Some Things Are Settled

Today I had to find peace with God about something.

I hold myself to a high standard. The Word is clear: If someone says, “thus saith the Lord” and it doesn’t turn out to be true, you have to cut them off from your faith fellowship. It won’t matter if you are in the mood to forgive; that’s not the standard. Given that we lack the authority in our covenant communities to carry out the death penalty, ostracism is what’s left.

Granted, I am quite sincere in what I’ve written. There is no guile at all, no attempt to gain anything from anyone. That means, if I’m off course, it’s because I’m insane. I can assure you that discovering I can’t get a clear word from the Lord won’t change what I believe and practice. I’m utterly convinced of the things I write.

But if I fail as a prophet, I’ll save you the trouble of making a tough decision — I’ll ostracize myself. I’ll confess openly and take the discipline. It would be my duty, and my sense of duty. I’ll keep writing, but I can’t say whether I would be interested in publishing any more. It’s more likely that I will withdraw and find some other way to occupy my time. Nothing will stop the praying, contemplation, study, etc. What I believe won’t change just because something didn’t work out, but I would lose the privilege of testifying.

That’s how faith works.

This is crunch time. One of the things I prophesied is that Trump would win in the courts, in the end. There’s a while yet before that door is closed; we are at a constitutional crisis of sorts, so it’s no over until it’s over. But I was even more firm about attacking Iran, and that still appears to be possible any day now. So I’m very aware that things have moved to the point of proving whether I speak for God or I’m nuts.

Just wanted to report what I’ve settled with the Lord today.

Posted in prophecy | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Some Things Are Settled

Reporting on the Path

I have a vision. I’m not dreaming it up, but discovering something that has been standing there all along. It’s not a question of what might be possible, but of entering into something God is already doing, whether any of us help or not.

Divine revelation came because God wanted us out of our fallen existence and back in the Garden of Eden where we belong. This mortal frame doesn’t belong there. You can’t live in the Garden without the Tree of Life, and that’s what it means to be mortal: You aren’t in the Garden, but you are outside of it in a fallen existence God had waiting for those who rejected His ways inherent in the Tree of Life. If you reject His ways, you reject the Tree of Life, and you can’t stay in the Garden.

The whole point is getting back into the Garden. It requires passing through that Flaming Sword, which symbolizes the same thing as the Cross. You have to nail that fleshly nature to the Cross — you have to die to this life and enter the Other Life.

The path for most of us is pretty long. We have to continue living here by the divine revelation before we actually move across the boundary of death. We have to embrace death and live with it for a while before it does its final work to take us Home. The reason God requires that is because of His glory. Nothing benefits us like His glory, and He knows that, so He encourages His own glory in us. Living by His revelation is how we generate His glory in our fallen existence.

The vision I have is restoring divine revelation to human awareness. In my experience, a great deal has been lost over the centuries since His Son walked among us. I’m driven by the notion that we cannot understand the message of His Son without going back to the frame of reference that gave the Cross meaning. Why was He so determined to die that way? What did He know about things? How did He approach His own human existence? It means trading in a whole bunch of stuff that won’t answer those questions, and taking up something else.

It means forsaking everything that conflicts with that vision. It means reclaiming however much of that context as we can. It means having faith that God has preserved the context sufficiently to make use of it. This cannot be a vain quest, or His revelation means nothing at all.

I’ve run into an awful lot of stuff in the current religious system that simply cannot take us back there. Those things are hindrances. Ditching that stuff has meant ditching the system. The people running the system won’t make room for the vision. I don’t write that in anger, but sadness that I have to leave them there. Maybe some of them will catch on later, but I suspect it will be much, much later, if any at all. I’m forced to build something separate in pursuit of the vision.

The vision is a body of ideas, an orientation to faith that restores the promises of God. It strikes me that there are an awful lot of blessings left waiting for us to claim. Not least would be things Jesus and His Disciples did that we aren’t doing any more. It’s not so much the blessings, but what those blessing represent about living in this world by divine revelation. The blessings are an indicator, not the thing itself. We need to restore whatever it is that produces the blessings.

