Sniffing False Flags in the Wind

You can smell a false flag coming soon.
As you scan back over the public reports from the past few decades, you realize we have suffered quite a few false flags here in the US. Increasingly, the disasters were predicted, in that more than one government mouthpiece whined about the danger of the very thing which later happened. Something like that is leaked in advanced by more than one kind of source. The US government controls a vast number of varied outlets for things they want to leak. Once you realize who is their most reliable leak outlets, and what sort of ways they are used, you can predict something coming.
Granted, we’ve had a lot of scares which never materialized. It should be simple enough to realize these things are sometimes tested and found unusable for various reasons we may never learn, but it’s not hard to imagine. Perhaps they can’t get a plausible story out there, or they changed their minds about whether it was needed. Maybe the wrong person found out the wrong information, or simply the plutocrats above them nixed it. In the past few years, though, the use of pre-leaks has grown, and sophistication has improved.
The story about a threat from some lone wolf attacker is linked to Norway’s Breivik. I’m not in a position to test whether they had warnings, since I don’t read Norwegian, but I am in a position to estimate a high probability he had police assistance in his crime. Mostly it’s the statements from the police themselves which make me think this. I’ve seen coverups from the inside before, and it looks exactly the same, though this is far more serious in nature. Never doubt our government includes people who would never bat an eye at killing some beloved public figure, or various size groups of innocent folks, simply for manipulation of public reactions. Or for any other reason; I’ve known folks in government service like that — gives you the shivers. This business of manipulating the public is part of the definition of Neoconservative political philosophy. The lone wolf scenario is likely to be used here in the US to eliminate some beloved popular figure who dissents from government policy (watch your back, Ron Paul).
We’ve also had scares about nuclear/chemical/biological weapon use in some urban area. This one is being saved, too, having been well established at least as early as the Bush administration. It still peeks out at us now and then from government mouthpieces just to keep it viable. Various plausible scenarios are trotted out based on whether the tyrants estimate resistance to some oppressive measure is getting too high.
Recently we have seen renewed talk of space alien invasions. That’s been in the works for a very long time. Quite reputable scientists have suggested it, which probably says more about the scientists than it says about what they seem to know. There aren’t many scientists who don’t draw their livelihood from some government or another. The alien invaders story is something we should expect would be coordinated between multiple governments, with an aim altogether more sinister than simply scaring people. More likely the staged attack will be saved for justifying some very broad and insufferable tyranny. What should concern you is not the probability of alien death dealing, but what sort of insane thing they would want to do which calls for such a crazy thing.
In my estimation, the likelihood of vigorous resistance to policy changes currently under consideration is exceptionally high. I’m betting the government thinks so, too. Things are already tense, coming apart in some places, just not yet in really big ways. Part of what makes it confusing for us who keep on eye on such things is the entities planning big events here aren’t all one single group. They may be working out the same office, so to speak, but they don’t appear to agree on what matters most and how to get it done. I believe this because too many bigshots have been thrown under the bus, then sometimes rehabilitated, both for no apparent reason. Seems to me things are pretty tense among the plutocrats, perhaps because things are not working as smoothly as they had hoped.
If you filter out the wild cacophony of fake “truth seekers” reporting any number of threatening things because it makes money and fame, we’ve seen some genuine humble folks report stuff that probably wasn’t supposed to slip out. Maybe they found something; maybe it’s just intelligent guess. The effect is the same either way. I won’t pretend to tell you whom to trust or not trust; that’s not the point. Too many people on too high a level can’t do without the Internet, and they are discovering there aren’t many ways to gain more control without hampering their own uses of it. Yet, that’s the primary means of those damaging leaks. I’m estimating their game is too close to unraveling if they don’t act soon, whatever it is they plan to do next.
Keep your buttered popcorn and cold beverages close at hand; the show is about to start.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Laptop Oracles: Trust

