Implications of the Decalogue: Eight

You shall not steal.

The word translated into English as “steal” covers a wide range of unjust takings, including frauds. It should be obvious how this inflicts harm on the community. The whole point of living in proximity of others is security, not inviting abuse. We should find it strange this even needs to be addressed. Still, such a blunt statement covers a lot of territory.

Our Suzerain says we need only what He grants us. It’s an affront to Him directly if we insist on nabbing something He gave to another, as if we were charging Him with mismanagement and neglect.

Paul said it best when he said we should prefer being a victim in this area than risk in the slightest degree defrauding another. A primary sin of the Pharisees and the Hellenized corruption of the Law of Moses was this nasty pile of excuses for grabbing other people’s stuff. Jesus condemned it harshly, suggesting a great many Jews were actually worshiping Mammon. A loose grip on the things of this world means they will have a loose grip on you.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Eight

Implications of the Decalogue: Seven

You shall not commit adultery.

This is one commandment more honored in the violation than in the keeping. The Suzerain is not amused when people break faith. We are not animals operating with no moral compass, but bear a heavy obligation to uphold the needs of our extended family community over our particular appetites. Sexual fulfillment is not a sacred right.

Nor is this a demand you view sex merely as an act of procreation. However, you cannot separate the two. It’s bad enough we carry the Western mythology that romantic love is mysteriously overpowering, but we don’t even have much of that these days. It’s just a form of recreation, detached from any other reality.

Notice here the issue is not sex out of wedlock, but sex which interferes with the marriage bond. Nor is it simply a matter ancient women were mere property in themselves. Rather, their sexual favors were a property right, as were the man’s. Sex meant making babies, and God says babies need the full support of their entire village — which always meant your extended family household. So you don’t upset things by getting your cousin’s wife/daughter/etc. pregnant without that lifelong commitment. Same goes if you spot some gal/guy from another clan or even another nation. Proper social stability was not possible without honoring commitments between persons. Obviously, prostitution is also a sin, regardless, but the Old Testament narrative seldom bothered to condemn the obvious.

God has distinct notions about this, and He knows what is best. Reading between the lines, we note idolatry and adultery don’t simply sound similar in English, but they are morally related. If you try to quibble on God’s requirements, you are a moral adulterer, as the Suzerain is the husband who marries the nation as His bride. The Hebrew death penalty on adultery applied to both sexes, but in spiritual terms, you are dead already if you can play around on God.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Seven

Implications of the Decalogue: Six

You shall not kill.

This has been worked over too often because certain folks like to play games with English translations. Our Suzerain here merely reiterates what He said back in the days of Noah: His domain shall not be disturbed by unjustified slaying of humans. Lesser creatures are a distinctly different matter in His eyes. It doesn’t take much thinking to realize a casual attitude about the lives of others has already been condemned in previous commandments, so this is nothing new.

What we like to forget is the underlying justice issue. First, God gets to say who dies and when, and He says man should die by natural causes — by God’s own hand — or by means of removing a threat to society. Not society as we know it today, but society as He meant it to be. When someone so distrusts the Suzerain’s sense of justice they can’t wait for Him to take care of something His way, they turn to things like murder to get their way. The explanations later in the Torah are careful to distinguish between starting a fight, slipping into a valid conflict, and simply defending yourself. You should restrain your passions in favor of trusting the society in which you live to work things out.

But this system is valid only if your society is structured as God intended. The modern state bears no resemblance to what God intended, so it cannot pretend to carry out justice. The duty of executing a threat falls to those most closely related to that threat. This is the other edge of the same sword from the previous commandment of taking the family seriously. The family has to take it’s duties seriously, too.

As a side note, ancient biblical justice meant if one of your family did an injustice to another, you were obliged to turn that member over to their justice, if that one would not submit voluntarily. The Suzerain would moderate, of course, so that retribution never exceeded the damage done. The underlying issue is obvious: God does not take lightly folks usurping His prerogatives. There is a God in Heaven, and you are not Him.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Six

Implications of the Decalogue: Five

Honor your father and your mother, so that your days may be long upon the land which the LORD your God gives you.

The Hebrew term “honor” means to reckon something very serious or grave; don’t take it lightly. It should not be reduced simply to “obey,” as that is not the same thing. Contempt for anyone is wrong, but in the tribal world of the Ancient Near East, it was downright deadly. The whole point is the minute dynamics of every day life must arise from a firm commitment to remain attached to the extended family at all costs.

