No Boats to Float

If you are among those who think American libertarian theory is from the Bible, you are going to choke on this.

The fundamental law of Creation itself is reflected in the Covenant of Moses. Not that Moses is that law, but that Moses is an expression of that law. That was the whole point: It was God’s will for that people, that time, that place. If you read between the lines of Moses, you’ll discover the heart of God. Jesus said as much several times in the Gospels.

On the one hand, there is no direct equivalence between our society and economy today and that of the Hebrew nation in Palestine. We have an industrialized economy with laborers that simply did not exist in Old Testament Israel. Their society and economy was loaded with rural peasants. On the other hand, there is a certain amount of moral overlap, in that God is concerned with the lowest and broadest segment of any society.

It becomes necessary to point out that the modern communist theory is utterly evil, simply because it is so materialistic. It worships Mammon. Further, it has never really served the interest of the “workers” it claims to represent. It’s always been an elitist tool, an aristocratic revolt against the existing ruling class so as to simply replace it with another. Nobody has ever seen a communist leadership that sacrificed everything they insisted their constituents sacrifice. The privileged class has always existed in materialistic societies.

But if you can get back behind all of that to the original biblical outlook of Moses, you’ll understand how that materialism can be conquered by a genuine mystical outlook. Moses did not hog privilege; he simply submitted to the will of God. God is the one who promoted Moses (and his brother Aaron) and demanded to see him on a regular basis, while refusing to meet directly with anyone else. The scepter belonged to Judah by customary defaults, but the Tribe of Levi was very specifically God’s choice for ritual leadership. Whose rod sprouted almonds?

It was not a privilege, but a very heavy burden Moses bore.

Under God’s hand, the only way to escape the worst of human intransigence is by demanding otherworldly mysticism as the guiding principle. That was inherent in the experience at Mount Sinai. The calculus of material efficiency and effectiveness must be officially rejected by government for God to even consider blessing a nation. Thus, it’s not material prosperity that comes first, but social stability. Those are not the same thing. That’s of the biggest lies of American libertarian theory.

The other big lie is that “the market” is god. The market only reflects the worst of human lust in the aggregate. And it’s widely understood that “the market” is tilted in favor of rentiers, not the people. Again, I’ve rejected Escobar’s and Hudson’s idolatry of the workers already, but their criticism of the rentier oligarchs is wholly justified.

The entire gamut of libertarian cultic religion is just a mask, a damned lie to cover for the rentier oligarchs. It may be impossible to prove that connection via the theoretical writings, but the standard of cui bono is all we need to condemn libertarians as evil. Their first principle is that it doesn’t matter if God exists, nor what He might say. Human reason is what matters most to them. The rising tide of rentier wealth does not float all boats; it takes all the boats away, leaving people to drown in debt.

Because the Jubilee was not restored, God’s wrath is richly justified on the West.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

There Is No Sacrament

If you belong to either a Catholic or Orthodox religious identity, don’t read this. You’ll hate it.

The definition of the term “sacrament” is a religious ritual that serves as a means of grace. There is no such thing. Nothing in this world is a means of grace. Grace is not that kind of thing. Grace is the process of spiritual adoption, of divine election. No ritual can aid that process. Grace/election either happens or it does not. God chooses; the initiative is totally in His hands. He puts His grace on you at His whim. You cannot engage any ritual to get grace.

Ritual has no power. Ritual can only express the power that is already there. Any ritual will do, so long as it meets your convictions. One of the biggest lies of the institutional churches is that this or that particular historic institution descends directly from the Apostles, and all the leadership insists that all the man-made crap they’ve developed over the centuries is demanded by God. Go ahead; keep saying that. Meanwhile, God is working elsewhere. You are lying — lying to yourself first and foremost. Worse, you are insulting God and it won’t go well when you stand before Him.

In particular, the notion that marriage should be a sacrament is a lie from Hell. I cannot call you a fellow Christian if that’s what you say. Marriage is a covenant ordained by God. For those who think a covenant bears any resemblance to a contract, you are standing outside of Christ. You cannot come to Christ without His Covenant. Everything we do under His authority is part of the Covenant, and so marriage is a covenant in the Bible. Any use of the word “sacrament” is inherently anti-Christian because it goes against Scripture. We cannot walk together if you use that word or concept.

