Implications of the Decalogue: Three

You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain.

If there was ever a phrase which suffers from cultural differences, it would be “taking a name in vain.” If the worst we ever did was using God’s names and titles in curses, it wouldn’t be such a concern to Him. Words and incantations were never more than mere symbolism in the ancient Hebrew culture.

We forget too easily He is the Suzerain. He does not want to be associated with things He condemns. The nation of Israel was His peculiar representative on earth, bearing His name rather like Americans carry their flag. Not just dragging it through the mud, but evil is trying to use the moral force of His name as a convenience, as a cover for things He considers destructive of His revelation. The whole point in calling Israel into covenant with Him was not simply to be nice to Israel. Indeed, God eventually says through His prophets the choice of Israel was paradoxically the one nation least likely to obey. The whole point was to show His power — His name — was greater than any obstacle on earth.

By extension, we cannot excuse our failures by hiding it under the mantle of “Chosen by God.” It was just too easy for Israel to develop a self-congratulatory culture when the record shows they seldom gave thought to their mission: They were called to manifest the glory of God to other nations. God was not glorified by Israel’s dominance, but by the dominance of His revelation in the Covenant. We have very little evidence any other nation adopted Jehovah as their God, in large measure because no one wanted to be like Israel. We do have nations which embraced the Talmud, but Jesus said that was most certainly not the Law of Moses. Meanwhile, even today the most hideous filthy crimes are committed under the excuse Modern Israel is the Chosen Nation.

The symbol is not the thing itself. The Decalogue was not God, nor precisely His will, but a divine statement of where to start in considering the kinds of changes necessary to find His will. Those who truly love Him don’t need the Laws as anything more than a reference point. He does not demand success, since He alone can grant success. Rather, He demands a desire to please Him; He says that is what makes Him look good.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Three

Fear of God

Somewhere just outside the window they heard the whining growl of a dog straining excitedly against the leash. Almost to man, everyone dropped what he was doing and lay down on the floor. Each was careful to turn so that his arms extended overheard could be clearly seen, palms up and empty.

The door burst open. Before it had struck the wall next to its hinges, the dogs swarmed across the barracks, hoping against hope there was someone not in compliance so they could bite. At the same time, they sniffed about for scents of forbidden items.

When the dogs came back and sat down in front of the door, disappointed at finding nothing, the guards came inside.

“Inmate one-eight-four-nine! Roll over!”

There was a sound of movement between two bunks and the finger tips of hands carefully kept facing palm up. The dogs watched with mild interest. The squad leader who had barked the command strode heavily to the place, nearly stepping on several sets of hands on the way. He placed a restraining device over the wrists, then roughly lifted the man to his feet.

As he was led out, none of others dared to twitch until the dogs were called out of the building. As the men slowly returned to their activities, one or two were heard to mumble something about being glad it wasn’t themselves.

They marched past the building normally used for punishment and torture. Even now with the sun almost gone, it was still hot enough to draw a fresh sweat from the brisk pace. He recognized the backside of the headquarters building. There was a very small door which had obviously been added after the building was finished. The squad leader opened it and shoved the prisoner toward the doorway. It was a big step up, but the prisoner did his best to comply quickly.

The tiny room was dark, but not so dark he couldn’t see it was empty. He wasn’t a young man any more, but it was protocol which told him to sit against the wall next to the door. He heard the locks click before the sound of footsteps faded away.

It took a moment for him to realize the room was air conditioned. How long had it been since he had felt that? His perspiration was not quite dry when the light came on and the opposite door opened.

A burly guard looked inside. He gazed at the prisoner who was hugging his knees. The small wooden stocks were worn smooth and just loose enough to permit this position with a modicum of comfort. The prisoner was careful to display open palms. The guard, face frozen, entered with a folding chair. He set it up along the side wall away from the doors. Then he hoisted the prisoner up and sat him roughly on the chair. Behind him, another burly guard entered with another, much better padded folding chair. This was opened facing the prisoner.

