Law of Moses — 1 Samuel 22:6-23

It’s very easy to get lost in the fascinating details of the conflict between Saul in his deepening madness, and David in his growing faith. It was the King’s paranoia that drove David out of his position in Saul’s court. We notice how David struggled to remain faithful to the Covenant without exposing himself to the King’s insanity. It only complicated matters that David and the King’s son, Jonathan, had sworn a covenant of friendship.

What matters for us here is how David weathered this fallacious persecution by remaining loyal to Jehovah. Nothing in Moses promised all things would always be smooth sailing; rather, God had warned that there would be times of testing. David was being forged as an instrument of divine justice.

In the previous chapter we learn that the priests had managed to reconstruct some portion of their divine service in a hilltop community called Nob. The Tabernacle was gone, as were the furnishings, but they continued with however much of the rituals they could as required in the Covenant. In his flight from Saul, David stopped by their worship tent. He sought to spare the current acting High Priest the liability from having to choose whether to cooperate with him, and so deceived him about the nature of his visit. The future king obtained discarded Bread of Presence and Goliath’s sword, since the technology of forging iron weapons was still a closely guarded secret of the Philistines.

We learn that Saul had accepted the feudal service of Doeg, who was from Edom. Such service required Doeg fully convert to the Covenant of Moses, and the rituals may have been a part of why he was there the day David and his bodyguards came. Of course, David knew who Doeg was, having served in the same royal court. He also knew Doeg would report it to Saul, but harming Doeg was simply not allowed under Moses.

David passed through a series of hideouts, even pretending to madness himself while staying in Gath of the Philistines. For a time he gathered an army of malcontents who had suffered under Saul’s reign, along with his extended family household in the cave of Adullam. Seeking to protect his aging parents, he committed them to the care of the King of Moab, relying on his kinship through his great-grandmother, Ruth.

Then, the prophet Gad warned David not to stay in the Cave of Adullam, which was on the border with Philistia, but to find some place in Judah proper. David and his army camped in the forest near Hareth. Our focal passage begins with Saul having received an incomplete report about David’s whereabouts. About the only reason Saul would be hanging out under a tamarisk tree would be the dense shade during the hotter months in Israel. He pulled out a characteristic rant about how he had been so good to his chief officers (fellow Benjamites), and here they showed their loyalty by keeping secrets about Jonathan and David working together against him.

Doeg had everything to gain at this point, because he was the only outsider. He related David’s visit to Nob and how the High Priest had given him Goliath’s sword and some leftover showbread. So the priest was ordered to appear before Saul. He did so with alacrity.

When presented with charges of conspiring with David, the elder priest answered correctly and honestly. He had no reason to imagine David was a traitor, and this was hardly the first time he would have provided any services David might have requested. It would have been treasonous to have refused David anything he asked.

In his paranoia, Saul refused to hear anything the priest answered, but ordered his servants to strike down the man, and then to go and destroy the village whence he came. But Saul’s fellow Israelis refused, because they knew it was a deep crime before the Lord. So he ordered Doeg to lead the reprisal. The Edomite didn’t hesitate, proving that his conversion was a mere formality of convenience. His depravity was characteristic of his home nation. Once again, the priestly service of worship in Israel was destroyed.

Indeed, the whole town was slaughtered as if they were Amalekites worthy of total annihilation. A single surviving priest managed to escape and went to find David. The young leader took full blame for the destruction. There was no just way to prevent that outcome. He knew Doeg would do anything to consolidate his position in Saul’s court, but had to trust the Lord. Yet he knew beyond all doubt that God would not abandon him to Saul’s madness.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Law of Moses — 1 Samuel 22:6-23

It’s for Him

I do not worship art and artistry. Some of the best art in the world is morally hideous. I’m not preparing to go on a jihad against art, but I also don’t care at all to preserve it. I will shed no tears with the last nude painting by some alleged Master is lost. If you cannot understand how God’s wrath falls on such things, you cannot understand God.

The refined appreciation for what is good and beautiful is not all interested in what God has said and done. Rather, it seeks to tell God what He is supposed to think. It’s just one more expression of the Fall, setting human reason above revelation. It’s another bite of the Forbidden Fruit, insisting that mankind can judge what is good and right without any reference to the Maker.

