Radix Fidem Blog

Couldn’t Have Guessed

Posted on October 13, 2009 by ehurst

He never expected to live this long. In the middle of his first century of life, nobody could have guessed how simple it was to remove most of the artificial pollutants. All that business about “natural” nutrients pretty much revolutionized medicine, once the calcified establishment lost its grip on things. Replacing the technology which created various energy fields, shielding stuff which couldn’t be replaced, made a huge difference. Not just in medicine, but in everything. Technology research became so focused on energy fields, one of the first things they found was the holy grail of solid fields, which had previously been theorized as “force fields.” It made it possible to shield all sorts of things by creating a field which simply turned back in upon itself. It also made it possible to build huge facilities in places no one ever dreamed.

At one point, one lab was working deep in an ocean fissure when they stumbled across the technology which brought him out here halfway between two star systems. Someone realized it was possible to manipulate gravity. That is, they created a device which could greatly magnify the effects of gravity on objects, both in attracting and repelling them. So they launched a probe with a gravity drive, and all it did was enhance the pull from the moon and repel the gravity well of the earth’s core. They didn’t expect it to be so easy to move a quarter ton of equipment without any moving parts, precious little use of anything resembling “fuel” and no pretty fire or colors, even. The field produced a faint glow at the repelling end, but the pulling end was blacker than black. All the primitive Science Fiction movies and books had failed to guess that one.

They also couldn’t have guessed what the instruments told them: Just outside low earth orbit, the radiation was so intense, nothing from earth could have lived. Nobody had expected to find the old US-NASA had been lying about those famous Moon landings. While the technology of his own day could have easily done a better job of making the pictures more accurate, it didn’t really matter. The shield technology was enough to handle the radiation. Indeed, once they managed to tune it to permit essential minimal levels of radiation which the human body used for maintenance, all it took was an added calibration routine in the programming for space travel shields.

So the result was a very comfortable cruise, such as men took on huge ocean liners before the global political collapse. The space ship was just a big rectangular box, assembled on the moon by field-powered robots, and easily launched by the power of a tiny gravity manipulation field. Nobody expected the improbable result of the field, once running, would power everything the ship would ever need for human comfort.

So he sat on the couch in his spacious cabin, reviewing in his mind the expectations he had when he turned fifty. That had been almost a century before. He couldn’t have guessed he’d be in better physical shape than then. He couldn’t have guessed they would learn enough about human thinking to find ways to keep track of two centuries or more of memories.

And as they silently sliced through interstellar space, he could hardly have guessed politics would never change. It’s not as if mankind learned nothing. It’s that mankind never changed. Not really. Once they realized the extended family structure was the highest and most productive social model, men still came up with all sorts of crazy new and old ways to try yet one more time. It always failed. Because he had been one of the earliest voices demanding a return to clans, it gave him just a tiny bit of political clout. So it was his clan selected to make this trip, and he was the head of household. He never could have guessed that.

The one thing he did guess caused him yet one more time to smile, with just a hint of smirk. He guessed Western organized religion would panic when the Nation of Israel turned out to be a complete fraud. He had felt that little country would destroy itself, but could not have guessed how completely it would do so. Right now the biggest shield project on Earth was keeping the sea of radioactive glass, spreading out from the site of Jerusalem, from harming any of the rest of the planet. All those nuclear missiles fired from Dimona fell right back on the Ancient City. And the almost the whole of Christendom collapsed with it.

Not faith, of course. Just the organized religious structure, most of the teaching, and all that investment in facilities came apart in just a matter of weeks. When the false prophesies of Israel fell apart, the entire Dispensationalist heresy wasn’t far behind. Some Reformed groups held on the longest, having never accepted Dispensationalism, but eventually came apart from other issues. The tiny few, such as his own clan, whose faith excluded all that before, were ready to succor those who didn’t commit suicide. Thus, his own clan was partly a spiritual clan, having no shared DNA, nor even married into the clan. They joined by covenant.