The guards then stood themselves in the two corners behind the prisoner. A few minutes passed. For a man clearly in trouble, the prisoner was quite relaxed, patient, even serene.

Eventually an officer stepped to the door, paused to look inside a moment. Gazing at the prisoner, he sighed, then came in and closed the door behind him. He took the empty chair with an air of relaxed command, which suddenly gave way to a sense of intensity. He frowned at the prisoner, who had not yet dared to raise his eyes. Grabbing each knee, he locked his elbows. The officer pursed his lips a couple of times, the spoke. “Tell me why the others want you in isolation.”

Upon being spoken to, the prisoner raised his face with that calm level gaze which never seemed to leave him. “I’m not willing to join their little gang, Sir.”

The officer, head cocked to one side, considered this for a moment. He folded his arms and stroked his chin. “Which gang?”

The prisoner might as well be the one in charge. Without breaking any protocol, he remained relaxed, with the faintest trace of a smile. “I often wonder, Sir, how you got stuck with this job. When I refused to accept a role in organizing a resistance committee, they threatened to plant lies about me. I knew you wouldn’t believe the report.”

The officer smirked. “You would be the last man on earth to say something naughty about my daughter. I find it hard to imagine you would resist much of anything.”

“Well, Sir, I resisted their conscription. They knew I had worn stripes a few decades ago, and assumed I would be willing to recruit a squad.”

“So they know what’s in our files, but don’t know you. We’ll have to see who among our staff is open to helping them.”

“Or is simply careless.”

“Yes,” the office chuckled. “I suppose you aren’t going to play informant, either.”

“Sir, I cannot. Because no one on this earth can be trusted, I always insure there is nothing which requires trust. Anyone who asks will get an honest report of what I know or believe. The truth is worth far more than my insignificant existence.”

The officer shook his head, not quite with impatience. “So you said during the intake interview. I’ve already figured out punishment means nothing to you, and since you have complied with everything, there’s no need to pretend making an example of you.” He paused for a moment, staring at the ceiling. “So if I accept their bogus accusation you insulted my daughter’s honor, I give them what they think they want. If I do not, they suddenly become more suspicious of you. What do you think?”

The prisoner shrugged. “I can’t pretend to advise you, Sir. It makes no difference to me. If you lock me up, I get more time to pray and meditate, while you investigate this new resistance. If you send me back, I get more time to teach the few who will listen, and the rest will draw away even farther.”

The officer pursed his lips again. “Hm. What can you tell me about his new committee?”

“They spoke of organizing and drilling on communications first. They seem to think they can bring the other gangs to heel some way, then organize a mass revolt and escape, I suppose.”

“What do you think are their chances?”

“Zero.”

“Is that why you didn’t join them?”

“No, Sir. If I really believed it was necessary to try, futility would not stop me. I don’t concern myself with results, but obeying my convictions. That’s why I didn’t join them. They don’t understand the one and only way anyone could escape is not the path they walk.”

The officer’s eyes narrowed. “What way would you expect to escape?”

“Sir, you miss my point. On human terms, there is no escape. On spiritual terms, there is no prison. If my God didn’t want me here, nothing you or anyone else did would keep me. When He is ready, I’ll leave, either alive or dead, but I’ll be gone. Until then, I remain here at His sufferance.”

The officer relaxed a bit. “Yes, that mystical babble again. Meanwhile, I have a bunch of military veterans playing SERE games in my camp.”

The prisoner smiled. “Then you already know who they are. You can easily estimate the types of things they’ll do. Their ingenuity can only take them so far in this sort of camp.”

“Maybe you are right … just a tempest in a teapot. Forewarned is forearmed. I think I’ll hold you a couple of days just to see who acts differently when you are gone. You don’t suppose this is going to accidentally implicate any of your friends, do you?”

This time the prisoner smiled more plainly. “Sir, are you aware of the concept ‘leaderless resistance’?”

The officer nodded recognition.

