Radix Fidem Blog

The Other Side: 6 – Bondage, Baggage and Wealth

Posted on August 25, 2010 by ehurst

As you come to know your self better, and the imperatives which drive your conscience, you begin seeking ways to break from commitments which don’t match. The process tends to be quite painful for most, particularly at first.

The single greatest obstruction will be materialism. No one says you have to divest yourself from every single material possession, only those which interfere with the process. Those which are necessary or useful to the process you should keep until events beyond your control take them. That means events which do not depend on your imperatives, which you should not try to control, also. As the process rolls on, the imperatives will speak more clearly on material goods and you will find yourself quick to drop anything which simply does not help, regardless of the value your fellow prisoners place on it.

But it’s not just material objects, it’s a whole host of relationships, habits, default choices, and so on. At some advanced point, you’ll be able to discern when any of those things is neutral, and you’ll know how to treat it so. But at first, just about everything not actively useful is probably harmful. No one can decide this for you. Shedding hindrances is like shedding shackles which make prison worse than it has to be.

Buried in those imperatives you will eventually find something which calls to your resources on behalf of others. This is more difficult especially for those who have always thought they were doing good for others in the first place. You have a great deal to unlearn about that. The most important help you can offer anyone, and by extension everyone, is simply acting on your imperatives. The greatest harm you can do is substituting someone else’s imperatives for your own. But if you can’t find a place where others matter, then you aren’t free yet.

Your abilities and resources are shaped by your destiny. The vast majority never come close to their destiny, so they die in prison. Your destiny is freedom on whatever terms are built into your character. In a sense, you don’t steer a single thing; you simply place yourself in the stream, and things will draw you forward to that destiny.

Prison is a living organism, the warden is a being actively and intelligently seeking to keep you blind and locked down. By the same token, your destiny is a living being. Again, you can imbue it with all sorts of flavors and traits, and none of them will quite fit, but that your destiny is alive and self-aware will become obvious if you are breaking free. It wants you alive, sane and wide open to the existence for which we were designed. It works out entirely organically, and actually requires very little active struggle, aside from the struggle to suppress the lies which keep you bound.

Thus, it should be obvious why you end up caring about others, because any Being who wants you free surely wants that for others. You must accept the burden of acting on your destiny as the one and only means to helping. Once you are free, you can afford to care, even when you are utterly powerless to actually do or say anything. Be sure you understand that the ability hate any other person is a prime effect of bondage.

Distrust is not the same thing, since you can’t even trust yourself, when it comes right down to it. A healthy distrust is simply cutting away the expectancy of support from another, not allowing anyone’s failure to change your commitments, and certainly not shaking your sense of freedom. The point is you aren’t wrapped up in commitments to things and mere ideas, but commitment only to your destiny, your imperatives. There are no goals, only processes, and how you deal with other prisoners is a critical element of your destiny. You offer your concern for their welfare within the bounds of your imperatives, regardless of what you can do, because the only thing you can give them that really matters is that sense of sharing their sorrows, their bondage, as you feel your own. Their response is their own problem, not yours.

You won’t need stuff nearly so much, because you’ll be free and powerful by what cannot be taken from you.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged culture, psychology, survival | Comments Off

The Other Side: 5 – Process

Posted on August 24, 2010 by ehurst

There is no goal; there is only process.

As commonly conceived, there is actually no such thing as “objective reality.” We can approach it, but the closer we come, the more uncertain it becomes. In Particle Physics, for example, we have long known the mere act of observing an event changes it. More recently, it was noted a choice made in the present can alter reality itself for the unknown past. That is, on the level of quantum particles, a change you introduce to one set of observable particles now will affect other particles you have not yet observed. You can probably read up on such experiments, but it quickly becomes a huge project just understanding it. Yet, at some fundamental level, all of reality, such as it may be, is actually dependent on observation.

There is a sense in which this extrapolates to everything you experience. Perception is reality. The business of escaping the prison is setting your perception free from the confinement or mere emotion and reason, by adding an upper layer of perception drawn from the subconscious. A life of conditioning under the mass hypnosis of the rational animal world starts with breaking the regimentation of time. Thus the exercise of getting alone with yourself and learning to open your physical perception in a way which holds no objective, no particular purpose other than learning to perceive.