Civilization was God’s idea, His command through Noah.
The fundamental question which civilization seeks to answer is how people can live in close proximity with minimal friction. A higher density of humanity provides a great many benefits, but at a distinct cost. Each must sacrifice some advantages which accrue to those who live in relative isolation. The higher density offers economic and survival benefits. The essence of human nature requires a modicum of interaction between fellow humans to maximize the potential for this plane of existence.
Naturally, the Networked Civilization is quite different from any previous civilization in approaching this issue. The value of shared information is presumed; that’s the whole point of networking. However, networking is a civilization of devices, not precisely people. It requires people act through their devices. The protocols of this civilization are mostly a matter of technology and a host of interactions most of us never see, nor need we really consider them much. Our rising civilization is not the underlying protocols, but it does presume them.
As Doc Searles and David Weinberger explained so very long ago in their World of Ends, there has never been a more egalitarian approach in human history. Because we encounter each other via machines, we must of necessity make it all utterly flat, because the machines just don’t care, can’t be made to care. Instead, we have to reshape our caring to match what is possible. It’s not that we lose all the beauty and ugliness we had before, but there is another layer between us which offers it’s own set of beauty and ugliness. If we refuse to understand how it actually works, we make ourselves slaves and prey to others who do understand.
Fundamental to its nature is something all Western Civilization hates: No one can own it. You can own the underlying physical infrastructure, but exercising ownership in the virtual space in any way destroys the Network. It’s existence arises from the full gestalt of hardware, something which is ever changing, and existing on a scale we can scarcely imagine. It is as close to a fully global civilization as is possible at this time in human history. It is not precisely a network of humans, but of mere machines serving humans. It stands on its own.
There are quite a few gurus and experts, hackers and crackers, and all sorts of human talent behind it and involved in it daily, but it remains by nature a collection of machines. We can’t even call it any kind of intelligence, but simply a collect means to process intelligence so it can be shared among humans. It’s all about the machines, and we have to understand the way the experts and gurus together have decided how the machines will cooperate. There is a vast lore of voluntary directives (RFCs) based on human intelligence about how best to make things work. Humans own the machines and each gets to say exactly how it will cooperate within the agreed framework. There is room for variation, but vary too much and you’ll find your machine disconnected by the refusal of others to provide the essential assistance in passing traffic. Human expertise is limited by the necessity of shared protocols, without which there would be no network at all.
In the end, it’s all about trust. People trust others within safe limits all have agreed upon, and construct machines with programming to execute on the protocols. Within that framework, everyone is someone, and anyone can use or add something. Anyone can suggest improvements, and use the system however it allows by its design. It’s the great leveler of humanity. There is a minimum level of trust, a sort of tension between protecting one’s property while connecting that property to something far, far bigger. Each user gets to decide their machine’s level of participation for their own purposes within the system.
Only in a virtual sense are we crowded together in a small space, with only the faintest reference to actual geographical location. Your identity is split between your physical person and soul, and your machine’s identity on the Network. Personhood is inferred, and trust arises from this virtual relationship. It’s just one big on-going agreement. It’s the most civilizing thing so far when everyone has to learn how to get along to get anything at done. It’s not at all a harsh conformity by command, but entirely of the nature of the thing itself. You can’t be Net neighbors without being neighborly.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking God is not interested and not watching. He has promoted the Internet from the start. God is pleased with this neighborly aspect of the Networking Civilization.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Laptop Oracles: Trust

