The Supernatural

Just a quick note…

In many ways, the word “supernatural” is mostly used in place of “inexplicable” in the sense that it signals something from another realm of existence. Granted, in movies and other forms of fiction, it is almost invariably frightening (as in horror) or full of sentimental crap (as in Western mythology about angels, etc.). But it is most certainly not something we can learn to handle with our minds, as if all we really need is just a better grade of intelligence and reason. There is no highly advanced science to it, or alien technology as sometimes depicted.

It’s just a matter of reality playing games, mocking humans who refuse to live in their hearts. God allows us to experience just enough to give us a clue, but most Americans (and other Westerners) treat it wrong. Either they put it in a strange place where it’s remembered but “crazy,” or it’s simply discounted, ignored and left out of the calculus. A proper calculus is to reduce your view of reality to the quantum level: your perception and experience. A good term is to call it quantum reality, because it gives you room to scale it up to see things and grasp them on different levels.

Sensory data is not all there is; your heart is a sensory organ in its own right. Your heart understands things your brain cannot handle.

Only if you flee God’s mercy should you fear the supernatural. If you seek His face, there is nothing that can actually harm you. Meanwhile, it’s just as real as tying your shoes, or scratching a itch, or eating ice cream. It’s a completely natural and normal part of the continuum of reality, so that “super-natural” is a bad word, but we are stuck with it. It’s just reality inviting you to see the truth.

She is a handmaiden of God; giver her room to work. Discuss it with her and listen with your heart.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Covenant Book: 02 Two Realms

Spiritual birth is a separate matter from a heart-led existence.

Non-Christians can be heart-led. What makes one a Christian is the presence of His Holy Spirit in your soul. Only your heart knows for sure; your mind will simply have to take the heart’s word for it. This includes whether the Lord has brought your dead spirit to life. Trying to construct a theology on spiritual birth is guaranteed to fail, because it twists you around impossible logical puzzles. Everything the Bible has to say about it is offered in parables, or symbolic language. That’s because the thing itself is beyond the intellect’s grasp.

The symbolism is chiefly two images in Scripture. One is the idea that you are born without a living spirit. Thus, you must be born from above, as Jesus told Nicodemas. The other image is that we are born with dead spirits, and they must be brought to life by the invasion of the Holy Spirit. Neither image fully captures what is going on in the Spirit Realm.

The few apparently blunt statements in Scripture indicate that God Himself decides who is born into His Kingdom; the initiative is His alone. You can become aware in your heart that He has called you, but there is no way you can prove it to anyone else. Instead, we rely on indicators referred to as Fruit of the Spirit. Yes, people can be self-deceived or faking it if they have a strong enough will, but God promises that He will eventually expose the fakes. So it’s really a question of what you can do with people in our fallen existence, not whether you can discern the ultimate spiritual reality.

This is why there is such a powerful emphasis on conduct and covenant law. We need to take a moment to put something to rest: grace versus law. The Reformation made a lot of that and it’s actually a false dichotomy. The New Testament passage that refers to “under grace, not under law” is in the context of “law” as the Talmud, a body of human tradition that Jesus disparaged as contrary to actual revelation from God. Again, the Jewish religion of Jesus’ day was deeply perverted by the intellectual influence of Hellenism; it was not genuine Old Testament religion. Thus, saying we are not “under law” means Christian Jews had no obligation to the Talmud, except as a matter of secular government regulation. It was the legal tradition of the official Jewish government, nothing more. Meanwhile, Paul says of the Old Testament that we are obliged to study it and “rightly divide” how it still applies to our lives in Christ.

In the Radix Fidem community of faith, we have a tradition of referring to Biblical Law. The term is meant to imply the Mind of Christ, by restoring the ancient Hebrew concept of law as the will of your sovereign, not merely some body of rickety legislation. We seek to overturn all the false images of law as it arose and exists in a Western society. Instead, we breathe life back into law as the living manifestation of a Person. Jesus Himself is the Living Law of God, so we use the term “Biblical Law” referring to an organic and vivid apprehension in the heart of what God designed us for.

The written record of various Law Covenants in the Bible are expressions of that Biblical Law. They were delivered in a context, and apply to that context. The Covenant of Moses applies directly to anyone seeking to claim the mission and name of Israel — you gotta have that mission or the name means nothing. It’s the mission to reveal the nature of God and His Creation, of how to live in a fallen world, as a nation of people who, as a whole, can claim His divine favor.

The much older and less detailed Covenant of Noah still stands today as the proper covenant of law applying to all other human governments until the Return of Christ. In other words, whether any particular government recognizes it or not, God is holding them all accountable to Noah’s Law so long as rainbows appear in the sky.