Furthermore, nothing in the rational mind can enhance this process, except to get out of the way. An awful lot of Eastern Mystical religious exercises are actually overly regimented, with elaborate prescribed routines, and often the results are equally artificial. At the same time, too much of what passes for Western Mysticism is really just another brand of reason, still intellectual, just a different framework. What we seek is to harness reason and thinking as servants to much higher faculty. We learn to evaluate in that upper realm, not with the rational faculty. Rather, the mind serves to organize your response to what is demanded by that higher grasp.

The most important thing to open up is the discovery process of your own internal reality. The one thing in this life most worth knowing is yourself, particularly what makes you tick. There is no analytical framework capable of doing this for you. What matters most is simply knowing what matters most. From birth you are imprinted with a unique character, and the first few years of life add to it. From that time on, the issue is not formation but awareness, and the current system all over the world seeks to prevent that awareness.

You can flavor your discovery any way you like, but the clinical understanding is referring to imperatives, those things you simply cannot walk away from, haunting you when you dare to ignore them. Those times alone in silence should have the effect of clarifying under the debris of prison conditioning what was there all along, what it is that makes you what you are. It means fully embracing a lot of things you probably were taught to hate, to doubt, to fear. Until you dig up that bedrock of identity, you cannot possibly escape the prison.

This discovery is not something accomplished, but engaged, because along with major blocks of revelation, there are subtle nuances which escape us until the time is ripe to know them.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged culture, health, mysticism, psychology | Comments Off

The Other Side: 4 – Take Time Away

Posted on August 23, 2010 by ehurst

In some ways, the prison itself is a living entity. It is most certainly composed of living beings, since no system of life can organize itself without life. A fundamental defining characteristic of the prison is denying that it lives. We add this to the previously discussed basic facts it is a prison, and that it has a warden which operates as a being with a distinct will to keep us imprisoned.

The only escape lies within you.

That is, the only hope for beginning to come out of this prison is finding the escape route inside yourself. If it’s not within, you cannot go out, cannot see out. As noted, the first steps of freedom are embracing the facts. If you are capable of embracing these things, the window is open. You will be able to see outside, and begin discerning what is there, what it all means. Obviously, if these notions remain alien, you won’t have any hope.

The mechanics of building that hope are so simple, most people reject that, too. In clinical terms, you have to break the most confining element of the prison itself: time. Granted, everything we know is constrained by the passage of time, quantifying it, etc. Those who live by the clock will never see outside. We cannot simply cut off the entire world around us, because that would offer them no hope or help, either. Rather, we have to build an internal mechanism for handling time in alternative ways.

Freedom is learning to operate outside of time constraints, as if time were not a controlling factor of your existence, but a variable much the same as spatial dimensions. This is similar, but not precisely the same as the concept of the 4th Dimension so popular in Science Fiction and theoretical physics. What we aim at here is not cold and lifeless theory, but a very personal dimension, an internal capacity.

So the first step is placing yourself in experiences where time fades from consciousness as much as possible. Few are able to make this jump quickly. We all experience situations where we forget what time it is, but rare is the person who is able to recover without being a wretched self-centered ogre. The point is to emphasize time might limit our options on the lower plane, but not rule all our actions, and certainly not our perceptions. We should rise to a point where we think of time as something which brings ripeness, not constraints.

A favorable exercise for beginning this transition is placing yourself in a situation where time is allowed to recede into insignificance. Simply stop letting a tight schedule rule every moment of your day. Open a gap in the regimentation and take time away in exchange for quiet. Get alone with yourself. It’s okay if the first few times you are just unwinding from the rat race itself. Whatever you do, don’t load that space with distractions. You really must be alone with yourself as much as possible, creating a distance between yourself and the system, the prison routine.

An example would be going out to an isolated hill top, somewhere people don’t crush past in great numbers. While an isolation chamber of some sort might work in a pinch, it is not at all like being alone in a large space. The psychological difference is huge at first. You have to absorb the peace of the moment in large doses until you start carrying it around with you. It really should be daily, and you should take the risk of leaving behind anything that allows a part of your consciousness to mark the passage of time.

Listen to the sounds; don’t struggle to organize and recognize the sources so much as just notice. Feel the air movements, the temperature variations, sense the moment as a whole. Until you can learn to do nothing correctly, almost nothing you do will matter.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged health, nature, psychology, science | Comments Off

The Other Side: 3 – It’s Personal

Posted on August 22, 2010 by ehurst

Hard sciences pretend, at least, to follow a clearly logical process. Most people don’t understand the whole idea. They get the part about sampling data, organizing, and reaching certain hypotheses. They don’t get the proving part. Hypotheses are tested, not by proving, but by attempting to disprove, to show there are conditions when it does not work. Then the hypothesis is reworked and the testing proceeds from there. We presume a certain honesty in the effort to disprove, but you and I know in reality scientists are people, too. They will cheat themselves and everyone else because they believe things strongly. Politics infest the hard sciences, too. No one living is truly and fully able to be impartial, so science is sometimes just an expensive guessing game, and results are overturned later.