It could be I’m totally lost. Still, this vision and this path are all I have right now. I’m convinced so thoroughly of the rightness of this path that I’m willing to forsake everything to pursue that vision. I’ve encountered so very many miracles along the way that I simply cannot imagine that it’s the wrong way to go. If it blows up in my face, I’ll be completely without any anchor for continuing this human existence. This is all I’ve got that gives any meaning to this life.

And I sure as hell can’t bring myself to want any of the things that seem to have captured so many other souls. Going forward is the only way I can go at all. Feel free to watch what happens, because a part of the vision itself is reporting what I experience.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Reporting on the Path

Not Any Kind of Norm

My life is by no means any kind of norm.

Yet, I insist that if God can do certain works in my life, that justifies believing He can do something similar in your life. He may not; I can’t pretend to have Him in some kind of box. That’s what got Israel in trouble, and it’s how churches shut out people who don’t conform to the expectations such churches establish for their members. So don’t follow me, but learn from my experience in that other sense, that it shows you what God can do.

God is able. We seldom give Him room to act. Too much of what He does excludes us because we don’t include His power and prerogatives in our calculus.

When I was in college, I was already convinced that God was offering me a destiny I could not imagine. I had an unshakable sense that His hand was on me, and He was ready to use me if I would be available. I was agreeing to be shaped by His power, even though I wasn’t fully cognizant then of just how radical that would be.

As I look back, I can see a thousand ways where He was in control of things, and I honestly don’t feel like I’ve missed out on much that He has offered. It’s not that I have no regrets, but that a substantial majority of what He wanted for me did happen. I haven’t missed much, because my heart tells me so.

Still, I must confess that it came at a high cost sometimes in terms of things I had to sacrifice and forsake, things that I really thought I wanted. I know now that those things would have made my life far worse. They would have hurt me and hurt people I care about.

God can do something similar for you. I firmly believe that the mix of things He plans for you will not quite match the mix of things in my life over which He exercised His divine sovereignty. There will surely be some overlap, but there are plenty of things wherein my choices didn’t make much difference to Him. Yet there were plenty of things where He expected me to surrender and wait for His hand to provide.

This is my testimony: He will do that with you, if you submit to Him. I’m utterly certain of it.

I’ve been exposed lately to a lot of words from people trying to make the world a better place. That’s all fine and dandy if that’s the best they know, but this world is going to Hell, and their ideas will go with it. Nothing we do outside of God’s sovereign will is going to outlive this fallen realm. When Christ comes back, the only thing mankind has accomplished that will remain is the marks of the Cross.

I’m not interested in making the world a better place. The most useful thing I can do for this world is demonstrate shalom. My words are surely a part of that witness, but the final issue is that I cannot help people in any way except to show them what God has revealed. That doesn’t mean I deny all the human knowledge and wisdom; I deny that any of it matters eternally. I am required by God to distance myself from people who honestly believe that their human pursuits matter.

So I do what I’m convinced my Lord wants me to do. I’m not all that concerned about the outcomes. I’ll live with the natural consequences, but that’s not why I do those things. I do them because I cannot be faithful and do otherwise. So I do what I do and let God handle the rest. It doesn’t matter to me if the common man can make any sense of what I do.

This is my calling, my mission. It ends up that I have little to say to the mass of humanity, because they don’t want divine revelation. The only people who can even grasp what I’m doing are just a few folks here and there who sense a similar calling on their lives. I’m the shepherd to those who can’t find a place in any other flock.

The people who are drawn to my ministry aren’t very conventional either. Whether or not the world would be better if the norm was closer to me is a question that cannot be resolved in this life. I sense that my mission requires me to act like the answer is “no.” But by the same token, I really have nothing to offer folks who aren’t drawn to where I am, way out on the fringe.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Not Any Kind of Norm

Tied to Eternity

Satan’s Fall came primarily because he sought to claim divine glory for himself. The last thing we want to do is get trapped in that folly.

First, allow me to reiterate an important principle of Biblical Law: The faith of a minority within any covenant community will bring redemption into the lives of the whole. Indeed, at any given time in Israel’s history, there were never more than a minority who were truly heart-led servants of God. Yet this was enough covering for Him to pour out blessings on the nation as a whole. This is what Paul means when he suggests that the faith of one spouse can bless the other spouse and the children of that household.