That was a part of the new post-Western culture. Nobody was quite happy, couldn’t quite agree on all the details. Still, the revival of the ancient Eastern ways of the Bible was progressing. The new intellectual ferment was the basis behind almost all the advancements since that nasty war saw Israel commit suicide, trying to destroy the world with them. Wild theories about fault lines which would break apart the crust if enough nuclear weapons were detonated on top of it didn’t pan out. Instead, the heat from the first detonation simply detonated the rest, each with a much weaker yield, until the last one melted in the air high above, doing nothing at all.

While the humanity did not suddenly have peace, they did have a huge mess to clean up. It was called a miracle when the discovery of field technology permitted the first effort to limit radiation leakage from Palestine. But had the problem not been so severe, the initial fast progress away from environmental poisons as a whole might not have happened. All of that, no man could have guessed. But the end of the old Western Christian religion was not just a guess for him, but a matter of faith.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged culture, fiction, government, writing | Comments Off

What Color Is Sorrow?

Posted on October 12, 2009 by ehurst

You may recall the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. The Apostle John echoes something of Old Testament imagery throughout his Apocalypse, and the horsemen are no different (Zechariah 6). Whatever else you make of it, John’s image would be recognized as symbols of political ambition (conquest), war, economic collapse, and plague. If we miss the broadest meaning of such symbols, we can’t hope to make any particular applications.

It should be obvious John is not impressed with human behavior at large. So at least a part of what he says with that image of horsemen is a contrast to what Zechariah saw, with angels reporting quiet and peace. John’s horsemen were anything but. Since man began to record his activities, we see where some urge to conquest always results in war, which destroys the economy and everything supporting life, so that disease runs rampant. Every part of it means death. The four were a team, and you always get them as a package. While the association is altogether natural in sequence, that hardly stops some ambitious politician from inducing the others intentionally.

Is there anyone who still clings to the myth America is peace-loving? Don’t let your love for the people here blind you to what people in other nations rightly see as a bully nation which goes to war for lies. From the American Revolution forward, the whole story of motives has seldom been told, so we get a nice whitewash over sinful human motives. History for kids is the story told by the winning side. We aren’t winning as much, so it’s pretty distressing to see the American Empire crumble. Political ambition is obviously the primary trait of America.

The wars are seldom what is publicly claimed. Here’s a brief exposure:

American Revolution: Merchants rejecting regulation of any sort, because they held a radical theology which said God intended for them to prosper materially, and any system or person which interfered was inherently sinful, deserving of death and destruction. Issues of taxation and liberty were mostly propaganda.
1812: We were provoking England with all sorts of naughty trade tactics, threatening to annex Canada against Canadians’ will, etc. We prefer to focus on England’s equally naughty tactics.
Civil War: All about taxation, with slavery the mere propaganda issue on both sides. The real movers and shakers in the North were hatefully seeking to plunder the South via taxation. Those in the South were contemptuous. The two sides hated each other because they were two truly different nations.
Spanish American War: Objective examination proved the explosion of that ship had nothing to do with Spain, but was a combination of faulty design and construction, plus abuse. We attacked an aging feeble empire like any thug going after an old lady — because we could.

So it goes, but the rest are more complicated, well covered in books and websites. A good and moral people have no need to stomp on others to show their ability to defend themselves.

And wars cost huge amounts of money. It is so easy to ignore how every war so far was the result of economic interests eager to sacrifice the children of others to enrich themselves. Our alleged prosperity after WW2 was manipulated by the same people who cause the Great Depression. As soon as things were stable, they promptly got us into Korea, then Vietnam. All of it leads right to where we are today, on the verge of total economic collapse. Will Grigg rightly says of this time in history: Have a Nice Apocalypse. We are the deadbeat nation.

And it’s not as if we won’t suffer from enough health issues once medical care becomes unaffordable, but we have to all appearances a concerted effort to cripple the nation’s health by hiding real health information to create a population utterly dependent because they can’t avoid getting sick. All the normal human systemic responses to disease are suppressed with fake medicine, so we can’t even ward off or get through a simple head cold. Now, we have this flu vaccine business which stands to fatally cripple the entire nation even more. The vaccines will either spread the disease like wildfire (see “shedding” in relation to the nasal spray vaccine), or cripple the normal immune system (adjuvants), and possibly sterilize an entire generation (also adjuvants). This, from vaccine makers who are downright criminal, with such fine acts as selling AIDS tainted blood products after being warned of the problem.

