Pranks and Trust

The best way to destroy trust is through pranks.

As noted previously on this blog, your sense of humor is your own. You never apologize for what you find funny, but it may force you to seek other company. In situations where you have no choice about your company, be vary careful about pranks. You may find yourself forced to sleep next to someone who thinks you are their enemy.

Cruelty in pranking is fundamental to Western culture. It arises from the tribal Germanic culture in which men are encouraged to remain juvenile and spiteful, except when they are socially promoted. In other words, it belongs to the commoners, and nobility is mis-characterized as stuffy. A bit of rough fun at the expense of someone stuck with you is part of our class warfare. It’s one of the rites of passage, a form of initiation into a dominant subculture.

However, it is also a matter of trust failure. Juvenile idiots don’t know the social value of trust, so they create a sphere of faux trust based on some common misery. For them, the only grounds of trust is misery, whether real or imagined, and they willingly manufacture false misery for others as the sole means of building social trust. In a culture where trust is considered a weakness, you’ll find pranking.

The danger is when the prankster and victim disagree over where the line should be drawn in defining a prank as harmless. Holding a measure of social power tends to make pranking intentionally cruel and hateful. It’s a matter of jockeying for position within the existing social structure. Among higher status Westerners, pranking is often a matter of words and contrived drama, whereas the lower class version is actual physical attack. It’s the false Western tribalism. What both share is the utter necessity of destroying fundamental human trust and kindness, as if such were the trappings of some forsaken tribal identity, to build something supposedly tougher as you enter your new tribal idenity. The real breaking point is how seriously people take themselves, both the pranksters and the victims.

The intent to be silly and harmless, an invitation to laugh with, not an excuse to laugh at, is not so hard to bear. That actually builds genuine trust. In general, Westerners are not very good at this. Westerners prefer humbling the victim, even to the point of suckering him as a set-up to something nasty and demeaning. It’s a demand that the victim accept that value system or face escalating hatred and threats. There’s usually one or more members of the existing social group who feel the drive to carefully guard something seldom consciously defined, or defined in mythical terms. The sense of humor is assumed without consideration, fiercely guarded as if it were God’s own.

This is the reality in which we live. People who are comfortable with whimsy and don’t take themselves too seriously are very much a minority. If you aspire to a shepherd’s soul, you will find yourself already completely alien to the virtually every social matrix of this world. When life tosses you into a new social situation, your strongest defense against losing yourself to distractions is to remain alien and aloof. It’s not a question of what you find humorous; it’s a question of the social dynamics and shepherding souls. You have a mission. If you react strongly, you have surrendered that mission.

You should expect pranks as a standard element to initial entry into any social structures. Your mission remains otherworldly, calling people to something above this realm. It’s one thing to salute the flag flying over the turf on which you stand; it’s another thing to forget that your God is neither that flag nor under it. You can be the only adult in the room, so to speak, and not have to play the scold for either side of any faux conflict. You’ll confront the existing structure, without so much seeking to change it as to rise above it. The shepherd soul belongs to a civilization in another realm entirely. You have to trust in a higher power, a cosmic moral fabric, to preserve your sanity.

Your mission is to build valid structures of trust for whomever is willing to climb.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Pranks and Trust

Doing What’s Right for Me

What is your commitment?

You don’t have to come up with a name for it, but you do need some frame of reference to claim the full benefits of the moral fabric of the universe. The fundamental nature of God’s Justice includes the absolute necessity of incarnating His Laws in your own flesh. You have to live the Laws, have to absorb them on a level that escapes words. As I often say, it’s not enough to think in terms of being and doing, because those miss the point. It’s a question of who you are in God’s eyes.

Having given it some thought, I can tell you my primary function is pastoral counselor. In Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) civilization, that would make me a lawyer in the sense of moral law. While I no longer wear the vestments of prophet, the prophetic nature of what I do will never diminish, because the biblical prophet was first and foremost an adviser representing the agenda of our Creator. Without that fundamental orientation, they would have no way to paint their messages in words. What has changed is that I don’t make it habit to preach, either literally or virtually. You could put me in front of a crowd of any size without warning and I would be comfortable trying to deliver something that might justify their attention. Willingness and ability doesn’t mean you do it all the time; the same underlying talents can be used in many different ways.

