Oklahoma State Fair: A Total Waste

Update: Here we are three years later and things are even worse. In particular, the prices are much higher than when I first wrote this. Our state fair is still a rip-off and still run by the most corrupt criminal thugs the state could offer.

Original post:

I live in Oklahoma because God tells me to stay here, not because it’s such a wonderful place to live. Consider as an example our State Fair, which is currently running 10 days only at the Fairgrounds nestled into the northeast corner of the junction between Interstates 40 and 44.

There was a time it was worth going. It ran two or three weeks. The entrance ticket was just a couple of dollars, the food and drink were decent, and the exhibits were consistent with a state dominated by agriculture and smaller manufacturing. A gratifying collection of local youth exhibits of all types could be found. We had plenty of international exhibits, too.

Those days are gone. Please note: The price rise is far, far above inflation. It’s almost $10 per head to enter. The food costs are now outrageous. Of course, that’s because the vendors pay such huge fees just to get a place, they have to triple the price of what they offer. Anyone for a 24 ounce soft drink? $8. Yes, the food is about triple what the same vendor charges outside the Fair. I have met several vendors, and they do not gouge just because it’s a captive audience; it costs them that much just to be there.

Many of the old favorite features are gone. For example, there was a beautiful historic home there once, but the management decided they couldn’t afford to keep it open, so they sold the building to some small time building mover. It now sits partially dismantled on the mover’s lot, where it has been for quite some time, but no one can afford it. The monorail ride was shut down long ago, and dismantled. Most of the permanent infrastructure is crumbling, and things like the space needle are closed. The raceway is closed, which once featured some fun and unusual events during the Fair.

The midway consists of the cheapest creaking mobile carnival rides, staffed by people you would not want to meet. I know these people because I once drove a cab in this city, and had to transport a bunch of them. I had to fumigate the car after they got out. The same class of folks still work the Fair carnival venues. On the other hand, they complain of horrific treatment by the full-time staff, and I’ve seen it myself.

Therein lies the problem. This is a bloated, overpaid staff, and it gets worse as you go up the ladder. I recall reading a tiny article in some obscure newspaper about graft and corruption, about state and city tax money invested which seems to have bought nothing much. I remember brief snatches of reports on local news radio about investigations, but obviously they know how and whom to bribe, because I don’t recall hearing about the results of those investigations. I’m really not in a position to follow up on such things, but these are not mere rumors. The pricing structure alone should indicate the very best we can say is the management is criminally incompetent.

Don’t bother with the State Fair of Oklahoma. It’s one of the most embarrassing rip-offs in this state.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , | Comments Off on Oklahoma State Fair: A Total Waste

That Green-Eyed Monster Stalks Me

I confess: I am suffering a serious case of envy. It’s almost like lust.

Among the clients I see in my computer ministry was a fellow with a nice Inspiron 1525 laptop — 2.0 Ghz dual core CPU, 3GB RAM, fast Intel graphics, and so forth. It’s almost as powerful as my desktop. He was griping about it not being fast enough, but that was because of spyware and a very junky anti-virus package. Having been ripped off at Best Buy, he tried to get someone else to reinstall the bundled Vista, but that didn’t go well. So he brought it to me and I got the installation cleaned up, found all the missing drivers, etc. Normal stuff I do every week.

Over the next few days I took calls from him and another visit to add a few features and explain things he didn’t understand well. He never understood, for example, the hibernate function on laptops. He’s probably doing okay right now, but I expect a few more calls in the coming weeks as I warned him I can’t make any computer meet his expectations; he has to learn what to expect from computers. And he still complains he’s not happy with it, and may be getting rid of it soon.

I told most firmly I wanted a shot at it if he didn’t keep it. I may not be able to meet his price, but boy would I like to try.

Update: Sometime after I first wrote this the man offered to trade for something I had, and didn’t know he wanted. That worked out well.

Posted in personal | Tagged , | Comments Off on That Green-Eyed Monster Stalks Me

Poverty of Morality

Jesus clarified the meaning of the Law of Moses. In the process He clarified the underlying meaning of all God’s Laws under all Law Covenants. This He did in the process of showing how the leaders and teachers of His nation were utterly wrong in embracing Aristotle and Hellenism. Modern Judaism is simply more of the same sin, so don’t expect devout Jews to help you understand God’s justice, since they have no clue.