Paint the horses any color you like. Your government wants you suffering or dead, America. We know some folks in government are just doing what they are told, refusing to think about whether it’s actually right or wrong. Many more don’t care because they’ve been bought, such as Congress. But a few honestly do know how this will turn out, and pursue it with a will. It’s no different from what the Apostle John saw in the Roman Imperial government. Those who aren’t stupid or insane are just plain evil.

Welcome to Apocalypse.

Posted in globalism | Tagged government, medicine, resistance, survival, war | Comments Off

Spiritual Data

Posted on October 11, 2009 by ehurst

It does not compute.

I’m a theologian. If it makes you happy, you can prefix that with “amateur,” since I don’t get a dime for what I write or say. I’m not sure I care one way or the other about degrees, titles, positions, etc., since they often have no bearing on the quality or importance of the verbal product. I’m certainly no better than someone noted by many as a theologian, but I contend I’m also no worse. And you are free to ignore all that, since the whole point is revealing my personal emphasis. Mostly, I’m just a writer with a preferred subject matter which falls under the academic heading, “theology.”

I surely enjoy technology toys, and especially operating systems. Sometimes I write about that, too. The whole point of this is keeping an eye out for a better means to writing my stuff. All my computers are simply glorified pencils. In my youth, I kept piles of pencil-scratched papers. I preferred pencil to pen because I was pretty sure I’d change how I wanted to say something in one part or another. When I got a typewriter, the first thing I wanted was a way to erase cleanly. The Army introduce me to computers after I hit thirty, but I was hooked. It was the ultimate typewriter, since nothing was committed to paper until I hit that “Print” command. If I needed to change it, I could print it again.

I have small piles of material, some of it going back to the pencil days. I hardly ever look at it. Indeed, most of what I once tried to drag around with me every time we moved has been tossed. Some smaller subset called out to something inside me, and I kept it. You might guess that stuff is theological in nature. Nowadays there’s a lot less of it, since I realize I can’t go back there. Proverbially, I have moved to a far distant land, and a far distant time, leaving behind most of what folks gave me. I realize the utter importance of those gifts as the starting place, but their primary importance now is the means to define what I reject. I tried it and found it wanting, and it remains a part of my identity, since what I now write reflects the failures of where I’ve been. I can’t call out to those who share nothing with me, so I keep some small expressions of what I once believed to remind me where that is.

The new land where my soul lives is defined by a fairly large collection of material. Printed and bound, it would be a small library. What would it mean to me if all this passed away? That is, if the dire future I predict for America and the West comes anywhere near our reality, I might lose access to most of that, since it depends on technology and electricity. I suppose I could make a stab at printing it all up real soon, but that might cause yet another headache if something in the future turmoil requires a sudden departure from this residence. The only reason I consider the question at all is realizing when I chance to reread some of it, I find I had forgotten little bits and pieces. Can I trust my mind to retain what seems essential? I don’t know. I’m torn. In the end, it’s a matter of faith, which is the founding stone of all this writing in the first place.

It’s painful enough for most people with data losses when things are supposed to be working well. Instead of the piles of paper I once carried, I have a stack of CDs I burned, but I seldom look at them, either. Smaller, but just as much a ball-and-chain. I’m on my fifth USB memory stick. But I’m pretty sure Nik Cubrilovic is right on one thing:

The solution may be to do nothing, certainly not to panic. The biggest problem is that we hoard data. We produce more data and information than we ever have, and we are all vain enough to believe that the data we create is so fantastic that it should live on for eternity. Losing the contact list on your phone shouldn’t be a problem — you should know who your friends are anyway. If you are losing sleep because you can’t find an old email you wrote, you likely have deeper issues to address.

Technology has spoiled us to the point where we feel nostalgic when we lose data that didn’t really matter in the first place. If it did matter, a primal instinct would have driven us to do more to preserve, rather than rely on a sleep deprived sysadmin on the other side of the country. If you didn’t care enough to take care of it yourself, then you didn’t really need it. It is our misguided expectation of technology that causes us to panic when we lose data. The only people who have a larger incentive to preserve your data are those who are using it to target an advertisement at you, or sell you something.