We are not activists; we make no pretense of changing the world. The world is going to Hell and there’s nothing at all we can do about it. There’s nothing wrong with decorations. They can brighten the moment. It’s part of what makes us human, but the issue is not some false aspiration to human greatness. The issue is expressing the fire God has put in your heart. You can ignore His boundaries for that fire, but the fire comes from Him. You should obey those impulses to decorate, or to appreciate someone else’s decorations.

You should also feel free to not like them. Let no one try to put a guilt trip on you for disliking any particular art expression. There are a great many music acts today I would do my best to avoid. Their sound is annoying noise to me, and I can’t be bothered to explain it to someone who loves their work. If you can’t understand how God could lead me in another direction, I have no reason at all to take you seriously — except perhaps as an enemy, if you start to act insulted by my tastes.

Talent is fine, but show me how it glorifies God. Otherwise I’m not impressed. It’s the same with my writing and even the images from my camera. It’s what God has called me to do, but I’ll be the first to recognize it isn’t for everyone. I’m not doing it for you, or for the sake of some abstract aspiration, but for Him.

Indeed, I cannot be silent. The divine calling is not an option; it’s a mandate. Prophecy does not come at the will of mere men, so it cannot be stopped by their resistance to the message. I will obey His will for me, even if it kills both of us.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on It’s for Him

Long Lost Treasures

We cannot help people who aren’t under the Covenant of Christ.

It’s not enough that one is spiritually reborn. He or she must also be fully and consciously committed to Christ as Lord over their entire existence. Every decision in life comes into question. You can take nothing for granted. The Covenant of Christ isn’t about “being saved” (as commonly defined) but about your adoption as willful servants in His divine Sheikdom. It must be consciously feudal and tribal.

Granted, there is an expected period of transition for people taking up citizenship in this Sheikdom, but it is no help if their teachers don’t know what’s really going on. A critical element in what a church does is teach folks what their minds need to know in order to surrender and serve the leading of the Holy Spirit in the heart. That includes a heavy dose of cultural reorientation to the biblical way. And the Bible is distinctively non-Western, non-democratic, etc. It is most certainly tribal, feudal and covenant oriented.

This is Biblical Law. This is the regime Christ came to establish on earth. This is His message and what He requires of those who claim His name.

The vast majority of those claiming to follow Christ have no clue. A very significant portion of their leadership is hostile to this teaching. As long as they remain outside of this regime, they cannot claim the fullness of their divine privileges as Children of Jehovah. Instead, they remain under Satan’s dominion, who consumes their shalom. They can’t live their shalom and present a clear witness of divine revelation.

Meanwhile, a great many people called by Christ have sensed something very wrong and don’t associate with churches. They have been turned off from the whole question of following Christ by the painful, if not entirely conscious, disjuncture between what most churches do and what Christ requires. Their minds are confused and they haven’t been permitted to unite the leading of their hearts with their religion.

Instead, the churches are filled with people who have no spiritual birth, but are convinced they do have it. They have been misled by church leaders who make it something it never was. Sure, we know that there will always be folks in the church organization who don’t really belong, even among the leadership, but few churches have any clear view of how to operate in Two Realms at once, so they empower a massive self-deception. They confuse the earthly church organization with the heavenly family.

In their minds, they make major categorical errors in associating spiritual attributes with a fallen entity. They ignore the distinction between the Two Realms, and the human organization becomes somehow sacred in their minds. They reject the understanding that the church in this fallen world is a mere manifestation of the Kingdom of Heaven. To them, the church is the Kingdom of Heaven. Thus, they have no hedge against the deceptions of Satan that turns church into a secular political entity. They can’t tell the difference between human politics and the work of the Holy Spirit.

So rare is the church that doesn’t make these mistakes that there’s no point in naming names. We can say with some confidence that we know of no genuine New Testament churches in our world. That’s not to say there are none, but that we have never encountered them. Then again, if they did exist, they would be hard to find through the normal means. They would not be able to organize and hold property legally, and would not dare to advertise their presence. They would rely on word of mouth, at most.

You won’t find such a church, but you could found one.

Don’t be blind, folks. The world as we know it is coming apart. It won’t happen all at once; this will take years, coming in fits and starts, with long lulls without much change. That’s how it works with the fallen human race. We are the seeds planted for a time of harvest somewhere down the road. I’m praying you catch the vision, that you embrace it and pray toward it. We are seeing the long, slow dawning of a new age in Christian religion, a recovery of things long lost. The Kingdom of Heaven is again at hand.