This is why it’s critical to strive, if possible, to maintain a broken marriage where one spouse is not living by faith. It’s not ideal, but God may well turn things around at some point down the road. Give Him time to work in His way. Naturally, His Spirit can also warn you to get out of a situation that He has cursed, but we begin with the assumption that He will use us to bless folks who won’t seek it for themselves. Our shalom in dealing with our own family is a witness to folks outside the family.

This is a critical part of God’s agenda in this world. His glory is inextricably tied with our shalom. Seeking His glory is seeking shalom, and vice versa.

We are on the verge of testing one of my prophecies. Word has leaked from several military units that they have been put on alert for deployment. Currently the only talk about military action anywhere is in Iran. I’ve warned that God will not let such an attack succeed. For the sake of our troops, I hope Trump is dissuaded from doing this. But for the sake of God’s glory, I sincerely pray that if he goes ahead and orders an attack, that the failure is fully visible and unmistakable.

Bro. Ed wants no glory if this works out as I believe. I have no way of guessing how widely my prophetic warning is known, but I honestly worry a bit that if this proceeds as I believe, then some notice will come to me on that account. I don’t want that kind of fame. What I want is for folks to realize that prophecy is real, and that God is not silent about the things He is doing, mainly because He wants people to see His glory. Nothing blesses His Creation more than for His glory to shine.

To be honest, I don’t expect much attention from the wider public. I’d rather this serve as a lesson to my fellow believers within a covenant community. This is not about my gifts and talents, but how God works through Biblical Law. If you are determined to serve Him, He will pour out His blessings, and Satan will be blocked by the hedge of God’s Law. In the process, He will reveal Himself to each of you through various callings and gifts. Consistent with Paul’s admonition, I’m praying that all of you can prophesy on some level.

This is why I keep emphasizing Biblical Law. This is the foundation for understanding all of the gifts, but prophecy in particular. To be a prophet is to be an expert in Biblical Law. You would know instinctively how God does things, and what matters to Him in any given context. Even if your prophecy is only for yourself, it remains a gift of the Holy Spirit. It points to the glory of God, and that’s why we bother living in this fallen world in the first place.

Shining with His glory is what ties us to Eternity.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tied to Eternity

Law of Moses — 1 Kings 21

We skip over the previous chapter, but we note in passing that Jehovah twice rescued Ahab from the hands of the Syrian king. Yet Ahab failed to execute the Lord’s justice against his enemy, and was condemned. We see, then, that Ahab began to fear Jehovah despite being unwilling to defy his wife and serve Him.

So we come to the story of Naboth’s Vineyard. It’s necessary that we understand a couple of things to get a picture of what happened. First, grapevines need to be grown on a hillside so that the each row of vines gets the same full measure of sunlight. Second, we know that the site of Jezreel is on the far end of a long, curving ridge that falls away from the peak of Mount Gilboa. The ridge snakes around, curving away WNW from the crest. The royal palace would have been somewhere on this final hump above the Jezreel Valley plain, so that Naboth’s vineyard was likely on the slope below the city. Current archaeology digs suggest it was the northeastern section of the hump.

Ahab decided this would make a great vegetable garden, so he offered Naboth a deal. The man turned him down, citing what he believed was a sacred duty to keep this ancient clan possession in the family. This put Ahab in a bad mood, showing yet another of his character flaws. Like a whiny child, he went home and refused to eat. When his wife inquired of the cause of this petulance, he told about Naboth’s refusal. Under the Covenant, the man had every right to keep his land, even against the wishes of the king.

But Jezebel cared not a whit about God’s Law, and suggested Ahab wasn’t acting regally. So she promised him she would get the land for him, which put him in a better mood. Then she issued a decree using Ahab’s seal. There would be a day of fasting to the God she despised. Naboth was to be brought up on public charges of blasphemy of God and cursing the King. Both were capital crimes under Moses. She instructed the leaders to secretly commission a couple of false witnesses. Our text refers to them as “Sons of Belial.” While a direct translation implies they were worthless, it should be easy to recognize that it refers to someone who serves (“sons of…”) a worthless deity. It’s no surprise that Belial eventually becomes a nickname for Satan.