This one thing must be firmly fixed in the reader’s mind: You cannot abstract the concept out to simply positive regard and familial piety. The entire Western Civilization has no frame of reference for what’s assumed by such commands as this. It is not something which is cast merely in a quaint tribal world where your society was your family, and there was no social outlet. We have wedded all our thoughts to the notion somehow we have advanced by spinning off the nuclear family from its original tribal village setting, and dissolved such structure in favor of the excitement and ferment of the urban individualist culture. No such thing exists, because this merely replaces the family with civil government. You can lie to yourself all you like, but you will either live with your old home folks and the family “government” or you will live under the secular state. The latter cannot be seen as anything but an open rejection of God as Suzerain.

While the context here specifically applies to Law and earthly life, the spiritual view recognizes our reverence to God Himself is depicted here. We are obliged to take family seriously because he take Him seriously. If we do not take family seriously, we surely display a lack of commitment, a lack of faith toward God.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Implications of the Decalogue: Four

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God. You shall not do any work, you nor your son, nor your daughter, your manservant, nor your maidservant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger within your gates. For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and sanctified it.

The Suzerain cares about people all the way down to the lowest in His domain. The first and primary effect of declaring a holy day was to prevent the powerful from overworking their subordinates and dependents. This is fundamentally about mercy to the unfortunate.

We cannot find any external proof the ancient Hebrews kept the seven-day calendar continuously before the Period of Exile in Babylon. Other nations had similar patterns, but only Scripture indicates the practice is truly ancient. Given periods of apostasy, we have no basis for insisting it was continuous from the Garden. However, the moral basis is God’s personal practice. If Our Lord takes a break one day in seven, we have no reason to resist. He can surely dictate we observe His personal habits.

If all you get from this is the austere demand your life must stop on Saturday, then you have missed the point. I don’t really care which day of the week you choose, and I doubt God cares, since what we have today is a German adaptation of a Roman practice absorbed during the time of early Christian tolerance, which grew out of a sect of Judaism. Talmudic Jews are notorious for the most outrageous claims of mythical authority, and Jesus often poked holes in their pompous emptiness. They had turned the Law into a very oppressive weapon against the common folks, standing this command on its head.

The Son of Man was Lord of the Sabbath, and claimed the authority to interpret what it should have meant. With all the references to doing things on the first day of the week after His Ascension, and Paul’s discussion about holidays being of no real significance, we have no reason to be crabby about it. If you can’t meet your material needs in six days, you need too much, and you aren’t relying on God to provide. So we take one day in seven to celebrate the mercy of our Lord upon us, and we share the mercy with others.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Four

Implications of the Decalogue: Three

You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain.

If there was ever a phrase which suffers from cultural differences, it would be “taking a name in vain.” If the worst we ever did was using God’s names and titles in curses, it wouldn’t be such a concern to Him. Words and incantations were never more than mere symbolism in the ancient Hebrew culture.

We forget too easily He is the Suzerain. He does not want to be associated with things He condemns. The nation of Israel was His peculiar representative on earth, bearing His name rather like Americans carry their flag. Not just dragging it through the mud, but evil is trying to use the moral force of His name as a convenience, as a cover for things He considers destructive of His revelation. The whole point in calling Israel into covenant with Him was not simply to be nice to Israel. Indeed, God eventually says through His prophets the choice of Israel was paradoxically the one nation least likely to obey. The whole point was to show His power — His name — was greater than any obstacle on earth.

By extension, we cannot excuse our failures by hiding it under the mantle of “Chosen by God.” It was just too easy for Israel to develop a self-congratulatory culture when the record shows they seldom gave thought to their mission: They were called to manifest the glory of God to other nations. God was not glorified by Israel’s dominance, but by the dominance of His revelation in the Covenant. We have very little evidence any other nation adopted Jehovah as their God, in large measure because no one wanted to be like Israel. We do have nations which embraced the Talmud, but Jesus said that was most certainly not the Law of Moses. Meanwhile, even today the most hideous filthy crimes are committed under the excuse Modern Israel is the Chosen Nation.

The symbol is not the thing itself. The Decalogue was not God, nor precisely His will, but a divine statement of where to start in considering the kinds of changes necessary to find His will. Those who truly love Him don’t need the Laws as anything more than a reference point. He does not demand success, since He alone can grant success. Rather, He demands a desire to please Him; He says that is what makes Him look good.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Three

Fear of God

Somewhere just outside the window they heard the whining growl of a dog straining excitedly against the leash. Almost to man, everyone dropped what he was doing and lay down on the floor. Each was careful to turn so that his arms extended overheard could be clearly seen, palms up and empty.