We are restoring the shalom long denied the Kingdom of Christ.

Posted in prophecy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Faithful to His Glory

I will testify what the Lord has done for me.

We owe nothing to secular society. We need not take seriously anything rooted in a non-covenant community. Our Father may send us to infiltrate, but they can never own us. Did you know that the Pledge of Allegiance was written by a communist who despised genuine faith in Christ? Our cooperation with any human agency is conditional, merely tactical.

Eventually we all have say “no” to something society or the government demands. If the Father tells me His glory is in bearing the persecution, so will I do. This is frankly standard in the Kingdom, but it’s not the only response. There are times and places when we must fight back for His glory. He will always tell each of us what He requires.

We have no interest in liberty for its own sake. When men gather their strengths to fight for liberty, our motive is shalom. I don’t care about liberty; I care about protecting shalom, for that is the glory of Christ’s gospel. I want peace with God; peace with anyone else might be nice, but not essential.

It is necessary to highlight sin by living righteously. Sometimes that means using words to denounce sin, but our conduct is the real mission of glory. How we handle sorrow is a major element in our witness; it’s the bulk of our shalom. It’s not just having that peace, but tending to it like a fruit tree that shines His glory.

We recognize that battle lines are being drawn, and none of them reflect God’s revelation. The polarization will get worse, and our message will be excluded by both sides. Whether you hide, flee or fight is between you and the Lord. But the nation is at war and the federal government will fall to the commies. The intentional destruction of the economy will continue. How we handle these things is our witness.

May the Lord extend His hand to do signs and wonders, and draw the hearts of many through our faithfulness to His glory.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Faithful to His Glory

The Red Pill Whip

In Radix Fidem, our covenant mission includes a strong motivation for redemption of individuals. There really isn’t much we can do for people who aren’t drawn by their hearts, but that is the wavelength on which we operate. We don’t try to convince people through their minds. We believe that was the reason Jesus used parables; He was trying to sift out the hearts by saying things only awakened hearts could hear. Mere minds should be somewhat confused by our message.

A message of conviction condemns sin for what it really is. But the most powerful condemnation against sin isn’t in the words, but in the lifestyle that embraces Biblical Law. It’s not a discipline; God’s Law is the sweet reward He holds out for those who will come to Him. It is the Fruit of the Tree of Life in a form they can grasp, demanding they throw down the Forbidden Fruit.

I’ve participated in recent discussions about some Men’s Red Pill stuff that really disappointed me. Whatever is good and useful from the Red Pill lore is already in Biblical Law. There’s an awful lot of that lore we must reject because it rests on condemnation without redemption. Those who make Red Pill lore their religion have zero interest in redeeming the people who don’t get it.

So the Red Pill religion becomes the excuse for labeling some people hopeless, and leaving it there. Gamma Males are treated as hideous creatures worthy of summary execution, but by no means is there any genuine effort to reach out to such men with redemption. Carnal women aren’t offered a better path, like Jesus did for the Woman at the Well; they are treated as creatures who should continue worshiping Good Men, but from afar.

Spite and condemnation are doctrines in the Red Pill religion. Redemption is not. It’s true that there will always be those you cannot help, and your convictions will tell you when the person you are dealing with is one of those. Your heart will know when to put up a barrier for your own safety and let them go. That cannot be everyone who comes up short. We have a mission to offer redemption.

Granted, the vast majority of humanity will reject our message. That does not justify cutting off the whole human race from the gospel offer. Anything Red Pill related must take its proper place in the gospel message or it has no business in Christian teaching. We cannot allow it to become a competing religion for us. We use some of the Red Pill lore to point out where Western society has gone wrong, which is part of the bigger problem of truly serving Christ. The biblical approach to life is non-Western.

Again, we can do nothing for sinners, but we can never know when God will use something we address to His children to awaken someone’s realization that they belong to Him. We don’t separate evangelism from teaching the Word to believers. It’s all one big mission. A great many people who consider themselves Christians aren’t spiritually born at all. A great many folks out there turned off by bad religion don’t realize they have been called by Christ. Thus, our message is cast largely in terms of Biblical Law: “This is what God requires.”