“I teach leaderless religion. I won’t let anyone become dependent on me, warn them to limit their trust in me, but find their own path. Several of the men have fully embraced it since coming here. Those closest to me in friendship are the ones who need me least, so they should act the same in my absence.”

The office nodded. “What keeps any of them from deciding God wants them to try to leave?”

“Nothing.” He paused, “Of course, I try to discourage it.”

The officer froze. His eyes slowly drifted downward, opening wide as he stared at the floor. His right hand drifted up to the side of his head, where the fingers spread and began pressing little indentations in the skin. He looked up suddenly and barked at the two guards. “Get him back to his barracks. Now!” By his hasty departure, you might think the officer was fleeing the little room.

Posted in fiction | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fear of God

Political Premonitions

I don’t claim to prognosticate or predict. I have private premonitions. I post them here because I don’t take myself too seriously, and because it might be fun to see if any of them come close to what actually happens.

Whatever it started out as, the Tea Party Movement has been hijacked. It is now the managed protest of one side against the other. You and I know it’s two uniforms, but one team. It’s the same money, the same real rulers behind the scenes. Having a protest outlet prevents — or at least delays — an actual revolt.

So they will pass this damnable “Health Care Reform” tomorrow, barring some really big surprise. We can be certain the majority of American citizens are against it, but it’s the same thing as with TARP. Unless there is something ahead more important than the current necessity of handing the nation over to the Big Medicine management companies, this will go through. It’s been bought and paid for, and it shall be.

And we shall have war with Iran. Consider that for our eight years in Afghanistan, we have only accomplished half the mission. We do now have massive heroine trade going into Russia, and making the CIA very wealthy. But we don’t have our oil pipeline route. That’s because, while we can beat the Taliban in direct battle, we can’t really do anything about them. After weeks of major battles in Marjah, a rural district, the Taliban still rule there, particularly at night. And we can’t seem to fix the problems in Iraq, but that’s all theater anyway. Most of the bombs are now being done by former Blackwater, and all of them in Pakistan. The US government is lying, lying, lying and always has been, every step of the way. So I am praying we are handed a very definitive loss in Iran. It’s only God’s justice.

Indeed, I’m praying the whole federal government collapse, fail, come apart at the seams. It’s gotten to the point their bottomless greed has caused them to begin eating their own feet, as it were. What has carried them along, making possible all this raping and pillaging, is no longer there. So they are gobbling their own toes, and the whole thing will collapse under its own weight. I suppose it will include lots of violence, but I’m hoping I can avoid seeing too much of it. A significant part of the collapse will be this constant expansion of our military mission around the world, mostly at the behest of Israel.

Our government mouthpieces keep talking about how Iran misbehaves with nuclear stuff, but Israel is the one who refuses to even sign the NNPT. But even the nation of Israel is probably about to shoot themselves in the feet. Any moment now they are simply going to forget there are other people in the world with their own dreams and such, and they’ll be crushed. It may well be the same defeat I hope God gives us.

Vanity of vanities; all is vanity. My only loyalty is to Christ as my Lord, and there is currently not a single human government obeying God’s Laws. Sorry, but that’s the truth.

Stop and think about this: It is no longer any part of the national will behind what the government is doing, and that includes the endless wars in the Middle East. Now when we say, “support the troops” it must of necessity mean support that evil mission over which we have zero input. I can’t do that. It matters not who is wearing the US uniforms, because that simply has come to mean some army of slaves forced to kill and destroy in countries which have done us no wrong. I cannot pray for their victory, because that is praying for evil.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Political Premonitions

Implications of the Decalogue: Two

You shall not make for yourselves any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in the heavens above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow yourself down to them, nor serve them. For I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the sons to the third and fourth generation of those that hate me, and showing mercy to thousands of those that love Me and keep My commandments.

The Suzerain continues with a corollary to His first command. The act of artistic representation is not forbidden, as we note when God describes Tabernacle decorations which include such things. The terms here apply specifically to idolatry, ritual images.