It was two men, the minimum necessary for a show trial to condemn an innocent man, under the Law of a God that the man respected, but which no one else present feared at all. Naboth was stoned (buried in a pit under a pile of rocks) and his property became forfeit to the King. So Jezebel told him to go and seize it. As he was doing so, taking stock of what he had gained, the Prophet Elijah showed up.

The Lord had given a word to Elijah about this crime, and told him to deliver a condemnation to the King. When Elijah showed up, Ahab had no doubt why the prophet was there. His question implies that he had been found out, caught red-handed, as we would say. Elijah said it was easy to do, since Ahab had so publicly sold himself to Satan, and it was certainly no secret to God, who knows and tells. Ahab had brought evil to Israel, so God would bring evil to Ahab.

Like Jeroboam and Baasha before him, the Lord would wipe out Ahab’s Dynasty. The Lord had told Elijah that Ahab would die in the same place Naboth had. Keep in mind that there was not a single pet dog in Palestine in those days; all of them were wild and dangerous. They would gladly lick up any blood spilled on the ground. So these dogs would also eat Jezebel at the foot of her palace walls, as well, and anyone of Ahab’s family who died near a city. Men who died in the open would be bird food. Ahab had reached the zenith of evil simply by virtue of having no particular will at all, just obeying his wife.

Those two had engaged in the vile and despicable pagan worship of the Canaanites God had wanted driven out the land in the first place. When Ahab heard this message, he promptly went back to the palace and repented in sackcloth and ashes. He believed just enough in Jehovah’s power to suffer no doubts about the word of Elijah. While we might grant that Ahab had no real change of heart, only fear in the context, that was enough. Notice what God says here: Ahab had humbled himself, and had given glory to Jehovah. So God relented insofar as He would let Ahab die normally, but then bring all the curses on his heir.

Notice that mercy is available for people even when their hearts aren’t pure before the Lord. Plain old fear and reverence is enough to reap at least a measure of shalom God promises to the covenant community. The issue has always been God’s glory.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Law of Moses — 1 Kings 21

Moral Pioneering

If I’m not running the show, I’m not involved.

That would normally sound like arrogance, but it’s not. I have no interest in leading much of anything, anyway. There are a lot of things that I leave in other people’s hands. I’m grateful for their leadership. But I have a commission from God, so I don’t invest energy and effort into things He hasn’t called me to do. And what He has called me to do, has always required me strike off in my own direction.

In times past I did a lot of participation, and ended up leading almost every time. That awakened me to consider what really mattered, after all. Then I bailed out of that stuff because I heard a calling that led me places where no one else was going.

I don’t have time for things that are so unimportant to me that I just play along. At no time on this entire planet could there be something so important that I would volunteer to be a mere participant. I may go along as an observer, but never am I just a member of the adoring audience. Nothing humans do in this world captures me like that. Nothing humans do matters that much to me because it doesn’t matter to God.

I don’t want to lead in something that humans do en masse. When I lead, it will always be something almost no one else is doing. That’s why I’m doing it. I represent a God who has already condemned the things humans do for their own reasons. God has commissioned me to do things He can’t get most people to do. I take off down those paths with alacrity.

Sometimes other people join in, and that’s great. I tend to pass off all the burdens at which I’m really not much good. Indeed, I often end up doing things half-assed, as it were, because I won’t mess with the parts that I don’t know how to handle. I look at the heart of the thing and pick the few parts I know best, and ignore everything else. I have to leave it in God’s hands. Most of what God calls me to do works like that. I just do what He tells me, share with anyone who’s interested, and let them do what they feel they are called to do. I have complete faith that it will work out in the end.

Some day, some of the stuff I’m called to do will attract bigger numbers. When that day comes, I’ll have to relearn how to lead. How I led in the past under typical human mass activities required one kind of leadership; what I’m doing now is different. Sure, lessons on how to bless others will transfer, but the whole mindset I was taught in those days turns out to be inapplicable, because those activities seldom involved the power of the Holy Spirit.

