporary. The power to stop any real threat is far above you and I, but it’s completely valid to want to keep an eye on things and communicate what we see amongst our widely scattered selves. I figure the Internet is the one thing worth fighting for, as even TPTB need something like it to do their own work.
But let’s keep watching, and see if a major trend is not taking over in domino fashion a series of national governments in Europe — removing any hint of democracy — and the Middle East — putting in pro-banking thugs.