Anyone who represents themselves as a follower of Christ will most certainly revere and follow the Law of Noah, and will tend to live in a way that echoes the Law of Moses. Thus, we distinguish between the ineffable Realm of the Spirit and the very real Fallen Realm of human existence. For the sake of convenience, we refer to a moral realm where those two realms overlap. Among those who live under the Fall, there is the possibility of touching the Spirit Realm by awakening the heart to rule over the mind and embracing Biblical Law.

You see, only humans are fallen. The rest of Creation remains as it was from Eden. However, Creation was meant to be under our management, so it tends to be chaotic because as fallen creatures, we are unfit and simply unable to manage Creation by the Creator’s power. By extension, we cannot properly manage our own lives in a fallen state. We are an integral part of Creation, but we are fallen, while the rest waits for us to recover our eternal natures through a heart-led life and spiritual restoration. Without the heart-led way and without spiritual birth, we are alienated from Creation. It only seems that we are somehow separate because our sense of awareness is damaged; it’s the reason Adam and Eve hid from God in the Garden. Nothing had really changed, but human awareness of ultimate truth was shattered by the Fall. Adam and Eve had closed their minds to the truth from their hearts. They didn’t know God, they didn’t know Creation and they didn’t know themselves.

The remedy is to kneel before God, to pass through the Flaming Sword at the entrance to Eden. The New Testament equates the Sword to the revelation of God. The revelation of God came first in terms of Law Covenants. But the law is not the revelation itself; the law is an earthly manifestation of God’s divine moral character. Get to know the law in that sense and you begin to understand the personality of the Father. Get to know Jesus and you know the Father.

Your mind can organize for you individually what you know about Jesus, but only your heart can truly know Him as a Person.

Posted in meta | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Covenant Book: 02 Two Realms

Covenant Book: 01 A Matter for the Heart

The Bible offers an entirely different anthropology than is common in the West.

The previous chapter sets the stage for adopting a different mind set. But of course, that’s just mowing down the old crop previously cultivated on the roots of faith. We propose to transplant those roots into an entirely different soil and climate. We want to plow the ground and prepare it well.

This different ground of assumptions cannot be trusted to mere intellect. This is not persuasion and conversion; we aren’t selling a new product for you to buy. If this thing doesn’t call your name, then you can’t truly belong. It must be a matter of conviction, not mere opinion and belief. This is not a decision; it’s a divine calling.

In the Bible, the Hebrew concept of human nature included the heart as the seat of faith and conviction, wholly separate from the mind. They meant this rather literally; it was no mere figure of speech. Frankly, there is good American science behind such a view. In my book, Heart of Faith, I referenced a large body of scientific research that recognizes the heart as a sensory organ in its own right. While the research doesn’t propose how to use it, the scientists were able to detect a very strong energy field emanating from the heart, along with an independent neural network with nodes for processing what that field could sense — a sort of “mind” of its own. The scientists could detect this field and how it changed in the presence of other living things — humans and other creatures have their own sensory fields — but still have no idea what it all means.

We aren’t surprised that scientists don’t know what to make of it. For them, the notion that there is something beyond the intellect is simply not an option. We believe this is answered in the biblical model of humans with a potential for being ruled by their hearts instead of their brains. Not the American “heart” as the repository of sentiment, however strongly held, but something quite different. Some Bible scholars say the heart is the seat of the will. The biblical model depicts the heart as the one part of us capable of commiting to God as a Person, of clinging to Him in faithfulness and loyalty. This heart also knows God on a different level. Indeed, the Holy Spirit is depicted as speaking through the heart-mind, not the intellect. God gave us our intellects to organize and implement the demands of faith in our hearts.

Obviously, this implies that the heart-mind defies mere ideas. The content of the heart cannot be packaged in words and thoughts, but rises above that level. This is partially reflected in the Hebrew approach to language itself. Hebrew is inherently different in purpose and operation from American English, for example. We use words as containers of truth; we describe things by drawing boundaries. We have a penchant for precision that way. Hebrew is not descriptive, but indicative. Words are treated as sign posts, trail markers for further exploration. Ultimate truth cannot be declared in words; it cannot be known as a proposition or logical argument. Truth is known as a Person, a living being, not some static-objective-concrete body of fact. The heart is prepared to know in terms of persons and moral character that cannot be contained in mere words.

Thus, faith in Christ is not mere ideas and doctrinal orthodoxy, nor strong emotions, nor steely self-discipline in obedience, nor all of them together. Faith in Christ is a burning and yearning desire to be like Him and to please the Father. If someone asks you where you live in the sense of where the real you resides, you shouldn’t point to your head. You should seek to move the core of your awareness into the heart. This is where you will find the unshakable will to love and serve our Lord when your human resources are exhausted. This is how you know what the right thing is and that you must do it regardless of what makes sense to your mind or how you feel. You hold your opinions, but your convictions hold you.