It will be the kind of work where it’s more about coordination than it is management. It will require that discipline be self-discipline. It will require a spiritual drive from inside of each participant, because nobody will have time to push you except God. Only after we have established this as the cultural baseline of our expectations can we then talk about shepherding sheep.

So, now you know what it means: If I’m not running the show, I’m not involved.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Moral Pioneering

The Mystical Faith Restoration

The Puritans who fled persecution in England moved to the Netherlands for a decade until they could gather enough resources to move to America. During that stay, they were harassed by the Dutch government, which was harshly secular then and still is now, not to mention quite forceful about teaching Dutch language and customs to Puritan children. The Puritans wanted their children to be religious and frankly to remain English.

When the Puritans came to the new world, they brought with them a very deadly doctrine that they shared with other groups. They believed that God had promised them material prosperity for their hard work, and that any system that prevented their prosperity was inherently evil. Great Britain could not be genuinely Christian, because Puritans couldn’t prosper. The Puritans weren’t really so otherworldly after all, since the real issue that drove them to resist the Church of England under King James (of KJV fame) was the vestigial ancient feudalism that would deny even so much as a middle class income to anyone who wasn’t from the noble class or higher.

This was during the time when the middle classes exploded across Europe and England. The merchants had found ways to become wealthy that didn’t require owning land, and this was a moral abomination to the upper classes. There was fierce competition in moral propaganda between the upper and middle classes. Middle class commoners developed a pretense of nobility but didn’t follow ancient noble customs regarding making money and taking profits. The merchant class were willing to charge interest on loans, which was generally frowned on officially due to Scripture and the pretense of England being a signal representative of Christianity. Usury was theft in noble eyes, but the real argument was that nobles and kings didn’t want to pay interests on their loans from merchants. Don’t confuse the issues here: Puritans favored restrictions on interest rates and didn’t like the idea of a whole market in debt obligations, but trading only in real goods. However, the broad social influence of the times did have a strong influence on the Puritans. Their fundamental assumptions about things was a reflection of the times.

Under King James, laws that restricted and taxed middle class commerce opportunities were enforced, and new ones added. He bypassed Parliament to implement commerce taxes to fund his lavish spending habits. He was always more or less at war with Parliament, the Lower House in particular. The Puritans found these broad restrictions on their God-given freedom to build wealth and power an abomination to their different interpretation of who God was. In their eyes, they alone were God’s Tribe, and they had a right to treat their own kind differently from those who were outside their closed community. This kind of insider dealing was illegal, as James promoted the Church of England in their claim to be the only valid church. Thus, there could be no such thing as purer, more righteous organizations breaking apart the unity of the national church. The Puritans must be forced to participate in the corrupt system that did not favor them much. This is the real reason that drove the Puritans out, along with others who weren’t so religious about it.

Again, the Puritans held to a notion that, if their holiness could not prosper, then the system was illegitimate. Where did this silly Puritan materialistic doctrine come from? One way or another, it was born of Judaism. A major element in the Hellenizing of Judaism was the logical frame of reference that was overlaid on the promises of the Covenant. It became a notorious Pharisaical doctrine that a primary mark of God’s favor was material wealth. If you were poor, then God obviously didn’t like you, because the Covenant promised prosperity, as the Jews read it. Instead of receiving from God’s hand a reasonable level of prosperity while pursuing mystical holiness, Jewish leadership began to assume He was obliged to enrich everyone who followed their highly logical structure of legalistic observance. They openly denigrated the mystical approach of their own ancient Hebrew culture.

The Puritans of the 17th Century had at least partly swallowed some of the British Israelism that had seized the king they didn’t get along with too well. It wasn’t so much a difference of doctrine as simple class warfare, because James made it so in the first place. He was notorious for his “divine right of kings” doctrine, along with his complete lack of charisma in lecturing Parliament about it. It never sold. But the wild notion that the Anglo-Saxons and the other races who made up British people were the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel did take hold, if not so consciously. It was simply assumed that the British were God’s favorites on the earth. It was only natural that Jewish notions of being God’s Chosen would be absorbed by the British. The Puritans believed they alone were God’s Chosen, and that He authorized them to take extreme measures to realize His promises to them.