And He requires that we offer a path to redemption in just about everything we do with other humans. People who choke on this teaching should be treated as non-believers in need of redemption themselves.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Law of Moses — 1 Samuel 16:13-23

This is not as spooky and inexplicable as it appears on the surface. The Lord had commanded Samuel to go and anoint a new king for Israel. He was directed to David, the youngest son of Jesse.

Upon being anointed King of Israel, the covering angel of the Lord left Saul and stayed with David. This left Saul open to the demons that were waiting their chance. Demons respect divine covenants. As long as Saul was the anointed, he had some protection. But his intensely shallow spirit was a beacon to demonic forces. With the covering angel reassigned, Saul was wide open to torment.

We learn later that the torment included violent urges arising from paranoia. This was quite unpleasant to Saul. His advisers knew the answer: It needed someone with a gift for worship in music. The shofar was not appropriate; this called for an instrument that would allow singing. About the only thing they had at that time was something like a lyre called the kinnor in Hebrew. So far as we know, this was a ten-stringed instrument played on the pentatonic scale (5 notes, missing the 2nd and 7th from our octave).

The task required someone who bore sufficient charisma to seem noble, and with strong faith in Jehovah. It so happened that the same David who had been secretly anointed the next king was also well known for his strong musical talent in worship. So he was called into service in Saul’s rather primitive court. As we would expect, his talent and devotion were sufficient to restrict the demons.

David was promoted to the position of Saul’s armor bearer. It made David the equivalent to a captain in our terms, but with a special assignment as the King’s personal assistant. He was sensitive enough to recognize when Saul was tormented and could sing the torment away.

Any other explanation misses the point. A pure heart-led worship of the Lord tends to clear away demonic presence anywhere, but is particularly potent under a covenant. Still, as Saul was increasingly alienated from God, the torment escalated in intensity and frequency. He was holding the throne unjustly by the provisions of the Covenant, and should have abdicated.

The obvious lesson is that singing worship songs, even without any actual talent, can still reduce moral and spiritual tension. More to the point, it reduces demonic power and presence when you are doing something for the Kingdom.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Going to Grow

Over the past couple of years it dawned on me that some of my expectations were false. A primary bogus notion was that I could build an online church congregation. For me, a virtual church is not possible. So even though it didn’t come to me in specific words like that, I knew by conviction that I needed to stop using the name for my church (Kiln of the Soul) online, and stick with the covenant name Radix Fidem.

So my church isn’t gone, but you can’t join Kiln of the Soul as a church family unless you live close enough to maintain a physical presence. You have to come into my house to be a part of my house church.

Instead, you can participate in the covenant of Radix Fidem online. Radix Fidem is a separate category from a church. It’s not a religion, nor a religious practice, but a meta-religion. Your church is wherever religion happens for you in meat space. The church is a group of people who can touch each other, however many are gathered in the name of Christ. It’s a part of our covenant teaching that a church is necessarily limited by the experience and gifts of those involved. It’s a concrete expression of faith, whereas Radix Fidem is a study of faith itself.

And it is yet another category that sometimes I provide something like pastoral leadership to folks, both online and in person. In that sense, Radix Fidem is sort of a warning about what you can expect from me. I don’t control Radix Fidem; I’m simply the first guy to start talking about it. That makes me the default elder, but by no means the master of all things worthy of your consideration. Indeed, the whole point of blabbering about what I make of my faith is so that you can start walking in your own.

But I can still be one of your pastors, in the sense of pastoral guidance. You can call refer to me as your pastor, though it helps if I know about it. Still, you won’t actually be a part of my church until you show up in person and establish that strong personal bond. You are still my covenant brother or sister online, but not a part of my church without face-to-face fellowship from time to time. You’ll receive all the same affection and moral covering, but there’s something missing without that face time.

That’s why I ditched the domain name on the other blog (soulkiln.blog) and closed the static server account (soulkiln.org). They simply weren’t appropriate.

Having said all that, I still maintain the prophetic declaration that there will be churches in the future that embrace Radix Fidem. They will all be “house churches” in one sense or another. A formal incorporation with all the trappings of government registration is flatly contrary to the covenant. There could easily be Radix Fidem fellowships within established churches, but I suspect that would be transitory. Something like that tends to be disruptive of the host organization. I find that distasteful, but I won’t pretend I could prevent it happening. Again, the whole point is that you exercise your own faith as you feel led.