Coming from an American background, it is wholly unlikely you will embrace our covenant, unless you first shift your sense of awareness into your heart. What we teach defies reason and broad human experience. It’s not as if American Christians can’t agree with our use of the term “heart-led” as a way of living, but the instinctive mental reaction to those words still clings to Anglo-American assumptions about reality. It does not know the Spirit Realm experientially, only as an idea. And behind the scenes of conscious thinking hides an ugly materialistic suspicion of anything that isn’t part of concrete reality. It’s exceedingly rare to escape that prison unless you can tap the power of the heart to rearrange the contents of the mind.

Of course, it doesn’t help that nearly every English translation of Scripture seems totally unaware of this. You’ll find words translated as “heart” because the original Hebrew, Aramaic of Greek words match the Anglo-American image of the heart, not that of the Hebrew people. Hebrew thinking, even in Greek writing, is rooted in a wholly different approach to expression. They would be perplexed at our American instinct to take the words at face value. The truth of the heart can never be confined to precise explanation; it can only be indicated by parables and characterizations. This is why Jesus taught in parables.

In Jesus’ day, the ancient Hebrew approach had been discarded, and was close to forgotten, by the rabbinical traditions that had embraced Hellenized intellectual traditions after Alexander the Great passed through Palestine in 323 BC. Judaism today is that Hellenized religion, not the ancient Hebrew faith of Moses. They had reduced religion to a matter of intellect and reason, and had forgotten the Hebrew tradition of trusting the heart first. This is the underlying problem behind all the debates Jesus had with the Pharisees and Scribes (the Sadducees were simply secularized). They had become legalized with nit-picking over semantics, something wholly alien to the ancient Hebrew approach.

The heart-led way is not part of our covenant; it is a prerequisite. It is presumed, and for good reason. We believe that the entire human race is equipped to make this transition. This is God’s free gift to mankind, regardless of whether they know Christ. Indeed, the heart-led approach is part of several pagan religions today, though often it is assumed without comment because it associates with non-Western cultures. Genuine pagan religions bear little resemblance to popular American notions about them. The lack of a heart-led concept is unique to Western Civilization.

Further, the very nature of the Fall in Eden was to shift from a heart-led obedience and faith in God to assertively placing human capabilities on the throne of the soul. The symbolism behind the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was the concept of “knowledge” in the sense of deciding for oneself what is good and evil. This points to the arrogance of the human intellect in presuming to discern by reason what morality is without having to defer to revelation. The intellect is fallen, so we don’t put a lot of trust in it.

Again, God gave us our minds primarily as the means to organizing and implementing what the heart knows.

Posted in meta | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Covenant Book: 01 A Matter for the Heart

Covenant Book: Introduction

The name Radix Fidem is Latin for “root of faith.”

We aren’t trying to be pretentious here; this is just an effort to distinguish ourselves from other brands of Christian religion. There’s nothing wrong with using the English translation, but that’s a rather generic phrase and we aren’t trying to hijack it as somehow uniquely ours. We don’t take ourselves that seriously.

The Latin word radix is related to our English “radical” — getting back to the root of things. We aren’t quite so radical as to throw away everything from our ambient culture, but we don’t hesitate to reexamine everything. This began as my personal effort to understand better the cultural and intellectual context of the ancient Hebrew people. Anyone with just a little academic background in Old Testament history is well aware that the Hebrew people were radically different from us today.

And if you take the Bible seriously, it presents a record of God’s revelation of Himself to one nation in particular. This God claims to be the one and only true deity, the Creator of all things. The narrative indicates that what we have today is a significant departure from where we began. Somehow we chose a path the led us out of our original communion with Him, and the bulk of His revelation is aimed at revealing His terms for restoring that lost communion.

The path to restoration includes Him building and developing a language and intellectual background, a vast ancient heritage that was partly fresh and new, but also partly drawn from the likes of Mesopotamian and Egyptian cultures. Thus, we can say that the Bible belongs to a much wider Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) tradition. Yet, it arose out of that to offer a unique approach to the question of peace with our Maker. In essence, ancient Hebrew traditions were made by God as the vehicle of His revelation, not simply chosen from a collection of existing traditions. The language and particular assumptions about reality were part of the package. If you don’t make some effort to grasp the huge differences between the Hebrew outlook and our latter day Western outlook, you cannot pretend to understand the Bible, nor the God of the Bible.