Laptop Oracles: Civilization

A new civilization is aborning.
The West is dead, it’s carcass moldering in the street. Will someone please push it off into the sewer? What once was is past. We shall be forced to bear its foul odor a bit longer, but that it is dead is not in doubt. Its last dying act was to spawn a successor.
Instead, we see the fresh-faced beauty of the Networked Civilization. You can call it another name if you like, but I would hate to limit this merely to the existing Internet. Cut all the wires and some other means of transmission will take its place. We have a had a taste and mankind will not be denied the full freedom of virtual communion. Our Internet is merely the current manifestation of it.
Governments will come and go, but only those which embrace the virtual world will keep power for long. Naturally, as with all things human, it will require a nimble foot in both worlds. However, the secret to ruling will be rooted in networking. Any government which tries to change the Internet through regulation and technological enforcement will fail. People will simply not allow it. Correctly to the voices of government policy realize the biggest threat to current Western governments is the virtual world.
And rightly so. God gave the West a chance, but she went from nasty to worse. Arrogant, spiteful, utterly mercenary, the West was doomed from the start. God published her doom long ago, but in case you haven’t heard already, you have now. The Networked Civilization will hold the same mixture of promise and threat as did all previous civilizations. It will offer much good and plenty of bad.
Of particular interest to this prophet is the opportunity to resurrect things the West tried to destroy. Materialism is an ancient god known by many names in times past, but was the chief god of the West. The notion nothing important existed outside what the five senses and analytical logic could detect was particularly offensive to God. In the next civilization, it will be impossible to carry on that way. It’s one thing to use scientific inquiry and inductive reasoning, but it’s another to suggest reality ends with what that produces. Many today of the first Internet generation know instinctively that’s not true. They might not have a name for what they seek, but it’s outside that frame of reference.
While anyone could predict much will go wrong and mankind will make a hash of it once more, we must acknowledge God has now turned His attention to the new task of raising up the Networked Civilization. Eventually, this, too will turn on Him, but that’s for Him to face. For now, the voices of His prophets call mankind to face this new future which His very own hand is helping to raise. Those of you who claim Him as Lord are now called to put your hands to this virtual plow. If we do not, we hand it to Satan entirely before it even starts.
Better by far to engage it directly and ensure some good is laid in the foundation. Thus saith the Lord: Those whom I call and touch must get fully involved in the virtual civilization now upon the earth. Now is the time to cultivate once again the ancient ways of My people, with a careful eye to what belongs today and what died with their nation on the Cross. But to drag in whole the filthy sewage of Western Civilization is offensive to Me.
Your fervent earnest prayers are an IM which will not be ignored or misrouted, because His DNS never fails.

Posted in computers, religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Laptop Oracles: Civilization

Squeeze, FFMPEG and MP3 Conversions

Debian Squeeze: Things have changed and there seems to be poor notice from the developers.
I still like to find my old favorite songs on YouTube and strip out the audio track to make an MP3. It’s gotten a little complicated, but I’m getting by with things. For example, I always use Chrome to watch the video, then dig around in ~/.cache/google-chrome/Default/Cache/ to find the downloaded FLV file. Mostly it’s just ls -l and find the biggest item, then run file f_0000xx on it to see if it’s what I’m hunting. Copy the thing and name it appropriately, and all is well, up that point.
Now, having made sure I got all the goodies from Debian-Multimedia according to this page, I found I could no longer use my old CLI incantations to do the magic. At first I found references to having removed the MP3 codecs. I struggled with a lot of DIY stuff and couldn’t come up with a good package. I kept getting conflicting advice and none of it was up to date or complete. I kept poking around with several search engines, then stumbled across it: the codec is no longer simply called “mp3” but “libmp3lame”. So when you do this, it comes out like so:
ffmpeg -i input.flv -vn -acodec libmp3lame output.mp3
I’m not sure why they felt this non-standard argument was a good idea, but there you have it. Of course, you can add various switches to change the bitrate and frequency, but I’ve never noticed much difference from using the defaults, but then I play my music from my laptop.
********
Also, on a wild tangent, I have decided the folks steering development of Firefox are complete jerks. I now simply download the tarball for Seamonkey as is and install it manually as root:
tar -xvfj seamonkey-2.3.tar.bz2
mv ./seamonkey/ /usr/local/

Then I create a menu and desktop launcher linking to /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey and chase down the appropriate icon for it. Runs like a charm and pretty much updates itself, plus offers none of the crazy decisions you get from the FF folks.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Squeeze, FFMPEG and MP3 Conversions

The Laptop Oracles: Preface

Edward, a madman and prophet of Jehovah, typing on a Dell laptop: The West is dying, and will be overtaken by the Networked Civilization. We shall have world governments, but the only ones which remain very long will build on the Net, not on the West.
Preface
The language of Heaven is parable; the logic of Heaven is symbols.