This and the previous command are summed up by God explaining His attitude. He warns those who find Him or any part of His lordship odious will have, in effect, cursed their own descendants. Critical to understanding this is to realize this aims to distinguish His nation from others. Israel was not to be like other nations, where there could be no worship without some particular concrete image. God was holy, separate, different from other deities, and His people would reflect that. Nations which found reason to disparage this would find themselves on God’s hit list for a long time. Even if they capitulated, once having been an enemy, they could not become full converts until the fourth generation. That’s how long it would take to wipe away the foolish influences of previous generations.

Instead, the whole thing called for a heart-felt, personal commitment to God. The promise was that He would treat such with mercy, not the harsh strictness of the Law alone.

Reading between the lines, we know this applies to just about anything which we allow to rise up in conflict with our duty to God. When we forget the entire Created world is merely a tool for God’s revelation, and start tagging concrete things with some spooky mysterious powers, we have raised a false image.

Going even farther, we have here a direct command from God His people shall consciously embrace mysticism, which was already fundamental to their culture. Here the focus is realizing one cannot possibly make a concrete representation of God because He cannot be known. When God on the mountain told Moses he could not see His face, it was in part symbolic in saying man cannot pretend to comprehend God intellectually. Thus, the Second Commandment serves to enforce the necessity of approaching Him and all His business from outside the mere rational intelligence.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Two

Implications of the Decalogue: One

I am the LORD your God, who has brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.

The Suzerain establishes His position by noting He redeemed the vassal nation from abject slavery. They were booty, a military prize by right of conquest. There was no room for disputing whether their new situation was any better, as they went from nearly untouchable status below a pagan and evil people, to a liberty as their own nation.

No other authority on earth had any claim on them.

All previous allegiances were broken. Any attempt to develop a rival dependency was more than simply ingratitude, it was a return to slavery. Further, there was the assumption it would be high adultery. Conquering rulers of the Ancient Near East always married their vassals to themselves, unless their aim was to dissolve a nation into slavery. This was a reversal, a promotion to nationhood and prominence — from death to life. This deity had not simply claimed them as His own, but humbled a whole pantheon of rival pagan deities in the process.

By every measure any human would understand in those days, the slightest deviation from allegiance to Jehovah was a grave and fatal error. Every single one of the adult men in this nation understood this personally, as they would have reacted severely had their newly purchased servant, taken from the most degrading situation and given a high social prominence as steward, began serving any other master. Any man would have reacted with extreme anger, fully justified, if his new bride was unfaithful.

This was intensely personal. God does not simply claim some measure of performance, or some portion of assets, but the whole person. The very breath of life was subject to His whims, and by extension, the very soul.

It is the norm in Hebrew literature we should attempt to read between the lines. It was not simply taken for granted, but expected, demanded. The symbolism is obvious: God owns all Creation. Not just Israel, but every human on earth — if it breathes, He owns it. He might excuse a certain amount of confusion regarding what was required, but not the basic assumption allegiance is due Him. There is absolutely no grounds for denying, quibbling or cutting corners on this. By extension, we find here the concrete reality which is symbolic of what Christ did on the Cross. Mount Sinai was merely about the Hebrew nation, but Christ died for all humanity. This is not simply a fresh permit to approach God through Him, but a duty and command to approach Him.

Nor does it matter if any of it makes sense to you. Your failure to grasp the nature of this was simply your problem, and could not relieve you of any obligation to offer full and heart-felt loyalty. No earthly power can lay any claim to that which He says is His. No other presumed divinity, no demon or angel, nor any imagined absence of the supernatural, is permitted to claim any portion of your unreserved loyalty.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: One

Implications of the Decalogue: Introduction

Place the Ten Commandments into their proper context. The time frame was roughly 1400 BC. The Covenant of Moses, delivered by God on Mount Sinai, took a very familiar form for the people involved. The closest documentary parallel was the Hittite suzerain-vassal treaty. The Hittites began colonizing and conquering during Abraham’s sojourn in Canaan (2200 BC), and their power faded during David’s reign (1000 BC).

