Cultivating Our Own Demise

We are killing ourselves. In a thousand different ways, we Americans steadfastly ignore the wisdom of the ages in our headlong rush to increase suffering and destroy what little we had that would have worked. We have so many pharmaceuticals in our water and food supply, most of which we know nothing about long term affects, we insist on acting as if wealth grows out of computers, that money is whatever we want it to be, that human need translates to imperative while we ignore the God who made it all… There’s not much we haven’t done wrong.

Worse, we have carried this same toxic environment to other nations. There is hardly any political entity on earth which has not suffered our attempts to meddle. Part of our massive deficit spending has been funneled through the CIA and other clandestine services, never mind massive military expenditures, wasting our own resources and laying waste to others. Having served in the military, I can not imagine a more wasteful bureaucratic morass. There is a semblance of efficiency in things which matter not at all, while we pay a premium price for junk which no for-profit company would ever accept. We would save money if we simply carpeted all the dry land surface of the world in $50 bills.

Our national hubris knows no bounds. Today we are funding a fake revolution in Iran because the current government won’t kiss our national posterior. Meanwhile we can’t keep our own lips off that of Israel. We dare to lecture China about “human rights” while we have attempted to drain their national output into our pockets. This, because they dared to rid themselves of pestiferous wealthy gadflies some 60 years ago. They decided whatever it was we were promoting, it couldn’t be better than some of the alternatives. Today the citizens of the People’s Republic of China are more free than we are, and their future prospects look far better. Talk all you want about their loosening market controls — as if we had much to do with it — but the more important point is we were messed up long before most Americans living now were born. At their worst, they have been more humane than even our child welfare bureaucracies. Their culture regarding humanity is closer to the Bible than we have ever been in the last century.

What makes it really sad? As we go marching off to Hell, the Left and Right will both affirm they are leading us to Heaven. The only difference between them is which hat we wear as the flames rise to consume us.

Neither capitalism nor communism, nor fascism nor libertarianism, nor any other -ism can reflect the Word of God. They are all man-centered abstractions of materialism and sin. When you stop caring so much about material goods, you suddenly realize you are at war with no one on earth, but they are at war with you. Yet they cannot possibly do much to harm you. Sure, they can take your stuff, and take your life, but you can defend those only at the price of poking your finger in God’s eye. This life is short and miserable already. The only thing you can hope to gain and take with you when you leave it is God’s favor. The nation which was once the USA does not have that favor.

So in the coming months — maybe tomorrow — we will pass some invisible tipping point. That tipping will be the value of the dollar against other currencies, by which we currently suck up the resources of other nations cheaply. At that point, it won’t matter how many digits in a computer the Fed spins over, or how much expensive green ink on expensive paper the Treasury prints off; it won’t be worth anything. A boatload won’t buy a basket of fruit from Indonesia. At that point, only what we produce for ourselves will be available to meet our human needs. As you might know, there really isn’t much of that going on right here in the USA, so there will be some friction as we transition our collective habits to spending our time making our own bread, clothing, shoes, and shelter. It will be very painful at first. We have indulged ourselves in so very many frivolous habits and time-wasters, and those habits will die hard. Your teenage son will stare at you with utter incomprehension when you tell him there will be no more cellphones and Internet games, and your daughter will throw a hissy fit when you explain she has to help weed that pitiful little garden in the back yard of she won’t get to eat.

Meanwhile, when the paychecks for police and fire services stop buying food and paying rent, you’ll have to keep an eye out for the predatory gangs, which many of those former public servants may be joining. Maybe you have a community capable of figuring this all out quickly enough to maintain some semblance of peace and order while everyone struggles to survive. Maybe your local situation will decline gracefully. By then it will probably be hard for any of us reading this today to discuss it with each other, since anything can happen to electricity providers and networking carriers. No one of us can guess what will happen, but I honestly believe the change will be sudden, very large, and far too many won’t be ready in any sense of the word.

Too much depends on things not in our hands, you and I. If we cling to these things, life will be dreary and ugly. If there are things for us too much more important, that we simply take it all in stride as background noise to the real issues of life, then it will hardly affect us. Back when we allowed the ruling elite to tell us gaining stuff mattered, and we bought into it, we sold our souls for a bowl of bean stew. Call America “Esau.”

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Cultivating Our Own Demise

Console Only: Unable to Serve

It was a washout.

While I had no trouble doing it for myself, there were lots of problems when it came to serving others. There are too many things I do for other folks which require having OpenOffice.org, multimedia capabilities, printing, etc. So while I’m quite comfortable with the console for my own use, my Kingdom service requires I keep the rest of that stuff on hand.

Having already experienced the sorrows of Lenny’s desktop offerings, I decided to risk trying CentOS again. Maybe the ifconfig got fixed. Either way, I’m running the KDE desktop. It’s tolerable.

Posted in computers | Tagged , | Comments Off on Console Only: Unable to Serve

Debian Lenny Sans-X

No two users are a like. Each of us has our own ways and reasons for them. By no means do I pretend here to offer a complete review, since I am neither competent nor interested in that sort of use. This is simply my experience in preparing my laptop for console-only use.

This is something I’ve attempted before, but I was unwilling to change my use pattern to match the requirements. This time, I’ve jettisoned activities, conforming my use to the new reality. For example, I had to cut loose my almost unused Yahoo account. Their webmail interface no longer offers a plain text mode. After a few minutes with Elinks, the site kicks me out with a mysterious 999 error code. I can’t even complain to Yahoo, because it requires JScript not implemented in any text-mode browser which I have tried.

During the installation, I made sure to uncheck the “Desktop” option on tasklist. I kept the laptop and base system. One of the first things I did after installation was complete was to set the console resolution in the menu.lst for Grub. Under “defoptions” I added vga=834, which yields the 1440×1050 resolution native to my Inspiron 4100. I also reconfigured the console-setup to use Terminus fonts.

I took the regular lynx-cure and links2 packages as is. However, I wanted the latest Elinks without features I don’t use, such as scripting, but added in the Spidermonkey library. Then I compiled Alpine 2.0 from source because I’m too lazy to keep track of the five account passwords I have to use. That was configured this way:

./configure --with-local-password-cache-method --with-passfile=.alpinepwd

For most editing I use Joe, and I’ve instructed Alpine to make that the default editor.

I haven’t had time to mess with sound, nor the wifi setup, but the latter is covered here in an earlier post. I’m not much on multimedia, but I will be learning to burn CDs on the console. It’s rare I do anything needing a printer, so I won’t miss OpenOffice much. All my docs are either plaint text or simple HTML. I haven’t done a spreadsheet in years, and have never done the other stuff calling for the other OO.org modules.

For the most part, I simply log into two or three TTYs and keep root logged into at least one, where I control the suspend modes. I installed the uswsusp package because s2ram and s2disk have worked better on this machine than pm-utils.

As noted previously, there’s a lot of stuff on the Net I simply don’t deal with any more. Videos never were a big thing with me, and I don’t usually care for the heavy graphics on most sites, particularly those offering news. I’m currently seeking to put together a list of console-friendly sites for the sort of reading and research I do. Google works well with Elinks until you visit their news page. It has tons of CSS and JScript which causes Elinks to display ghost text and other artifacts all over the page.

I can’t begin to think of a way I could use CUPS from the console even if I did want to print. I realize I would have to learn a lot about Enscript, probably, or something like LaTeX, groff, or some other high-learning-curve formatting language just to begin printing from the console. We no longer have anything like a charater-based printer driver set. Aside from a few ancient commercial packages, we have never had a console word processor in Linux.

Feel free to comment on your favorite console related stuff, but don’t expect me to show any enthusiasm for stuff I don’t do on a computer. I’m very interested in a discussion of console-friendly websites.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Debian Lenny Sans-X

Now Non-GUI

I’m trying to type this from my now console-only Lenny install. I’ve already discovered there are some places on the Net, and some functions on some websites, are inaccessible completely. Anything requiring lots of Javascript to function is simply not an option any more. I certainly can’t keep using anything from Yahoo, for example. They have become increasingly hostile to geeks, and I suppose they block the blind users of plaintext software, as well.

It won’t matter to me. I’m losing interest in the Web as most people experience it. There is simply too much other stuff in my life which matters a lot more. Insofar as the original geeknet still exists, I’ll rediscover so much of it as meets my needs. Otherwise, it can roll on without me.

Posted in computers | Comments Off on Now Non-GUI

Another Possible Death-of-the-Net Scenario

So we have this story about plans by the US government and some allies to attack some certain sources of cyberspace troubles. If I understand correctly, the idea is to use various methods to implant what amounts to spyware on sources of trouble, and decide from the data gathered what is the best way to respond to such attacks. The article seems to suggest the governments would sponsor doing things to cause the computers used for these attacks to be blocked, to shut down, even to cracking the computer and destroying the operating system.

The first thing which comes to my mind is wondering at the technical competence of the folks in these government agencies. Some of them are really sharp, but they aren’t usually in charge of the decisions. It seems the people who really understand how this all works have very little input on policy. This stuff gets really complicated really fast, and we have people in Congress who think of the Internet as “tubes” — they lack not only the vocabulary, but don’t even comprehend what they see on their home computer screens, much less how it got displayed there. I can’t count how often I’ve had service clients complain about things not working properly, and having no place in their brains for the possibility it’s something on the other end. Telling them, for example, Microsoft refuses to fix the security certificates problem with Outlook 2007 does not help them get used to the pop-up message “warning” them about their ISP’s mail servers. There is a whole raft of things going on in the background with Internet communications we seldom see. If our own Congress is run by people who don’t understand these things, I’m not sure I want anyone in government fiddling with it.

The more obvious threat is a political agenda, hidden or not, which would find these efforts eventually turned against users who don’t really harm anything. Let’s face it, the folks who get their hands on the reins of power are seldom folks like you and I. They don’t value what we value, or they would not be there. Decent people don’t seek to gain power over others. A willingness to take jump on the campaign trail, with all it encompasses — or the willingness to submit to the process for gaining employment in the federal bureaucracy — requires a personality morally unfit to exercise the powers of the office they seek. Such people get to decide what you should be allowed to read, or write and post, on the Net. I feel certain it’s not too many steps from there to deciding what you get to install and run on your computer. Not just the selection of software, but the operating system itself. It might seem like a long leap between blocking evil crackers in foreign countries and oppressing you and I, but I note the PATRIOT Act has not been used once on a single terrorist, but has been used repeatedly against fairly ordinary people doing things which made politicians and bureaucrats unhappy, but was otherwise not even illegal.

To bring it back down to a more personal level, in the long run I expect to lose much of my current use of the Internet. There are already a raft of reasons for that without the government applying meat-space thinking to cyberspace. There are no borders on those wires, and trying to apply them will only break things. I’m sure there are better ways to block troublemakers using DNS. For example, the government already has the authority to order the “backbone” providers of the Internet to firewall certain troublesome folks via IP addresses. I’m sure I don’t understand how that works, but people who do have described it as easily implemented and preferable to other suggestions coming out of Washington, DC. But I am cynical and skeptical about the future of the Net from where I sit.

It’s just a tool for me. For now I post here when I can get my wheezing old laptop running Ubuntu 8.04 to cooperate with the software which runs WordPress. I’m still just a few more incidents from chucking it all and restricting my use to the Linux console. When that happens, I won’t be able to post here any more. This blogware doesn’t work with any text browser I’ve tried. My other blog seems to work well enough with both Elinks and Lynx, and is more important to what I do. However, even that is just a way to publicize my ministry notes to a small group. Even as I type this, things are afoot which will engage my time more fully on the ground here, in meat-space. That said, if I should simply disappear from here and you really want to keep communications with me, try the more archaic methods suggested by this link.

Posted in computers | Comments Off on Another Possible Death-of-the-Net Scenario

Who Says We Can’t?

Inherent in the concept of “academic” is the idea we isolate things from the complexity of the real world so as to understand some element more fully. The assumption is we do this for as many parts of the reality matrix as possible so we can come back to the matrix better informed. In real practice, everyone gets really good at one particular part and assumes they have reality all worked out completely within their own little discipline. Turf wars follow. The biblical worldview assumes you start from the whole, and apply peculiar talents to the part you can grasp, but never assume you can play God. That is, you never assume your understanding of things is more than woefully limited. You know enough to act, but never measure things in terms of success, but in terms of faithfulness. The more mature and experienced are the first to admit they don’t have the world by the tail.

That sense of healthy self-doubt is missing from far too much of our world today. It seems worst in the cesspool of government bureaucracy. Those who are particularly free of any hint of self-doubt are steered into enforcement roles. It’s a paradox the people least morally qualified are the ones most likely to hold such positions. From personal experience in law enforcement, I can attest people with a conscience are driven out by the others, if only because it took them too long to leave on their own revulsion. Now, that would be fine if we all realized it and took it for granted. That falls under “know your enemy.” But no, we have to paint this glowing aura of holiness on government in general, and in particular over those who face the front line of enforcement. We have no room for recognizing there can be a hero for bad causes.

I’ve seen the underbelly of the beast and left because it was sickening. I came to that conclusion, not because I have read things like this, but because such writings merely echoed my own personal experience. I was being trained to attack everything in my own personal background. Monthly Review supports socialist and communist views avidly; I am aware of that. Capitalist writers support torture and wars of aggression, so it’s not a matter of whether I favor left or right, but condemn the whole mess. Both sides embrace different flavors of evil.

Rather than launching into another diatribe against police officers, let us cut to the chase. What we have today is fundamentally wrong all the way around. Carping about police abuses is a waste of time until we cease from the niggling academic discussion of what they should act like, and realize the whole thing is horribly broken. The reason we have high levels of complaints about abusive police behavior is more than just a reason to call for reform. It is a symptom of the utter failure of modern Western society itself. You can’t fix something which is badly designed, or poorly built, when it has an evil purpose from the start. According to the Bible, no one who isn’t related to you by blood or marriage should have any significant control over any part of your life. The very existence of strangers carrying guns and directing your compliance with written laws and policies is sin itself.

That so many cannot conceive of life without a police force simply indicates how successful Satan has been at shaping this world. Yes, much of Scripture assumes we can’t change political structures, even to the point of advising us not to try. No amount of learning can overcome the Fall, since the whole of the human being is damaged by it. The idea behind civilization was to ameliorate some of the effects, to provide a framework for keeping things together until God is finished with His Creation. He made clear through the writings of the Apostle John, called The Book of Revelation, He fully expected things to only get worse as time rolled. At the same time, He held forth a demand we increasingly withdraw from the broken structure of human society and adopt His original plan in defiance of those structures. The structures were laid out, but far too many are blinded by false assumptions going into the reading, so they can’t see what He meant to say.

We are meant to live tribally. We are supposed to stay together in the extended family household, living in whatever space we can negotiate to hold. While we do interact with the fallen world around us, we do not accept its mold, but follow our own. We are called to live a separate existence even in the middle of fallen society. All this business of dysfunctional families is Satan’s handiwork creating a system preventing that extended family lifestyle. But when we do it God’s way, there is no need for much government in the first place. Your government, your school, your social system, your entire world is your family. That’s what God intended from before the Fall.

Who says we can’t return to that? God demands it.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Who Says We Can’t?

Interwoven by Nature

Do you want God to help in some particular way? Seek the welfare of another. It’s not a simple matter of paying your dues, because God is hardly reducible to a slot machine. He’s keeping an eye on you, and if you take seriously His command to love your neighbor as yourself, He will meet your needs. It won’t much matter the mechanism He chooses; the principle is reliable whether you consider yourself born-again or not. That’s the Covenant of Noah. When you need something, give something. If you become a giver by reflex, your needs are met. Guaranteed — written on the rainbow.

Personal example: My wife needed to talk last night. It was spiritual stuff; she needed a sounding board to confirm what she was sensing. Her welfare is my welfare. It wasn’t a chore, because it was interesting to discuss. In the middle of that, the Lord inspired me with an answer to a query of my own. No one has to explain the dynamics to me. By putting myself aside, stopping what I was doing and giving her my full attention, I filled my own needs. It is not possible to separate my needs from hers in marriage; the union is organic in nature. When I embrace that, act on it, God supplies.

I have been puzzling over why I feel so burdened to go Downtown and spend time. I had wanted to do so this past Monday, but I something else arose. Besides, my bike was not quite suitable for long rides like that. I needed something to elevate the handlebars enough to take some pressure off my hands and arthritic shoulders. The part I ordered arrived yesterday — a couple of days earlier than promised — but I still wasn’t sure what I would do Downtown, aside from walking around and praying.

It’s part of the bigger question regarding the next ministry pursuit. I knew some time ago it was something about the urban setting, much to my dismay. I prefer the rural setting. Still, once I took my sign downtown, I was seized by a desire to be there as much as possible. For whom, I did not know; there was nothing concrete, and I find most modern ministry training about “target audience” is a corruption of the New Testament practices. When I received such training at college, it felt somehow wrong, even though it made sense intellectually. At that time I was unaware of the vast gulf between Western logic and biblical logic. At any rate, I had no idea how to filter out the possibilities, so I could not think of an obvious course of action to match.

Earlier in the day, I had realized a very significant part of what I have been doing is very much in the way of pastoral counseling. Indeed, it’s at least half of what I’ve done since the Lord called me to ministry at age 16. In case you haven’t been enlightened, this is not some glorified social work, because the divine version is more about sensing what God is up to in that person’s life, at least insofar as I can contribute. It’s mostly listening and asking useful questions, but it’s also a large degree of expressing confidence in God’s ability to answer anything and everything. Sometimes all they need is a little hope. Having walked through the Dark Valley of the Shadow of Death myself all too many times, I can affirm surrender is not an option. This sort of work became rather large in my mind during the day.

So I applied myself to my wife’s need for a listening ear. Then it hit me.

I’m going to letter another t-shirt. On the front, it will say, “Street Pastor.” Now, I realize that’s not a unique phrase. I am hardly of the sort to even appreciate the style of that young fellow using that title to promote his Gospel Hip Hop recordings. Nor would I care to ape the glorified social workers for which the Church of England uses it, where men and women do little more than escort home youngsters suffering from a night of partying in the pubs and clubs. There is nothing really wrong with their work itself, but I won’t be carrying water bottles and cheap shower shoes. Indeed, I may end up doing nothing but sitting around on public benches nodding at folks who smile — or snicker — about the message on the t-shirt. Still, I find it a safe assumption, based on past experience, God will selectively move folks by that label to consider the sorts of things they might discuss with a pastor. I’m quite certain a major element in doing any good is being there consistently. I’m guessing for now that would mean mostly catching folks at lunch or on break, so initial planning is to ride out from home to arrive mid-morning.

I won’t accomplish a thing without the loving and prayerful support of my beloved wife. Without carrying my share of the load, I can hardly justify that support. So it is in this world for all of us. There are plenty of people we should stay away from on very good grounds; we don’t need to raise any unnecessary barriers. God is watching. If we can’t reach out to another person with some expression of support and respect, we deserve none from God.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Interwoven by Nature

Economics: You Don’t Have to Understand It All

Economics, as a part of the Social Sciences, is an effort to explain how we got here. Data is pretty easy to get, but providing a comprehensive explanation of human nature requires interpretation. If your interpretation is flawed, you will inevitably ignore some data, maybe even hide it (consciously or subconsciously), to prevent your precious theory falling apart. The problem is, no one theory really accounts for everything. In the process of examining the record of mass human behavior, we find ourselves in the stream itself, and no one can ever really step out of it without losing the ability to comprehend the whole thing. We aren’t gods.

A tip of the hat to my friend, Robin, for alerting me to yet another strong analysis of how we got in this mess. You can read the original post by Charles Hugh Smith, and you might understand it. I agree with Robin’s critique in principle, but for myself, I detected a hint of his contention buried in Smith’s own analysis. That is, without reading everything else Smith has written, it seems he assumes fiat currency is a problem of its own, but does not squarely address it because he emphasizes something else.

And if you really wanted to dig into the banking moguls who lead the pack of greedy wealthy elites scraping off all the profit from the world’s peasantry, you could find all too many commentators willing to enlighten you. I don’t deny the term “Illuminati” could refer to something real and dangerous, but too many people have their own definition. The threat is real, but too many fools jabber endlessly about their private nightmares. Perhaps that is partly intentional to mask the facts, but you can easily get lost in trying to discern who is a propaganda plant, whether they know they are such, and how much fact is used to disguise blarney. It’s not a total waste of time, since the mainstream media is no better source of information than a million blathering idiots, but we don’t have enough time to sift everything. I’m pretty sure consensus is not possible, any more than it is in academia. Even PhDs can write some really stupid stuff. You’ll have to build your own filtering system and make what you can of it all.

It’s much easier to agree on what we can do about it. On the one hand, an awful lot of this is completely out of our hands. Indeed, I remain convinced the elite folk seeking to steer all this suffer, thankfully, from their own limited vision and leverage. The global intentions of past empires lasted a lot longer than anything we see today, and I doubt the brightest minds of today’s Illuminati see things any more clearly than Nebuchadnezzar, Alexander, or the Roman Senate. They have the advantage of far faster communication nowadays, but that would not exist were it not so open and out of their control as it now is. So while they can extend their manipulations farther and faster, they are paradoxically less absolute. The fine science of human manipulation inevitably grinds to a halt on things too easy to ignore in making grand plans. There will always be some who just won’t play along, the cranks who see just enough to prepare monkey wrenches to limit the power of the machinery to devour them. We can develop resistance because that is one thing which seems to change little over the course of human history.

Characterize it any way you wish, but the single greatest monkey wrench is your own brain. When you tend to question everything, to include maintaining a healthy dose of self-doubt, you won’t be herded so easily to your doom. The very existence of monkey wrenchers is the defeat of tyranny. They can never be fully eliminated, neither tyrants nor rebels. Indeed, glorious visions of liberty are always false. The American Revolution traded one slavery for another. Only briefly did anyone living in Colonial America hold real freedom, perhaps a single generation. While the tyrants of the world are afflicted with eternal lusting for a control they can never really gain, it is dangerous for us contrarians to ever believe in our own dreams fully. Rather, we have to realize the mere existence of thinking rebels is its own good. In this we agree with Jefferson about revolutions every twenty years — it’s the best we can hope for that tyrants are never allowed to fester long in control, but we should never expect them to simply go away. We can’t afford to take ourselves that seriously.

No, you don’t have to understand it all to be blessed with the assurance it’s not all a waste. Tension is both the bane and blessing of living in a fallen world. You want to end all tension? The grave is the only place you’ll see that.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Economics: You Don’t Have to Understand It All

Secret Sins of Government

During military service, I went through all the stupid security briefings, worked alongside a couple dozen military “spooks” and so forth. I asked rude questions to make sure I understood the philosophy, and didn’t care about the cute little scenarios you get from training documents. Here’s what it boils down to: We keep certain tactical information secret so our enemies are caught off guard, and don’t catch us off our guard.

Okay. So why do we mark “secret” stuff which we know the enemy already knows? It boils down to this: to cultivate paranoia. I realize suffering from paranoia doesn’t automatically mean they aren’t all out to get you, but paranoia is another name for a sinful denial of useful information to those who have a need. We end up with thousands of troops killing civilians because of stuff like that. Or maybe we end up with troops committing other heinous acts they would not willingly do if they fully understood what was going on. In other words, it all becomes an excuse to fool men of conscience into violating their conscience, and — yes, I have to say it — exposing them to demonic activity they might otherwise avoid. We have enough of that already, thank you.

It’s called manipulation, tricking people into doing things they would rightly resist. No, sir, you do not know better than I. Nor does anyone else, from the President on down. You see, God Himself says so. Bluntly, plain as day: If we adhere to His Laws, it won’t matter what our enemies know about us, they cannot prevail in the long run. He will direct Nature itself to fight on our side. We don’t know much about it because we’ve never tried it. Demons don’t find it easy to show up where folks tend to observe God’s commands.

The corollary is simple: Because we refuse to do things God’s way, we have guaranteed in the long run our nation will fall. Nature itself will fight against us. Instead, we will pile up crime upon crime, offending God mightily, until He’s had enough. Not just that, but we will get more and more demonic powers active in every element of what our nation does, in particular in government. Does anyone not realize the way Congress responds more to dollars than voters’ expressed will? Demons run Congress. Does the President lie about what he intends to do? Does he lie about what it’s going to take to fix this country? Demons run the Executive Offices, too. Do we see the Supreme Court filled with idiots and making unjust rulings? Demons live in their law libraries, attach themselves to the judicial robes, live in the equipment, etc. Meanwhile the bureaucrats in every office are wading through demons.

It won’t matter how wise, good and faithful any man or woman may be. When they get into those demonic buildings and breathe in the atmosphere of Hell, their work will be damned. You think this is hyperbole or colorful speech, don’t you? It’s the literal truth. We have rejected God’s ways, so don’t be surprised when blood runs in the streets in places during the next few months. It’s so easy to think we have it all figured out with our social sciences, but we like to ignore what we can’t see with a TV camera. Fine, look for the bloodshed, riots, civil war, etc. Demons will be having a party.

Posted in religion | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Police: No Neutral Ground

You might think the writer and commenters at Pro Libertate blog start out with a hatred for any law enforcement. You’d be wrong; they only hate what it has become. In response to an interesting look at the sheepdog metaphor for police officers, this one comment from Jim O’Connor stands out:

So, how is it that we little people aren’t justifiably in fear of our lives with every police interaction we might have given:

1) there are almost no severe penalties for police when they maim or kill us

2) they are almost always armed with multiple life threatening weapons while making it difficult for us to be similarly armed

3) they often travel in gangs and always have access to backups via radio and dispatch services

4) we’re effectively legally prohibited from trying to do even the slightest thing to defend ourselves once they attack us

5) any other place you might try to get to is occupied by a similar gang who is all too willing to take up their “brother’s” grudge so you can’t get to a neutral place to surrender yourself for impartial evaluation without risk of unaccountable reprisals for things you may not have even done

As a former policeman myself, I find this an accurate appraisal. The particular item of interest is the last. Under the Law Covenants of the Old Testament, there was always a refuge, a neutral place where you could wait until your case is reviewed. The existence of such places assumes no one is perfect, and any policing agent may be mistaken. We have no such viewpoint in evidence in our nation these days. That business of “presumed innocent until proven guilty” is nothing but words.

So let’s state the obvious: This is sin. That is, our current situation is a rank offense against God. In His Laws, this justifies a certain amount of resistance. Second-guessing may be very messy, time consuming and expensive, but without it we have no claim to a just system. You wanna be a cop? It’s not just a job, but a sacred calling with a very high standard. Bear the full burden, or count yourself among the Children of Satan.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , | Comments Off on Police: No Neutral Ground