The Puritans in turn were pretty rough on their own dissenters, but those who were driven out seldom failed to keep the Puritan obsession with material prosperity as the mark of God’s favor. This business of working hard to succeed materially was infectious. Or rather, it was a good cover for the elite promoting hard work as inherently virtuous for the common folk so they could skim off the profits. And not just hard work, but compliant and silent hard work. The elite never tired of selling that to the masses.

This is how the mystical angle was cut out of any future American religious developments. The question of what “salvation” meant become a mere matter of religious conversion, not seizing the full inheritance of a communal shalom life. It’s how those great revivals out in the wilderness were more about running off to engage in sexual promiscuity than it was about getting right with the Lord. The great revivals were all about putting on a show of repentance; it was mere entertainment. Nothing we teach under Radix Fidem would discourage hard work, but we deny that it must necessarily attach to any material reward. The biblical understanding is that you work at being faithful for the sake of faith — your commitment and allegiance to God. You work for Him, not for concrete rewards that won’t follow you to Eternity.

For all their claims to be otherworldly, Puritan religion is quintessentially middle class in nature; it is fundamentally materialistic. It’s strong influence in American culture is the reason there is no true mysticism in home-grown American religion. This is part of why American churchianity is more about the show than the substance. Radix Fidem cares not for revival movements. What we seek are very real and substantive changes in cultural orientation, of tearing down intellectual strongholds of idolatry. This is a long, slow process, working from within the confused culture around us. We don’t long for those moments of crisis repentance and highly emotional on-site conversion shows. We want people to awaken to the mystical truth of God, and that typically takes a while.

The Radix Fidem meta-religion should produce contemplative religion. There’s nothing wrong with strong emotional experiences, but you can’t trust them to indicate truth or divine power. The real power of God shows up in long term changes and stability in things that really matter. We seek to restore this to the earth.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Resistance in Love

It is the nature of Hebrew language to be indicative. It was never supposed to be legalistic; that was a perversion introduced with Hellenism after the conquest of Alexander the Great (323 BC). Rabbis began absorbing the delirium of human logic and the undying search by human pride for godhead. “You shall decide for yourselves what is good and evil.” Hellenistic reasoning (Aristotelian teaching) is the primary excuse for your intellect to usurp the throne of the soul.

God gave us the heart-mind to rule our lives. It is a prerequisite for the Law of Noah. No human is exempt from the command to let their hearts rule in seeking moral truth (AKA, “knowing good and evil”) because the heart alone is capable of reading God’s revelation woven into the fabric of Creation (AKA reality). You had darned sure better come up with a good answer from your heart-led search for truth, or God’s wrath will fall on you. You are accountable.

God’s Word says that Noah trumps all human laws. Every human government is accountable to God for getting as close to Noah as they know how. So if you read Genesis 9 about what God told Noah declared was the meaning of that rainbow, you’ll see this in verse 6:

Whoever sheds man’s blood,
By mans his blood shall be shed;
For in the image of God
He made man.

As always, Hebrew is indicative, not descriptive. Hebrew language is first parabolic, and you should reflexively seek a symbolic meaning in the words. The truth of God is not contained in the words of the Hebrew language. Divine truth is indicated; you are supposed to think of the words as sign posts pointing to boundaries and territory that should be explored in prayerful contemplation. The truth is not constrained by the words.

What kinds of things can people do that cause bloodshed? It didn’t say “violence” or “fighting” but refers to any activity that causes bloodshed. That means humans are accountable to God for anything that threatens the human existence of others. It’s not that shedding blood is inherently wrong, but that you are accountable for it. If the blood you shed is in pursuit of divine justice, then it cleanses the soil. If the blood you shed is unjust, it defiles the ground on which you stand.

And by standard Hebrew extrapolation, a lot of evil things people do can cause bloodshed indirectly. Yet this passage suggests they would be accountable for that, as well. God will demand their blood for injustice of all kinds.