A conquering emperor through his representatives would establish his identity as the suzerain, the overlord to whom fealty is due. In the Ancient Near East (ANE) this included the notion all those under the treaty terms were entering his personal household as servants. That made them vassals — dependents who owed something to the suzerain. While he did propose standard legal policy, each individual was personally liable to any whim of the suzerain.

The Ten Commandments were not law as we think of it, but legal policy. The responsibility to the divine Suzerain was to construct laws and adjust customs to produce the results depicted by the ten commands. Thus, it’s a matter of “your conduct shall fit in these limits.”

Along with this was usually a body of previous rulings which served as detailed examples of how it worked. Thus, the various civil, kosher, ritual and other bodies of code in the Pentateuch were not set in stone like the Ten Commandments, but were precedent. No one expected each precedent to fit every circumstance. The suzerain always set up courts to ensure conflicting demands were resolved, and confusing applications were clarified.

For us today the Ten Commandments are not specifically binding in the sense of God’s Law for today. We are not under a suzerain-vassal treaty. However, the Covenant of Christ’s Blood does build on that ground; it serves as a cognitive parable of some higher truth which is beyond words.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Implications of the Decalogue: Introduction

The Insanity Plea

A significant portion of my studies has exposed me to the field of Mental Health. Aside from some very well crafted notions on self-help, virtually the entire field is littered with mines.

Make no mistake: God holds us accountable under the standards of His Laws, which were reduced in modern terms to (1) remain unquestioningly loyal to God as Creator and Lord, and (2) treat all other humans with proper respect. Vast tracts of academic real estate are built on the presumption there is no God and rejects the notion humans are actually people. That is, given some folks don’t quite measure up to some arbitrary standard, they aren’t considered fully human.

It’s one thing when God grants you a child to raise. Therein are you fully required by Him to make some effort to shape their behavior patterns. Indeed, this is at the root of Noah’s Covenant. We might debate forever how much freedom to self-raise is appropriate, and under what conditions, but the principle remains a parent is somewhat responsible for cleaning up the messes their children make, particularly the messes they make in the lives of those outside the home.

But it ends at some point, and herein is the sin of almost all modern cultures. We have rejected God’s guidance on the matter of what constitutes legal adulthood. For females, it’s whenever the family deems her ready for marriage, often shortly after menarche. For men, upon whom the burden falls more heavily for social stability, there is an initial step of grasping the structure of that burden, typically before physical growth is finished. Then there is a period of apprenticeship until they are deemed stable enough to manage their own household. Frankly, the meant most men didn’t get married before age 25. Get a clue: Unmarried people are a danger to social stability, unless God has called them to some special task incompatible with married life. The point is, we do have a clear point of departure.

A family can extend certain kinds of support, but cannot be held accountable after that point of departure. That is, they may choose to clean up the mess, but aren’t required. They can allow legal and social consequences to follow their natural course. The Bible makes it pretty clear what God had in mind on these issues, and there is plenty of room for adjustments without violating the underlying principles. However, what cannot be justified is our current madness of families removing themselves from the clan structure, and outsourcing the entire social fabric to strangers. The parents who bear the child are responsible for the entire gamut — directly and personally responsible. They cannot agree together with strangers for some objectified process of education for some material convenience.

Nor can they contract out expertise in deciding when someone in their family needs help after reaching adulthood. You are not permitted to appeal to “authorities” as the grounds for forcing anyone to submit to parental controls after they reach adulthood. Just because someone in your family does things inconvenient for you, there is no justification for taking over their lives, in particular their material assets. God does not approve of the legal fiction of incompetence before the court. If they are a danger to themselves, stand back and let them choose. If they are a danger to anyone else, restrain them. Not some policeman, but you yourself. If you don’t have time and energy for the big boys in your clan to do it, then you aren’t responsible enough yourself.

As repeatedly stated on this blog in the past, if your social structure is anything other than clan-tribal, you are wrong already. After that, nothing you do will be right — nothing. You have no righteous leverage for getting involved in the lives of your kin without it. So if you can’t negotiate with a difficult family member, shut up and put up with their antics. Provided their material goods did not come from crime (as God defines crime), you have no claim on their property so as to tell them how to use it. As far as God is concerned, the Ten Commandments make it painfully clear He regards the spouse and children of a man a sacred trust from Him, and no one on this earth is authorized to get involved unless they have already been living in a clan-tribal social structure. The freedom of a man to choose is a grant from God, and almost no modern nation, state, society or civilization is doing this right.

That’s what God says.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Insanity Plea

Family Feuds Not My Problem

I am posting for your edification a redacted (names removed) version of what I emailed to a couple of people trying to drag me into their family dispute.

To the Children of Mr. X:

I am putting this in written form so that there is less confusion. Whatever action you take should be properly informed.

Please know that I share precious little of your apparent world view. While I would be loath to judge anyone, I hardly expect others operate that way. I live consciously by my Christian convictions, and the proper term for my brand of faith is Christian Mysticism. I don’t doubt you will associate that term with much baggage I do not carry, but that can’t be helped.

Rather, let me declare to you the pertinent notions regarding my association with Mr. X. My first and greatest loyalty is to God, and that loyalty takes the form of a very anti-materialist concern in favor of other-worldly truths. I hold no interest in your father’s property, nor very much interest in my own. I regard all material things as mere tools for those other-worldly purposes and designs I perceive.

My own life is not precious to me, but was long ago forfeited to Christ. It follows I would be rather disinterested in my health, safety and sanity, should I perceive the will of God demands it of me.

The God I serve has called upon me to befriend Mr. X. By no means do I imagine my services are any great importance, but I adhere to my convictions and offer what I have. I have not asked anything in return. Many times Mr. X has expressed a desire to lay out a fee for service angle to things, but I have always demurred, making him decide for himself what he wants to do. As one who uses all resources in service to God, whatever Mr. X has pleased to give me I accept.

Should he be destitute and on the streets, I would simply take him home with me and do what I could. The issue has nothing to do with anyone’s stuff.

I have a personal spiritual covenant with Mr. X, not the the X family. I am not family, and I will not be roped into family matters. I refuse to enter into discussions regarding his competence. If what he asks of me is within my power and consistent with my convictions, I will try to execute his wishes. Discussions with me about what is in his best interests is a waste of time, as I regard him the true expert on such matters. Should he decide to fritter it all away, or hoard it to himself, that is his decision. In my mind, whatever material possessions he may have gained over his life was by God’s grace, and he is the sole proper steward of it before God Almighty.

If he changes his mind a hundred times on any single thing, I will do my best to grant his wish each time. I have no end of patience with such things. I am not entangled in results, only my commitment to loyalty. Thus, the only thing which I can advise you do is make your case with him, whatever it is you want him to do. By no means assume my love and regard for him and Mrs. X automatically binds me to your expectations.

Should you find all of this dangerous or threatening, it lies in your hands to take whatever action you see fit. If you manage to, say, obtain a restraining order, I would abide by the terms. However, on your own authority, do not ever presume to instruct me yourselves. I owe you nothing except what God says I owe every other human on earth. I remain friendly and open to all, but I call on all people still breathing to reject this world and the things of this world.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Family Feuds Not My Problem

Plain Text Browsing the Net

Why, when there are so many graphics, scripting, and all the extra multimedia stuff? That’s why.

I’ve tested this off and on for several years. When I visit my favorite sites with Lynx or Elinks, I find more actual information, and find it much more quickly, than if I browse with Firefox or Opera. Even Dillo can be a bit much at times.

To some degree, it really depends on the user. If you are visually oriented, you might find it a bit boring. However, not long ago researchers discovered a subset of those who learn visually, and it’s those who learn textually. I’m not sure if that applies to me, or if I’m simply old enough, and was poor enough as a child, to have developed little taste for TV and movies. Actually, I hate them. Then again, whatever is actually behind the popular diagnosis of ADD/ADHD afflicts me as well.

Sure, I do use my scripts to download copies of videos which someone convinces me I simply must see. I think it’s sad that some of the very best information is no longer coming out in text, but video only. (I have no interest in entertainment films.) Perhaps one time in ten, the advice is correct, and I have kept a few of those videos. Otherwise, Firefox is used only for blogging and a precious few sites where it’s really the best way to interact.

For just news reading and such, Lynx is my favorite. I save a lot of heartache by opening an Xterm window the default width of 80 characters, and stretch it downward a ways. A few sites are slightly better with Elinks, with a wider Xterm window. It takes far less time if I don’t get myself distracted by images, ads, marquees, and other annoyances which hinder reading and information gathering.

I have lots of computer horsepower, a huge LCD monitor, but I just don’t care for graphical browsing. Give it a try.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Plain Text Browsing the Net

Sin of Jeroboam: American False Gods

God Himself granted to Jeroboam the northern tribes for a kingdom. There was no sin breaking up the nation that way. Where Jeroboam sinned was twisting religion to political ends.

Here in America, the churches have joined in the sin of Jeroboam. We haven’t raised rival temples, in that we don’t have one single Temple of God, but symbolically, we have raised up a rival religion: We have made the state our god.

When I merely hint or suggest to the faithful followers of Christ our wars are wrong, there will be no substantive discussion of issues. There is a mindless emotional bristling that I am tearing at the fabric of our nation in failing to support the troops. And somehow a mindless devotion to destruction of a bunch of people who did us no harm is equated to true devotion to God.

Jesus Christ did not support any human government, refusing to let Himself be dragged into the conflict. He did suggest it’s simpler to let Rome have what she justly demanded — tribute — but devotion and loyalty was God’s. He also noted we should avoid cursing those who ruled, even if they ruled unjustly. Not that it would make any difference whether we cursed them or didn’t, in the sense God was already on the case. The point was proper respect, as was the entire subtext of His comments about loving God and loving your neighbor as yourself. That pretty much equates to giving what each is properly due.

When His disciples began spreading His message after that first Christian Pentecost, it was most assuredly a call to petition for citizenship in a higher domain, that of Heaven. That was offered as the Empire which ruled all Creation. When the demands of loyalty compete, Heaven wins. You should willingly give up your life if that’s what it costs you to remain loyal to God as your ultimate Lord.

So I don’t counsel you revolt, nor do I suggest there is any good thing which comes from efforts to replace what we have here in the U.S. with something else. God’s taking care of that; America has sinned too much for too long, is doomed. Wrath has begun falling already. But the point is American Christians have tried to drag Jesus into supporting mindless bloodlust. They don’t examine the facts about what we are doing in this world, but simply repeat verbatim the lies told them by a government which does not love Jesus. Don’t confuse them with facts, because in their blinded minds, that marks you as the enemy.

In later generations, after the Northern Kingdom was exiled to other lands, and the Assyrian Empire imported a mixed bag of others into their place, they naturally wanted to know about the local gods of Samaria. So Assyria sent back the priests who had supported the corrupted version of worship which mimicked the Temple worship in Jerusalem. Naturally, to support this false cult, they had chopped out lots of textual material from the Law of Moses.

Modern American Christians have chopped out of their Bibles the intellectual culture in which it was written. They refuse to read it with the eyes of those who wrote it, but read it with foreign eyes, minds deeply instilled with a foreign understanding which rejects all the assumptions of the people of the Bible. No, it’s not that they don’t understand the epistemology of the Bible; they bluntly reject it. Try just once in a Baptist church, or some other mainstream evangelical congregation, to mention the Ancient Near Eastern Mystical understanding of things, and they’ll go ballistic on you. They have chopped out a lot of Scripture by refusing to understand it as written.

It didn’t matter how wise and powerful were the rulers of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. God took them down, and they were never heard from again. America is next in line for the same judgment.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sin of Jeroboam: American False Gods