The Right Tribe

Most Christians today are ill-equipped to understand what’s happening in places like France.
I’ve been watching for some years the rise of right-wing nationalist groups in Europe. I won’t pretend I know the subject well, because that would require staying in Europe far longer than I did with the US Army, and having more time to explore it directly. I do my best to make sense of the news reported in both the mainstream and alternative sources. As with all things, we have to recognize the tension between each major figure and the various influences versus the overall effect we can observe as generalities. The basic rule of social studies is to create generalizations, knowing they are accurate enough, but never exactly the truth.
Let me take a moment to remind my readers I am no right-winger. That is, unless you understand I don’t stop at merely “conservative” (hoping to conserve what has been) nor even “reactionary” (trying to recover something now almost lost), but an extreme primitivist. I am more conservative than any reactionary could dream of being, because I assert the pinnacle of human society was long before Christ, far back in ancient prehistory. At the same time, I am all for maximum freedom for the individual, which I assert is a very primitive value, despite the popular mythology about such things. I propose to evaluate all things from such a perspective.
God has said mankind after the Fall can do no better than live in a tribal social structure. The original concept of “nation” is roughly equivalent to “tribe.” The resurgent urge to nationalism, versus mere patriotism (statism), reflects this ancient truth. By no means does it come off so well as it might, in most cases. It doesn’t require hating the outsider to preserve what God ordained for your people. Having a strong national identity is necessary for God’s blessings under His Laws: prosperity, stability and safety. You should expect each nation to shamelessly boast in their own traditions, while honoring that of others.
But even the pugnacious and provocative acts are correct at times. If Muslims in France whine because Bloc Identitaire serves pork soups with wine to the homeless, let them whine. By no means should anyone suppress such charity, because exclusion of outsiders is fundamental to human nature, and not a moral flaw. The right to decide what one shall do in terms of charity with their own resources is fundamental to understanding God’s Laws.
The problem is the question of moral balance which brings Muslims into France. France perverted their national pride in times past into an excuse for oppression and exploitation. They invaded and colonized nations which are now predominately Muslim, and remain rather proud of that. If your nation invades another, you cannot justify keeping that population outside your ancient borders.
On the other hand, it is entirely appropriate to hold them in their own little neighborhoods. Of all modern identities, it is Muslims who remain most tribal. We could easily justify some of the French colonizations as pay back for the original Muslim drive to conquer the world. Frankly, Muslims drew the first blood, demanding others surrender their own traditions. But the only reason they were so successful is their strong tribal identity. While Western Civilization has outstripped them in the science and technology of destruction and warfare, it’s entirely normal for Muslims to carry out a reverse colonization which takes advantage of the arrogance of claiming to have “civilized” the world.
In other words, there is no clear high moral ground. On the one hand, Muslims will continue their peaceful conquest, because they are closest of all modern societies to what God had in mind. They are adhering to the moral fabric of the universe with greater accuracy. They will win, but it will be very messy. The only proper response is to claim the same moral fabric. Since Muslims do not in truth actually acknowledge the Creator, but worship a paganized perversion which they claim is Him, they stand to lose to the first nation which actually matches their basic moral probity, enhanced by honoring God as He revealed Himself.
I don’t expect to see that happening any time soon. Meanwhile, I watch with some amusement the various threads of competing rightness, wondering who will find God’s favor this week or the next. I am utterly convinced He controls the outcome, and right now I don’t see anyone competing too well against Muslims in the long term. Depending on where this rising right-wing tribalism goes, they may score some interesting victories. It’s not just in France, as this Bloc Identitaire has reached out to all sorts of similar movements all over the world.
It would be totally unfair to paint them all as fascist, because that serves merely to excuse not paying attention. There are fascists who would love to find their place at the table, even co-opt the whole thing, but they will never again rise to dominance. Except in the US, that is. People forget fascism is simply government by and for merchant conglomerations, who exercise their power through the apparatus of the state. The state as an artificial construct becomes the focus of all attention, the mythology by which the subjects are oppressed. It’s socialism in disguise. To the degree the right-wingers are more tribal, more about people than the state, they are doing it right (pun intended).
I dare say most of the modern world has no clue how much this matters to God, even among those who claim His Name.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Christmas Grammar Grouch

I really don’t have any great words of wisdom, nor any diseased mutterings to share.
Instead, I’m going to grouse about some things which have made me grouchy regarding the decline in precise grammar. But first, a factoid: You know that silly story about the frog sitting in pot of water with the oh-so slowly rising temperature? It’s been tried, and it doesn’t work. I’ll leave it to you to look it up, but when it gets too warm, those suckers do jump out. Pick yourself another metaphor.
It’s not “baited breath” because you aren’t catching anything with your halitosis. It’s “bated breath” which a colloquialism for “abated breath.” It means you almost dare not breathe because of the tension of the moment.
In the military, we line up carefully, and the standard is the toes of our boots are in perfect visual alignment. It’s called “toe the line.” It means follow orders, do what you’re told, take your assigned place. You don’t “tow the line” because you aren’t dragging anything around.
At least I haven’t had to endure any “irregardless” or “floormat” instead of “format.” Of course, those or more often oral errors, and I really haven’t had any long conversations in quite a while. In case you don’t see what’s wrong with “irregardless” it works out like this. If you regard something, you evaluate it. It counts for something. If you make a decision regardless of that thing, then it no longer counts. If we add the prefix “ir-” then we reverse it one more time; now it means something again.
There are a couple of really good writers out there who acknowledge their poor grammar and punctuation. Those who humbly refuse to put on airs can be forgiven, because communicating some things is simply too important to worry about rules. I’m sure you can scan back through some of my previous posts and find typos and such aplenty.
I grouch at myself, too.
Addenda: This one bothers me so much it was worth coming back to add it. You hone a knife using something which restores the edge. You might hone some skills, but if you don’t stop writing “hone in” when you are supposed to write “home in” you have need to hone your grammar skills.
In times of old we used homing pigeons for the Internet. Take them anywhere you like, tie your tweet or short email on the leg and let it go. That bird will always return home. When you fire a smart missile, it will home in on the target. Sometimes I wish I had a smart missile to chase folks who insist on writing it wrong.

Posted in personal | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Beside Himself

Until you know yourself, you can’t hope to step outside yourself.
Is this madness? So very many claim to be objective, or claim to strive for objectivity. Is it even possible? I assert it is possible only in a limited sense. The greatest barrier to what little is possible is refusing to be objective with the self first.
Over the years, as I played the role of counselor, the whole mission could be summed up in helping people face reality, to recognize fantasy for what it is, and embrace however much of reality as comes within the reach of the individual. In order counsel others, I first had to be in the habit of discarding my own fantasies. The task is never done, but you have no hope if you can’t internalize the habit of seeking out those blind spots. A mystical commitment to truth means nothing if you can’t find even a sliver of operational truth.
That operational level of truth is really all we have. I count it a fantasy to expect the full truth to be in human reach. What we need is just enough to face our own individual reality. You don’t need to learn how to fly if you spend all your time tunneling and mining in the earth. Writing a few books on my own search would prove somewhat pointless, but encapsulating those few threads of my own experience which seem to be common is the basis for my claim to counsel.
I can’t stand to see people suffer needlessly, but I’ve learned long ago you are the only one who can set you free, in a certain sense. If what I share doesn’t touch you, then I have to let it fall to the ground, wither and die. If my ranting and mumbling amuse you, there is at least that. If they strike a chord of recognition, stick around; I may have something useful to say. Otherwise, make your own path. Let me at least assure you it can be done.
Whether that path is Utopia (literally “No Place”) or Eutopia (“Good Place”) is what you have to decide. Choose your vision; do this intentionally. Refine it forever. Question all things you have been told until you begin finding yourself in the jumble, then stay at it. That’s the real objective, because you can’t be objective otherwise. You can’t hope to compare the vision of others with reality if you don’t find at least something reliably “real” for you. You can’t help others discern a method until you have a working method yourself.
All I can offer is what I’ve found. I can’t even offer that if I haven’t been through the finding process. I realize I can’t possibly know what I am, and I surely discovered long ago I can only sometimes do what I think I should. So it’s not a question of being nor really of doing, but more of who I am. I am the sum of my commitments, the collection of things from which I cannot escape. There is just enough commonality among us humans we can certainly share some things. When I have a good idea who I am, only then would I be in a position to evaluate some measure of that common experience.
Who are you? Pleased to meetcha.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Beside Himself

More on Those Concentration Camps

I’m not the only one who sees the concentration camps as getting real close.
Of all the writers associated with Alex Jones, Kurt Nimmo is about the only one I give any credibility. I followed him long before he found it necessary to hang out with Jones in order to keep eating. Nimmo sticks with stuff he can prove, and is the first writer to show me the evidence al-Qaeda was fake, a CIA operation. Thus, you’ll notice the linked article isn’t overwrought the way Jones does when writing by himself.
What we have here is another smoking gun, in the form of contracts being let to actually run those FEMA camps.
The only problem is, I’ve not seen any good reports which actually give the location of such camps. Keep in mind, I was trained to work military detention camps and know a good bit about how to build them. Yes, I’ve seen some hyped reports listing various facilities, but two of them are right here in my backyard. One is the not-at-all-secret air terminal used by the US Marshals at Will Rogers World Airport. It’s capacity is something like 800, and it’s pretty full most of the time. The building is pretty secure, but the fenced area around it would be pretty hard to use as a camp.
The other location is more probable. There is a substantial portion of a square mile area (called a “section” here in Oklahoma) which had been a decent but aging middle class neighborhood just north of the Tinker AFB runway. Because of how catastrophic the crashes were in the 1970s, Tinker bought out most of that section. They fenced it all in and began using it for storage and some peculiar training exercises. From what I can see outside that fence, it could conceivably be converted to a detention camp without much trouble. For example, all the sewage lines from several hundred houses are still in the ground, I believe. So far, I’ve seen no evidence of that conversion, and I pass there several times every week.
Most of the infamous photos of such sites from REX 84 look like simple Military Police training sites. That is, they aren’t actually built to use as genuine detention facilities. There are a large number of details in the difference between a mock up and the real thing. There are some big fenced in resettlement centers, as famously seen in one of Jesse Ventura’s TV episodes, the one they didn’t actually televise, that you can find on YouTube and other places. Those places I’ve seen before, and they are frankly more expensive and civilized than I would expect for the more sinister purposes alleged as FEMA camps, which would be labor camps.
Need a job?

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Reprise: Linux Elitism

I stand by my almost-three-year old post about the elitist attitude of Linux fans.
To restate in fewer words, the attitude of Linux users reflects to a large degree that of the developers. The Open Source culture is developer-centric. The guy or gal who writes the code gets to make all the decisions, because they do it in their own time. That’s only fair. The results aren’t too bad, but only if you are attracted to what the developer considers important. The relatively small fan base reflects something obvious to everyone except the Linux evangelists:
Superiority of any computer software is decided by the user.
The purity of your developer’s vision has no bearing on whether it really is better. The expectations of the user count for something. When Linux evangelists make their pitch, it’s always in terms of what they consider important in computer use. It falls flat when what they offer is of no use, or frankly hinders the pattern of use most people possess when they come to the keyboard.
It matters not a whit how the user came by those habits and expectations. If you won’t meet them where they are, don’t pretend you care about them.
The Open Source community is wrapped up in their vision of computing nirvana, and are often completely out of touch with the common computer user. They believe the problem is the user, not the software design. This vast gulf of understanding is not accidental; it reflects the standard temperament of code geeks. They see themselves as the Truth Police, the Chosen Few who truly understand. If you aren’t inclined to agree, the problem is you. There is zero objectivity about the problem and solution in terms of what meets genuine human need. This hateful demand everyone bow down at the altar of their beatific vision for purity in computing is what keeps Linux in the minority.
Yes, that may mean some day theirs will be the only computers still able to access the Net when some doomsday virus hits all the Windows boxes. But if most computers become unusable for whatever reason, the common computer user will find something else to fill that void. The likelihood that would mean a mass migration to Linux or other Open Source operating systems is quite small. It’s more likely they’ll abandon the whole thing. Then the Net will be relegated once again to the rarefied domain of geeks and elitists it was in the beginning. Most of them would like that.
In other words, virtually no one in the wider Linux and Open Source community gives a damn about you.
I understand all too well how much easier it would make things if there were no viruses because they simply didn’t work, and malware didn’t work, and spam would be reduced, etc. But I’m not sure I’m willing to exclude most of the world to have that. Computer geeks would be quite happy with that. If there is to be a doomsday virus to take down all Windows computers, it would have to come from a member of the elitist Truth Police of Computing.
The real computer criminals are only interested in milking the current computer ecosystem; they love Windows and want even more people using it, so long as these users don’t become smart about it. They are elitist, too, just for a different reason.
What makes Linux users bristle at my three-year-old post even today is some silly notion elitism is inherently evil. I never said that. In a recent post, I stated my contention elitism was God’s plan. The problem here, as always, is which elite should rule? My thesis is, since the Open Source elite despise most of the world, and the criminals are basically the same as any other predators, the whole issue would benefit from a little benevolence, a class of developers who somehow manage to adopt the shepherd’s instinct of caring about the people they lead. Shepherds know better than trying to reprogram sheep; the lead sheep as they are. They realize sheep are what they are, which is part of what makes them so beneficial. They value what sheep are because of what sheep provide, but even more so, what it means to those they love.
It’s possible you can get just a little of that from a closed-source commercial developer process, but not much in the modern Western Merchant Culture. The whole existence of the Open Source culture is a group of people who don’t like being controlled by the big commercial elites, so they create their own coder elite. Most of them frankly do not like real people, and prefer the company of computers.
If there is to be any shepherd instinct, it is least likely to come from the Open Source Linux crowd. Open? Yes. Useful? Only by accident. You can trust Linux developers only in that they will not prey on you; that’s because they would rather you didn’t exist, unless you are a fanboy.
Oh, and I forgot to mention: Since I wrote that original post three years ago, I have since seen the Linux desktop become so utterly foreign and useless, I gave up. I’m using Windows 7 now.
Update: That didn’t last long. I switched back to CentOS 6 when it came out.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Solving Drug Abuse

I’ve been on the front line of this issue most of my adult life, and almost no one is serious about stopping it.
For those who want credentials: I served in the US Army Military Police for several years, making big drug busts. I served as a DARE Officer and even managed the program with other DARE Officers working under me. We went into the DoD schools in Europe and taught the kids strategies which were supposed to help them say “no” to drug abuse. I ran this program at the school where the kids from several embassies attended, all sponsored by the US Embassy in Bonn, Germany. I worked as a counselor in churches were drug problems were a significant issues, watched as friends slipped into that dream world, and generally fought this beast on every level except as a medical doctor or technician. I even faced it in my own family. I studied as much as my brain could absorb the very psychological mechanics of drug abuse.
I know about drug abuse as much as any human can claim to know it. I am forced to conclude there is no serious intent to solve the problem anywhere in America.
It’s not enough to realize on one level The Powers That Be are using the entire racket as a means to collecting and using power over the masses. I have seen it on every level. Nor would I be so simplistic as complaining the drug treatment industry has kicked God out. There are plenty of religious programs which have received the official government sanction and even money. No, at every level, the system works to destroy the very effect it claims to produce.
Here’s an example. Does busting users really work? We may never know, because the biggest users never get busted. I worked as a cab driver in Oklahoma City for about a year: May 1993 to June 1994. I drove the night shift all over this county, and was well acquainted with the centers of illicit drug trade in the OKC Metro — I was an informant calling an unlisted police phone number. I watched on the news huge drug busts at addresses I passed to the police department. I can assure you the folks who get busted are those designated for such harassment, regardless of their crimes, or even lack thereof. Rather, the comfortable middle-class customers who really do put big money into the business are never busted. I ferried lots of thugs and losers to their connection, but for each of them, there were three more from the pricey suburbs.
Yes, these people used and managed it well enough to keep their place in this world. Not every addict ends up on Skid Row. That’s another of those popular official lies. But if arresting users is going to work, it will have to include those currently protected by the system as the biggest source of illicit income for dope dealers. I won’t even mention drug abuse within the medical system with bogus prescriptions and massive sales of unneeded pharmaceuticals.
I could go on at length, because the same crap went on in the military, and it surely goes on in Washington, DC. It goes on in the counseling centers, in churches, in prisons — every part of the entire system. In other words, the whole War of Drugs is a huge massive fraud.
Solving drug abuse is both simple and impossible: Make people stop caring about the sorrows of this life.

Posted in sanity | 1 Comment

Radical Management: Measuring Success

If you listen to the MBAs’ lies about what defines success, you’ll always be a moral failure.
My prescription is simple: If you adhere to God’s Laws — or Cosmic Moral Principles, if you prefer, it’s all the same — you’ll have as much worldly success as is proper. The world is fallen, broken, and failure is built in, if you measure by terms of material success. If you seek to fulfill human desires of the flesh, entertainment or appeal to vanity, you’ll make a fortune and blow a fortune. You’ll be a high roller. But if you seek to fulfill genuine human need, you’ll prosper, create social stability and reduce human suffering. It’s not quite the Golden Mean, but it would resemble it on the surface. You need to see beyond the surface and mere mechanics.
The proper aim is to help people not be so hung up on the mere mechanics of life. Success is setting people free from those lower inclinations, from being stuck in the materialist mode. Aim for the proper goal of raising humanity to a higher consciousness and all this other stuff will take its proper place.
Yes, it sounds like pie-in-the-sky, but the world really does work that way. Our modern Western Merchant Civilization cannot help but implode soon because the basis on which it’s built is a big lie. The core has already rotted away, and we shall soon see all the things for which we scrambled, things we thought we had gained, will slip through our hands. It wasn’t because we didn’t follow our own rules; we followed them all too well. They were the wrong rules, the wrong plans, the wrong goals. It’s all gone, now. That’s not so pie-in-the-sky, is it?
Do what’s right; make that your goal of success, and all the rest will fall into place.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Radical Management: Measuring Success

Poor Man's Economics Forecast, Part 2

A few more issues in which we recognize the difference between the plutocrats and the rest of us.
By now I’m sure most of my readers are aware there are two completely different sets of laws for Them and for us. For example, everything you see and hear from or about the DEA is what applies to us. The plutocrats, meanwhile, continue actually running the drug trade. That is, via the CIA and other clandestine services, the sources, collection and processing of illegal drugs is protected and “taxed” as the means to controlling the governments through whose lands these drugs and drug interdiction efforts pass. The DEA and CIA work at the same time in the same countries at opposite purposes. The CIA will keep the DEA from ever being effective, except against those who don’t have a deal with the CIA.
And if you’ve been paying attention, you know the US Army recently admitted it now actually helps the heroin trade in Afghanistan: guarding the fields, guarding the shipments, even helping to move the stuff.
You can’t stop the corner dope dealers unless some plutocrat wants it to happen. Look for this to get more blatant as the economy sours further.
So it goes with the trade in child porn and child trafficking. The plutocrats get their pick of available orphans and children of their servants, while those who infringe on that privilege are hunted down like dogs. So long as you serve the plutocrats, you share in their pleasures. This stuff isn’t going anywhere, and nothing any of us do will stop the child porn trade on the Net. You’d be amazed and sickened at what goes through the encrypted government networking channels. Wikileaks would never show you the real secrets.
Look for child trafficking to get worse in the coming months. Keep your kids close to home; consider home schooling. All the more so if they happen to be cute girls, handsome boys. And do you think the Child Welfare folks aren’t in on this? The plutocrats are insatiable. Franklin, Dutroux, Asian Pedo Tours — all this merely scratches the surface.
Then continue applying the same standard to all human vices. From the very source to the end product for sale or use, what gets you and I in prison for life, or for execution, is their standard luxury. I’ve already posted often enough about the scandals covered up by the highest ranking officials in every country. The only time it hits the news is when some plutocrat servant gets out of line. You’ll never see one of Them named or pictured in the scandal sheets.
Most of us aren’t cynical enough.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Poor Man's Economics Forecast