Jesus presented Himself as the Son of God, the final and ultimate revelation of that God. It’s not enough that a Westerner would attempt to understand His words and actions, but it requires seeing Him as the revelation itself. We note that biblical language personifies things in ways we might consider a figure of speech, yet we know from studies of ANE cultures as a whole that they would have taken that personification quite seriously. In other words, for them it was virtually literal, that you cannot abstract truth into words and ideas, but must become acquainted with ultimate truth as a living Person.

That’s just an example of how radical is the difference between today’s Western outlook and what lies behind the Scripture. Americans are highly conditioned by a general influence of folks like Plato and Aristotle, along with a hoard of Germanic myths. There is some academic evidence that the Christian gospel was highly modified and compromised to appeal to an Anglo-Saxon audience (among others) so as to bring them under a faux political “Christianity” (see my previous book, A Course in Biblical Mysticism for an in-depth examination of this shift). The problem is that the compromised version of the gospel has become the very foundation for the whole range of Anglo-American Christian religion.

American Christians tend to assume that this is what God intended. We take issue with that. Not in the sense of hostility, but we aren’t willing to continue in this tradition any longer, particularly when we cannot find peace with God there. God has awakened something in us that, when shared with American believers, provoked varying degrees of rejection. We aren’t so arrogant as to demand the world as it is should change to suit us, but we know where we aren’t welcome. The current community of faith under the name Radix Fidem consists of folks who couldn’t find a home anywhere else. Keep what you have if it works for you, but it’s not working for us.

A critical element in our different approach is embracing the notion that reality itself is formed on the character and personality of God. His revelation also reflects that same personality. He chose to depict Himself as a nomad desert sheik, an eastern potentate ruling under ANE feudal customs and traditions. We believe this was for a very good reason: Creation itself is hard-wired according to that ANE feudalism. It’s not a feudalism like Western Medieval feudalism, where the focus is on ownership of land with people attached. ANE feudalism is a familial ownership of people; a sheik’s domain and greatest treasure is His household of people.

We know for a fact the first churches in Jerusalem were also structured under this same ANE feudal model. We believe the New Testament churches scattered across the Mediterranean Basin were also organized this way originally. We believe “church” meant an extended household under a covenant of faith and guided by a shepherd elder. This elder was rather like a clan chieftain. The other primary leader was a priestly figure. Thus, we have the Two Witnesses of “priest and king” in terms of how they functioned within that extended family household. And while most early churches were, indeed, pretty much literal kinfolks, the ANE had a long tradition of adopting new family members. In the New Testament, the emphasis was on shared spiritual heritage, not DNA. This was no different from someone converting to the Covenant of Israel and becoming a very literal member of the nation. The covenant was the identity, not the bloodline.

Radix Fidem is a covenant family and is organized along ANE feudal lines. We believe in elder leadership alongside pastoral leadership. There is ample tradition and custom to make this work; it remains for us to make adjustments to understand and adhere to it as part of our covenant of faith. We know it’s a big leap for people pickled in the philosophy of democracy. We insist it shares very little with historical church organizational structures like magisterial, presbyterial or democratic and others, but our path is ANE feudal simply because we believe Creation itself operates that way.

This is just a part of our radically different approach to following Christ.

Posted in meta | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments

Meta: Working on Another Book

With a strong focus on preparing to grow, I’m working on a book I knew had to be written sooner or later. Later is here now. This one is tentatively titled Radix Fidem: A Covenant of Faith. There’s nothing new in it for regular readers. The narrative is specifically aimed at folks who haven’t encountered it before. Nonetheless I will serialize it here for your inspection. Feel free to comment; I may not use your advice, but it’s still valuable to hear from a different perspective.

This will be published at my account on Smashwords, and I hope to prepare a format for paper printing. I can’t afford to print a bunch of copies myself, but we can make it easier for someone with the right equipment to do so.

The first installment follows….

============

Foreword

This is our covenant, the basis for working together in a community of faith. Granted, I am the sole author of the words in this book, but there is a growing community of people who have embraced it. As will be clarified later in this book, this covenant is not a matter of orthodoxy. It’s more a question of how we can agree to work together based on common assumptions. Nobody is setting forth a statement that this is how God works with everyone, but it’s how He works with us.

So it’s not a question of reading this and swearing allegiance to the ideas. Rather, it’s a question of whether you can say: “I can live with this.” If you can understand what’s written here, then you can form a good estimate of what to expect from the leadership. You’ll understand nobody is required to swallow everything, only promise not to interfere as our common efforts grow out of these ideas. Indeed, we rather hope you won’t try to join unless these ideas speak to your heart as the right way to do religion.

This is a huge leap away from the mainstream Western approach to Christianity. I’m not going to tell you that what’s written here reflects a precise adherence to the ancient Hebrew approach from the Bible, but is our best approximation of what that approach demands of us today in our current context. We don’t pretend we are somehow reviving the ancient Hebrew ways, but we do hope to take our cues from their ways, letting them inform our choices.

What we have found is a treasury of peace with God. There is simply no way we can be silent about this and keep it to ourselves; there’s more than enough to share.

A note of caution: This author is an American, called of God to witness to an American audience. Nothing excludes others from using this message and embracing this covenant. However, the frame of reference is the United States of America, so the reader is cautioned to be aware of the limited context. If you aren’t immersed in American social culture and religion, some of this will require adjustments to fit into a non-American context. I’m not touting America as God’s favorite; quite the contrary. This message includes a harsh judgment against the particular sins of America.

Posted in meta | 1 Comment

I Cannot Avoid It

I believe you need to see how this works, to see the questions and inner struggle to discern the wisdom of God. We have such a long way to go in many areas of our shared faith, and this struggle is a sign of progress.

At some point the prophet knows what he has to say. Some prophets find it easy; others struggle like I do. Either way, the shining light of conviction cannot be kept hidden inside. I try to be careful to distinguish for my readers the boundary lines between something solid for me and something that seems fuzzy and incomplete. So I find my prophetic warning about attacking Iran is stone solid, but other issues aren’t quite so crystal clear for me. I can tell that my heart sees something clear as day, but I’m still having trouble freeing my intellect from a lot of bad influences.

In one sense, I can tell you that the mainstream organized Christian churches will be destroyed. In another sense, I don’t think all of them will simply disappear. The difference is perception; heart-led believers will see it as destruction from the level of the moral sphere. Humans without the heart-led vision will see only changes in social influence and style, along with some economic collapse dooming a few particular religious organizations. Thus, we should expect to see a significant number of individual churches lose their facilities, for example.

Whether or not that means the congregation disbands is another matter entirely. But for us, the changes will be of a type, a particular moral character in how mainstream Christian religion degrades. Their dependence on money is what will kill them.

But it’s more than that; it will be connected in some way to the big problem for Israel. I’m not allowed to see much detail, but something big and bad will happen to the Zionist project. It will be a major factor in the destruction of a lot of things, particularly plans and dreams cherished by the neocons and globalists. But it will also hit the mainstream churches pretty hard. While it’s not exactly clear enough to call it prophecy, I suspect some elite group currently supporting Israel will throw her under the bus in order to save something else they value even more. Again, I believe it’s all about the control of wealth.

This is why I wrote that Israel is just a distraction, not of any great significance in the grand scheme of things. All we really need to do as a community of faith is point out that this Israel has no connection to any Bible prophecies, because she rejects the very basis of her true identity: the Covenant of Moses. Furthermore, she is obliged to recognize Jesus as her Messiah; she has to follow the Law as Jesus taught it. That part is simply a matter of Scripture, and doesn’t require any prophetic insight.

As time slides by us, I get a sharpening image in my soul of how the US is going to end. First, there is the inevitable economic shock. This has been coming for a long time and there is nothing any human or group of humans can do to stop it. Second, there will be a constitutional crisis of some sort that shatters the government system. While it is certain to come, the particulars are not clear to me just yet, but the internal conflict between various factions has reached the breaking point. The economic and political crises will play into each other. The primary issue for you and I is to pray that we can discern the current and future events that aren’t big enough to break things. There’s an awful lot of noise that signifies nothing.

These things will affect us. For some of you, your calling doesn’t make much room for such concerns. But for elders, at the least, it matters. We have to see the kind of hassles coming so we can react in practical ways to keep this thing moving forward.

And that’s what really matters: Our religion will explode. If not Radix Fidem by name, then any number of heart-led groups will come to life across America (and elsewhere, for sure). It’s not that we need to pull them in under our wings, but that we need to think in terms of seeing hearts awaken. We are obliged to help them if we can, and pray for those who feel the need to go their own way. This explosion is our raison d’etre, the purpose for which God bothers to grant prophetic gifts among us. It’s our job to nurture this thing.

So as a part of our broader teaching about the continuity of things versus the academic distinctions, I want you to see how the heart-led way works to bring a prophetic insight. In one sense, I cannot distinguish between a specific Word from God versus a general insight that comes from a heart-led sensitivity to what happens in the moral sphere. I see the moral pattern, the shape of things in the character of my God. Does it matter what imagery I use to portray what I see?

All I can tell you at this point is how consistently this prophetic insight has worked for much smaller things along my path to this point. For example, I ride my bike choosing a route based on the very same sense of heart-led awareness that I use to discern the events ahead of us all. The route that I then take riding always results in finding a sense of shalom. Not that everything is perfect, but the results of my choice — in terms of things I cannot possibly control — do come out well. Whether it’s motor traffic staying out of my way, or some peculiar challenge that I didn’t expect, it still all turns out in a broad sense of blessing and serves to reaffirm His divine favor.

That sense of peace with God is indestructible. Nothing in this world can shake it. That’s not to say I cannot lose it, and I can assure you I wouldn’t want to go on living without it. But I simply cannot bring myself to turn from this path, and I want more than anything on this earth for other people to find that sweet peace for themselves. So I’ll keep taking the heart-led path of living and I’ll keep writing about the prophetic insights that I cannot ignore as part of the same package.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Browser Wars: Lost Pretense of Innocence

Nobody is surprised when Google does something sneaky and dirty. We all figured out long ago that Google is evil in the sense that they will not hesitate to lie, and will gladly sell you to the highest bidder. They don’t in the least mind doing things we find creepy, manipulative and invasive.

Google is the Devil we know. We also know that their expertise in technology is hard to match. They’ve taken on the older generation of technology companies and have little trouble competing in areas the Google wants to dominate. The only thing holding them back is their degree of willingness to invest and fight for something that may not be an easy win. But we as tech-savvy users have come to expect Google to act like any government, with their behind-the-scenes “screw you” attitude, but doing it with a great deal of competence because it’s all about the money.

We don’t expect this from Mozilla. Mozilla has positioned themselves as friends of users. They admitted their technology was lagging in some ways, but assured it was partly because they were watching out for our best interests. Maybe they were at some point in the past, but no longer: Firefox Is on a Slippery Slope.

Mozilla has slipped a new bit of malware into their browser without warning. There has been a huge backlash and Mozilla has shut down all means of comment or complaint on this issue. Right when they have just now managed to win back a lot of users with their new and vastly improved browser, they crap on everyone who trusted them.

Let’s be clear: There are no good guys in the browser wars.

Okay, let’s refine this image just a bit. The Internet has become entirely too complicated. When it was a means to deliver documents and information, it was something that changed the world. When it became the means to delivering advertising and applications that run inside your browser, it was turned into a virtual pox on the human race. We can debate whether that transition was inevitable, but we cannot debate the hideous nastiness that it has become.

This is why we seek and use the precious few efforts to dial back the abuse. We use ad-blockers, we seek ways to turn off or tone down certain features in our browsers (mostly having to do with Javascript), and we generally fight back as best we can in what has turned into a technology arms race. Sure, it was all born of the best intentions of delivering things the users actually wanted. But technology is morally neutral in broad terms, so any evil sonuvabitch can get in on the fun. Low and behold, it seems the sonsabitches outnumber the good guys in terms of user experience.

There are two ways a browser project can go: full service or something less. There are three basic projects trying to do the full service stuff: Microsoft’s Edge (formerly IE; the Trident engine), Google’s Chrome (the Blink engine), and Mozilla (Gecko engine). There are some legacy engines that were previously part of this show (like WebKit), but are now relegated to minor projects. Then there are a several more projects taking the other route, with no intention of implementing everything. And the big three are bundled into operating systems, so the typical user never gives it that much thought.

In this market, Mozilla has long been the underdog of the big three. It is currently bundled with a lot of Linux distributions and similar operating systems, which amounts to a tiny minority on Net. Their squeaky clean image was their primary selling point. Whether they might have damaged it in the past won’t matter too much now, because they have thrown it away completely with their latest slimy actions.

So now the only question is which of the evil sonsabitches offers the closest to what you can tolerate. Yes, there are dozens of browsers built of Blink and Gecko, and some of the projects are striving to correct some small selection of abuses. You’ll have to make up your own mind, the question is frankly complex.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Sermon the Mount 11

Model Prayer 6:9-15

So what would your private prayer sound like? On the one hand, memorizing this passage as some kind of sacred liturgy is a huge mistake. Nothing here suggests it, much less commands it. Rather, Matthew chose Greek words that translate roughly to “along these lines” or “in this fashion.” Nor should you imagine that it’s some kind of holy outline, treating it like a checklist. Again, that misses the point. A proper Hebrew approach is to get the flavor of what He says, to absorb the protocol underlying the words.

Oddly, the first line is standard rabbinical stuff; you can find it in the Talmud. Keep in mind that the Hebrew concept behind “Your name” refers to Our Father’s title, His role as God of all things. Further, the second line is typical Messianic wording. You can be sure that when the Messiah comes, He will assertively require full obedience in His Presence just as He would from the angels in Heaven. Thus, these first two lines are familiar to His disciples already; Jesus reaffirms common practice thus far.

The reference to “daily bread” was widely understood as a Roman term. Without digging too deeply into the details of a Roman conscript’s daily life, his captain was his master. The captain would keep his conscripts in line by keeping them dependent on him. At the end of each day, he gave his troops just enough food to last through the next day. To avoid becoming dependent on local provisions, Rome often provided directly the makings for a very good quality of bread as the bottom line for military rations. It was not at all like the flat bread common in the Levant, but was like a big round loaf and could be quite tasty by comparison. This better bread was one of those small inducements that kept soldiers loyal, but the limited ration would discourage going absent. If you want to keep eating, you have to keep reporting back to the captain.

Thus, Jesus depicts the Father as rather like our captain, giving us better stuff, but just enough to keep us dependent. This line in the prayer was to teach His disciples to think differently about the whole issue of shalom. You should be aware that the false Messianic Expectations blathered about unlimited supplies of food, rather like turning stones into bread. This imagery drawn from the Roman Army overturns the greedy Jewish thinking.

Jesus returns to conventional rabbinical wisdom about repentance. The Talmud says more than once that the burden is on you to move to the place of forgiveness first, so that you stand in the place where Jehovah’s forgiveness is poured out on you. Sins were viewed as debts that burdened the sinner and prevented God’s prosperity, but so was a lack of forgiveness. Forgiveness was an open door to resolving those debts. You cannot compel someone else to repent for sinning against you, but you can open the door. Forgiveness must be offered, but could not be claimed without repentance.

Connected to this was the line about being led away from trials. In the Hebrew mind, it’s one thing to submit as David did to examination (Psalm 139); this is one kind of testing. It preempts the other kind of testing — a fiery trial that falls on those who need encouragement to develop a penitent heart. The word Matthew selects here is more like “discipline” than “temptation.” We should pray for the first kind of testing, so that we can avoid the second. Failing the second testing means we are turned over the Evil one, whose nickname here in Greek can be read as “Calamity.” It’s a picture of being turned over to the nobleman appointed by the king to put you into harsh and degrading slavery until you earn back the debt you failed to pay in the first place.

The doxology line is nearly a quote from 1 Chronicles 29:11, a part of the Jewish ritual for addressing the Ark of Covenant. It’s the standard protocol for leaving the presence of your feudal sovereign. Then, as your final takeaway from the Divine Presence, Jesus hammers home the point about penitence as a way of life. The only way you can lose that is to close off your heart. A primary mark of the Holy Spirit is the reflexive sense of one’s culpability before a Holy God. It broods and burns in the background and never leaves you alone in this life. You can never escape the sense that you are wholly unworthy, but it’s always paired with the overwhelming sense of joy at the grace of forgiveness. How could you not forgive others?

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Sermon the Mount 11

Phenomenology as Clue to Phenomena

It seems a good time to point out something that may not be obvious.

For those of you familiar with philosophy as an academic pursuit, you recognize that I use the terms and some ideas from Phenomenology. You may also recognize that I take them in a different direction entirely. My underlying assumption is that all of Creation is alive, sentient and willful. If the question is first-person experience of reality, then we have to treat reality as the second person. Meanwhile, every other human is by birth alienated from Creation and from their divine heritage.

Jesus set the pattern in no uncertain terms: We speak to Creation as a person. With His authority, Creation responds as a person under authority. The Roman Centurion had it right (Matthew 8:1-17). This kind of authority is what we surrendered in Eden, and to some degree it is restored by following Christ.

Phenomenology is not a matter of following Christ, but among the other choices we might have in pursuing philosophical questions, it’s the better path. We are missing a vast lore of intellectual assumptions that belonged to the ancient Hebrew people. As we promote the heart-led way of life as a covenant community, some of you will never feel drawn to such questions. That means you are called to trust your brothers and sisters who do have the calling to pursue such things. Not that you swallow everything they say, but that you come with an open mind and pass these things before your heart to verify or deny.

There is no objective truth upon which we all are supposed to agree. There is only a common acquaintance with the person of reality, which would naturally tend to overlap with some common experience. We all get to know this person in our own unique encounter, because it’s part of getting to know God the same way. He won’t react to each of us exactly the same because He made us all to be unique. Thus, what we share is not binding truth, but suggestive truth. The proper use of words to share these things is not as containers of truth, but as indicators to where one should search out truth. Heart-led communication is not descriptive, but indicative.

Thus, all of my teaching is suggestive, not binding on you. I rely on the Holy Spirit to witness to the truth of my words in terms of applicability. The question is not whether I am right, but whether you can use it.