The door burst open. Before it had struck the wall next to its hinges, the dogs swarmed across the barracks, hoping against hope there was someone not in compliance so they could bite. At the same time, they sniffed about for scents of forbidden items.

When the dogs came back and sat down in front of the door, disappointed at finding nothing, the guards came inside.

“Inmate one-eight-four-nine! Roll over!”

There was a sound of movement between two bunks and the finger tips of hands carefully kept facing palm up. The dogs watched with mild interest. The squad leader who had barked the command strode heavily to the place, nearly stepping on several sets of hands on the way. He placed a restraining device over the wrists, then roughly lifted the man to his feet.

As he was led out, none of others dared to twitch until the dogs were called out of the building. As the men slowly returned to their activities, one or two were heard to mumble something about being glad it wasn’t themselves.

They marched past the building normally used for punishment and torture. Even now with the sun almost gone, it was still hot enough to draw a fresh sweat from the brisk pace. He recognized the backside of the headquarters building. There was a very small door which had obviously been added after the building was finished. The squad leader opened it and shoved the prisoner toward the doorway. It was a big step up, but the prisoner did his best to comply quickly.

The tiny room was dark, but not so dark he couldn’t see it was empty. He wasn’t a young man any more, but it was protocol which told him to sit against the wall next to the door. He heard the locks click before the sound of footsteps faded away.

It took a moment for him to realize the room was air conditioned. How long had it been since he had felt that? His perspiration was not quite dry when the light came on and the opposite door opened.

A burly guard looked inside. He gazed at the prisoner who was hugging his knees. The small wooden stocks were worn smooth and just loose enough to permit this position with a modicum of comfort. The prisoner was careful to display open palms. The guard, face frozen, entered with a folding chair. He set it up along the side wall away from the doors. Then he hoisted the prisoner up and sat him roughly on the chair. Behind him, another burly guard entered with another, much better padded folding chair. This was opened facing the prisoner.

The guards then stood themselves in the two corners behind the prisoner. A few minutes passed. For a man clearly in trouble, the prisoner was quite relaxed, patient, even serene.

Eventually an officer stepped to the door, paused to look inside a moment. Gazing at the prisoner, he sighed, then came in and closed the door behind him. He took the empty chair with an air of relaxed command, which suddenly gave way to a sense of intensity. He frowned at the prisoner, who had not yet dared to raise his eyes. Grabbing each knee, he locked his elbows. The officer pursed his lips a couple of times, the spoke. “Tell me why the others want you in isolation.”

Upon being spoken to, the prisoner raised his face with that calm level gaze which never seemed to leave him. “I’m not willing to join their little gang, Sir.”

The officer, head cocked to one side, considered this for a moment. He folded his arms and stroked his chin. “Which gang?”

The prisoner might as well be the one in charge. Without breaking any protocol, he remained relaxed, with the faintest trace of a smile. “I often wonder, Sir, how you got stuck with this job. When I refused to accept a role in organizing a resistance committee, they threatened to plant lies about me. I knew you wouldn’t believe the report.”

The officer smirked. “You would be the last man on earth to say something naughty about my daughter. I find it hard to imagine you would resist much of anything.”

“Well, Sir, I resisted their conscription. They knew I had worn stripes a few decades ago, and assumed I would be willing to recruit a squad.”

“So they know what’s in our files, but don’t know you. We’ll have to see who among our staff is open to helping them.”

“Or is simply careless.”

“Yes,” the office chuckled. “I suppose you aren’t going to play informant, either.”

“Sir, I cannot. Because no one on this earth can be trusted, I always insure there is nothing which requires trust. Anyone who asks will get an honest report of what I know or believe. The truth is worth far more than my insignificant existence.”

The officer shook his head, not quite with impatience. “So you said during the intake interview. I’ve already figured out punishment means nothing to you, and since you have complied with everything, there’s no need to pretend making an example of you.” He paused for a moment, staring at the ceiling. “So if I accept their bogus accusation you insulted my daughter’s honor, I give them what they think they want. If I do not, they suddenly become more suspicious of you. What do you think?”

The prisoner shrugged. “I can’t pretend to advise you, Sir. It makes no difference to me. If you lock me up, I get more time to pray and meditate, while you investigate this new resistance. If you send me back, I get more time to teach the few who will listen, and the rest will draw away even farther.”

The officer pursed his lips again. “Hm. What can you tell me about his new committee?”