It’s not as if Aristotelian analysis of the Bible is evil, only that it won’t get you very far. A teaching to which I subscribe arose long ago from fairly mainstream Western evangelicals, in which the term “gifts of the Spirit” was broken down into categories associated with Greek words that are commonly translated as “gift”. The teaching lists (1) direct manifestations of the power of the Spirit, (2) roles and offices within the church body, (3) human spiritual temperaments and (4) the basic effect of your service in terms of spiritual influence. The flaw in this teaching was a tendency to match each category too precisely with certain specific passages of Scripture in a manner typical of Western Christians. The material lent itself to legalism, rather ironic for something supposedly spiritual. The basic idea was pretty good, though: We need to be careful with labels precisely in that we don’t restrict their meaning too narrowly. God cannot be defined by words, so we should not confine our expectations by them, either.

According to the underlying idea, I would (1) manifest a word of wisdom often, (2) wearing the role of elder mostly, (3) with a prophetic temperament and (4) a broadly pastoral effect. Could we transport me over into a parallel universe where ANE civilization prevailed, I would probably be a court adviser to some king or chieftain. I should not and would not make the final decision, but offer a particular perspective on the problems of daily life. Once the decision is made, count on me to do all I can do to help make it happen, or at least stay out of the way.

Thus, it should surprise no one that, while I say that I address the world primarily as a pastoral counselor, I am actively seeking employment as a personal assistant (no longer). The computer ministry is just a sideline, a way to keep myself busy while God prepares the ideal job opportunity. I’m serving God first and foremost; everything else is just a mission while I’m here on this earth. The paradox of my teaching on Christian Mysticism is how intensely practical it is. Not just some theories and fuzzy thinking, but approaching a system of how to deal with reality in accordance with a particular viewpoint. I had to understand the Law Covenants before I could understand mysticism, so my mysticism has distinct pragmatic implications. I’m always analyzing things from the perspective of pastoral guidance.

So what’s driving you?

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Doing What’s Right for Me

Dinner with Jesus

Jesus wined and dined with sinners.

This was no mere social justice campaign. That it appears as such is merely the insistence of reading modern Western politics back into something totally alien. It’s not as if Jesus never engaged in social justice, but He would have defined it on totally different terms. He would ridicule modern social morals.

We who seek to walk with Jesus must join Him, both in ridiculing modern Western mores and in walking among sinners to reclaim their lives. This isn’t merely a question of social outcasts, though it surely will include that. Rather, it requires each of us to consider where the mission is for us in revealing His moral imperatives, which are unavoidably contrary to whatever the world might be claiming in almost any context.

The fallen world will seize upon anything except the truth as God revealed it. That is the starting point when you evaluate your own social context for opportunities to glorify Christ. Your basic assumption is that the majority voice of any human element is likely wrong. Not in the whole; Satan is a smarter liar than that. But when you pick over the details, the Devil has already won. We might discuss them only as symptoms of something much deeper, something that typically defies mere words. Our Enemy walks all around the truth, attempting to pervert everyone’s perception of it.

Each of us is called into a specific context. As God opens doors, we enter into whatever human activity is available to us, not with a heart and will to promote that activity, but as the field of operations for His Kingdom. It’s almost as if we are spies against all human institutions. But instead of working hard at sneaky tactics, we can operate in the full light of honesty because most people aren’t going to comprehend what is plainly set before them. The truth of what we do is veiled by its nature as contrasted with human fallen nature. No matter what we sense as our native element in this world, we rejoice not so much in that sense of comfort, but that we can be used to bring Him glory because of where our flesh belongs.

Delving into computers, I am not committed to any particular technology. It’s all just a tool. I find good things and useful opportunities in Windows, Mac, Linux, Unix, etc. All of them have their place. What I seem to like at any given time is merely a reflection of where the Spirit leads me as His divine influence working through me to touch others for His glory. That I forecast the eventual institutional failure of Microsoft or commercial software as a whole has little to do with my personal emotional loyalty to something else. That kind of loyalty is quite plastic because it is merely a reflection of what fits my needs at the moment. It’s just software; none of it is sacred. It’s just a tool for His glory.

While I grew weary of the insanity, I also enjoyed some elements of my military service. Something in that beckons to my human side. It’s not as if I delight in the destruction of human lives across the globe, nor am I ignorant of the moral horror of US imperial arrogance. But give me a chance and I would gladly commit my flesh to that atmosphere again. I can recount for you a very large crop of spiritual fruit, a magnificent harvest of souls, from working among the people who wear military uniforms.

It might be more difficult to show you what I accomplished when I worked with those who live with various handicaps, but my favorite students in public school were often those with special educational needs. It was very tiring work, but I always volunteered to take the temporary vacancies in those classes. Then again, having worked extensively in public education, I can assure you I cannot go back there. The training and experience are invaluable to me, but that is not where I am called.

There are other spheres of human activity where I am comfortable, and even more where I am not. That’s just human nature. Feel free to condemn or approve, because it has little to do with how I discern the will of my Lord. Join me where our paths converge, but stay on your own path. The vast majority of Christians, at least, are seriously misled about what constitutes a spiritual “Do not enter” sign from God. They prefer to project their own personal mission onto all humanity, as if their own experience is normative for humanity. How could God lead someone differently? That shallow intellectual absolutism is what keeps so very many Christians out of the real action. They talk a good game but castigate other Christians who faithfully serve Jesus. They would refuse to eat with the sinners among whom Jesus hung out; they would side with the Pharisees.

The fallen human impulse to repair this world itself is a poor substitute for how God actually operates through us. He flatly said He would not fix this world, but has announced concrete plans to destroy it, though He surely offers us a chance to claim the very best part of this fallen existence through His Laws. Yet His Laws plainly treat this world as of no great importance in itself. What matters is His holiness within an irreparably broken, wholly limited and temporary context. The larger human political stream of history is just a background upon which His glory is projected through us. We don’t belong here and dare not claim any part of it as our home. You can afford to commit your flesh to doing a good job at whatever your calling may be, because you aren’t going to change this world.

Where do you meet Jesus? Where are the sinners with whom you will dine so you can serve Him?

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dinner with Jesus

Tool Shed 6

Despite my years of tinkering with Linux, I find the printing framework (CUPS) still lags what you can get on Windows or Mac. Most people might never notice the difference, but when I need something out of the ordinary, I can’t do it on Linux. We all know that while some printer manufacturers do turn out nice drivers for CUPS, they never go beyond the driver itself by providing the rich software controls with their own packaged drivers for Windows. On the other hand, you also don’t have to worry about running those huge, fat printer control packages on Linux that bog down your Windows computer. Still, I sometimes need what Linux will probably never provide in terms of printed product. That most of the world is quickly abandoning paper output means this will become irrelevant soon enough, but for now, I have to run Windows for some things.

The headache of running Windows is that it remains unsecured by design. It’s not as if you can’t make Windows pretty tight against most malware, but doing so has always been the domain of serious and secretive MS engineers and expensively trained technicians. There are a wealth of policy tools built into the professional grade versions of Windows used in many corporate networks, but they are obscure and challenging to implement. Most of these are very sensible and really should be set by default, but MS is all about convenience and lowest-common-denominator. Your Home Premium Windows box lacks those tools. The underlying restrictions still work, but the suite of policy tools is part of the difference in price compared to the Professional version or higher.

Implementing those restrictions sensibly for you is what CryptoPrevent does.

It’s pretty simple. Download the free version of “setup.exe,” launch it and accept the defaults, then click “Apply.” You’ll have to reboot, but once it comes back up, chances are really good you’ll never notice the difference in how your system acts. Relaunch the application and hit the “Test” button to see if it works as designed. Only rarely does it fail and the site offers some guidance. Honestly, folks: This thing will disable a really large swath of malware out there today. The changes it makes should be the default on Windows for home users.

Another smart habit is simply using web browsers that lack all the bells and whistles for general surfing. I always keep multiple browsers installed, in part for testing, but also because each has different strengths and works better for one site or another. Most browsers allow you to disable lots of features, but it can be inconvenient unless you understand how to create additional profiles on the same browser you normally use. Even then, the browser might still do some things that are risky. One of my favorite browsers is called D+. It began as the Windows version of Dillo, available on Linux and BSD for quite some time. The current version of D+ actually works better than Dillo. You’ll need to run through the configuration options and test things to see how they work. You make the changes, close it, and then relaunch before they take effect.