Nor can you ask anyone representing the popular philosophical strains dominating the discussion in the West. For example, Progressives are all about helping the common man, but are quite willing to rob every one else to do so. They alone know what is best, and become hostile with even the slightest protest to their plans. They are the most hateful and oppressive groups on the earth. Almost as hateful are Conservatives, though libertarians are a faint bit better. However, where those two converge is the insistence anyone in poverty must have done something stupid to get there. Thus, they have no responsibility to help the poor. They believe the one best thing they can do for the poor is get themselves richer, because their favorite lie is “rising prosperity, like water, causes all boats to rise.” It’s been proven utterly false, but they keep saying it.

Sometimes God is the one who brings poverty. His sovereign will is typically incomprehensible, so don’t assume someone poor made bad choices. He does it to His children and His enemies, and it will never make sense to us on a human level.

Jesus had it right. First, don’t talk about fixing any socio-economic issues until you restore society to the biblical pattern. If you can’t live with your blood kin, live with your spiritual kin. Not just gather once in a while, but reside together like a clan. You must build that extended family society to reduce the imbalances which make the world an ugly place. You can’t keep Babylon at bay if you keep following Babylon’s social planning — which is precisely what Classical Liberalism (American Conservatism) is. Without that extended family dependency and social structure, you can’t fix a single issue, and you can’t have God’s justice.

Once you have that, then you can understand what Jesus said about poverty. He said there will always be imbalances because mankind is fallen. That means even when you do economics right, it’s not possible for everyone to make it big. Some folks simply find themselves outside the family support system, for any number of reasons. But under God’s Laws, you were to assume nothing, only that you were responsible for doing something. If you have material to contribute, you give alms, as it were. If not, give what you have. Look up Peter and John and their helping of the lame man at the entrance of the Temple. But you are always prepared to give something.

It’s none of your business what strangers do with the coins you drop in their tin cup; God says that’s His business. You prepare yourself to give. Set it aside as a portion of what you carry into the wider public world. Give when the opportunity comes. You aren’t looking at effectiveness; you are looking at obedience to a divine command. Indeed, you don’t have to interact with the recipient at all, because they are simply the agent. As far as you are concerned, the money went to God, because that’s how He sees it. Again, without the family bond, any attempt at significant involvement in their needs is usually sin.

In general, avoid mixing charity with direct outreach. Don’t use benevolence as a trap to capture someone’s time for your holy sales pitch. Find some other way to express the love of God; He will create proper opportunities. If they want to become family, and you sense God’s peace in it, get involved. If not, do what God’s peace does allow. If they seek to become family, seek to lighten their misery, but make righteous demands on them to contribute what they can in return. That’s the way it works. It is absolutely evil to have any significant involvement without those family ties. Family always comes first, but you had better be ready to give outside the family bonds.

Property is not sacred, not a God given right. Nor is your stuff community property unless you have that extended family social structure, where everyone is responsible to everyone else in a bond of commitment. All of it belongs to God. It is a tool for His glory, and stuff comes and goes, almost randomly, as His servants seek a clear conscience.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Poverty of Morality

Fake America

Whatever we once were, and certainly regardless of what we say we are, we are fake. Not just slyly fake, but in the most outlandish, over-the-top, blatant satire of ourselves. All the world can see it, but we are blind to it. As long as we do nothing to stop our rulers making fools of us, we are fools by choice.

Universal outrage has been drummed up over the case of an Iranian woman about to be stoned to death for adultery. She’s also implicated in the murder of her husband, for which she may be hanged. This second, more serious crime has been left out of many news stories. America also executes, but it doesn’t stone, especially for a bit of ticklish fun on the side. We inject, electrocute, gas, hang and shoot our condemned. We’re more humane that way. Forever bureaucratic, we pay attention to procedural niceties.

Our objection, then, is not to capital punishment, but to certain methods. Stoning is barbaric. We don’t stone, period, except during one of our serial wars, where we will stone entire communities back to the Stone Age. But that’s war, buddy. We also use phosphorous and cluster bombs, plant landmines that will last generations. To rectify and avenge the stoning of one woman, someone we don’t really care about, whose name we can’t even pronounce, we’ll flatten Iran, maybe by Thanksgiving.

The United States is concerned about women worldwide. It is touched and outraged by one Afghan woman, Aisha, whose nose was sliced off by her Taliban husband. To defend her honor, it has killed hundreds of thousands of her brothers and sisters. To protect her, it has destroyed her country. It’s the principle that matters. We care about the individual, at least those who are useful to our agendas. It’s the masses we don’t give a flying whoopee about. How can we not raise our voices, for example, when an imprisoned prostitute – hardly a criminal, really, even less so than adulterer – is left in a cage, to be baked to death for at least four hours in 107-degree heat? Her captors ignored her pleas for water. They wouldn’t even allow her to use the bathroom, so she soiled herself before passing out. She was still alive, however, when finally taken to the hospital, where doctors allowed her to die. Incredibly, no charges have been filed. Such barbarity and judicial callousness deserve our fullest condemnations, except that hardly anyone has heard of Marcia Powell, 48, who died in an Arizona prison in May of 2009. The mainstream media ignore her, because her abject death cannot be exploited for political purposes. We’re not trying to bomb Arizona.