The softer sciences, so-called, are actually simpler. If we talk about economics, we can lay out a vast hoard of data, interpret what the data seems to indicate, and conduct various tests to verify our interpretation. No one expects pure scientific work, just a reasonable estimation. Oddly, the application of such is often very dogmatic, with grand orthodoxies aplenty. The results may take a while, but most of the time these orthodoxies crash because political pressure is even stronger in behavioral sciences, of which Political Science is but a sub-genre.

Attempts to use computers still suffers from the bias of the programmers. For all our efforts mankind is not capable of creating a purely logical process of deciding what we should do in this world. The conflict between what might well be the very best answer versus the one we can persuade others to accept is still the most infuriating aspect of it all. We seldom use even the best we get from such shaky processes as the various sciences. Yet a very strong part of our prison is we are compelled to act as if the best of science somehow matters, in spite of the background awareness we never will know because we don’t get to try it.

To a large degree, this is the nature of the prison. We might have an intellectual awareness of better things, but it never seems to head far towards the best answer before someone exercising some power over others hijacks it. There is something at work which forbids even the best we can know, and that something is the prison.

This prison has a warden. While the warden is a person in one sense, nothing in our intellect is prepared to handle properly the nature of this person, so we end up with an “It.” Yet It is a person, insisting on asserting It’s power over the rest of us. The primary failure of those who think about escaping is trying to deny the personal nature of It. This is the same blindness which finds people honestly expecting somehow to overcome human nature and enforce purity of thought and science. Not only is any particular pure answer unlikely to be The One Truth, because we are all in prison, but we can’t find a way to apply that truth without some leverage against the masses.

The fundamental nature of dealing with people is that they are people, with more variations than anyone likes to admit. We have to make generalizations or we can’t even pretend to have behavioral science, and they are academically valid exercises. But it always breaks down when you try to make it work in the real world. People are still people, and nothing inside this prison will ever make them more than broken people in prison. Whatever system you create to make things better absolutely most include a very human flexibility, or it is wrong before it starts.

It requires understanding this whole situation is a matter of persons, not objective truth. A critical element in escaping the prison is escaping the false notion there is such a thing as objective truth. Everything truly critical to freedom is inherently personal in nature.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged computers, economics, psychology, science | Comments Off

The Other Side: 2 – Capacities

Posted on August 21, 2010 by ehurst

Recent articles point to the notion humans as they are will likely evolve. If not, surely science will find enhancements, ways we can meld with the seemingly ideal intellectual capacities of the computers on which we have come to depend so much. All well and good; push it as far as you can. You still won’t escape the prison.

The prison itself is the sort of discrete logic which many hold up as the answer to all man’s needs. Whether inductive or deductive, linear logic, compartmental objectivity, or any other means of pure intellectual analysis can only take you to the limits of the prison. They can’t take you out, because the intellect is the prison.

We are all well aware of our emotions and the threat from brute instincts. Those things serve well enough if you are merely an animal among other animals. When you are a human among other humans, they can be pretty destructive. We acknowledge them, but wisely avoid letting them vote on much because most of our time is in rational space, among rational beings. Even those precious few moments when threats to life and limb push us into animal territory, emotion and instincts are deeply flawed. We can train those instincts, but then you are simply a really fine warrior. There is still a need for working toward a more peaceful life, something instincts do poorly.

While inside the prison, we should realize peace is not an absolute, but a relative condition. We want things to be as good as they can get, because that pulls us up out of the animal existence far enough to give attention to things which make escape possible. So we seek to cultivate the intellect and give it charge over the lower impulses. But if this is all we have, we are in most woeful shape. The prison of intellect can only keep us in the prison. There is surely a way to reach beyond the limits, to enhance our dealings within the prison. We want to draw down into our limited existence some of what makes freedom free.

It is most certainly true humans possess a capacity for something outside the intellect, something above it, not below it as with emotions. This capacity is not simply more of the same. Nor is it simply a better version of intellect. Granted, we hardly tap the capacity of our minds now, such that far greater things are possible. But even those far higher uses of the mind are still within the prison.