Not only is a lot of this data not important, but do we really want to keep it? I certainly would not want a full account of everything I did in my youth sitting on a server somewhere. I am also certain that we do not want the record of our as a society time being documented and discovered by future civilizations based on Twitter messages.

Data experiences its own form of natural selection. What is important will survive, the remainder will thankfully fade away.

While it may be the mere vanity of a self-important nobody, a wannabe theologian whose contentions will be forgotten only slightly later than his name, I consider often how I can keep it for future use. I’ve studied the issues of file formats, the minimum necessary to convey what in my mind is the essence, and the widest possible use, and the most convenient recall, etc. I’ve studied copyright, and decided I really don’t care half so much about my name as I do the ideas. What difference it makes in another human soul strikes me as more important than all the wealth of the world. That’s what theology is. It’s about things which, if correctly understood, will affect you long after your body and this whole universe has passed.

But then, how could something like that depend on such a flaky system of transmittal? It’s enough, according to my theology, that we do whatever it is we do best until we can’t do any more, in the cause of passing on these ideas. If all computers and technology, and electricity itself, suddenly disappears from the earth in some man-made catastrophe of global self-immolation, I can’t do much to prepare for that. I’ll have to assume that divine prerogative demands yet another change in my Really Big and Important Plans.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged computers, culture, internet, writing | Comments Off

Clothing Nazis

Posted on October 10, 2009 by ehurst

On the one hand, I’m completely prudish. At the same time, I would be the last person to legislate regarding public dress codes. Yes, I reject any notion of gender equality because God made women with more assets, and made men to notice them. Women are made to compete on those grounds, and men fail to realize they go all out more for that competition than to actually impress men. That and a large number of other complications, but minimum cover standards for public have been long established. I even go so far as to support having places where nudity is acceptable, but clearly marked so the rest of us can avoid it.

The point is I despise the cultural element which makes sites such as People of Walmart such a big draw. Yes, I turn away in disgust when some blubber-babe shows too much. No, it’s not exactly the same as when some cutie shows too much, but I still turn away for both. There is something nasty about the crude comments and laughter which accompanies photos of the former. It smacks of self-righteous smugness, which is never anything less than a sin.

By the same token, I would refuse to take that site down. The problem is not the pictures; they are worthy of note for showing something of human behavior. People do crazy things, and we need not hide away from it. The sin is in how we react to it. Not just the over-exposures of flesh, but particularly when we see the other kind of picture, with outrageous costumes which don’t have much of a sexual titillation value. Again, the problem is not the photos, but the captions — those supplied and those we make up ourselves.

The very definition of “bizarre” includes the notion of transgressing generally accepted boundaries. Prophets in the Bible used it to good effect. My argument is with our definitions, but even more with our underlying reaction, as if outlandish costume is somehow “wrong.” This plays into the hands of most people who choose to wear such costumes. We have created artificial standards, which completely confuses the message sent by people who transgress them. Is it some punk who simply looks for anything alarming, out of some juvenile desire to offend? Or is it someone with a righteous ax to grind? We can’t know because our culture refuses to recognize righteousness in general, and substitutes an empty materialistic version.

Sure, we understand gender confusion as a sin. A man is not a woman, but does it occur to no one sometimes the confusion is in our own souls, in our broken culture, not in the actual fact of so-called cross-dressing? If a scruffy guy wears a frilly skirt and top, perhaps he’s pointing out a weakness in our categories. That is not a sin, but we would hardly know the difference between a carefully crafted dramatic challenge to culture and a deluded, sick, broken soul. We simply assume the latter, laugh and ignore the possibilities.

Walmart is not so evil as it serves as a pronounced symptom of evil. I have long noted that store brings out the worst in Americans. That’s the bigger point here: We are shallow, crude, selfish and evil as a nation. Walmart reduces the shopping experience to its essence. You want your stuff at the cheapest price. Scrape away any pretense of moral qualities, loudly denouncing God for daring to place a moral tone on His revelation and expectations of us. We’ll eagerly replace His revelation with any number of ways for perverting the truth; sin is defined as anything other than what God says. So we give full vent to our fleshly desires by fighting for the parking places closest to the door, pick through the shopping carts for one that rolls sweetly, run over each other in a hurry to get the cheapest crap any store could stock, make the stockers and clerks miserable for failing our unreasonable expectations, carp and grouch about the long checkout lines, and ignore every civility as we rush back out to our cars, and creep through the vehicles crowding every passage while the drivers wait for their passengers to buy three carts of junk.