Granted, as one comment on the linked article says, we don’t own the system, and any attempt to change it makes us a targeted enemy. We aren’t responsible for the system in that sense, but if we acquiesce and make no effort to protest, if we take no risks because we fear the system coming after us, we are then supporters of it. We make no meaningful protest as citizens.

There is no goodness left in this country as nations go.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fake America

The Non-Manifesto

AKA: Christian Mystics Manifesto

We are in rebellion, but we aren’t doing anything. Our rebellion is against this whole plane of existence, so considerations of doing and being are missing the point. We aren’t taking over anything; we don’t even pretend to take our own lives back from anyone or anything. This life is a prison, and whomever or whatever is welcome to it.

The only real manifesto we could offer is the way we face our existence on this plane. Each of us in our individual choices and actions, whether there be any perception of success or failure by any measure on this plane, is a manifesto. The labels are offered back to those who use them. We didn’t create them, only use them. The only reason anyone bothers to compose a manifesto in words is to make sure readers know we aren’t anything they expect.

If you have to ask, there is little we can do to help you. But it’s our nature to assay the impossible.

Nothing we have and nothing we do really matters in itself. That is, unless we catch ourselves turning away from our fundamental commitments. Those commitments are what we are, so to speak. We are committed to something which has no words, but we find some glimmer of useful meaning in words to point to those wordless commitments: peace, love, understanding, truth, empathy, welcome… But in actuality, nothing with a name is worth saving, simply because anything for which those names actually fit properly is not a thing of value to us.

We don’t care about this world. It’s just a place to which we are bound for a period we don’t determine, and we are eager to leave. Life is not precious, as commonly defined. It may be valuable to a lot of those who are in it, but not to us. We belong to another Life of another kind, and on another plane. That other Life is our agenda.

Thus, our manifesto is simply raising awareness of it. To do that, we end up rejecting just about everything everyone else holds dear. We are utterly certain this world can’t be fixed. We know there is a good way to pass through it, but humanity has spent their whole time on this plane trying to avoid that way. They have sought every way under the sun to replace it with something else, things absolutely guaranteed to fail every time. We point that out when we can.

Thus, we give allegiance to something which no earthly authority accepts. In return, we reject all earthly authority, in the sense we take none of them seriously. Going to take my stuff, confine me, cause me pain, take my life? I tremble not. Those things are surely in the power of earthly authority, but they just do not matter. There is something inside which cannot be touched by any earthly power, yet it can overturn the whole world when that serves the higher purpose for which we live.

We have no particular plans, just urges we cannot name, and which we will obey at any cost. While it is vaguely possible we might by necessity run over some folks and their little empires, it’s unlikely for the most part we’ll do anything to harm anyone. Then again, there is the question of measuring harm, and we reject standard definitions, even as we are thoroughly aware of them. We don’t care about what you care about, unless you are one of us. We can’t make you one of us, but we welcome you if you turn that way. It’s what we hope for, but we aren’t foolish enough to confuse cause and result. We can’t touch the cause of turning, only rejoice when we see it.

So we aren’t being anything, aren’t doing anything, but we refuse to conform. We are playing along with something you won’t ever understand until you find yourself in it.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

I Still Read Books

Among my computer literate associates, there seems an almost invisible line right around age 30 or so. Those below that line who are serious netizens don’t read books that much. Those older typically do.

Right now I’m starting what amounts to a re-read of some Oklahoma History. The textbook we used in teachers’ college was the latest edition then, but I stumbled across a much earlier version from the 1960s. Frankly, our slightly fatter later edition was less readable. Apparently what I found in a thrift store last week was the first edition: Oklahoma: A History of Five Centuries by Arrell M. Gibson, a professor at University of Oklahoma, where it was published (Harlow Publishing).

I was also reading Bamford’s Body of Secrets, finding that at the Friends of the Library book sale. Right about half-way through it got a little too intense for me, but I’ll get back to it probably next week.

I confess I’m a little harder to please these days. I once went through a period of about two decades devouring anything which claimed to be science fiction, plus a lot of fantasy. It started with Ray Bradbury novels. One day, I simply lost interest. Over the years I’ve plowed through several different genre. Upon starting my work toward a teaching certificate, I became a fan of social science books. I still love good history, and even still enjoy some economics, but frankly I prefer what is called social history, a sort of everyday life in some time and place.