In the past I’ve discussed something called the “Game Theory of Socio-sexual Response” as proposed by someone else. In particular, this theory proposes a hierarchy of male types. You should understand that this is an inherently Western model, not biblical. This hierarchy exists only in Western society; it is not fundamental to human nature. It can be applied to non-Western societies to some degree, but largely because Western values have leaked over into the whole world. Those archetypes of masculine identity don’t fit well into the ancient Hebrew society. There are some useful observations in the map of hierarchy, but it’s not the whole truth. The biblical shepherd male is not in that hierarchy.

Thus, I do not suggest you aspire to any of those listed roles. All of them presume a pagan background, a non-biblical approach to truth and reality. They do reflect what you will find in Western society, but not what you find in the Bible. We can use that theoretical model for what it gets right, but not as God’s truth. The gospel requires that you escape that matrix.

So, for example, that model explains the likes of Trump as a classical Alpha Male, particularly in the weaknesses of that role. He’s a blowhard, a highly competitive man of inflated ego and demonstrated arrogance. It works because he’s dealing with a Western nation.

It also explains why the alleged “Deep State” lacks the total control they would like us to believe they have. There aren’t any real Alphas in the Deep State apparatus. A basic rule of Western Alpha Males is that everyone caters to them in broad general terms, so they have no use for bureaucracy and rules. The Deep State bureaucracy rests entirely on non-Alpha resentment.

Don’t get drawn into that trap. Trump is not a good guy; in biblical terms he’s repulsive. He’s just moderately successful in the context. Meanwhile, there is a huge army of even more repulsive creatures opposing him and trying any and every way possible to remove him from office. This whole drama is part of God’s plan for destroying the US government, and bringing His wrath on America. Trump is an important manifestation of that wrath; his behavior and character help us to understand the shape of God’s wrath.

This takes us back to quantum moral reasoning: Reduce things to their simplest terms and apply those moral truths at multiple levels. Within the context of doomed America, the whole Trump show is almost amusing. In heart-led terms, he’s a total boor whipping up a frenzy from resentful Deltas and Gammas, who are in turn deploying their army of twisted Omegas to attack him. Meanwhile, the Betas are drawn to Trump as the only way forward with the plunder.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

American Demon of Retaliation

A demon of retaliation stalks America.

Granted, it’s been around the US for a long time, but recently it’s become far more active. We are seeing the spirit of retaliation like never before, a whole new scale of things in both breadth and depth. It’s new in the sense of how shocking and egregious it is, coming from sources you simply could not imagine previously.

Granted, we’ve come to expect this from government agencies. The concept of accountability has been turned on its head; it’s an Orwellian reversal. The only accountability is one-way — we to them. If you haven’t experienced it directly, brace yourself. Even the training of those in direct contact with the public has embraced this retaliatory spirit. They are ordered to be abrasive with us.

But have you seen how this has arisen also in business? We are awash in petty lawsuits from various thin-skinned professionals and companies. The very notion of “customer service” is considered passe, a quaint notion from ancient times. Can you believe a consumer relations department assessing monetary penalties on customers who dare to complain?

And yet, sometimes you can’t blame them. Customers themselves have become petty and vindictive. Your average Joe Consumer will demand an entire company be shut down and the employees jailed for the most minor disappointments. No, I mean that people have literally demanded just that. The ancient Lex Talionis is quite tame and friendly by comparison.

This goes far beyond mere bad manners. It’s more than a threat to civilization; this is a broad evil seeking to devour human existence. This is precisely the kind of misery and spite that Satan has always sought to implant in human society. It represents the kind of “violence” we see in the Bible when the prophet Jonah prophesied against Nineveh.

This thing is devouring America. The mouth of Hell is wide open, swallowing the whole nation. Do you see how this guarantees people will transgress every part of Biblical Law and allow Satan to absorb every blessing God offers? This is the snarling beast at the very core of Western Civilization.

Obviously this is what’s behind the New Testament teaching of patiently enduring trials and tribulations. If you feel drawn to the shalom and the calling of Christ, you have to know that this demands we pull away from retaliation. This has nothing to do with a vigorous defense of your feudal domain granted from God. One of the hallmarks of Ancient Near Eastern dominion was the grand placidity in the face of roaring spite. It came from a willingness to absorb inconsequential losses by making it obvious they didn’t hurt.

We don’t promote the snarling arrogance of contempt, but an honest rebuke that asks, “Are you trying to hurt my feelings?” When your feelings aren’t attached to the things a fallen world scrambles to hold, you aren’t going to rage at small losses. In the mind of Christ, it’s not a matter of correcting and coercing fools, but calling their attention to how foolish their concerns are. Learn the distinction between guarding something entrusted to you by God and scrabbling over something our Lord can easily replace.

Live shalom; be ready to shrug off the petty bitterness of people who are consumed by demonic powers they can’t comprehend. It’s going to get far worse before the Lord is finished pouring His wrath on America.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on American Demon of Retaliation