Once you engage such a covenant fellowship where you live, you can call it a church and name it anything you find appropriate. I wouldn’t dream of denying your use of the name I use here, Kiln of the Soul. You can treat me like a distant elder or ignore me completely. I can explain what Radix Fidem means as a limited form of identity, but only God can enforce anything. I’m trusting Him that no one will ever decide to try hijacking our name, but our flat refusal to protect it legally is part of what it means.

Maybe that clarifies things for future reference. This covenant fellowship is most certainly going to grow.

Posted in administration | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Contemplate Less Entanglement

We know it’s a general principle that being “holy unto the Lord” means a degree of separation from the ambient moral perversion around us. At the same time, we are told to go out into the fallen world and shine the light of divine glory. It’s typical of divine moral truth that it comes out in human words as a paradox.

Think about the context for each of these admonitions. Being separate shows up in 2 Corinthians 6:11-18. The context is Paul admonishing the Corinthian Christians to withdraw from the highly self-indulgent culture of Corinth, a city that catered to sailors. Corinth offered any number of shrines housing temple prostitutes, along with just about every other hedonistic pleasure known in those days. The Corinthian Christians needed a whole lot of separation from that perverse atmosphere in order to bear a clear witness against sin. It’s echoed in Revelation 18:1-8 with pretty much the same contextual message, though the symbolic reference is Babylon, instead of the very real corruption of Corinth.

We can find all sorts of similar admonitions throughout the Bible about keeping your distance from morally foul situations. The whole idea is to highlight the difference between sin and the divine calling.

Yet, when Jesus told His disciples to take the gospel into the whole world, He was addressing men from a nation that had come to regard themselves as holy by default, having no need for repentance. It had been a long time since Israel was some kind of magnet to souls seeking redemption. In many ways, they were the most cloistered people in the world. They went everywhere seeking commerce, but it was seldom beneficial to the Gentile customers. It was exploitative commerce, seeking to morally seduce people they actually despised. Yes, there were a few Pharisees who prided themselves in rhetorical exploits and coaxing people to convert to Judaism, but only so they could tax the crap out of them. Jewish authorities ran the most abusive tax schemes in the world at that time.

Side note: The Jewish spite for tax collectors was a matter of hating them for competition. If the common folk were paying taxes to the Romans or the corrupt Kings of Judea, there wasn’t much left for the Pharisees to squeeze out of them.

Thus, what Jesus was telling the Apostles was to take a totally different message, promoting a totally different image of Jehovah, out into that same world. These men would have borne a very similar level of cloistered separation from the ambient corruption, yet gladly coming to do them good by seeking to spread shalom everywhere. It wasn’t a matter of suckering folks into submitting to a torturous legalistic regimen, but something that would set them free and empower them to live consistent with Creation’s design.

Rather than going out to plunder a despised Gentile world, as Jews did, the Christians were supposed to colonize that world with the gospel truth. They certainly retained much of their Jewish cultural heritage, but the Apostles understood full well what that heritage meant as a message of truth. Judaism had long forgotten the meaning.

The message of Radix Fidem is not the same kind of radical shift as between Judaism and Christian faith. It’s radical in a different sense. Some form of Christian religion is already established all over the world; we already have a foundation on which to build. So while you may have individually a very real missionary call to travel, it’s generally unnecessary for Radix Fidem. We get a lot more done using the Internet. And our message most certainly is not a lone voice for the gospel, but it’s a message for very slender minority from within the wider Christian religion. It’s not elitist, but very demanding nonetheless.

The gospel is for everyone; the Radix Fidem covenant is not. There’s no doubt we sense that this is what God really intended for those following Christ, but we should know beyond all doubt that God isn’t going to make this a universal call. Not yet.

This is where you’ll have to trust me as a prophet. This whole thing is 100% voluntary, but if you feel called to share in the blessings of my moral covering as your shepherd, you’ll need a conviction that I’m not misleading you: Our message depends on tribulation. Shaking people loose from their false religions requires shattering those religious strongholds. That can’t be done with rhetoric. It requires the hand of God.

Thus, in broad general terms, I’m calling for more outreach via the Internet, which is now a virtual public market place, rather like those where the Apostles preached as they traveled. Right now the meat-space part of our lives calls for more separation. This is a time to pull away from the prevailing atmosphere, to cloister ourselves to some degree. Invest more energy in building a sense of strong boundaries, of holiness as separation. And to the degree possible, consider ways to do that literally.

I’m not going to nail down details for that kind of thing. You have to invest in your household, especially the children, the sense that they aren’t being deprived of the goodies enjoyed by everyone outside the household, but that they enjoy a strong noble privilege by not being trapped in worldly things. Holiness is an adventure and an advantage. Don’t make it some harsh, dour legalism, but a joyful freedom from perversion. If those in your domain see you celebrating holiness and relishing the sweet communion with God and His Creation, they will tend to want in on it.

And they will equally tend to mimic your moral failures, too, so be careful to seek the Lord’s strength. You can’t hide sin forever. The people closest to you will sense something wrong because, if nothing else, the Devil will expose you. It’s best to be humble and let them see your penitent heart.

Jesus warned His disciples in Matthew 24-25 about a very literal siege of Jerusalem coming in about 70 AD. His instructions were to keep a watch for that kind of trouble and be ready to flee without looking back. We aren’t likely to see troops laying siege like that, but there are plenty of signs that tell you disorder and destruction are coming. Jesus didn’t mean for every last believer to leave Jerusalem; some stayed to maintain their personal mission calling. Still, the bulk of them left. I’m calling on you to be aware that wherever you live may be the wrong place to stay as tribulation deepens on the world.

Posted in prophecy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Contemplate Less Entanglement

The Bible on Child Sexual Abuse

Nobody’s telling you what to think, but I wanted to share the biblical viewpoint, in contrast to the common American viewpoint, on child sexual abuse.

It is a sin — but not for the reasons most Americans assume. It’s a sin for the same reason the vast majority of human sexual activity is a sin. The Bible promotes sexual intimacy for one case only: husband and wife committed for life. There are a few exceptions and they are well established. The point is that God’s ideal is very clear, and anything less risks pulling away from shalom.

As a secondary issue, it is not healthy for children to engage in sexual activity. This is not as critical, but it’s a sin against the child. I do not hold with the harsh doctrinal assumption common in psychology that children cannot recover from sexual abuse. They can, and often do, but nobody wants to talk about how that works. They fear it will somehow serve to justify child molestation, and that’s just not true. If you defend the biblical standard for sex in the first place, you have child molestation well covered. It’s an attack on shalom.

The issue of what constitutes a “child” in biblical terms is not so easily nailed down, and it’s definitely not the same as it is for the US. There is no such thing as “age of consent” in the Bible. There is only arranged marriage, and it was a matter of community consensus when the male or female was ready.

We do know that men seldom got married before 30 for purely economic reasons. The wealthy could afford to marry younger, and frequently did. Females were seldom less than 10 years younger than their husbands, and it was common to have up to 20 years difference. The whole focus of life was different in the Bible, and it’s not just a matter of context. It’s based in part on fundamental assumptions about human nature after the Fall. We won’t expand on that here.

The point is that the Bible doesn’t look at the issue of adult sexual desires for children the same way Americans do. Americans tend to have this frantic obsession with how awful it is, whereas the Bible considers it pretty typical of fallen people to want things that threaten shalom. It’s not some deep taboo or violation of anything sacred. Nothing in the Bible promotes the American idolatry of youth, as if childhood is something sacred. This attitude is flatly evil.

If anything, this perverse cultural element makes the whole situation worse. The visceral hatred for pedophiles masks an obsession with youth, which in turn masks a dread of death. Granted, we know the flesh fears death, but we should seek to rise above the concerns of the flesh.

It serves little purpose to demonize pedophiles; it’s far more prevalent than anyone wants to admit. It is appropriate to distinguish between pedophilia (the desire) and child molestation (the act). There are a great many pedophiles who don’t allow themselves to indulge. It doesn’t make them evil to desire it; the hysteria about that is evil.

Child porn is another issue. Simple nudity in images is exploitation, but there’s no way to make images of sexual acts without breaking the law in the US. Still, the biblical perspective is not to be horrified by such things, but to condemn the whole gamut of sexual immorality. Take it home or do without. Child sexual abuse is not somehow more threatening to shalom than adultery. The problem with America is that we don’t condemn the latter nearly enough.

We know what would go a long way to reducing this problem, but the biblical solutions will never happen in the US. The only thing we can do is stand on the truth of divine revelation. Meanwhile, I would most certainly work to reduce child sex trafficking, simply because the victims are utterly helpless. The Bible hammers home the idea of defending orphans and widows as the image of those most helpless in Hebrew society; children caught in sex trafficking in the US fall into the same category. It does matter, but not for the reasons assumed by most Americans.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Law of Moses — 1 Samuel 15

We remember that the Amalekites harassed Israel during the Exodus, attacking the rear of the column where the infants, elderly and sick were riding in wagons. It was universally regarded as a cowardly act, the kind of thing for which the Amalekites were well known. It’s hard to pin down just who these people were, and the name cannot be restricted clearly to descendants of a man by that name. Rather, it appears he gave his name to some people his descendants joined. Balaam refers to them as a very ancient nation that may have been around before Abraham (Numbers 24:20), but that they would be wiped from history.

By the time of Saul’s reign, the Amalekite range was centered on the Wilderness of Zin, an area west of Edom, and starting just south of the usable land held by Judah. As near as we can estimate, Telaim is the name for an area near Ziph, down in the Negev, not far from the western border of Edom. At that time the border of Edom would be some poorly defined area they guarded in or near the southern rift valley rising out of the Dead Sea. Saul was marshaling his troops on the eastern end of the Amalekites’ range.

Their “city” was probably little more than a dense collection of tents with some stacked stone and piled sand fortifications. They were distinctly nomadic. The attack would hardly wipe out their whole nation, since they ranged all over the Sinai Peninsula. However, it would reduce their numbers significantly, since this was likely the single biggest concentration of them.

The Kenites that Saul advised to leave the area were a tribe noted for their metallurgical skills. The most memorable member of that tribe was Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law. They had done Israel no harm, so Saul was being fair with them.

The attack ranged on the eastern end from some place call “Havilah.” It turns out this may have been a generic descriptive name instead of any actual place, because the label shows up in the Bible all over the Ancient Near East (ANE), starting with a reference point for the river flowing through Eden. It appears to mean any really sandy area, which could be anywhere in the eastern Negev. The slaughter continued westward to the ancient highway known as the Way of Shur that ran from Egypt, through the central highlands in Palestine, and all the way to Assyria.

Saul’s carnal nature showed through in the victory march home. He saved their King Agag and all the better livestock found in Amalekite possession. The purpose in holding the king would be to keep him as a living trophy in Saul’s court, a common practice among ANE warlords. The troops took the livestock as plunder, though a lion’s share would have belonged to Saul. Notice that everything followed rather uncivilized tribal customs common to nomadic tribes in that part of the world.

The Lord warned Samuel that Saul could not be trusted to obey Him. For this, Samuel wept all night, because he was very fond of Saul. In the morning, Samuel learned that Saul had returned to a town named Carmel (not the mountain up north on the coast) near where he had marshaled his army and set up a monument to himself. From there, he came around the western edge of the highlands to Bethel, and then down to Gilgal in the Jordan Valley. This remained somewhat a national headquarters still.

The exchange when they met later that day showed Saul was unrepentant. He talked as if he had no real control over his army, and that they seized the livestock as plunder. Then Saul tried to make it sound like they were planning on using the livestock as offerings. Here we have the famous verse that God puts a very high value on obedience over ritual observance. God cannot be bribed, but He can be won by a faithful heart. This is the soul of the Covenant itself, to live as faithful and loving children adopted by the Father.

Saul’s confession of his failure rings hollow. He was more worried about his reputation, having Samuel’s presence with him in front of the troops, than he was about God’s will. He begged Saul to stay for the ritual victory celebration, essentially a thanksgiving service of worship. There was a dramatic moment when Saul grabbed the edge of Samuel’s cloak and tore it by accident, and Samuel remarking how it symbolized God tearing the reign from Saul. Again, Saul very painfully cared only for his reputation. So Samuel relented, but it was a bitter celebration for him.

By this time Agag is pretty sure he’s safe, so when Samuel demands to see him, the Amalekite comes out rather cheerfully to meet the nation’s chief shaman. Samuel was completely unsparing, pronouncing sentence and executing him on the spot by his own aging hands. It was a ritual slaughter symbolizing God’s wrath on the nation of Amalek.

Samuel returned to his home in Ramah, and Saul headed back to Gibeah. The two never met formally again. The Lord is characterized as regretting making Saul king.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Law of Moses — 1 Samuel 15