Once I got online, I read far fewer books. It took a lot of my time just to figure out what being online meant, and what was my place there. But that thrill is gone, as they say, and books are calling me again. Even while I was digging into the Internet, most of my books were not for entertainment, but seeking information. Lots of computer books took my money, and I still have quite a few. But that’s not the sort of thing one simply reads, but uses for reference. Once I retired, I started reading more books for pleasure.

Lately publishers are simply pumping out the pulpy trash. The system for putting both fiction and non-fiction on the shelves of most stores is tightly closed. I haven’t seen much at all, even in places like Borders or Barnes and Noble, which I would buy if I could afford whatever I wanted. Most modern fiction from the big publishers is lifeless junk. I wouldn’t trade a dead rat’s patootie for what the reviewers call a good novel these days, since the reviewers are also owned by the same system. You hear about only because some thinks it will make a buck. Most of what I find nowadays worth buying is the stuff nobody publishes any more.

Still, I’m always keeping my eye out for good stuff hidden in the piles of tomes justly discarded because they weren’t worth the paper on which they were printed. The real treasures will never make into any electronic format, either. So I am slowly building a library of solid reading. Yep, some of us still think books matter.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on I Still Read Books

Facebook: Virtualizing the Soul

As we watch the death throes of Western Civilization, certain symptoms manifest prominently. As the electronic mesh expands and thickens, with fatter pipes and richer content, so does the shallowness of each connection within the mesh. We can surely speed up our ability to process incoming data, but it comes at the necessary expense of meaning. We know more, yet understand less.

The human faculties are not unlimited. Our current approach to things will not fulfill the dreams of opening the floodgates of untapped potential. Growing integration between us and our electronic devices is the path of nightmare, making us less human. We are not designed for that. Our highest potential lies in another direction.

The optimal connection between humans is not wiring transmitting bits and bytes, even if that produces voice and video on each end. If there is no strong human bond underlying that wired connection, it will all be noise and distraction. Sadly, even in meatspace our connections are often little more. Were we honest, most of us cannot claim our social connections as much more than mere acquaintance, regardless whether we call them “friends.” Can you really trust that person? Will they really stand with you and share the costs of suffering when things go bad for you? In this, the electronic linkage is merely the newest layer of insulation which has been building for several decades between people.

But it’s all so enticing and entertaining! It tickles our receptors and keeps us loaded with stimulation, all while it cripples our ability to produce anything but more of the same. Rather than tapping untapped potential, it is shriveling the neural pathways to what we once had, and are surely losing. The online world is loaded with such opportunities to fritter away time and our humanity. Today I’m going to pick on Facebook, but it’s easy to generalize to other services, and the broader Internet as popularly experienced.

Similar to just about every other corporate giant touching us every day via the Internet, Facebook is primarily a marketing tool. It seems half the entire Internet population has at least one account, easily the largest single advertising audience in existence. At Facebook, the product is you and all the other users, delivered to the advertisers, who are the real clients. Were it not for that marketing income, it would still be a college boy’s hobby.

It’s so easy to forget all that in the rush to join our online friends. We can’t wait for the next item of inane chatter, the next candid photo, funny video and all those silly games. It cheapens friendship, as this is what passes for friendship in the current generation. It’s not to say previous generations did not have their own pervasive inanities, shallow connections and empty lives, but Facebook requires it. I’ve had an account there, and found it nearly impossible to make it serve a higher purpose. I made new acquaintances, and stumbled across some old ones, but by no means did it enhance the depth of communication I prefer with my real friends.

This is not entirely the fault of the Internet itself, since some of my closest and strongest friendships were formed over the wires with people I’ve never met. But those friendships were formed in the same fashion as if we had met face to face, with the same sort of depth and devotion to spending time together. The difference was we didn’t often have to invest that time simultaneously. Yet those without such inclinations in the first place will seldom gain them if the Internet is where they start. Facebook aggravates this problem dramatically.

Facebook is suited only to maintaining mere acquaintance. The design militates against genuine depth because that would detract from the advertising. Most people tune it out. With tricks and technology improving our abilities to that end, the developers behind Facebook will up the ante. At the same time they find new subtle ways to draw your eyes to the advertising, they are also eroding your privacy. Your market profile is the most valuable commodity produced by Facebook. So far, they’ve been cautious about the ads, but practice profligate promiscuity with your personal data. They cooperate eagerly with ever more sinister ways to reduce each member to statistics and habits marketers love. It is critical to their profits to prevent you actually spending time with people, making you more materialistic, shallow and easily distracted.