Acts 4:1-21 (echoed elsewhere) is our authority to say that Christians can resist government in some circumstances. It is a matter of your convictions when and where the love of Christ demands it.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Resistance in Love

How Covenants Work: Background

There is a Spirit Realm and there is our Fallen Realm — two entirely different entities. Humans can not possibly comprehend the former, and can’t escape the latter. Indeed, the reason we cannot comprehend Eternity is because we are fallen. However, there is a divine revelation, a moral sphere that doesn’t warrant capitalization because it’s not really a domain unto itself. Rather, it is the invasive extension of God’s hand into this world. It’s the space where the Spirit Realm overlaps the Fallen Realm.

We can talk about the Fallen Realm of existence factually. We can describe it. We can’t even understand, much less talk about the Spirit Realm. We can discuss the moral realm only by parables. We can indicate features of the moral realm, but we can’t describe it factually. The human soul is capable of sensing divine truth within this realm of existence through the heart.

We are wired by God to sense His revelation in the heart-mind, as it were, even without spiritual rebirth. Granted, that’s very difficult, but it is part of our design. The idea was that we should pursue divine truth in our hearts until we gain recognition of our spiritual nature. It was a demanding process, and was a critical element in what the Covenant of Moses was supposed to provide. And while it was possible with the Covenant of Noah, it was much more challenging because it lacked the specifics and the concrete approach offered in Moses.

This is part of what Jesus did coming into our realm of existence. By His death and resurrection, we were granted the opportunity to discover spiritual birth before digging into the Law Covenants. But the whole point is that, once spiritually alive, we are supposed to now bring that anointing back to the Law Covenants so we can understand them better, and engage in the blessings of shalom. Every moment of human life in shalom increases God’s reputation; it calls attention to Him and His revelation. He has skin in the game; He benefits from our living by His revelation.

Still, Moses was tightly bounded: that people, that time, that place. It was never designed to fit any other context. It was a very clear statement of what Noah had implied all along, but giving it such clarity meant it could only be one precise example of all the very many different things Noah could be. Noah is the generic version; it’s still binding. We see the image of God still displaying the rainbow over His throne to emphasize that (Revelation 4:3).

The final clarity of God’s revelation was the Person of Jesus Christ. He came to fulfill Moses in the sense of bringing to life what Moses was supposed to accomplish. Instead of a narrow contextual statement in factual terms, He presented the full meaning of Moses and Noah together in moral terms. We refer back to Moses so that we can understand how it promised the Messiah, and what He would be and do for us. Nobody lives by Moses today; that covenant was closed at the Cross. It had a distinct shelf life.

Noah is not closed. It lasts as long as rainbows in the sky are possible. Noah is Christ in the form of law. To have Christ in your heart means you have Noah in your hands. Noah, as exemplified in Moses, is what being a Christian looks like. Humans can’t see Christ in the flesh any more, unless they see Him in His followers. And His followers use Noah/Moses as the reference points for what Christ looks like.

When you commit to following Christ as your feudal Lord, you commit to manifesting Noah. We can talk about the Covenant of Christ, but that moral covenant pointing to a spiritual reality has a law component that applies to the facts of his world. You have brothers and sisters in Christ who should respect all of that. You deal with them via moral truth, the parable expression of Eternity.

You have a domain He gave you, and you use it for His glory. It belongs to Him and you are His steward. In a certain sense, fellow believers entering that domain of your service. In doing so, they submit to your moral authority; otherwise you cannot bless them. It is typically an ephemeral thing, but some people will eventually submit more permanently to the moral authority of some elders and pastors in a covenant community. The sheep of your flock know what to expect because they understand Noah.

When you deal with folks who do not follow Christ — as best you can tell from the witness of the Holy Spirit in your heart — coming into your domain, they don’t have that connection to Eternity. You can’t count on that moral sensitivity. Rather, you are compelled to handle them more specifically by the Law of Noah. Alternatively, a lot of your presumed brothers and sisters are so badly crippled in their moral awareness, they also must be handled mostly by Law. Now, since Noah is rather generic, that means you’ll need to offer some kind of expressed provisions of Noah’s Covenant, written and/or spoken in words. And yes, some fellow believers need reminding, too, but it’s really essential with nonbelievers. They have nothing else to go on.

So we tend to organize our faith communities around a covenant statement of some sort, something that echoes Christ on one level, and Noah on another. Rather like Moses, it’s a contextual expression that points to a mystical connection to the moral realm, which in turn points to the Spirit Realm. It would naturally differ between communities because the context is different.