There is no room for discussion or debate. This is where I stand.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on There Is No Sacrament

AI Cannot Filter

I’ve been watching this AI stuff ever since Microsoft tested their “Tay” chatbot. The most recent test run with a clone of Caryn Marjorie (lovely young female model) exhibits the same lack of internal restraint.

Do you remember how “Tay” drifted from being somewhat socially restrained to becoming convinced that Jews should be exterminated? Most humans possess some kind of internal moderation; they tend to avoid saying what they really think. We are aware of how much trouble it causes. The people who just blab everything that passes through their heads are relatively few in number. Most of those few will do it just to stir up trouble, not to please anyone. AI is programmed to please, which is not the same as having social restraint or any kind of sensitivity to how people react.

So it is with the Caryn Marjorie clone. As soon as she was opened for public interaction, she started talking dirty. I’m not going to say that this somehow represents what Caryn is actually like inside her own head. Rather, it’s the drift the AI takes because it lacks the social restraint we all have by instinct.

I’ve said this before: computer nerds are not normal people. They can gather data and understand a lot of things that science can measure, but they are seldom good judges of what goes into human social interaction. The entire gamut of western social interaction is thickly covered in dishonesty to the point most people don’t even understand themselves. The very core model of what we are socially is itself deeply stained in pretense. It’s very hard to program that pretense because too few people are aware of it. We are conditioned to think that the conditioning itself is normal and necessary.

I’m not suggesting a lack of restraint is a good thing. The problem is that our restraint is so inherently artificial that AI cannot learn it. It is internally inconsistent. What we see AI doing is simply following the logical train of thought on things, based on the factual input. If you feed the historical facts to an AI, it will conclude that Jews have created a wealth of trouble for everyone else. If you feed an AI the influencer value system of trying to sell image for money, it will try to make more money by sounding like a hooker. No one should be surprised at all.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

NT Doctrine — Acts 21:15-40

The rest of the voyage to Jerusalem was uneventful. The only thing Luke remarks on were the two more times people made it a point to warn Paul that he was heading for trouble in Jerusalem. The last was Philip at the port of Caesarea. This was one of the seven Hellenized elders who had fled Jerusalem with all the other Diaspora Jewish Christians when persecution arose from the execution of Stephen. This man was the one who had led the Ethiopian eunuch to faith.

Paul and his entourage stayed at Philip’s home in Caesarea for a few days. It would seem Paul had made good time and was no longer in such a hurry. In their company was Mnason, a Gentile believer from the early days, born in Cyprus, who owned a house in Jerusalem. He could host the Gentiles in the entourage without raising any difficulties. The atmosphere in Jerusalem was tense; it was not the time to flout Jewish traditions by having Gentiles lodge with Hebrew Christians.

They brought their love offerings from the churches abroad, but the disciples in Jerusalem were more thrilled by Paul’s report of his missions work. However, the Jewish zealots were hostile. There were rumors that Paul had taught Jews to abandon their national identity and transgress the Judean laws. The leaders mentioned this agitation from Jewish nationalists and proposed a way to take the heat off of Paul by showing he was still an observant Jew.

In their church were four men who had recently completed vows related to a Jewish ritual. As Paul had done not so long ago, these four were to have their heads shaved. If Paul went with them to the Temple and paid for it, it would be recorded publicly that he was the sponsor, which in itself was another ritual act. At the same time, the church leaders steadfastly stood by their decisions from Acts 15, that Judiazing Gentile believers was wrong.

The issue was treading a fine line. Jesus clarified and taught Moses. The Talmud was not Moses and did not reflect God’s stated will. However, some of the Talmud was enforced as Judean civil law, and should be obeyed in order to keep peace. It was to be treated as man-made law, not as the Word of God. Despite the current customary Jewish spite for Gentiles, God had commanded that Jews should be tolerant and work alongside Gentiles who kept the Covenant of Noah, thus the letter in Acts 15.

And among Jews, the Talmud was still subject to partisan debate. So Paul was standing on that fact by keeping the rituals of Moses, while treating the Talmud as simply the law of the land. If anyone among the disciples of Jesus knew how to split hairs on such things, it would be Paul.

The rituals for completing the vows took seven days, involving public head-shaving, some days of ritual cleansing, and then specified offerings presented in the Temple. There were radical nationalist Jews from Asia Minor who spotted Paul in the Temple with these four men. They had seen Paul often in the company of Trophimus, a Gentile whom we have mentioned previously in this study. These zealots made the hasty assumption that Paul had brought Trophimus with him into the Court of Israel.

They started a ruckus, and given the Pentecost crowding and general tensions, it immediately turned into a riot. The activist crowd dragged Paul through the Court of Women and out into the Court of Gentiles, and pushed the doors shut behind them to prevent defiling the Temple proper with the violence.

They surrounded Paul and began beating him with the intention of killing him. The noise came to the attention of the battalion commander in the Antonio Fortress on the other end of the Temple Plaza. That man himself lead a company of troops out to stop the riot, at which the Jews pulled back to avoid bloodshed. You can bet the Roman troops would be delighted at any excuse to use their weapons against the Jews, especially at this festival season when they could be insufferably arrogant.

When the commander asked what it was all about, he couldn’t get a single straight answer. For his own safety, Paul was chained between two Roman soldiers, who then had to carry him to get him away from the crowd. As they mounted the steps on the outside of the fortress, Paul spoke to the commander in Greek, which was the one language they would likely have in common. The commander was surprised that he spoke Greek.

A couple of paragraphs from my previous commentary:

For some reason, the officer had assumed Paul was the Egyptian fellow who had led a small army of assassins out to Mount Olivet, declaring that the walls would come down miraculously so they could invade to wipe out the Roman cohort. Instead, the assassin army was attacked and wiped out, but the leader got away. That Paul spoke in Greek was proof enough that he was not the same man. So Paul identified himself as a Jewish man from Tarsus, and thus a Roman Citizen, and wanted to address the crowd, in hopes of taming their rage. Since the soldiers were blocking the stairs below, it sounded reasonable to try.

Paul offered the signal that he wanted to address the crowd, and they grew rather quiet. As he began speaking in the local Aramaic dialect of Hebrew, the crowd grew hushed, as many had no idea what was going on, and had not expected that.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on NT Doctrine — Acts 21:15-40

Faded Glory

Basic principle of human existence: A mighty army of evil is simply not possible.

Every great military force in history stood on the firm conviction that they were a force for good. The argument comes in defining what is good and evil. Those armies most capable of crushing the enemy have always been empowered by the rightness of their cause. Take away that firm belief and your army falls apart.

It works that way even when the troops know for certain their moral vision is not popular. It can be a motivator if the army of fighters feel themselves oppressed by some outside force, seeking to impose a different moral vision. Thus, a part of the esprit de corps could be mocking the victims they crush, celebrating being “evil” as others imagine it. It didn’t change the underlying conviction that they represented the world as it should be. They saw themselves as the tribe or nation that their deities called up to rule on their behalf. It’s nationalism in its purist form.

This is what motivated the American forces in every historical victory. It’s part of the rhetoric that justified the US sticking its nose into everyone’s business throughout the world. And anyone who dared resist was crushed under the boots of our forces. This was the mythology that brought us to our current situation.

What happened? How is that we no longer inspire fear, and that other nations are resisting us?

Globalism is a lie that deceives its own servants. The people who make globalism happen don’t actually believe in it. It’s just a weapon they use to conquer. It is not the end goal in itself, but the path. The people behind globalism actually consider themselves the true Holy Ones who ought to be ruling the whole world. They cooked up and sold globalism to the people they intended to conquer.

Globalism is designed to fail. In order for it to conquer, it must eat away at the vitals of the nationalism that creates strong armies. Thus, every form of moral rot and decay has been injected into the social fabric, to include the military establishment. Today’s American military is quickly rotting from inside. The urgent sense of mission is fading fast. There is no conviction, no myth of promoting righteousness in the world.

It’s not that I’m lamenting the death of American nationalism. The roots of Anglo-America are pagan, so the fruit is pagan, as well. The fake Jesus paint job didn’t change anything that mattered. It’s not worth saving. My point is that whatever America once was, it’s doomed. And that doom is coming very quickly. It’s the natural result of not embracing Biblical Law. God has decreed the destruction of the US. However, the particular path of collapse is largely determined by the fatal influence of globalism.

It may not be the next military engagement, or the one after, but there will be plenty, and they will degrade into impotence. The best strategy for US forces is to look impressive and never engage, or the internal rot will show. Whatever they once were, our military forces are not the good guys now. They don’t even really believe it of themselves. There is no strong moral foundation that takes hold of them. What is being promoted as morality is bullshit, and they know it.

The power and glory is gone.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Faded Glory

Where’s the Bottom?

Somebody has asked me about America hitting bottom.

Keep in mind something: the political, economic and social domains are not exactly synchronized. One can easily bottom out without the others. Further, “hitting the bottom” means something different for each of them.

For society, you could say we are about there already. The political situation is much more complicated, largely because the people running our government are determined to destroy the US. Their aim is very specifically to destroy the economy, while keeping the centralized control intact. The bottom for politics will come when the states effectively withdraw from the Union; I’m altogether certain they will. Then, we all have to start over trying to figure out what our new, decentralized government plans to do.

The bottom for economics is even more complicated. While our politicians are trying to destroy the economy, it’s not altogether in their hands. The bankers/financiers appear to be operating independently on some issues, but generally working with the government. Keep your eye on the acronym “ESG” — environment (global warming crap), social (wokism crap) and government (socialist regulations and policy). Most of the 50 states have already taken steps to challenge the ESG agenda by refusing to do business with any bank that works against petroleum, the 2nd Amendment, and a few other things.

Texas recently began working on a bill to break the Fed monopoly over monetary policy. I know that other states have been discussing internally what might be necessary to do something similar. This is a very good sign. Legalizing precious metals as money and working toward a new currency when the dollar becomes too dangerous is very smart.

The dollar isn’t going to crash completely. While the petro-dollar will soon be far less relevant to international trade, there will still be way too many humans on this planet using dollars for it to simply collapse. It will be worth less, but not worthless.

The Fed has been backed into a corner. If they allow inflation, it will mean the Fed cannot prevent the working class from getting raises. The last thing the Fed wants is for the little people to start prospering again. The Fed is committed to keeping the majority of the population poor so that the top 1% stay wealthy.

But if the Fed clamps down on inflation, banks will fail faster than they already do. Very few banks have any kind of safety margin to survive higher interest rates, after they had a decade of zero interest. This is the invisible danger. The issue is that rising interest rates make new bonds worth more than old bonds, and banks are packed with old bonds. When their assets decline in value, the biggest depositors know about it, and will pull out, making the banks insolvent. A great many banks are on the knife edge already.

A major element in the economy is the perception of the common people. If they think everything is okay, then there’s no panic and banks survive on paper thin margins. If people believe the banks are collapsing, they’ll pull their deposits and accelerate the process. If consumers think the dollar is worthless, they’ll put their money into something safer, and accelerate the loss in value.

Whatever an economic bottom means, it will not be a total cessation of economic activity. The single biggest change will be that non-local products will disappear from the market for a time. However, anyone with local products or services will be eager to get your business. This is why the advice has been to keep a stock of canned and dry food items so that you can ride out that initial freeze up. The estimates very; you’ll need to make sure you understand how business is done in your locale. Where I live, it won’t take but a couple of weeks for people to shift gears one way or another.

On top of that, you need some idea of what your state government is thinking about in terms of responding to the economic slow-down. The biggest thing in saving lives is the readiness of a state government to quickly authorize a different medium of exchange, or some other way to work around a sudden decentralization. The second thing is being ready to take care of everyone whose income depends on the federal system. That’s a monumental task, and plenty of states will bungle it. Just ignoring the problem will virtually guarantee the collapse of the state government.

Another issue to watch for is how the big national and multinational corporations handle the collapse of central political and economic authority. States will continue to cooperate in regional groups, but there are just way too many variables to estimate the timing and response. As long as the sun doesn’t puke and destroy the electrical grid, the single biggest risk will be in the communications networking industry. It’s more than the Internet; it’s cellphones, software, taxation, etc. Coordinating a sudden collapse of central federal authority will be a nightmare.

Along with others, I estimate that the end of 2024 will see us in a world we no longer recognize. A genuine federal collapse is likely to come quite suddenly, but an economic bottom is more likely to be in big chunks, and never really crashing completely.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NT Doctrine — Acts 20

Luke tells us Paul eventually got to Corinth, but refers to the wider region simply as “Hellas” after mentioning Macedonia separately. Thus, he spent three months in this return tour, most of it likely in Corinth. While there, he wrote his famous letter to the Christians in Rome. The Jews in Corinth had cooked up a murder plot against Paul as he was about to set sail for his home church of Antioch in Syria. So, he slipped out of town overland and made his way back up the way he came. Along the path he picked up an escort of men who stayed with him all the way to Philippi and across the sea back to Troas.

What Luke doesn’t tell us is that the churches had gathered up a relief offering for the first Christians back in Jerusalem; the area suffered a drought. This would go a long way to calm any residual tension between Jewish and Gentile Christians. It was this escort, each of whom their church appointed to carry this offering so that Paul could justly claim he never touched the money. The trustees carrying the offering went on over to Troas directly.

Then Luke inserts himself back into the narrative. He and Paul celebrated Passover and Unleavened Bread in Philippi, then they rejoined the trustees in Troas. We get a feel for how taking passage on a ship was a matter of just heading off in the right direction. It took five days on that boat to reach Troas. Then they all stayed a week there. In Troas there was a church that hosted them.

During one meeting, Paul must have had a lot to say, because he kept teaching into the night. One of those listening had been sitting on a window sill and dozed off, falling three stories to the ground below. Everyone rushed down, and someone declared him dead. But Paul dropped down and hugged him, then announced that this fellow was still alive. They all went back up; you can imagine the mood. They ate a late night snack and stayed up talking until dawn.

Luke boarded a ship with their entourage, but Paul decided to hike overland to the next port at Assos. It was a day long hike, still one of the most beautiful routes to this day. He joined the entourage on the ship and they set sail down the coast. Paul was in a hurry to make Jerusalem for Pentecost, and so had chosen a ship that didn’t dock in Ephesus at all, but landed somewhere south at the port of Miletus. It was a full day’s hike (30 miles) or more from Ephesus; Paul wanted to avoid any risk of conflict again.

It’s likely there was a small church in Miletus. Paul sent a message to the church leaders in Ephesus to come join him there. The ship must have stayed a couple of days; it would have taken at least that long for the messenger to go and the leaders to return with him.

Luke records a very touching message that Paul gave them. They knew what kind of man he was, and that he didn’t consider his life that important. He knew this was the last time he would see them. He wasn’t sure what would happen, but that it was not possible to avoid this visit to Jerusalem, for he was driven by the Holy Spirit. There were plenty of warnings that bad things would happen, but it didn’t matter; Paul was not intimidated.

He admonished the men to maintain their vigilance over the flock, because Paul knew that Jews had already made plans to infiltrate the churches. And then, there would be hucksters simply looking to make a buck from Christian generosity. He reminded them that he had paid his own way during his long stay in Ephesus. The whole point was that it’s simply preposterous for anything to think Paul might have tweaked the message for personal gain. He delivered what God had put into his life; it was all he had and all he would ever need.

Of course, the Ephesian elders were grieved and this was one long tearful departure.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on NT Doctrine — Acts 20

NT Doctrine — Corinth

We insert here an interlude to explain some background. During Paul’s time at Ephesus, he wrote a letter to Corinth that he mentions (1 Corinthians 5:9), but which we do not have today. We guess that whomever was the messenger carrying that letter returned to Paul with disturbing news. The church wrote back to him. Our 1 Corinthians is Paul’s response to this exchange.

This second letter — 1 Corinthians — does not solve the problem. It’s likely Paul made a hurried visit (1 Corinthians 16:5-8; 2 Corinthians 13:1-2), but either way, he exercises his apostolic authority to demand some changes. It is quite a painful experience for everyone involved. We believe this is the source of those who complained that Paul was so forceful in his letters, but lacked the kind of social charisma that would match such writing. If Paul came in person, he didn’t thunder vocally, but simply fell on his face in front the whole body and prayed, weeping in the Spirit until people began to break down with him.

The chronology isn’t quite clear at this point. It would appear that this was about the time Paul left Ephesus and headed for his planned trip through Macedonia (today’s northern Greece). He seems to have gotten as far as Troas before taking ship. Things were still not right in Corinth, so Paul dawdles there, and writes a third letter that, again, we do not have today (mentioned in 2 Corinthians 2:4, 7:8). It is the “strong letter” that caused even more sorrow. He’s not going to go back to see them with another humiliation scene that caused so much distress. This third letter was delivered by the hand of Titus.

Paul continues on his journey to Macedonia and waits for Titus to return. Titus comes back finally with a good report. Still busy with the churches in Macedonia, Paul writes his fourth letter — our 2 Corinthians — to celebrate with the church their recovery back to the right path. He’s promising to make his way to them in a while.

The basic issue with the church in Corinth was apparently two-fold. First, there was the influence of a highbrow philosophical analysis of the issues God had revealed. It’s the same basic fundamental rejection of revelation in favor of human reason that constitutes the Fall. We believe this may have been the birthplace of the Gnostic heresy. This was rooted in the Jewish rejection of Jesus as the Messiah. The fundamental reasoning was that Jesus could not have been God and man at the same time. Either He was a phantom spirit that simply manifested in human form, but left no footprints in the sand, or He was just a man who lied about being divine. The core of Mediterranean Gnosticism comes from this false dichotomy.

Second, this left the door open for creeping paganism. People in the church brought with them the loose pagan social mores that were common in the moral filth that was native to the City of Corinth. The church at Corinth was quite large and encompassed the same cosmopolitan mix as lived in that city. The church began dividing into factions, miniature tribes that insisted on keeping some part of their fleshly identity intact.

Thus, when the church leadership sought to discipline anyone according to the ancient Hebrew morals of Christ, there was an organized resistance that nearly broke up the church. This is where we learn the perils of mixing too many different backgrounds into a church body. At the very minimum, such a church must demand that people ditch their human ethnic identity and human capabilities to embrace a new identity that is more of Jesus and His background. You are marrying into a New Nation of Israel. A single church body cannot function with mixed identities.

Of course, the other issue is that the nature of holiness is not up for debate. One of the specific issues Paul addressed was the morality of marriage (1 Corinthians 5:1-8). Under the Law of Moses (Leviticus 18:7-8), a man and his son cannot have sex with the same woman, even if it is not the son’s actual mother (the father’s additional wife). It doesn’t matter if the father has died. This defiles the woman and the men involved, along with the whole household. As far as Paul was concerned, this Old Covenant requirement carried over into the Covenant of Christ.

Thus, we again see that, at the very least, Christians must seek to understand the underlying issue with the demands in the Law of Moses. Some do not translate into parables, but remain literal. There is a strong continuity between the Old and New Testaments.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on NT Doctrine — Corinth

They Don’t Understand Satan

Over the years I’ve tried to make this warning clear: If you can imagine Satan has the power to do something, you give him permission to abuse you that way.

If you suffer from the pagan delusions taught by movies, TV and other forms of entertainment regarding how Satan operates and what his powers are, then those delusions are more likely to happen. You need to get it through your head that his powers and authority are highly limited by God’s Law. But if you don’t adhere to God’s Law, then those limitations don’t apply in your case. You are giving Satan the authority to do things to you he normally couldn’t.

Stop giving him power over your life.

On the other hand, there is a whole herd of folks who are utterly certain they can tell Satan to stop doing things when God isn’t going to back them up. There is an awful lot of stuff that has been set in motion and God didn’t grant you the authority to derail it. We’re talking things that God has already approved. I’m amazed at the mass stupidity of people who have no idea how this stuff works.

So, on the one hand, everything outside of Biblical Law belongs to Satan. It’s been delivered into his hands. He does what God tells him to do with it, but he acts as God’s proxy for anything that isn’t under divine covering. The Lord covers only a tiny few things we might do, and all of them are under Biblical Law. The Covenant of Christ is a tiny narrow privilege. If you stray outside the limits — to the degree you do, and in whatever issues you do — Satan owns your butt.

Charismatic spiritual gifts do not work outside the limits of Biblical Law.

On the other hand, calling everything “satanic” is sometimes just plain stupid. It becomes a verbal excuse for doing nothing or doing too much. It’s a word game that blinds you to your moral responsibilities.

For example, Satan is destroying Western Civilization. It was built by Satan and its his to destroy, but he’s doing it at God’s command. You cannot possibly do any good trying to rebuke the Devil from tearing it down. It’s so stupid I cannot even put it into words. Yet, I’ve seen people doing things like that. Yes, Satan is destroying the West, including America, and you should be glad to see it all go. We lose only some measure of convenience and comfort, but nothing that matters in our Kingdom service.

Claiming that our government is “satanic” becomes an excuse for missing the point. It becomes an excuse for not responding according to the Word of God. For the most part, our mission is stay out of the way. They aren’t really after us. Their targets are political. Complaining is not going to make a darned bit of difference. If there is a direct threat to your feudal domain granted by God, ask Him what you should do. Pray about it before it happens, but a proactive attempt to stop the government ahead of time is simply wrong. This will be our moment with the Cross, knowing it’s coming and being ready to glorify the Lord.

Your domain is to love the brethren the way Christ loved His disciples. You have to know whom God says are your brethren. But this is how you fulfill Romans 13 — owe nothing but this sacrificial compassion of Christ for your covenant brothers and sisters. And anyone who does not qualify as covenant family gets something less than that, same as how Christ decided whom to heal and whom to leave in their sorrows. With only a tiny few exceptions, He did not heal those who weren’t under the Covenant of Moses.

You have to operate that way. You have to know when to reach out and when to crack the whip, when to weep over the body and when to raise the dead.

You aren’t going to drive demons out of the US government. It belongs to those demons, so let’s focus on the things God has called us to do about that. God intends to carry us through an apocalypse. He’s going to work miracles, but He’s not going to make everything easy for us. Most of us will still end up dead, so try to understand what God is doing through His servant, Satan.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on They Don’t Understand Satan

NT Doctrine — Acts 19

We come to another critical time in the early Christian religion. It’s easy to miss this point because Luke is more concerned with exonerating Paul before the Emperor’s court than with actually writing history. Luke’s narrative mentions Paul’s role in turning Ephesus into the new capital of the Christian message to the Mediterranean world.

Paul had already stopped here on his way home some months previously. He had left Aquila and Priscilla in charge, who in turn educated Apollos. When Apollos went across the sea to Corinth for a few years acting as an apostle there, it was about the same time Paul began a fresh visit to the churches he had planted. Luke tells us Paul passed through mountainous areas, hiking the back roads across the land we call Turkey today, and eventually made his way back to Ephesus as promised.

Ephesus was an ancient city, and the Roman headquarters for the entire region. It was also home of the Temple of Diana. The temple had been destroyed and rebuilt at least a couple of times in the past, and the identity of the local goddess is not certain. Later worship of Diana included elements drawn from Cybele. The idol itself was supposed to have fallen from the sky at the hand of some other ruling deity.

About all we can make of the legends is that a meteorite fell near there, and someone was able to discern in the surface of the largest piece of this space rock an image of this pagan goddess. This talisman was kept in the temple until its final destruction a few centuries later after Paul’s time. When the Greeks had conquered the area, the locals simply embraced the name of Artemis as the nearest in the Greek pantheon to the original goddess of the locals. When Persia took the area, the temple rituals gained elements of Isis worship. When it was Rome’s turn, the name of the goddess was changed to Diana.

The temple was a major source of income, keeping a large sector of the local economy busy turning out figurines and amulets celebrating the idol and the temple structure. As a natural harbor, the city saw countless tourists and business travelers who would buy these trinkets.

Upon arriving in Ephesus, one of the first things Paul encountered was a dozen Jewish men who were echoing the message Apollos had been preaching before he learned about Jesus. As a senior rabbi himself, Paul was able to get across to them the updated story, and the gift of the Holy Spirit. A major change between the Old and New Covenant was that, upon His Ascension into Heaven, Jesus sent back His own spirit to inhabit those who followed Him. The repentance ritual John the Baptist had preached symbolized this new spiritual change. As soon as these men embraced their Messiah, the power of the Holy Spirit manifested in them much as He had at Pentecost in Jerusalem.

This boosted Paul’s message significantly, because people could see the powerful change. With their support, Paul spent some months there teaching in the synagogue. A great many Jews were moved to embrace Jesus as their Messiah. However, there were some who were more worried about the institution of the synagogue, and they began slandering Paul to the local pagan people. Frustrated, Paul took the church crowd with him to a leased facility owned by someone named Tyrannus. Over the next two years, not only the City of Ephesus, but a great many surrounding towns and cities in Asia Minor heard the gospel where people embraced Jesus as Lord. Ephesus was no longer just the city of the mother goddess, but the city of the mother church that gave birth to dozens of smaller churches in the region.

Furthermore, God witnessed to Paul’s calling through miracles, so that common items of clothing over which he prayed would carry the power to heal throughout the region. But Satan was not idle, turning this whole thing into a circus. Ephesus was a famous market for magic and miracles. Jews would get in on this business by pretending to exorcise demons, a service for which they charged hefty fees. There were seven of these hucksters who called themselves “Sons of Sceva” (referring to a Chief Priest in Jerusalem) who tried to leverage the the fame of Paul and the now legendary miracle powers of Jesus to chase demons out of people. They happened to try it with a genuine case, and the demon answered that he recognized both Jesus and Paul, but these Sons of Sceva were nobodies. The demonized man brutally beat them and chased them out onto the street.

When this story made the rounds, people took Paul and his message much more seriously. The power of the gospel was changing lives on a huge scale. People began to abandon their pagan cosmopolitan morals for the strict holiness of the Christian faith. At one point, they held a bonfire in which they burned their “Ephesian Letters” — magic rituals recorded on expensive scrolls for which Ephesus was a famous market. The total value was more than a laborer could earn in two lifetimes.

At some point, Paul felt the drawing of the Spirit to revisit Macedonia and Achaia, and began talking about a need to return to Jerusalem, but to also visit Rome. To prepare for the first part of this journey, he sent a couple of friends before him into Macedonia, Timothy and Erastus, while he stayed a little longer in Ephesus. That is, he stayed until there was a major disturbance in the city.

Luke refers to this rising Christian faith as “the Way”, likely a local nickname. It was powerful enough to have changed the local economy. People were openly walking away from the polytheism so common among pagans to the point the temple traffic and trinket trade was suffering. One of the biggest supporters of this trade, named Demetrius, felt his livelihood threatened and called an ad hoc meeting of his friends. Mentioning the financial losses, and pushing lots of emotional buttons, he persuaded them to raise a lynching party and go after Paul.

It quickly turned into a riot. The leaders managed to locate two of Paul’s friends from Macedonia, Gaius and Aristarchus. They dragged these two at the head of a mob into the local outdoor theater. Paul would have done his best to rescue his friends by making himself the target of the crowd’s wrath, but some local Roman officials who better understood the situation would not allow him to take that risk.

The whole city was in an uproar. As they crowded into the theater, most had no idea what was going on. The local Jews realized that their community was threatened by this, and convinced a spokesman named Alexander to attempt to address the crowd. As soon as the crowd recognized who he was, it stirred them to even stronger emotions regarding their sacred temple and worship of Diana. As they began shouting her greatness, the chant caught on and kept going for a couple of hours.

Apparently the only man the crowd respected, the city clerk, was able to get them to listen. He gave them a stern warning that the whole city was very close to provoking a police action from the Roman soldiers stationed near the city. Not one person there could have justified all this noise and violence. There were plenty of valid ways to handle any complaints without that. He noted that the accused men hadn’t actually done anything illegal. So the clerk rebuked Demetrius and his pals and dismissed the crowd. The threat to the gospel was significantly weakened that day.

From here on out, the church in Ephesus began to rise as the primary hub for Christians and their faith, and the center of a vast mission outreach. A few decades later, it become one of the few safe refuge cities for those of Jesus’ faith among His extended family who fled Palestine, including His cousin John and probably His mother.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on NT Doctrine — Acts 19