“They spoke of organizing and drilling on communications first. They seem to think they can bring the other gangs to heel some way, then organize a mass revolt and escape, I suppose.”

“What do you think are their chances?”

“Zero.”

“Is that why you didn’t join them?”

“No, Sir. If I really believed it was necessary to try, futility would not stop me. I don’t concern myself with results, but obeying my convictions. That’s why I didn’t join them. They don’t understand the one and only way anyone could escape is not the path they walk.”

The officer’s eyes narrowed. “What way would you expect to escape?”

“Sir, you miss my point. On human terms, there is no escape. On spiritual terms, there is no prison. If my God didn’t want me here, nothing you or anyone else did would keep me. When He is ready, I’ll leave, either alive or dead, but I’ll be gone. Until then, I remain here at His sufferance.”

The officer relaxed a bit. “Yes, that mystical babble again. Meanwhile, I have a bunch of military veterans playing SERE games in my camp.”

The prisoner smiled. “Then you already know who they are. You can easily estimate the types of things they’ll do. Their ingenuity can only take them so far in this sort of camp.”

“Maybe you are right … just a tempest in a teapot. Forewarned is forearmed. I think I’ll hold you a couple of days just to see who acts differently when you are gone. You don’t suppose this is going to accidentally implicate any of your friends, do you?”

This time the prisoner smiled more plainly. “Sir, are you aware of the concept ‘leaderless resistance’?”

The officer nodded recognition.

“I teach leaderless religion. I won’t let anyone become dependent on me, warn them to limit their trust in me, but find their own path. Several of the men have fully embraced it since coming here. Those closest to me in friendship are the ones who need me least, so they should act the same in my absence.”

The office nodded. “What keeps any of them from deciding God wants them to try to leave?”

“Nothing.” He paused, “Of course, I try to discourage it.”

The officer froze. His eyes slowly drifted downward, opening wide as he stared at the floor. His right hand drifted up to the side of his head, where the fingers spread and began pressing little indentations in the skin. He looked up suddenly and barked at the two guards. “Get him back to his barracks. Now!” By his hasty departure, you might think the officer was fleeing the little room.

Posted in fiction | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fear of God

Political Premonitions

I don’t claim to prognosticate or predict. I have private premonitions. I post them here because I don’t take myself too seriously, and because it might be fun to see if any of them come close to what actually happens.

Whatever it started out as, the Tea Party Movement has been hijacked. It is now the managed protest of one side against the other. You and I know it’s two uniforms, but one team. It’s the same money, the same real rulers behind the scenes. Having a protest outlet prevents — or at least delays — an actual revolt.

So they will pass this damnable “Health Care Reform” tomorrow, barring some really big surprise. We can be certain the majority of American citizens are against it, but it’s the same thing as with TARP. Unless there is something ahead more important than the current necessity of handing the nation over to the Big Medicine management companies, this will go through. It’s been bought and paid for, and it shall be.

And we shall have war with Iran. Consider that for our eight years in Afghanistan, we have only accomplished half the mission. We do now have massive heroine trade going into Russia, and making the CIA very wealthy. But we don’t have our oil pipeline route. That’s because, while we can beat the Taliban in direct battle, we can’t really do anything about them. After weeks of major battles in Marjah, a rural district, the Taliban still rule there, particularly at night. And we can’t seem to fix the problems in Iraq, but that’s all theater anyway. Most of the bombs are now being done by former Blackwater, and all of them in Pakistan. The US government is lying, lying, lying and always has been, every step of the way. So I am praying we are handed a very definitive loss in Iran. It’s only God’s justice.

Indeed, I’m praying the whole federal government collapse, fail, come apart at the seams. It’s gotten to the point their bottomless greed has caused them to begin eating their own feet, as it were. What has carried them along, making possible all this raping and pillaging, is no longer there. So they are gobbling their own toes, and the whole thing will collapse under its own weight. I suppose it will include lots of violence, but I’m hoping I can avoid seeing too much of it. A significant part of the collapse will be this constant expansion of our military mission around the world, mostly at the behest of Israel.

Our government mouthpieces keep talking about how Iran misbehaves with nuclear stuff, but Israel is the one who refuses to even sign the NNPT. But even the nation of Israel is probably about to shoot themselves in the feet. Any moment now they are simply going to forget there are other people in the world with their own dreams and such, and they’ll be crushed. It may well be the same defeat I hope God gives us.

Vanity of vanities; all is vanity. My only loyalty is to Christ as my Lord, and there is currently not a single human government obeying God’s Laws. Sorry, but that’s the truth.