This other capacity is of itself a whole other thing. Precious few people believe it exists, which makes keeping us in the prison far easier. Some get just a taste of it with intuition. For this discussion, intuition is the ability to skip some steps in the linear reasoning process and arrive at a conclusion. Without chasing all the paths that could lead to, intuition means dipping into the subconscious, not the emotions. Thus, what we seek for our escape resides there.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged health, psychology, survival | Comments Off

The Other Side: 1 – The Prison

Posted on August 20, 2010 by ehurst

We don’t belong here. We weren’t designed for this, but we are stuck in it. Nobody escapes without first embracing this.

The English language, and the entire thought process behind it, lacks the facility for handling this discussion properly. So it is with most European tongues. It’s quite a chore to put this discussion in plain terms, which is why I often resort to fiction to introduce the underlying concepts. But today we are going to try our best to make sense of it in somewhat clinical terms.

Our current plane of existence is a mess. Worse, it can’t be fixed. It’s basically a prison, so it’s not supposed to be nice. Any effort we expend in making it nicer must be sensibly limited to things we can actually do. The problem is primarily one of perception. There is another plane of existence, but everything around us militates against that idea, never mind how to access it.

If the notion of another plane of existence finds root in your mind, there is some hope for you. It shows some part of you has been awakened to the inherent conflict in each of us, making us long for something better. It shows you also possess sufficient skepticism to avoid being suckered into thinking that “better” has to be here. The next step is helping you realize just about everything around you is built to keep that other plane, that Other Side, away from you.

The easiest thing about keeping it away from us is mixing. Any amount of truth in the matter, plus one single plausible falsehood, is all it takes. It’s as if someone is presenting any number of combinations, each indicating some sort of parallel universe, none of which actually exist. Each is offered as “The Way of Truth” and each has its own mix of flaws, designed to soothe the haunting question born in each of us in our many varieties of needs. Any way you can be channeled into an acceptable failure will do, because the most dangerous thing of all is escaping the channels.

The primary reason this works so well is all of us instinctively fear being alone, so we keep seeking some sense of inclusion somewhere. We even get deluded about that, given there is any number of classical Loner channels to make us feel accepted and recognized in our fake uniqueness. That’s just one example of channeling and herding. Nobody escapes that easily. We all have vulnerabilities, subject to endless ways of manipulation, keeping us in the prison.

So the first step is something in you recognizing you are in prison, as it were. Until you embrace that fully, you can’t possibly consider escape.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged culture, health, mysticism, psychology | Comments Off

Israeli Madness

Posted on August 18, 2010 by ehurst

First, I don’t consider modern Israel any part of Bible Prophecy. That is, they utterly fail every test of what God promised to do, chiefly because there is no significant adherence to the Covenant of Moses. Please note, Jesus, the Son of God, said the Talmud was man-made trash and contrary to Moses, so having a minority of Orthodox and observant Jews won’t get it, since those are all Talmudic. No, it has to be the Law of Moses as taught by Jesus. But modern Israel can’t even do the Talmud right, never mind Moses.

Second, it won’t matter if they are genetic Hebrews or not. There is strong evidence they are mostly not, but the point from the biblical standard is Children of the Law, not Children of Israel. Several Old Testament prophets indicate they can’t even claim the name of Israel if they don’t obey the Law.

No, modern Israel is entirely artificial. I’ve often said in the past, they are also not really that important to the Rothschilds, except as a distraction for the rest of us. Keeping us all stirred up at the impossible claims, ramming them down our throats by legislation, and the entire Holocaust Industry, has never been anything but a huge mirage designed to keep everyone on edge. It naturally divides nations and keeps them at war. The whole point for the Rothschilds was endless war, because that’s where the money is. The Rothschilds are all about money and power, but not direct political power.

So while the Rothschilds have spent considerable sums grabbing Israel, building it into a fake democracy, populating it with compliant Jews who don’t know they are tools, it’s not really where their heart is. When things have run their course and Israel no longer serves their purpose, it will be allowed to fall. More specifically, it will be destroyed in one more grand act of inhumane war. They don’t really care about all those people, neither Israelis nor the Palestinians, nor anyone else in this world.

They use their power behind the scenes to manage the politics of Israel, just as they do here in the US. They don’t care which party wins, just as long as events stay within the acceptable limits. So they’ll all this or that party to gain control for a limited time, but no one wins anything unless they promote the wishes of the Rothschilds.

When you read suggestions Israel would not use nukes against Iran, don’t believe it. If Israel were sane, she wouldn’t, but the Rothschilds make sure sanity is only apparent in a very limited quantity. Look at most of their claims regarding the Flotilla Massacre; reasonableness is simply not part of it. Sheer chutzpah and “reality is whatever we say it is” are the order of the day, and is fully characteristic of Israeli government. If the Rothschilds tell them to nuke Iran, they will, with relish. Defying all the rest of humanity is pre-programmed, just as defying God.

While I don’t necessarily believe they plan to do so, I would hardly discount the idea of Israel employing nukes or other weapons of mass destruction anytime they think it will serve their purposes. Their mission in life is to raise impossible demands on all the world and provoke everyone to fury. Once we all focus on them, we aren’t paying attention to the real evil. So don’t let anyone tell you Israel won’t do this or that, especially if it makes no sense at all. They probably will, sooner or later, and laugh about it. Their arrogance is unlimited.

Let’s just pretend for a moment Israel actually manages to grab all the land they say they want, and everyone else is dead or moved out. What then? They’ll demand everyone serve them. All their neighbors must become tributaries. If not, those neighbors will suffer endless warfare and turmoil. Israel will demand it. Peace will come only on Israel’s terms. Negotiating with Israel means lying on the ground and letting them walk on you first, then we talk.

For as long as the US is useful to Israel, the government and economy will be propped up by the bankers, who are themselves all servants of the Rothschilds, most unknowingly. The Fed will continue to keep us on life support until it’s pointless. But as long as we have bodies to send to war on Israel’s behalf, they’ll try to keep us alive. When that has run its course, look for the props to disappear. You can’t imagine how fast things can fall when the banks stop cooperating. Really; you can’t imagine.

All these reasonable analyses are missing the point. Major events are manipulated, and things will not be allowed to follow their natural course unless they don’t matter.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged economics, government, propaganda, religion, resistance | Comments Off

Tough Eating

Posted on August 17, 2010 by ehurst

Given the horrific practices behind the industrial food production in the US, I’m darn near a vegetarian. While I love good animal flesh, the problem is there is so little of it which appears safe.

Every day Monsanto tries a new trick to grab total monopoly control. It won’t matter if they are so deeply evil they would cynically push poisons on us; that’s hard to prove. But monopoly ambitions in “efficient food production” is evil enough. And if it’s poisonous, they don’t want to know, or us to know.

So I spend a lot of money at so-called “health food” stores, and a few local providers I have come to trust. We get bison meat from Wichita, Kansas, because we can’t find anything suggesting they do evil with the animals. We sometimes get grass-fed beef, and I wish I could afford goat’s milk, but we settle for cow’s milk guaranteed produced without hormone injections. I realize there are some things we simply cannot get that is actually pure and natural. I probably couldn’t afford some of it if I could find it.

Fast food and most restaurants are out. I no longer eat sweets, except stuff made at home — with a lot less sugar. I’ve become very fond of beans and rice. I’ll buy a lot of stuff made in Europe or other places which restrict GMOs and such.

These are habits on the way, because I still believe we are headed for a painful situation where pretty much all imports will cease. That’s because the dollar will be worthless and no one will take it. Since we make so little here these days, that will be a real shock. We may be lucky to eat anything at all, soon.

Posted in health | Tagged economics, nature, resistance | Comments Off

Eden and the Conspiracy Theory Sampler

Posted on August 16, 2010 by ehurst

Everyone wants to go back to Eden. But there is this problem with that flaming sword.

Okay, so we realize what really matters in the Eden narratives is not the facts themselves, but the symbolism, and what it tell us about our situation today. Eternal truths cannot be communicated in words, so God uses symbols. We did have a much better situation at one time, the one for which we were designed, but something in us just can’t quite play along with the requirements. So we find all humanity in this broken state, and it’s not fun. Surely we can do better?

Yep, but the narrative more or less ends with that flaming sword guarding the entrance. It doesn’t actually deny you entrance, just reasserts the original requirements. I cover that on my other blog, and focus here on how everyone is trying so very hard to get back to Eden some other way. In modern parlance we discuss Utopia (“No Place”), aptly named since there won’t ever be such a place until we get past that flaming sword.

But even a great big slice of Christianity wants to ignore that sword, and this business of we are fallen, and we can’t fix it ourselves. So every effort to produce some sort of earthly Nirvana is doomed to failure. Instead of recognizing that, everyone keeps looking for a way to slip past that sword. Some will simply break all the rules and force people to do what they believe will bring Utopia. Others know better, but still insist Eden is our birthright, so they concoct a lot of explanations for why we aren’t getting there. We call them “conspiracy theories.”

Just a reminder: Every government is a conspiracy — a conspiracy to rule. That is, unless it arises directly from God’s Laws, and we don’t have any of that kind right now. So all we have are genuine conspiracies, and a lot of them include creating misinformation so that we have conspiracy theories. People running around putting out the lies, and others collecting them and trying to make sense of them. Meanwhile, nobody is paying attention to the real government behind the apparent government, so most theories are wrong. That doesn’t make theorizing a mistake, but it does require you not be so gullible.

For example, you have guys like Greg Szymanski and his “Arctic Beacon” site. I’m not linking to it; look it up. Greg is a theorist, but a liar, too. He may not really know what’s going on, but he promotes some ideas he knows are false. I’m willing to bet he’s a government shill, but that’s another matter. Mostly he promotes some crazy stuff about the Catholic Church, Jesuits, etc. He’s not too far distant from the stuff spouted by Lyndon LaRouche.

First, let’s get one thing out of the way: The Pope is not Antichrist, per se. That is, the position itself is not inherently evil. The whole church arose as the natural by-product of political development and the compromise of the early churches with civil power. Popes are neither particularly holy nor especially evil, but men who rose through the process to take the role. Natural human variation within the system brings good and bad, and mostly just people being people. And while I’ve never met a Jesuit priest I liked, I find a lot of Catholics aren’t that fond of them, either. Their whole mission is wrong-headed, but not diabolical. So like any other truly large organization, the Catholic Church has bad apples, some truly rotten to the core, but the organization is just one more human organization.

Every organization is subject to infiltration, and the Illuminati have their people everywhere, including just about every Protestant church, as well. That’s because there are so very many people who are fooled about what is and isn’t dangerous. So if the Illuminati use the Catholic Church, the Catholics are hardly alone in that. If you want to avoid infiltration, don’t organize — at least, not the way most everyone in the West does it.

Szymanski loves to pick on the Catholics, particularly Jesuits, as do a large number of other theorists. It’s an attempt to get you focused on the wrong thing. It is plausible, of course, since you can find some nefarious deeds in the hands of the hierarchy. But Szymanski seems tied to a pretty nefarious religious organization himself: Cloverdale Bibleway. Again, look it up for yourself. You’ll find a fair description on Wikipedia under “Branhamism”. You’ll notice the patriarch of this particular organization sounds a bit like a Christianized clone of Mohamed — the One True Prophet syndrome. It’s a lot less organized than Islam (yes, that’s supposed to be funny), but it’s still a cult group.

The crazy part is Szymanski does cover some issues quite accurately. That’s how it works: Do a lot of noisy truth-telling, then slip in that one package of lies. Like Alex Jones, who seems to get some things right, but then he defends Israel tooth and nail. It’s possible our CIA, FBI and the rest of the alphabet soup gang aren’t quite that competent, but these guys work just the same as someone paid to confuse things. The simplest answer is the alphabet soup is just another conspiracy, with real Illuminati servants in pivotal positions, and the rest are just dupes. Let them grind along in their usual mix of oppression, make sure they bumble a few things, but when it really counts, use them to keep the real conspiracy on track.

You may remember that wild Neonazi, Hal Turner, who was an FBI shill. Frankly, almost the entire Neonazi movement is run by the FBI, at least indirectly. That’s rather like the CIA and al-Qaeda. Most of the loudest yelling about anything is probably, at best, only half true.

Mosque at Ground Zero? No. It’s a community center across town from it. Iran building nukes? Nuclear power and medicine, yes, but not bombs. Iran has fulfilled obligations under the NNPT; Israel won’t sign it. Obama’s birth certificate? His mom worked for the CIA helping overthrow the government of Indonesia, and Obama himself worked for them, too, visiting Pakistan and other places, and they paid off his student loans. At a college which most certainly serves the Illuminati.

Yes, there are real conspiracies to take over the world, and we might as well call the insiders the Illuminati, since it properly characterizes their net actions. But they may not succeed. That really depends on a higher power. The whole question may not interest you, and that’s fine. Some of us are driven by curiosity for all different kinds of things. I don’t pretend to have everything nailed down, but I am quite curious about this stuff. It always amazes me the different ways people seek return to Eden, when the answer is in plain sight.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged government, propaganda, resistance | Comments Off

Radix Fidem Blog

Tough Eating

Categories

Archives