When you back off and see things from a wider perspective, very often the effect of certain actions is the key to intent.
This seemed to call for a second post today. One of the few justifications for a video is to quickly pass on information which arises from a live interview. It still lends itself to deception, but some sources are better than others. In general, I find RT is more likely to report honestly than just about any other major content provider. So I find myself in the unusual position of recommending a video interview with Ian Crane. In this case, he does a fine job of hitting the probable intent on several major news events by backing off far enough and gathering the critical details which most affect the broader outcome.
Related to his comments about the Osama bin Ladin adventure, you may want to take a look at this discussion of a live interview in Pakistan from an alleged eye witness. According to this fellow, only one chopper tried to land at the targeted compound, while two other choppers remained in the air nearby. The one which landed exploded when it tried to leave the area, scattering its parts and those of the passengers all over the inner courtyard. This fellow isn’t the only one to offer this story, and it is a far better fit with physical evidence observed during the light of day later that same morning after the raid. Ian Crane notes this serves to take attention off the fraudulent birth certificate.
Pay attention, not to what the MSM report, but to the broader effects of their reporting. Don’t always swallow the line taken by the alternative press, either. Crane could easily be wrong no several points, and admits it, but the asking of questions is what he emphasizes, not his own answers. This in itself gives him more credibility with me than a vast horde of other commentators and self-proclaimed insiders.