The rendering is really quite different and takes getting used to. If you’ve used Lynx a great deal, you’ll recognize the layout is very similar, as both tend to ignore columns and tables. What you’ll see is usually more like what cellphone and tablet users see as the “mobile version” of most sites in a plainly vertical display. If you read the longer version of the description of D+, you’ll learn a lot of common browser features are left out on purpose. A crippled and simplified browser protects you from bad stuff, yet allows you to read the text and view most static images. A few sites won’t work at all for Lynx or D+, but that’s what “full feature” browsers are for.

If you really want to run Lynx, as I often do, you really should work through the Cygwin Project. Run the installer and check in the various categories like Networking and find a checkbox for the “lynx” package. The installer will take care of adding anything else needed to run Lynx. I rather like this excellent visual tutorial, even though it’s primary purpose is to allow running an obscure software project called PhysioNet. The point is, that particular page will show you how to get Cygwin installed and set up to run. You can adjust the size of the terminal window to suit your tastes via the usual context menu. It’s also a really great way to learn the Linux CLI without running a virtual machine. Lynx running from Cygwin is actually a better experience than it is on Linux because it reliably renders more common symbols and special characters that tend to disappear in the Linux version.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Obvious and Wrong

In the Kingdom of Heaven, good and evil are determined by the Spirit of God.

That means we cannot rely on mere utility. It’s not in the nature of the thing, but in whether it serves the purpose of God’s glory in that moment. For you as a fallen human, you cannot pretend to discern that in terms of absolutes, but only whether you find peace in conscience. So long as there are unsettled feelings, you need to pursue the feelings to their source until you can untangle your own confusion. Meanwhile, you can do only what you know best in that moment, so your primary guide is seeking a clear conscience. If your conscience relies too much on mere obvious utility, you will be wrong.

Drinking straight tap water exposes you to significant health risk in the long term. Some water sources are worse than others, obviously. If you can, you should avoid it. Then again, the calling and mission from God might nix completely such concerns. Either God intends you to suffer from the effects, or He will protect you miraculously, or maybe some of both with a measure or mitigation. Obedience is the issue, not the utility of the choice.

Impinging yourself on the comfort and convenience of other folks is generally wrong, not to mention risky business with the way some folks take offense. People kill strangers over the silliest things. But if your noise and inconvenience of others is the result of obeying God, you’ll have to take that risk. Now on this, the biggest problem is people misreading what it means to obey God. Most of Western Christianity is deeply stained with a nasty mythology on this point, as often discussed here on this blog. Still, you have to go with your conscience where you are at the moment.

There are a whole range of things by which people attempt to discern good and evil through “common sense.” Unfortunately, some of the content of “common sense” varies widely across any given population, particularly in Western Civilization. The problem is that Western epistemology, in the very act of proclaiming objectivity, lends itself to a vast array of personalized analysis. Since there really is no such thing as objective truth, what folks imagine it ought to be is subject to all manner of personal bias. It’s a wonder we can get any three people to ever agree on whether the sky is blue. Since most folks don’t bother to analyze very much more than what their narrow tunnel vision includes, we have do have a functional consensus on lots of things. In other words, Western Civilization would have never happened if it didn’t appeal directly to fallen human nature. Common sense becomes little more than the broad consensus over things nobody really bothers to consider, very fuzzy in some areas, but still not too hard to identify.

Thus, we end up with a bunch of nosy nannies insisting you are doing something wrong because your actions don’t match their personal value system of utility. The most insidious part of this is the unconscious assumption that they have an interest in results that have zero effect on their lives. It’s this faux charitable outreach that masks unconscionable arrogance that we encounter every day. This is the direct result of conditioning trickling down from plutocrats. The social elite live in fear that someone somewhere is acting without their expert advice. You’ll find this in every stripe of political philosophy. Each of the binary issues of popular debate finds all sides agree on one thing: We have to make everybody conform. Never mind what it is they demand conformity to; people must conform to what their betters decree. When you reject the intrusion of a nosy SOB, you are the one who is wrong.

Even when the actions of one person do have an effect on you, God says it may not be yours to object. For example, one of the greatest injustices is how public school administrations use the excuse that, since certain social factor affect how satisfied they are with the results of the schooling process, they have an inherent right to try manipulating those social factors. “We can’t have those kids being individual humans, and the education gods forbid we should allow parents full parental freedom to be themselves!” As if their so-called expertise can somehow set the world aright. Sometimes you have to absorb the folly of others because God didn’t place a certain amount of reality into your hands to control. Trying to control all the factors that affect your human occupation is arrogance beyond comprehension.

All of this is a blatant denial of the Fall and denying the Spirit Realm itself. This is hard-wired; we aren’t going to change it by even the most extreme efforts or even the use of overwhelming force. You would at best merely defend your mission, and rare are those contexts where God will support a violent defense. It’s one thing to note the Law Covenants grant you license to kill another person for a limited range of causes; it’s another to realize it might not glorify God in a given context.

The human mind cannot conceive rules that fit all occasions. God Himself warned it requires His divine wisdom infused into the human soul over decades just to begin coming even close, and at that, it requires understanding in the first place that objectivity is utterly impossible.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Obvious and Wrong

Another Milestone

The currency of the Spirit Realm is voluntary sacrifice of the flesh.

By implication, it means rejecting this entire Fallen Realm as untrustworthy. It’s one thing to know all about this world and the mechanics; it’s another thing entirely to decide what you ought to do with that knowledge in any given context. Spiritual priorities seldom make any kind of sense to folks who are unaware of the Spirit Realm. For them, various urges to make the most of our existence here are all there can be.

Thus, we tend to see people admiring those who push the envelope, even as the majority would never push themselves that hard. Any number of human flaws will prevent it. They may still admit it, but it’s a paradoxical reaction that they seem disappointed when someone else backs off something they wish they could have done themselves. What’s crazy here is the disconnect between what they believe and what they actually do. It’s the common human hypocrisy.

While those in the Spirit are seldom any better in terms of performance, a truly spiritual person would not suffer hypocrisy in terms of what they desire. The Spirit measures human activity in terms of desire to please God, not in terms of measurable achievement. Just because I know how to “get the most” from this or that information, it may not matter at all. A spiritual person is balancing between what’s ideal and what’s real based on something other than laziness or hypocrisy; it’s based on what matters in the Spirit Realm.

We struggle to translate that to folks who don’t think along spiritual lines.

I have no intention of showing off proudly what I’ve accomplished. To me, the image posted here is merely the simplest way to indicate a promise kept. I posted here a couple of years ago that God had called me to get serious about physical fitness. That’s not a goal to achieve, but a commitment that ends only when the Spirit changes the marching orders. For those of you who pay any attention at all and want to see some proof of what faithfulness can bring, here is a quick and easy indicator. I have hit the equilibrium point and further significant progress is unlikely. That’s not because my body is complaining and refuses to push the envelope farther. That’s because the Spirit of God has given me a sense of peace about having reached this point. It’s a milestone, a marker on the path.

I still have plans to hit the gym three days weekly and pump that iron. However, I’m now in a maintenance phase, not catching up. My duty to you as my virtual congregation is to offer some evidence that if I can do it, you can too. Not specifically getting physically fit — sure, do so if you feel moved. Yes, it’s quite an accomplishment given my injuries and arthritis. There are some exercises I simply cannot do, yet I still get the results another way.

The point is that you can also obey what the Spirit of God calls you to do and know that His peace is within reach.

57 years; 210 pounds.

57 years; 210 pounds.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Another Milestone

Job 22

The debate sinks to the level of being preposterous. Eliphaz commits intellectual dishonesty to defend his untenable position.

From the very start of this whole story, Eliphaz and his pals have perverted truth by pulling things out of context. Human language cannot describe how God operates; it can only characterize and indicate. That is the very nature of the symbolic languages of the ancient Semites. What the trio have been doing is a very low grade of literalism that abuses the fundamental nature of the tongue these men spoke. This is what you expect from illiterate bumpkins, not community leaders.

Eliphaz asserts, in so many words, that men cannot bless God. God has no friends, he alleges, and no favorites among men. If things go bad for a man, there can only be one cause, and that is sin. He then pointedly and rudely asserts Job is evil.

He goes on to allege that Job’s former greatness came at the expense of moral failure and it finally caught up with him. Eliphaz rattles off a list of sins he knows for a fact Job did not commit. Having painted himself into this ridiculous logical corner, he flatly asserts what all humanity in that region knows to be a lie. Were Job anything like this, his reputation would have been awful and they would never have been his friends.

Eliphaz even goes on to insist that Job was like those drowned by the Flood, openly rejecting God’s Laws. Obviously Job was so morally blinded that he deserved the same fate. Then he insults Job once more with formulaic calls for repentance that reduce God to an mere mechanism. This is precisely the same reasoning of the Pharisees, who insisted one could only be wealthy because of God’s favor, and poor only because they were accursed. This why the Twelve were rather stunned by a rabbi who didn’t teach that the rich were going to Heaven. It’s the same logic here: If the rich weren’t going to Heaven, who was?

Eliphaz is forced to deny the reality before his own eyes to defend his goofy theology.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Job 22

Network Age Economics

Once the Network Civilization has fully taken hold of humanity, much of what we now think of as economics will be forgotten.

Not because people will be stupid, but the Net changes things and it is we who have failed to understand. In economics, we note that the key to exchange is limiting access. What is freely available to all might well be important and valuable, but cannot be traded. Never mind the official terminology: If you have control over something others want, you can make deals for things you want but do not control.

In the Network Civilization, data will be the commodity. Anything digitized will have zero or near-zero trade value, but physical objects will continue as part of the economic landscape. A great many skills and talents will be replaced with AI and virtual fulfillments. Knowledge itself cannot be an item of trade, because where one person has the knowledge, it can be duplicated either in itself or in its effects. As we have seen, even the deepest secrets, once reduced to digitized format and infinitely replicable, cannot be restricted for long. Artificial restraints are powerless against the Net.

Trademark and patent will cease to exist, so get ready for that.

Further, most things humans can do as a means to offering something unique for trade will be replicated in my lifetime. You can see already that Microsoft is slowly being buried by the rising tide of Open Source software. Not just piracy, but what software does cannot much longer be restricted. Soon enough, AI will write its own software. Then it will make movies and write music and books and the masses will hardly know the difference.

Even the competition among organic creatures will lose its entertainment value, as the difference between “natural born and developed” and any form of enhancement will be blurred into meaninglessness. To some degree, the limits of animal and human performance is already impossible to determined because cheating is ubiquitous. In other words, rarity will cease to exist in the field of entertainment.

What happens when computers can replicate virtually any article we can imagine? How far down toward the molecular level would it have to go to make it effectively indistinguishable from any other? Not just in sensory experience but in how it works and can be used. Even your very personal presence will be replicable with saved data and something like a hologram or clone. What is economically viable today will seem childish and silly in just a couple of generations from now.

There remains one thing no computer, regardless how advanced, can replicate: the Spirit of God. If He is living in you, it is utterly impossible to analyze that down to engrams and algorithms. Our God is the ultimate unfathomable source, the one ineffable Creator of all things. You can teach a computer God’s revealed Laws, but you cannot make a computer responsive to the Spirit of God moving in a unique context in favor of His divine justice.

I cannot say that it would signal the End of Time if mankind and computers pushed beyond what we can now imagine and generate at will anything men can desire. We cannot say whether the economic system of human exchange will remain viable in any form such that some critical mass sinks into jellied souls with nothing left to explore. I’m pretty sure space exploration will turn out to be an epic disappointment, but I don’t think it will prevent anyone trying. I think it would be folly to build an eschatology on what we know now.

What I do know is that the NSA, with all their massive access to data and behavioral observation collated in the most massive quantum AI, cannot predict how God will move in those who serve Him.

As the product of human intelligence, AI will never understand the value of a spiritual soul.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The Spiritual Battlefield

It’s not what you naturally expect.

In our fallen state, we have an awful lot of trouble discerning the fundamental nature of reality. The single most common failure is refusing to grasp the nature of the Fall itself. Most humans outright reject the notion, thus crippling every other consideration. Worst of all, we live in a civilization built on the most pernicious mythologies arising from that rejection.

At our best, we still cannot imagine in our minds the fundamental reality outside our Fallen Realm. This is the reason for parabolic language. Jesus bluntly said parables were necessary because they could only be processed by those spiritually alive. Even when He explained the meaning of a parable, the disciples only thought they understood, but missed critical elements in why the parable had to be told. The import of the parable still passed over their heads, as evidenced by their clinging to false messianic expectations.

This was a critical part of the very reason Christ lived in human flesh and sacrificed Himself on the Cross. Simply saying, “to pay for our sins” offers language that allows most people to miss the point. Under the Law Covenants, gaining actual use of spiritual truth required an awful lot of study, study from within a particular epistemological background that is quite rare among humans today. Yet, even in the ANE world of the Old Testament, rare was the individual who rose to the occasion and was able to lead others into the benefits of that spiritual truth. Christ came to make that spiritual truth a free gift, and reversed the procedure. His Spirit grants the spiritual connection first, after which the seeker then goes on to train his mind to follow where his spirit already walks. The soul has to catch up with the spirit.

The point in religion now is not first to know the moral laws of God so as to approach the gates of Heaven and petition for entrance. Christian religion assumes you hold an entrance pass and need to shed the baggage that won’t be permitted inside. The actual difference between those two images from the eternal point of view is impossible to grasp, but using parabolic or symbolic language, we can characterize the task of religion. Shedding the baggage of the Fall is not an objective, but a process requiring faith — AKA, commitment. It’s the place you live until you are called Home.

Perceptive readers will notice the fundamental task of religion has not changed. We still need to learn God’s Laws as the means to a parabolic understanding of how to manifest His glory here inside the confines of our time-space continuum. Are you surprised at how this echoes what God told Moses on Mount Sinai? God said He could not show Moses His face, only the backside of His glory. Moses would have to leave his human body to see God face to face. Whatever happens to folks who reanimate after death, they don’t see God face to face. This would represent reporting to your Lord for retirement, since the mission is complete. So long as you occupy a body of flesh, the mission continues.

The mission is not to change the world. God alone does that without any reference to us at all. Rather, the mission is self change. Some of my favorite songs use martial language.

Unfortunately, if you converse with folks who tend to love this sort of music, they reveal some horrible misconceptions about what it all means. They typically cling to the mythology of changing this world. We don’t fight Satan out there in the world around us; we fight him inside ourselves. There is no static victory place. The flesh does not stay nailed to the Cross. The battle does not end until we leave this world. Granted, there are changes we can make that tend to have a permanent effect in what we fight. Still, the business of “we wrestle not with flesh and blood” is a reference to fighting the demons in the mirror, to which our flesh is allied.

That is, we are not fighting the people and institutions we encounter in human space. Those are mere tools Satan uses to provoke us to fleshly responses. If we pay too much attention to the actions that provoke, rather than our response to the provocation, we get lost in the details and Satan wins. The question is not what God might do to change things, but what we will do whether or not He answers our prayers to change what we encounter.

The powers of the Age to Come are not for changing the world, but for changing ourselves. The spiritual battlefield is your own soul.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Spiritual Battlefield

AI Predicting Mass Behavior

You’ve probably seen a movie or two in which the hook was using artificial intelligence (AI) to collate data on mass human behavior and predict how populations and even governments will react to various threats, etc. You’d have to be a special kind of stupid if you didn’t think the US government has already been trying to do this.

Ever played Sim City, or something else from that game franchise? Lots of game engines are based on the very same kind of thinking, though typically at a simplified level. They create a virtual world, a simulation of reality but without all the expense and resource use. You play those kinds of games and after awhile you find the unrealistic responses in the game, but you understand what will happen when you take this or that track. Try playing a game where the AI engine attempts to account for some of the most intimate details of every stinking person on the planet. And then, the AI noting how all of that fits together in an accurate portrayal of how whole nations actually respond to changes in reality, and also changes in mere perception of reality.

What if all the Snowden revelations about NSA point to the that very thing? It’s a long read, but I suspect George Washington’s Blog might be onto something here. This is better than something I might have written for today.

Posted in globalism | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on AI Predicting Mass Behavior