This is the background for a post on my other blog (it’s gone).

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Don’t Hesitate to Slice

It’s a very old truth, cited in ancient sources: Evil will call your bluff and try to wear down the righteous. Righteous men seek to be merciful, and evil seeks to exploit this.

There is a very real difference between being stupid and being evil. Sooner or later, stupid will surrender. Evil never does. We learned this in our last Bible lesson about Jezebel and Elijah. Jezebel was demonic evil, not just some stupid misguided bitch. Elijah expected her to surrender after God’s victory on Mount Carmel, but God was not surprised when she didn’t. It’s odd how Elijah understood the necessity of bloodshed on the priests of Baal and Asherah, but didn’t understand how the thing that made them worthy of execution was rooted in Jezebel’s lust for power.

So the resolution of Elijah’s retreat to Mount Horeb was God promising to end the terror of Jezebel’s power using other fallen humans as His weapon. He was preparing to raise up a ruler over Damascus who would eventually destroy the Omride Dynasty. He was also preparing a usurper for the throne of Israel. He was also preparing a successor prophet who would be more determined than Elijah, someone ready to take the sword even more than Elijah had been.

Why do you suppose God condemned Israel at Bochim (Judges 2)? It’s one thing when fools rush to shed innocent blood, but it’s another when the righteous hesitate to execute justice on evil. The key is not to get lost in debates about what mercy requires; it was a mercy on the rest of Creation to remove the unspeakable evil of the Canaanites. If you can’t tell the difference between stupid and evil, you deserve the loss of all shalom. And if your convictions don’t give you the power to execute justice, pray that God will raise up someone who can.

The question is not mercy, but discernment. If you do not see how Christ on the Cross represents the same God who called for genocide in Palestine, then you don’t know God at all. If you don’t see how the Cross condemns genuine evil on this earth, you cannot see at all. This was part of the Covenant of Noah, as well: Mankind serving God must be willing to execute divine justice in capital punishment. Stop assuming a genuine follower of Christ cannot bear the sword. Don’t assume the mission of Elisha would disqualify him as a follower of Christ, any more than David’s mission of conquest was somehow un-Christlike.

Jesus used a whip where the Covenant required it. That was what the context demanded for divine justice. The question rests on the context of the covenant and the threat. Neither David nor Elisha nor Joshua were defending mere human comfort. It was a matter of defending shalom. It was keeping peace with God. This is the same God who will destroy the whole world when He sends His Son back.

You cannot make peace with demons. Christ said that the majority of this world belonged to Hell before they even died. God’s wrath fell on Jesus as a proxy for all, but only the penitent can claim that sacrifice on their behalf. We are told to expect that anyone can become penitent, because God refuses to tell us who is or isn’t Elect. But everyone’s life on this earth is forfeit from birth, so this isn’t about saving your human existence. It’s about promoting the glory of the Lord, so during that lag time before the presumed potential of repentance of any random human, the issue is whether their evil crosses that line of no return. Human life is not sacred. God has said the covenant elders must be ready to defend shalom God gave them to the death, and that means sometimes to someone else’s death.

We know that we must turn the Flaming Sword of the Spirit on ourselves before we can use it on the domain He places in our hands. Our lives become forfeit to divine glory, and this is grants us the authority to hold a domain on God’s behalf. When some other person enters that domain, they are subject to that Flaming Sword. You must oppose evil no matter whom Satan has chosen to bear it. We hope it slices the evil out of their lives. If that person is unable to disconnect from that evil, they die with it.

Jesus said that if your hand belongs to evil, cut it off. He said if your eye is wedded to evil, poke it out. That implied that if your life belongs to evil, you deserve to die. How much of you belongs to the Devil?

If the Lord puts a sword in your hand, literal or metaphorical, be not slow to use it. Be quick to use it on your own sins, so that you can justify holding it in the first place. But when you are called to lead, it means you exercise dominion over sin in others who enter that domain. Divine justice cuts off sin, and sadly that means it sometimes cuts off people. Don’t be slow to defend the Lord’s sovereignty in your life.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment