Our Crazy Ancient New Religion 6

You will fail.

That is, lots of things you try won’t turn out as you expect. So the only wise course is to adjust your expectations. Turn failure into learning and learning into victory.

I’ve done what I could in this series to shake loose a bunch of crappy thinking about how religion is supposed to work. It is work, and it is mostly failure for a very long time because that’s how we get better at it. But the whole purpose is not success in those terms; redefine success as perception, not objective fact. It’s not a question of knowing the truth, but your truth. Yours and mine cannot be precisely the same, because God will not let it be that way. Yes, God Himself will see to it that “reality” is varied somewhat between His servants.

That’s why I’ve tried so hard to shake you loose from a view of reality that tries to make it all concrete. The danger in that approach is that concrete itself is alive and God can let you hear it talk if it’s part of His mission and calling in your life. Concrete ceases to be an image of something that never changes. So-called “concrete facts” are more fungible and variable than Western minds are prepared to accept. Stop asking the question of who is right about what they perceived and start asking the question of what is right for you.

Walk in the light you have.

Start where you are and pray that God will reveal where you should be. Don’t take yourself too seriously because it may require He put you through several different places to sojourn on the way to your earthly “home.” Your ideas and expectations are part of the scenery, subject to modification because it’s all a matter of path, not place. We are practicing for Heaven, and that means shedding a lot of junk that won’t get us there because it can’t exist there. A lot of that junk is the structure of processing perception.

There’s nothing wrong with keeping track of what folks around you think, of how they perceive the world. There’s nothing wrong with keeping one hand on that false “concrete reality” thing most people adhere to as they live their heartless existence. But don’t remain trapped there with them.

You cannot demand that reality be consistent across the entire spectrum of your life, much less consistent between two different people. This is why one of our catch-phrases is, “We are creating a new reality.” Reality, as most people think of it, is variable. Not wholesale, like with horror movies or drug-induced hallucinations, but variable in ways that allow plausible deniability of moral truth. Walking with Christ is wholly voluntary. If you don’t want it, God won’t force the issue in this life. Spiritual birth is wholly His choice and initiative, but walking here in this life according to the inheritance that comes with that spirituality is another matter. You are permitted to refuse moral truth on this earth regardless. However, you will never find anything else you imagine that you seek. It will keep slipping through your hands because those hands are continually reaching for shadows.

All the miracles and stuff you could see will remain out of reach until you step into the light of His glory in this moment. And you should fully expect that spotlight will move, not following you, but going where you should be at that point. What’s outside that spotlight is mostly irrelevant. All the noise and movement out there in the Shadowlands is not your concern. Don’t allow the Lust of the Eyes draw you off into mere entertainment and curiosity. Instead, exercise your curiosity in the moral demands of your life here and now.

Realize that somewhere down that as-yet unseen path, you’ll come to place when you can look back and discover what was consistent, what characterized your existence through all the various changes. You’ll begin to know who you are in that sense. Not who everyone says you are, or says you should be, but you’ll discover the person God says you should be. You know — the One who made you? Your “concrete reality” is His moral character, so stop looking at Creation for clues that your intellect can handle. Start looking for clues that only your heart can handle.

What will amaze you is the surprising level of moral consistency you’ll find in other believers on that path. When you stop seeking concrete consistency and seek moral consistency, you’ll find it. There are people in this world who will share this moral reality in ways you never expected. You’ll find heart-minds that “think” just like yours. You’ll find fellow believers who can agree with you on things that mere intellect cannot handle. You are most certainly not alone. Socially isolated at times, but never truly alone. If Creation itself can be a good friend and companion, you have to know that some of your fellow humans are also connected to Creation that same way. God will not allow the witness of His glory to be snuffed out in this world.

And you will discover a whole company of fellow-failures who have more victory than words can tell.

This entry was posted in teaching and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Our Crazy Ancient New Religion 6

  1. Pingback: Kiln blog: Our Crazy Ancient New Religion 6 | Do What's Right

  2. Mr. T. says:

    I think this is a useful way to look at things.

    It’s easy to get bogged down in all kinds of external forms and social standards that come with “organized religion”.

    Christianity has had a lot of different strands, doctrines and opinions over the last 2000 years, it appears. Same as it is now, of course. Not to say that those aren’t interesting and perhaps even useful ways of looking at things intellectually, but modelling “righteousness” and “morality” (Christian ethics) just based on scripture alone seems very difficult. You probably do truly need the Holy Spirit to make moral decisions and see sin for what it is. Building a moral “expert system” based on simple rules or some utilitarian calculus seems out of the question.

    Do you need to be able to explain your moral decisions or is it just too complex and spiritual? Can it be done? Is it useful if you insist on thinking and using your intellect for something?

    What framework to use? I was into stoic philosophy (and CBT which is more practical) before I found God and Christianity, and according to some people it has some similar lines of thinking.

    Which things should you leave to be taken care through prayer and spirituality and which are more useful to be looked at intellectually and using “practical/physical/scientific/empirical” methods?

    • pastor says:

      Do you need to be able to explain your moral decisions or is it just too complex and spiritual? Can it be done? Is it useful if you insist on thinking and using your intellect for something? You should be able to explain the moral focus of your choices, but not in every case. It comes with some practice in abstracting the Law Covenants from a moral plane of awareness. In that sense, anything that looks like a command from God, but particularly the Law of Moses, can be used to explain the moral reference. I believe we’ve given a lot examples here, and you should expect to see some more.

      What framework to use? While I prefer to use the one I learned from Hebrew cultural studies, that’s not within reach of everyone. So I share that with readers and hope they can find their own. Compare notes, but I’d be reluctant to work from any frame of reference rooted in Western history.

      Which things should you leave to be taken care through prayer and spirituality and which are more useful to be looked at intellectually and using “practical/physical/scientific/empirical” methods? I can tell you only how I sort through things. You’ll have to build your own. I suppose for you the biggest question is not “could you” but “where to start.” Really, just start where you are and build a moral frame of reference that works.

  3. Mr. T. says:

    I was recently watching the BBC TV series “Sex and the Church” that tries to show where some of the Western ideas and hang-ups regarding sex come from. As with everything else, opinions have varied a lot.

    Article: Christianity’s rocky relationship with sex – http://www.historyextra.com/article/sex-and-love/christianity%E2%80%99s-rocky-relationship-sex

  4. Mr. T. says:

    Does anyone happen to know any modern prophets with good track records?

    I haven’t checked him out thoroughly, but David Owuor looks like a contender (miracles and all): http://www.repentandpreparetheway.org/

    • pastor says:

      Does anyone happen to know any modern prophets with good track records? There are so very many to choose from. The only thing I can suggest is that you learn how to bounce a man’s testimony off your own convictions. Walk in the light you have; when thing go wrong, pull back and try to see the whole thing before picking over details. I will say that I’m turned off by that website mainly because it’s not good web design. Some of the come-on titles don’t set well with me, but you’ll have to find your own comfort zone.