It should surprise no one when policy changes reflect a heartless and inhumane disregard for actual user needs. Not just cavalier, though plenty of that, but intentionally excluding those least likely to be suckered into buying more useless junk. Recently Facebook instituted the requirement to verify a new account by sending a text message from your cell phone. People who have such equipment and services are more likely to waste time and money, more likely to divulge private details they should not. People who don’t have text messaging, or lack a cell phone completely, are too poor, too tight, not silly enough to fit the favored user profile at Facebook. So if you are elderly and sensible, or simply too poor, you aren’t welcome at Facebook.

Any attempt to complain falls on deaf ears. This is by design. It takes a tsunami of public shaming before the management notices. If people should start closing their accounts, all that lovely extravagant compensation goes away. Oh, the horror!

There is little I can do to help those with virtualized souls to change their ways, but for those with a taste for real friendships, let me encourage you to close your account and find some better way to reach those who actually care about you. In just a few days, we’ll see the launching of Diaspora, which claims to be a much saner version of Facebook. I plan to give it a try, myself.

Posted in computers, social sciences | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Facebook Hates Elderly and Poor

In the on-going saga of Facebook foul-ups, they now have decided anyone opening a new account must give their cellphone number and text message the confirmation.

Most elderly do not have cellphones, and the few who do aren’t into texting. The poor are likely to have no cellphone. Whose brilliant idea was this?

I realize they are under no obligation to reach out to anyone. But this sort of ugliness does not match the rhetoric of their sales pitch. The problem is most Facebook users don’t give a rat’s patootie, either. The whole thing is simply a giant snarky club.

I feel an article coming on….

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

False Flag Plans for US (Updated)

Update: The article I reference here turns out to be a forgery. If you click the link you’ll find that out.

I would like to recommend yet another article: Israel vs the United States and Iran by Dr. Phillip L. Kushner. I want you to note this man is very much anti-Islam, so it’s rather odd he openly admits Israel is wholly likely to pull yet another false flag operation against the US to make an enemy look bad, Iran this time.

The most current plan would be for a known militant Arab anti-Israel group, Hezbollah, to actually deliver an atomic device to the city of New York, or, alternatively, to Washington.

The American Central Intelligence Agency, now seeking to reshape its negative image, would report to the Federal Bureau of Investigation the exact details of the arrival and placement of the bomb.

The actual bomb would be genuine but would have a part that was malfunctioning, thus rendering the weapon impossible to detonate. The Arabs involved in this delivery would have in their number, a Yemeni Jew, such as the ones that instigated the 9/11 Saudi attacks, and this sleeper would carry numerous forged documents “proving” that Tehran was directly behind this planned attack.

Revelation of these documents by the fully-supportive New York Times and Washington Post would immediately swing a significant bulk of the American public behind an immediate attack on Tehran with the purpose of neutralizing its atomic weapons capacity.

This program is now on the table and undercover Israeli agents, posing as top-level Iranian operatives, have located a small group of Hizbollah in Lebanon who would be willing to deliver and prepare this device in New York or, as an alternative, Washington itself. Israeli intelligence feels that the use of Hizbollah personnel would entirely justify their obliterating Hizbollah-controlled territory in southern Lebanon that now house many thousands of long-range surface to surface missiles that could easily reach Tel Aviv and other vital Israeli targets.

He believes it will happen in December this year, which is pretty close to another estimate for November. I don’t buy everything Kushner says, but at least he seems honest in reporting what he believes. If my readers know of any supporting links, I’d love to see them in the comments.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on False Flag Plans for US (Updated)

Defense Against Psychopathic Government

Government as an institution invites psychopaths. The very nature of what makes someone a psychopath is what makes them so effective in government. That is, so long as government means a centralized authority. The one single best defense against psychopathic government is decentralizing. The one and only proper way to build strong decentralization is allowing the natural tribal tendencies of humans to develop, to get people to build up a loyalty to their own clan above all other loyalties.

This reverses the other natural tendency to follow strong leaders. That is, if your cultural assumptions are decentralized and your highest loyalty is always your closest blood kin, with ever weakening ties as the circle grows larger, you can prevent tyranny and bloodlust from getting out of hand. That the household-clan-tribe-nation social structure is assumed by the Laws of God simply makes good sense of this.

I want to encourage you in the strongest terms to set aside the time to read this long article. It will help to explain for you how psychopaths gain such control that we could have the likes of Nazi Germany. It will also explain how the Zionist Christian Party in the US is simply a restoration of the SS, and how Zionism is the new Nazi Party. The article is so good I’m going to keep for my archives a plain text copy.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Defense Against Psychopathic Government