Walmart is not the problem; it exposes the problem. That website designed to castigate people for daring to be honest about their sins is another symptom. We reject God’s ways, create a cheap substitute, and poke fun at those who don’t bother with the pretense. Yes, People of Walmart is funny, but the joke’s on us. That’s the real America.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged culture, humor, internet | Comments Off

Praying for an Upgrade

Posted on October 9, 2009 by ehurst

Poor baby. I’m giving her all she’s got and it’s just not enough any more.

My Inspiron 4100 has a 1Ghz CPU with a half-GB of RAM. It’s not enough any more. I still love the little beast, and use it every day. But I keep running into tasks for which it simply is not able. I’m also quite happy with CentOS 5.3, but it requires a little more machine for the stuff I do.

So if you understand prayer, pray with me for some kind of upgrade. I don’t much care if it’s a laptop or desktop system, but I would really like to have an LCD. I spotted quite a few decent systems on Craigslist, but I simply don’t have any room in the budget. That’s why it’s a matter of prayer. Not begging, but prayer.

I just passed off that clunky Pavilion 542x, and hope I never get another machine with such cheap components. Those Trigem boards are trash. HP, Compaq and Emachines cranked a lot of them. I’m not all that picky, but there’s no sense having something which is simply not going to work with Linux. I don’t care about fast video, huge harddrives, video cameras, etc. Frankly, something aimed at server use would be best, but I realize those tend to be a lot more expensive. So if you ask me while I’m dreaming, here’s what I consider close to ideal:

CPU at least 1.5Ghz, dual is better, RISC is nice
1GB RAM is plenty
Any video chipset for which X.org has drivers
Sound (anything that works with Linux)
Ethernet port
At least 30GB harddrive
DVD-RW
Display 17″ or better (capable of 1280×1024)

Yep, dreaming….zzzzz.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged centos, computers, economics, linux | 1 Comment

Easy Targets

Posted on October 8, 2009 by ehurst

So far, most of the newest crowd control weapons have been deployed against harmless protesters. In other words, that nasty business in Pittsburgh over the G-20 meeting was police bullying. The way you can tell is no one did anything to the primary weapons. The protesters didn’t assault the cops; that was the work of provocateurs, cops in disguise. Rather, the protesters kept trying to avoid the cops. Their only intent was to have their say, something we used to believe mattered here in the US.

Had the police been facing a real threat, I’m pretty sure those fancy toys would have been broken very quickly. For example, that super-sound-blaster could easily be defeated with a couple of sniper rounds. Shut the thing off and the police don’t have quite the advantage in assaulting First Amendment rights. So far, the police haven’t really faced any serious resistance, which proves they aren’t dealing with any real threat. It’s just naked government bullying, wholly unjustified.

A part of me wonders how long the more destructive resistance tactics will sleep. The government is arming themselves for yesterday’s battles, and what they use today is actually aimed at the anti-war riots of the 1960s and 1970s. In short order I predict those tactics will fail, as the resistance is hardly so slow thinking as government. I also wonder how long before folks realize they are under armed occupation, and what our troops are doing in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. is just a mirror image of what’s happening here. We are occupied by a foreign entity, most certainly not of us, nor operating in our interests, but an invading forced determined to destroy whatever we have so they can carry out their rape without resistance. The term “continuity of government” is just the label for it.

The system was closed long ago against external input. Those who prevent peaceful change are demanding violent revolution.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged demonstrating, government, resistance | Comments Off

Can’t Walk Away

Posted on October 7, 2009 by ehurst

The one thing which matters most in our human existence is conviction.

The model of human nature to which I subscribe assumes human nature is a trio: flesh, mind and spirit. We can’t really separate them very well in actual practice, but it permits academic discussion. Further, I posit not every human has a living spirit; most are dead spiritually. We were designed for it, but the default condition right now is no operative spirit. God alone can awaken it, and He has chosen not to reveal the hows and whys of that. Nor are we permitted to know whether another person is alive or dead in the spirit, only how we should respond to them. We are constrained to remain open minded about it, and work off the cues He has revealed. Academically, I can’t say whether the spiritually dead possess convictions, but it seems there is something which operates that way for them.