Stop and think about this: It is no longer any part of the national will behind what the government is doing, and that includes the endless wars in the Middle East. Now when we say, “support the troops” it must of necessity mean support that evil mission over which we have zero input. I can’t do that. It matters not who is wearing the US uniforms, because that simply has come to mean some army of slaves forced to kill and destroy in countries which have done us no wrong. I cannot pray for their victory, because that is praying for evil.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Political Premonitions

Implications of the Decalogue: Two

You shall not make for yourselves any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in the heavens above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow yourself down to them, nor serve them. For I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the sons to the third and fourth generation of those that hate me, and showing mercy to thousands of those that love Me and keep My commandments.

The Suzerain continues with a corollary to His first command. The act of artistic representation is not forbidden, as we note when God describes Tabernacle decorations which include such things. The terms here apply specifically to idolatry, ritual images.

This and the previous command are summed up by God explaining His attitude. He warns those who find Him or any part of His lordship odious will have, in effect, cursed their own descendants. Critical to understanding this is to realize this aims to distinguish His nation from others. Israel was not to be like other nations, where there could be no worship without some particular concrete image. God was holy, separate, different from other deities, and His people would reflect that. Nations which found reason to disparage this would find themselves on God’s hit list for a long time. Even if they capitulated, once having been an enemy, they could not become full converts until the fourth generation. That’s how long it would take to wipe away the foolish influences of previous generations.

Instead, the whole thing called for a heart-felt, personal commitment to God. The promise was that He would treat such with mercy, not the harsh strictness of the Law alone.

Reading between the lines, we know this applies to just about anything which we allow to rise up in conflict with our duty to God. When we forget the entire Created world is merely a tool for God’s revelation, and start tagging concrete things with some spooky mysterious powers, we have raised a false image.

Going even farther, we have here a direct command from God His people shall consciously embrace mysticism, which was already fundamental to their culture. Here the focus is realizing one cannot possibly make a concrete representation of God because He cannot be known. When God on the mountain told Moses he could not see His face, it was in part symbolic in saying man cannot pretend to comprehend God intellectually. Thus, the Second Commandment serves to enforce the necessity of approaching Him and all His business from outside the mere rational intelligence.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Two

Implications of the Decalogue: One

I am the LORD your God, who has brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.

The Suzerain establishes His position by noting He redeemed the vassal nation from abject slavery. They were booty, a military prize by right of conquest. There was no room for disputing whether their new situation was any better, as they went from nearly untouchable status below a pagan and evil people, to a liberty as their own nation.

No other authority on earth had any claim on them.

All previous allegiances were broken. Any attempt to develop a rival dependency was more than simply ingratitude, it was a return to slavery. Further, there was the assumption it would be high adultery. Conquering rulers of the Ancient Near East always married their vassals to themselves, unless their aim was to dissolve a nation into slavery. This was a reversal, a promotion to nationhood and prominence — from death to life. This deity had not simply claimed them as His own, but humbled a whole pantheon of rival pagan deities in the process.

By every measure any human would understand in those days, the slightest deviation from allegiance to Jehovah was a grave and fatal error. Every single one of the adult men in this nation understood this personally, as they would have reacted severely had their newly purchased servant, taken from the most degrading situation and given a high social prominence as steward, began serving any other master. Any man would have reacted with extreme anger, fully justified, if his new bride was unfaithful.

This was intensely personal. God does not simply claim some measure of performance, or some portion of assets, but the whole person. The very breath of life was subject to His whims, and by extension, the very soul.

It is the norm in Hebrew literature we should attempt to read between the lines. It was not simply taken for granted, but expected, demanded. The symbolism is obvious: God owns all Creation. Not just Israel, but every human on earth — if it breathes, He owns it. He might excuse a certain amount of confusion regarding what was required, but not the basic assumption allegiance is due Him. There is absolutely no grounds for denying, quibbling or cutting corners on this. By extension, we find here the concrete reality which is symbolic of what Christ did on the Cross. Mount Sinai was merely about the Hebrew nation, but Christ died for all humanity. This is not simply a fresh permit to approach God through Him, but a duty and command to approach Him.

Nor does it matter if any of it makes sense to you. Your failure to grasp the nature of this was simply your problem, and could not relieve you of any obligation to offer full and heart-felt loyalty. No earthly power can lay any claim to that which He says is His. No other presumed divinity, no demon or angel, nor any imagined absence of the supernatural, is permitted to claim any portion of your unreserved loyalty.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: One