“I am the LORD your God… I spoke to the prophets; I Myself revealed many visions; I spoke in parables through the prophets.” Hosea 12:9-10 (NET Free Bible)
In Matthew 13:10ff, Jesus said He spoke in parables because those whose spirits were dead wouldn’t understand in the first place. Those whose spirits were alive had at least the capacity to grasp the ultimate truth on some level.
The revelation from God cannot be literal because no human language is worthy. Mathematical precision is for computers and engineers. Clinical description is for scientists. Ultimate truth is far higher than mere facts, for it rests on something which is not limited to this plane of existence. The closest you can come to describing is to emphasize deductive logic over inductive. We deduce how to live in this world from revelation. Inductive can explore what it can sense of this world, what it can organize, but it cannot account for things in this world which arise from outside it. So call it supernatural, or superstition and mysticism and forget it, right?
Go ahead, take that path. I’ll be the first to tell you I’m a madman. You can stop right there and read what follows as amusing fiction. But the truth of God revealed drives one to the edge of sanity, as humans consider such things. So I claim to be a prophet of God and I have a message to share. Like the parables of Jesus, if the truth does not seize you through my words, then it won’t matter. If it does grab you, then make of it what you can.
But in case it matters: I am a long time ordained clergyman (45+ years), with a theology education and every bit as much a professional theologian as any other human. I am also a serious Internet user, professional technology writer, and genuine Linux geek. So much for human credentials. God forbid you should call this Scripture. There is a difference between Revelation and a revelation. The former is a theological term referring to God’s Word to all mankind; the latter is simply an attempt to make the former relevant to a given context. This is a mere collection of prophetic applications.
Be warned to all who proceed: Revelation from God has always been delivered in murky language, parables and symbols, and a lot of hyperbole. I can’t execute my commission by packaging it all neatly and precisely the way you’ve been taught to expect. Some of this simply cannot be stated literally. Even when it is, the margins between literal and symbolic overlap often and I’m not too sure myself what to make of it at times. If you take God seriously, you’ll find something you need. If not, you may still extract something useful here, but I can’t promise that.
Enter at your own risk.

Posted in computers, religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Laptop Oracles: Preface

The Internet Fire Burns

I’m angry. I’ve had up to my eyes, and it’s time to set them straight, to slap some hands.
Curiosity is a human trait; it’s built in and you can’t simply remove it. It can be disabled at great cost of destroying a person’s humanity, but it cannot be removed. In children, we channel it. When a child persistently reaches for that hot stove top, you have to do something to stop that action. Over thousands of years, humans have learned there are two ways: Let them get burned a couple of times, or swat their hands. Simply changing the way stoves are designed is so expensive in the long run, it serves merely to deny the possession of a proper stove, and forces people to use even more dangerous equipment for heating food. In other words, there is no way to avoid the child learning without pain. An ancient proverb gets it right: learning equals pain. Only a complete idiot believes otherwise, and deserves to be treated like the stupid child who demands the right to burn themselves in the fire.
The problem is, letting the child get burned can be pretty expensive on several levels. But never mind psychopathic child welfare agencies; we know a child will lose something if we simply let them get a burn sufficient to teach them. We all know instinctively the short-term suffering from a hand-slap is much more efficient for most kids. The point is not what constitutes proper child discipline, but the nature of things. Ovens are hot, and they won’t cook any other way (and microwaving is an inexcusable health threat itself). Cooking food has made human existence far, far better, even if we do tend to cook too many things too much. It constitutes a God-given right to cook one’s food where resources exist.
Freedom to explore is a good thing in and of itself. Allowing and encouraging that human curiosity is a moral obligation. The invention of written language was a blessing, as was the printing press which made written materials far cheaper, and reading became virtually universal. The Internet has made it all far cheaper still, in terms of how much we can access for the price. That freedom does come with costs of another sort. We create a situation where folks can get hurt, just like having a functional oven in your house. It requires we create a system, a collection of expectations, which didn’t exist before. It changes the way we do things, and we simply have to get over our nostalgia about eating everything raw. Feel free to not cook, but if you demand the right to remove the household oven, you will rightly risk being killed by those who value that freedom more than your gadfly life.
It’s time we start slapping some hands. And if that’s not enough, maybe prepare stronger measures. The Internet is what it is, and dreams of making it conform to an earlier age is simply evil, a truculent Luddite hatred deserving of the worst persecution. Here is the Luddite message by Robert Levine:

All of these companies faced the same problem: they weren’t collecting enough of the revenue being generated by their work. The public hasn’t lost its appetite for television, journalism or film; shows, articles and movies reach more consumers than ever online. The problem is that, although the internet has expanded the audience for media, it has all but destroyed the market for it.

Mr. Levine and others still live in some fantasy world; they imagine the clock can be turned back. What he asks is simply wrong, because it destroys the very nature the Internet. The genie cannot be put back into the bottle, and any notion you could squelch the wide open digital access to all digital data requires something more unrealistic than taking drugs. It would be the same as making fire illegal.
Granted, we don’t love Google and others who leverage their very good services as a means to taking over the Internet. We who really use the Net would like to slap their hands, too, but government won’t let us. A government agency created the Internet, but has never for a second listened to those who worked to do it, and government now threatens anyone who dares make a peep about how government needs to let the Internet simply be.
Until you understand the Internet, how it works and what won’t work, you have no business pretending we who use it give a whit what you think. Shut up, Mr. Levine. I’m slapping your hand, and if that won’t work, we’ll be glad to let you incinerate yourself. But don’t pretend we will let you put out our fires, you filthy Luddite scumbag. Those who wish to continue profiting from their “work” will have to find another way to capture revenue. We could tell you how, but you won’t listen, because it means giving up some of that hateful and oppressive control for which you lust with insatiable fire.
Fine, burn your hand, fool. We spare you no pity, nor the enemies of human freedom like RIAA, MPAA, and all the rest.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Internet Fire Burns

I'm All I Know

Ultimate Truth is ineffable.
While I can tell you I’ve met God face to face, there’s no way I can tell you much about it. My brain got lost before it got started. The human mind is not capable of processing that level of experience and existence. So it was some other faculty of mine which did it all, and I sincerely wish my brain would do a better job of listening to that other part of me. But in the end, all you can get from me is my pitiful attempts to organize how I’ll respond to the imperatives of that encounter with God. Whatever I have to say will of necessity be merely my reaction, my response.
Having read and discussed interminably the various systematic theologies of some really smart people, I can tell you they take their brains too seriously. They somehow imagine their minds can work out all the necessary details, so if they can just get you think like them, the job is done. There is no way any human on this plane of existence can tell you God’s nature, or much of anything at all. They can only tell you what they are going to do about it, how they are going to think about it — if they really encountered Him at all. So every grand theological construct is no more than the personal experience of one or more folks making the best they can of implementing their own imperatives. In that sense, there isn’t a one of them really right about it, such that you need to go along with their story. Go ahead, take a look at what they’ve got to offer, but don’t ever buy the notion you have to swallow the whole thing. It’s the same basic fact we all have some common elements as humans who share so much, but of necessity each of us must have some unique choices and ways, or we die.
I will warn you every religious organization I’ve encountered or heard about is far more exclusive, and on the wrong grounds, than God likes.
But it’s not simply what appeals to your fancy. You can’t trust your brain to accurately discern what’s really true; it can’t know. It wasn’t designed for that, though it loves to boast it can handle everything that matters. No, it’s just a tool for organizing something it can’t really understand, and it can’t understand anything that really matters. Its rightful place is to take its cues from another part of you which does understand as much as any thing in Creation can understand. When you examine the story told by anyone else, all you can do is compare notes, and embrace things you recognize. You will inevitably find someone doing or saying something better than you do, and it’s good and right to pick up on that. Still, whatever you come up with, whatever you hold at any given moment, must be completely and totally yours. It must be the best you can make of something utterly impossible, yet utterly necessary.
Even saying all that is just the best I know for me.
On the other hand, having struggled so hard to follow the inscrutable twists and turns of where this has led me, I can honestly say I am utterly at peace. The only thing gnawing at me is the urge to share it, that I’ve never quite done enough, or done it well enough. It’s not like I’ve arrived. Every moment is a fresh call to struggle, but I figure I’m engaged in the right struggle, and that’s what I have to try to tell. It’s that paradox which says the struggle itself is my peace. I didn’t find some treasure trove of answers; I’ve found the right question for me to ask. The question itself makes more sense than anything which has come before. Not that I could put that question into words you might grasp, but perhaps you’ll at least get the idea there’s something worth chasing, that whatever it is I consider being utterly at peace is possible for you.
Don’t mistake someone else’s peace for your own.
If you are curious about it, I can tell you for the last decade or so I’ve known I was just an arrow in the quiver. Whatever it is I’m really supposed to be doing can’t be done right now. All that vast pile of stuff I have written so far is just a tiny slice of what’s possible, not because I’ve failed to try, but because the context doesn’t exist yet. By no means will I pretend to know what it is I’m waiting for, but I do know it’ll be pretty obvious what it comes. The other faculty in me has told my brain that. For all I know, the right context may never come. I am assured that’s not the right question. Rather, it’s all about making sure I’m ready for it, in the sense I’m looking for something really different from what I see right now. As you might expect, this is a big element in some of the other stuff I write about here.
I don’t take myself that seriously, and neither should you, but if something I write rings a bell, take it for what use you can make of it.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on I'm All I Know

Moral Economics

To ignore moral considerations in economics is slapping God in the face. He gets tired of it after a while.
The symbolism of Babylon is, “Everything has a price, and that’s all that matters.” It’s the bedrock of materialism, that we can construct a worldview and system which ignores God, replacing Him with something far less. The original Babylon chose a misleading astrology over God’s revelation. It won’t matter what that some else is; anything other than God is lesser and ineffective. But God deals with humanity on a longer time scale, for the most part, than any human life itself. It’s just as well folks don’t live so long as Methuselah any more (969 years), because it would only add longevity to our weaknesses and folly. But we are fully aware of that longer time span, when we choose to rise about the gorilla level of intellect — creatures which essentially start from scratch with each new generation. We have history, if we dare pay attention.
There are certain moral absolutes which we have ignored for ages: Do loan or give to your neighbors; don’t charge interest; pay day laborers at the end of the day without fail; wipe all system debts every generation; etc. Significant accumulations of wealth are a sure indicator of immorality, because the only reason God permits prosperity is because we are supposed to share. We are morally obliged to give away enough to keep us from becoming significantly more powerful than our neighbors. “Love your neighbor as yourself” is not simply a sweet platitude, but a summation of all our dealings with our fellow humans. Their needs are your needs. (The meaning of “neighbor” is also answered in that context.) These things are not subject to debate; they are absolutes for which God has left no doubts in His revelation. And the Apostle Paul makes it clear you don’t have to know about Him or His name to get it right. He permits a wide array of belief which excludes Him, so long as it arrives at the same basic conclusions.
So it won’t matter what your theory is. If the results don’t match those standards, you are doing something wrong. Human sin kills, but not always immediately in the literal sense. You can be morally dead long before your body tumbles into the grave, and kill a lot of other folks along the way. By the same token, what help we see offered these days is subtly designed to keep on killing. The modern Western theoretical framework for charity is as abominable as refusing to help. It is all cynically designed to enslave. We don’t have room to describe a course of correction here, so I’ll leave it at this: We need to start from scratch almost everything we do regarding economics.
The fundamental assumption is you should get by, and do well enough, but extravagance is a moral red flag. I care not a whit your favorite economic theories and what you call it from your frame of reference — America has raped the world economically. We seem to have absorbed the notion we earned it all simply because we were able to get our hands on it. If whomever was sitting on it didn’t want to use it, we felt justified stomping them into the ground on our way to claiming it for ourselves. Our Enlightenment based assumptions of what’s fair and moral in the process offers no protection from God’s wrath. In essence, what we have done is absorb the natural productivity of others and walked off with an inordinate share. Not content with that, we also stole from our own future. We didn’t simply accumulate an immorally high share of resources, but consumed them with profligate abandon. We have created an appetite by which we simply cannot conceive of less as justified. “Dammit, the world owes it to us!”
In simple terms of economic reality, the system we constructed was unsustainable. In case you haven’t noticed yet, we done sucked all the juice out and it’s going dry. The refill rate won’t keep up with our consumption, but we have truculently rejected any discussions of what that refill rate was. Like most people, I’ve had it up to my ears with silly talk from the Mother Earth worshipers of Greenpeace, Earth First, and the like. We were commanded by God to explore and reap the harvest of His provision, including petroleum and whatever else we can find here, but get it without destroying everything in the process. Deep ocean drilling is not inherently immoral at all, but doing it with reckless disregard for safety is immoral. God expects us to find and use, not make a stinking filthy mess for someone else to clean up later. He’ll do a lot of it Himself, but that may come at the price of vast losses in human life.
That the blood of that loss is on our hands cannot be disputed. In the Court of Heaven, we are culpable. We can’t claim ignorance. Until He is ready to end this situation and conduct that almighty reset of His Creation, He’ll continue to run Creation as He sees fit. It won’t matter if you believe in Him; we are all accountable. This world has built-in corrective measures and ignoring them because it can’t be quantified in our science won’t save us any sorrows. You can characterize it as you wish, but the best way to understand and predict what’s coming next is to realize we have blown our limited opportunity by wasteful living, by demanding more than our share, by rejecting the notion there is such a thing as a fair share.
In more than one religious tradition in this world, to shorten your neighbor’s rations so you can lengthen yours is equivalent to murder. It’s our turn to die now.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Moral Economics