We are going to have more company here at the bottom of the economic food chain.
Taken as a whole, we see all the maneuvering over banking, finance and monetary policy is carefully structured to protect a certain group of insiders. That group is subdivided between the Illuminati and their hirelings. Much of what you see in the news is the activity of the hirelings, permitted to pull off all sorts of crime by virtue of calling it “not a crime” because of who is doing it and how they do it.
But the overall planning is at the level of the plutocrats. The plan is, obviously, to reduce the middle class to a tiny group of folks useful to the upper classes. People who are poor, and aren’t comfortable that way, are easier to manipulate. Those of us who know we belong down here, the much ignored educated lower classes, aren’t numerous enough to be a target for the scheming. We get to watch as all this sweeps past us, recognizing these grand schemes for what they are.
Let me clarify: It’s not the possession of stuff which makes you a fool, but when the stuff possesses you.
Think about what draws out the less wary folks who pine for more money, more consumable trash, etc. The Black Friday madness was for them, not us. What’s on TV is for them, not us. What shows up in most movies, most popular music and sporting events, most of the popular Internet portals — it’s all for the fools. These are the people who absorbed the public school conditioning designed to make everyone petty, self-absorbed, easily bored and basically an empty vessel for whatever the shapers of social consciousness wish to pour in and dump out.
As we watch the maneuvering in European banking and similar shenanigans here in the US, most folks are hardly aware of what it all signifies. The system may well collapse, but it won’t happen until everything is in the right place. That is, the plutocrats’ fortunes will be shielded and everyone else will bear the loss.
That business with MF Global? That was most likely a setup. Corzine used the investors’ accounts to absorb his corporate losses. Who took the loss? Smaller investors in commodities markets. These folks had been getting uppity and refusing to follow the script, so they were whacked by the plutocrats via Corzine (who is probably not one of them, but a servant). The protected classes suffered no significant loss because Corzine used investor accounts to pay them back. Getting all hung up on legalities and whether the SEC should have done this or that obscures what’s really happening.
Americans in general are conditioned to go along with the New World Order. In many ways, the UK is more so. The Greeks are already in revolt, and this will be contained, perhaps by crushing or simply exhausting it, or some combination of things. So it is with any national group which cannot be harnessed to the plans, commensurate with the degree of rebelliousness. At all costs, there cannot be more Iceland style reforms. That, too, will be dealt with in due time. But those who know more than I predict the actual collapse will begin in Asia, for which we get precious little news, even from the alternative sites. Everyone seems distracted by the carnival in Europe.
Meanwhile, as with the Tea Party, the OWS movement was allowed to flower only so the thinkers could be identified for future restrictions. It was more than making an example which saw police departments brutalizing the activists. What cannot be hijacked will be crushed, and you will see not a shred of shame or apology from officials, except those who need replacing as unreliable servants. This is a multi-pronged, multilevel attack on resistance. For the most part, OWS is as finished as the Tea Party.
So we should understand: The bankers’ fortunes will not fail, though the banking system will seem to fail. We will probably be told it failed, at which point it simply means the plutocrats are ready for the final confiscation of savings and so forth. Running to those local credit unions? Watch the laws change regulating them. Those who manage to serve the system will be allowed to keep some kind of job and some measure of pay which won’t purchase nearly as much as before. Many will be reduced to casual (slave) labor, and plenty will be on some form of dole vastly reduced from what it now is. Quite a few will be slaving directly for the government, and folks will be begging to enlist in the military. Those who aren’t economically useful will simply starve.
That is, those who don’t know how to get by on next to nothing. During the previous Great Depression, there was a really large portion of the population already long in poverty. Their lives changed not at all. So it will be in the coming crush, except it will require new measures our grandparents never considered. This time around the social and legal controls are far tighter, and more pervasive. If you honestly believe your cellphone is a necessity, you are in trouble. You’ll need to learn a lot about phone hacking to survive.
Same with the Internet and general computer use. The technology battle between the hackers and corporate providers who control all access will continue escalating, but the hackers are already out ahead, and will probably remain there. If in your mind the whole point is information access and communications, you aren’t likely to do anything stupid. Your greatest vulnerability on the Internet is demanding access to music, videos, games and porn. Secondary is the demand for expensive software. It’s really smart to find and learn how to use Open Source alternatives for whatever you really have to have, especially on Windows. If you really need it, learn more about it.
Your greatest asset in the coming years will be self-reliance in everything. There is no way any of us mere mortals can do this in every aspect of our existence, but stretch where you can. More than anything else, be fully aware.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Poor Man's Economics Forecast

Concentration Camps in America Soon

That’s pretty much what I have to conclude when we cross reference the new military specialty in camp guard with the most recent defense appropriations bill.
It was sometime ago we had that business with the new military occupation specialty for “Internment/Resettlement Specialist”, which is pretty much the same as Prison Camp Guard. This was previously a portion of the Military Police job, but it’s now become its own specialty. The training is actually half-way entertaining.
But this latest Defense Authorization Bill specifically authorizes the US Military to arrest and detain any person anywhere in the world, including on US soil, and hold them indefinitely.
Anyone remember the huge contract awarded KBR for building detention camps all over the US some years ago? Yeah. How many more puzzle pieces do we need?

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Concentration Camps in America Soon