The word conviction in this sense refers to a body of belief which drives us, seems to have a life of its own, and does not necessarily respond to reason. It is as if we were programmed somewhere below the conscious level, and can only counteract that program at risk of suffering mental instability, or at the very least, neurosis. It’s roughly equivalent to the concept of conscience.

What’s the difference between dogged determination and hard-headed foolishness? Only our internal evaluation. The mechanism inside another human soul which drives them beyond any hope of “success” is conviction, functionally labeled. Whether that conviction is good or bad depends on who is looking at its effects. What’s more important is for us to make a place in our cultural understanding of this world.

Armed agents of the government tend to say someone is good or bad based on whether they can persuade someone to obey their mandates. Ask any cop, and they will seldom admit the people they’ve had to threaten and coerce might have possessed honorable motives. It’s the orthodoxy of “modern policing” — resisting the will of the cop, which is presumed to be the will of the state, cannot come from a clear conscience. The hive mind of human government cannot permit the acknowledged existence of something “good” which is contrary to the policy of the state. Thus, the state is God in the sense of defining what is good and evil.

This over-simplification leads to the current descent into Police State misery. An obvious conclusion I ask you to make is realizing what you are told is “the law” or legal requirement is not necessarily just, and certainly not necessarily righteous in God’s eyes. Whether you believe in that third element of human nature, my message to you is: The starting point is Noah’s Laws, and God Himself has promised you can understand it well enough to please Him when you are forced to decide whether any particular demand of human government is justified. The mere existence of human government is not sufficient cause to obey as if God had spoken.

For those of us who believe our spirits are alive, we sense the certainty a core of conviction was planted within our spirits by God Himself. We might not have a clear grasp of the contents, but the presence is undeniable. The task for life is clarifying what conviction requires of us in the broad sense, as well as specific application. At some point, regardless of consequences, you’ll find there is some internal demand from which you cannot walk away; you simply have to do what you have to do. Your best hope is having some idea what your convictions demand.

Posted in religion | Tagged culture, government, psychology, resistance | Comments Off

Flu Shots: Back Door Compulsion

Posted on October 6, 2009 by ehurst

The noise about health care reform is not based entirely on imagination. We do have a very large portion of the US population receiving medical treatment under a wide array of state-funded health care programs. We can discuss all day long how government intrusion, both in regulating and in funding, have helped jack up the prices so there’s no real choice, but that is not the worst of it. With the helping hand comes the mailed fist of compulsion.

Recently, I have heard several young women receiving care under various county- and state-funded programs have been told they will be required to take the flu shot because they are pregnant. This comes to me third hand, so it’s possible this is mere gossip. However, it is wholly consistent with what I would have expected. The implication is they will accept the vaccine or they will be kicked out of the program.

I’ve already stated the complexity of this thing requires we tread carefully in how we talk about it. On the one hand, it’s accurate enough to say “They” want to kill a huge segment of the US population, and are willing to use a lot of sneaky methods to get it done. That hardly gives us a clear picture of how it comes about. The global elite are They who would see the world’s population reduced to some 500K. This number has been cited in too many places, written by too many different hands, to be merely hyperbole — lots of big thinkers, leaders, professors and scholars, folks holding government powers in many countries. How they get others to act on this vision is what complicates it.

We assert they control the process, and our elections in the US are proof. We can find all the evidence we need to show the process is manipulated and controlled, nothing fair and honest about it. We can easily demonstrate They own and control the entire mainstream media output. We can even show how They profit indirectly from Big Pharma, but that would be more complicated. What is equally complicated is how They have hi-jacked any number of regulated professions, and the powerful bias within medicine to exclude anything which does not enhance Their control. So we have this massive weight of official voices telling us we must get this vaccine, spicing up the story with vastly overblown tales of how the “When Pigs Fly” flu is destroying humanity. It hardly compares to regular seasonal flu in severity of symptoms and resulting complications. Of course, if you get all your information from the MSM, you’d never know it was bogus.

So it seems They are willing to employ a wide range of methods until they get the desired result. If the back-channel Internet news system effectively counters the MSM, they are willing to pull strings and force the issue in small ways, at first. States, like New York, which traditionally act like Soviet bureaucrats, can produce a mandate all licensed health care workers get the shot. Other places like Oklahoma, where ordinary people still drive around with a gun rack mounted on the back window of the pickup cab, it comes more stealthily, via the hand of government funding. If you receive any form of assistance, directly or indirectly, that support system comes with strings attached. You will do as you are told, or you will be bumped from the system. What may not be obvious is every medical facility in the entire state receives such funding. It comes with the license to operate, so to speak.

And if that is not enough, other harsher methods are waiting. So starting with the group of vulnerable young women bearing children, and their already born children, we are likely to see mandatory vaccinations. That the vaccine is frankly dangerous is no longer in question, if you’ve been paying any attention at all. In that injection is stuff which has been shown to cause Gulf War Syndrome, various autoimmune disorders, sterility, and a very long list of other effects. On top of that, we have good reason to believe a great many of these injections will include the dreaded RFID They would love to force on all humanity (except themselves, of course).

I’m waiting on confirmation of the local story details, but I confess I am not only inclined to believe it, but predicted it some months ago.

Posted in globalism | Tagged government, medicine, propaganda, survival | Comments Off

Keeping My Word

Posted on October 5, 2009 by ehurst

We are doomed. I will sometimes venture an educated guess, but by no means can I claim to know how that doom will manifest, nor even how it will telegraph itself. Part of the problem is we have too many things going wrong at the same time. The economy is already lost, but most people in the US simply don’t realize it yet. When they do, expect some panic. We have those threats of forcing folks to take the “When Pigs Fly” flu vaccine, along with a host of other tyrannies likely to signal civil war. We have threats of expanding our warfare in the Middle East to Iran, and the need for too many more troops without instituting a draft. The IRS has already promised to put us in jail if we don’t buy Obama-approved health insurance. Various attempts at mass gun confiscations are in the works. The broad “community” of law enforcement people are ready to stomp anyone insufficiently obsequious in the face of even the most outrageous crushing assaults on human rights and liberty. Lots of things are going in the wrong direction.

Unlike so very many who like to trumpet these things on their websites, I’m not trying to make a buck from it. Nor do I somehow conveniently forget when I propose a likely date for certain kinds of bad stuff. I truly believed the end of last month would find us in a final crushing loss of value for the dollar. I wasn’t sure what the mechanism would be, though I suspected it would be the result of foreign banks demanding ours come clean. American banks are currently hiding the fact a major portion of all mortgages are dead, or “non-performing” as they call it, because acting to foreclose would force them to account for the true value of their losses, making each admit to being insolvent. It would close them all down. Those who know more than I have investigated and shown evidence vast swathes of mortgages in the US are not properly accounted for on balance sheets anywhere. Some of these were the same folks who honestly expected it all to crash by the end of September.

They aren’t saying anything about it right now. Given how it all works, it’s quite possible the foreign banks have already played their hand. We are unlikely to know, since this is the stuff of secret banking communications. Given the massive number of dollars involved — hundreds of trillions perhaps — it might take a few days for the ripples to become visible. I suppose if we have a sudden spike in bank closures, that would be a signal we can use to deduce it has happened. Or maybe something else equally dire, but simply kept from our view. But I believed these experts, and tried to put their reports in easier terms to understand. For the time being, I still believe them, but if by mid-month no evidence of their predictions appear, I’m going to dismiss them from my reading.

But I haven’t forgotten I repeated their reports, thus endorsing them. If it turns out wrong, it shows my judgment of such things is pretty bad. If I can’t do any better, I need to stop writing on such subjects. Given that’s a major feature of my posts here, I’ve promised to shut this blog down. Since some of my posts are about other things, to which other sites have linked, I’ll leave it running, but I’ll stop posting — I’ll shut up. I’ll make one last post eating crow. Then, perhaps after a hiatus, I’ll restart, but stick with stuff I actually know about.

Posted in meta | Tagged economics, government, propaganda, resistance, survival | Comments Off