Recipe for Riot

A comment from Old Jules on the previous post got me thinking. I know, it’s dangerous, but it sparked memories from my studies in social sciences.
First, the basic principle behind all social science: We can observe a mass of human behavior and detect certain general patterns which are generally accurate and never precisely true. Some of what follows cannot apply with perfect accuracy to your experience, yet will provide a model which accurately predicts certain broad events. Don’t forget, I always throw in my own flavor of prophetic viewpoint, so take me with a grain of salt.
As a case study, the riots in London should serve as a warning to all of us. We share enough context with the UK to get similar results from the same inputs. The first riots began as a simple protest, rather orderly at that. It won’t matter what the motives are or whom you would prefer to blame. What makes things ripe for riot are the present in the US. All it takes is something to set them off.
This crazy business of class envy didn’t start with communist theory and the workers’ uprisings. Class warfare was a specific intent and motive of the middle class against those they saw below them. They despised anyone not like them, mostly in the sense they wanted everyone to be as phony. The middle class got that way when they were powerless under the control of the nobility. That was some serious class envy. The merchants in Europe wanted all the prestige but none of the responsibilities which tend to draw a few folks up to act somewhat more noble. And with the nobles, it was a very ugly and powerful origin of class consciousness. They went from lucky in battle, thus the clan warlord, to imagining their position was more a matter of inherent virtue and better DNA. It was the nobles, and by extension royalty, who drew first blood in this battle. Oppression began with the simple ability to oppress, and it’s as old as mankind.
Thus, class envy is not merely an isolated problem, a contextual thing worthy of some particular spite. When people feel like they have too many footprints on their backs, they get tired of it. When the cultural context makes no virtue of being a carpet for others, you should not expect a noble patience among the poor and oppressed. One quick look at predatory lending, riding on the back of manipulative materialistic advertising, in a legal system which sells justice to the rich, and a genuine armed revolt is wholly justified by God’s Laws.
But most of our oppressed aren’t that organized because they aren’t that bright. That is, they’ve been denied a good education, having their heads instead filled with marketing mush and fables. Technology they know; thinking deep is foreign. Most of them could become entrepreneurs, but the system genuinely seeks to prevent it, and most of the worthwhile jobs have been shipped overseas. And if you could read the philosophical and doctrinal discussions about law enforcement from the past half-century in the US and the rest of the West, and if you could understand what they were getting at, you would find a vast shift in thinking which forces the police officers to become schizophrenic. Put on the badge and everyone without one becomes your enemy, a criminal just waiting get caught. Yes, this is intentional; this is what the folks in academic ivory towers wanted. This is what we have now.
A significant minority of the US population believes the system owes them, calling their supports “entitlements.” The middle class rail at the welfare mentality, but suffer from the same schizophrenia they like to see in their policemen. They knowingly cultivated the very rules they demanded for offering it, just so they could turn around and spit on the folks forced to accept those rules. This is not theory, dear readers. I’ve read the crap they wrote when discussing the theories behind the current political system. The words they wrote justified the system; the attitudes they harbored, but refused to admit consciously, justified hateful implementations. The hook was set and our reputation for heartless torture of our captured “terrorists” is simply an extension of how the American mainstream views anyone who doesn’t suffer the same brand of madness.
So the system shreds all dignity from people who can’t bring themselves to adopt middle class cultural schizophrenia. Being honest is the best way to get into trouble, decency is punished. Is anyone surprised a significant element of the underclass is predatory? That’s because the middle class is no better, but prefers to use uniformed professionals for their violent thuggery, while the underclass is more DIY. From the moral standpoint, the mainstream are the aggressors.
Thus, we see a growing number of people who have had their patience and wisdom stolen, their morals intentionally crippled, and now what little creature comforts and conveniences they could squeeze from the system is being increasingly denied them. As more and more benefits of economic activity are funneled ever more tightly to the flaunting wealthy few, and not only the pitiful rotten jobs are fading, but so are all the other ways folks could occupy their time, they really don’t have anything better to do. The first time some genuine protest of grievance hits the streets, these folks will come out in droves so as to grab the few things which they have been made to believe matters to them. You shouldn’t imagine the race riots the MSM have been trying to cover up and describe as mere “flash mob” entertainment is not a symptom of a boiling pot with the lid on too tight.
The stage is set. Many of us old folks would gladly work if we could, bearing our share of economic decline, but there aren’t any jobs for us, either. We have been told, and rightly believe, what we have left to survive on is our right, because we paid for it from our pockets or because we gave up some sizable chunk of our very beings for some cause we were told was noble. Take away what the system really does owe us, and we’ll protest. Old or not, we’ll march on Washington, DC and everywhere else. When we do, the rioters-in-waiting will turn out and things will get messy.
I’m praying I got this all wrong, but I honestly expect full on rioting in some urban areas very soon.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Budget in Blood

I was going to save this for tomorrow, but it feels like an elephant lying on top of me.
Congress is slated to come up with a fresh federal budget come end of September. That’s next month. By then, the “Super Congress Committee” (or whatever they call it) will be well established. Whatever evil has been lurking in the backs of their minds will be all too easy.
Keep in mind: In theory, all the money for Medicare and Social Security is supposedly already fully funded for quite some time, since they’ve been sucking it out of our wallets for quite some years. Yes, I know Bill Clinton had it all shifted over into the general accounts and called it a “budget surplus” that year, leaving only a stack of worthless IOUs in the accounts being held in our names. They have yet to confess they have stolen all our savings, yet they are already talking about cutting payouts under Social Security and Medicare. They have also been rumbling about cutting expenses for military payouts to retired and disabled service members.
I’m hardly the only who figures they’ll try to pull this off. Keep all the funding for Israel and our current wars, most enforcement agencies, and their own expenses, of course, but cut everything else. But I am sensing here they won’t be as slick as they believe they are. Something in my intuition expects them to bumble and fumble through this, needlessly provoking everyone. Then again, maybe it will be on purpose. I think the London riots will look pretty tame compared to what we’ll see here in a matter of weeks.
Given the plans, equipment and personnel are already in place for military suppression of riots here in the US, I’m expecting literal blood in the streets. Lord have mercy; I hope I’m all wrong about this.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments