The Babylonian Principle

“Everything has a price; nothing else matters.”

So goes the basic principle of Babylon as found in Scripture. This is also the fundamental nature of the international Business Culture, not to mention Corporate America. Their god is Mammon. The Bible makes the point the final end of this religion is destruction. The Children of Babylon make deals with whomever is willing, but of course the most important partners are the State and the Church (“Harlot Church”). The latter gives power to support the world according to Babylon, and Babylon rewards them with material support.

It is particularly discomforting to recognize no country in the world more exemplifies this better than the US. Sure, I found the Dutch relentlessly secular and materialistic, but they at least had a heritage and culture which gave life some flavor. I found the Belgians hopelessly locked in regional factionalism, and it made them delightfully passionate about things they did well in each locale. Germans were a little too close to our ways, but were a lot more patient, at least, and could express a certain pride in their technical accomplishments. I saw too little of the Danish to notice anything more than way too much interest in profligate sex with foreigners. The Swiss were mostly proud of their rugged individualism in the places I visited. The Austrians were unfailingly gracious and charming. The Americans were boorish, utterly lacking in manners and civility, and clung to their own little view of reality — I generally avoided them in Europe, and didn’t often let locals know I was one of them.

Corporate America can out-produce and make war like no other nation. And as soon as we win a war, we have no idea what it is we have accomplished. The best we know to do is export our hideous lack of culture, and try to cultivate the same mechanical regimentation infecting our lives, and call it “democracy.” When we march away, we leave our corporations to continue extracting whatever it was provided the actual reason we went to war. Meanwhile, outside the corporate compounds, the locals go on with their former lives as much as possible. We haven’t really changed a thing, and have proved absolutely nothing good by beating the stuffing out of them. Our superiority has never been a matter of morality, but always the result of our passion for profitability.

Think about it. Yesterday, I shared my experiences with the hide-bound rule chasing mentality in America. There is a reason you can’t get real customer service from anything bigger than a 12-man operation: It doesn’t pay. That is, all the blather about customer satisfaction is a lie, a sales pitch. On rare occasion you can get something taken care of by customer service, but only because it falls within some flow-charted, scripted response. Just try to ask about something rather unusual and you’ll get a standard response which filters out anything not in the script. We have some amazing creative people in the US, but they do not work in corporations. The concept of actually knowing their business died long ago.

You see, there was a time when people here did tend to know what was going on, but having them on the payroll cut into the profit margins. Once the business had a very good system in place, tweaked and adjusted by the experts, the whole thing was sold and the experts were fired. In comes a huge workforce of idiots who read scripts. It all seemed to happen about the same time, within a single generation — about 1950-1970. Sure, the roots go much deeper, but the obvious effects appeared over those two decades. Most significant elements in the destruction of America actually coalesced during the end of the 19th century here. By the early 1900s, the powers that be were implementing the foolish fruit of earlier intellectual moves. In other words, whatever we might have had in the guise of the “Spirit of America” was long dead when the general stasis manifested.

People mistakenly long for that period before the dead body began to stink. They forget it was a long decline before death. Our “Civil War” was the first symptom of really bad things coming, and the Union victory sealed our fate, culturally. If you honestly believe it was about slavery, you aren’t informed enough to be reading this blog. It was always about a crushing, highly centralized control.

That centralized control can only be accomplished with uniformity. Uniformity might be efficient, but it is death. People are not uniform. To drop them into neat little categories kills them, in effect. It makes them a mere matter of expense against profit. This is the reason government bureaucracy and corporate bureaucracy appear the same to the five senses. Real humans are messy and wasteful, because real humans each need to learn what went before, what makes us different from gorillas, which seldom remember anything from one generation to the next. In the process, each of us has to make sure what is and isn’t unique about us. Today, the most trivial idiocy is mistaken for “individuality” — because that’s the sort of thing which makes for a good trash trinket market. Real individuality can’t be achieved if you can’t get above the gorilla level, which is where bureaucrats want to be and where they need to keep us.

America: We are Babylon.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged | Comments Off on The Babylonian Principle

Uniquely American Stupidity

On my other blog, I rant quite often about Western Christianity missing the point on most things. Actually, what I’m referring to is American Christianity, though it is obviously rooted in European religion. The real problem is something culturally fundamental to America: hide-bound mechanical rules.

This was most readily apparent when I served as a Military Policeman in Europe. Every time I ran into a glitch in our operations with the local national police agencies, it was always a problem with Americans following precise regulations and the Europeans doing something which made more sense in the circumstances. They have this thing about the spirit of the law being more important than the letter.

That is, we tussle intensely over words and semantics, and they casually get work done. Even when you account for their lazy, do-nothing socialism, along with their doctor-ordered year-long “stress leave” policies, they got at least as much done as we did when measured in man-hours. Plus, they had a darn sight more fun doing it. And no surprise Vox Day runs into the same idiocy dealing with FedEx. This is a glaring example of how Americans operate.

Even worse is the filthy hypocrisy of finding new meanings in the words of laws and regulations (not to mention the Constitution) when it becomes painfully obvious the letter of law just cannot fit the situation. The examples are so numerous, my head spins just trying to pick out a few. I could write books on it. We are the laughing stock of the world.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged | Comments Off on Uniquely American Stupidity

Don’t Dial 911

It’s not enough local governments tax you half to death, now they charge hefty fees for responding to emergencies. No, I don’t mean ambulance services, nor are we talking about nuisance calls. If your house catches on fire, your tire blows out and you wreck your car, or you just need police assistance, many departments are now billing you thousands of dollars for their time and services.

Imagine you’re cruising down the road when you hit a patch of black ice and slide into a guardrail. A passing motorist calls 911. Soon firetrucks and police arrive.

Weeks later, a $1,400 bill does, too — for the cost of the police and firefighters who answered the call. What’s worse, it’s not covered by insurance, and it might scar your credit if you ignore it.

Sound implausible? It’s happening in a number of towns, cities and counties in at least 24 states. And given today’s cratering economy (and property-tax revenue), more strapped local governments may be tempted to authorize so-called accident response fees.

I have no use for policemen — I used to be one. If something gets out of hand, I deal with it myself. Most of the time they are utterly useless in protecting your rights, and they are under no obligation whatsoever to protect you from thugs. In many places they are the thugs. All they do is come and fill out reports, and you’re lucky if they don’t find some off-the-wall excuse to put you, the victim, in jail, too.

Now that they have discovered billing and collection agencies, it’s as if they know no bounds. Look for them to start arresting you if you don’t call them so they can put you on the hook for a couple thousand dollars. Meanwhile, don’t call them. I am told, if someone else calls them, and a collection agency comes after you, remind them you never signed a contract, and don’t owe them a dime. If they persist, you can (for now) file a civil complaint for harrassment.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged | 1 Comment

Good Trails, Bad Path

The trail is progressing, but I’m in a slow stretch with lots of vines and dead-fall. Still, it rides well so far, so I’m confident it will turn out well.

A lot of other things are not going so well. I wonder how many people realize Hillary Clinton is constitutionally illegible for Sec. of State? No Senator or Rep. can vote a raise for an office, then take that office. She voted to give the Cabinet positions a raise during her current term as Senator. But then, it’s looking more and more like Obama was never a US citizen in the first place. Nor is he yet entitled to be called “President Elect” since the Electoral College hasn’t met yet.

But then Bush ignores the Constitution when it suits him, too. Congress restored the laws regarding Posse Comitatus, but Bush simply issued a signing statement to the effect he refused to bound by that. He may yet still be planning to use the troops against the citizens of the US, and will certainly hand that off to the new team.

How many of you remember that 60 Minutes report on the “Millennials”? There are plenty of fine people in that age group, but way too many of them are suffering a bad case of unearned self-esteem. What will happen when these folks find out there is no money for mommy to keep their iPods filled with music, their cellphones texting, and they may be lucky to eat? Mr. Rogers isn’t going to able to rebuild their shattered self-esteem when they have to sleep in a wretched homeless shelter and can’t even watch reruns.

Oh, wait! They can join the herds enlisting for military service because there aren’t any other jobs. These days it won’t be a tough round of Boot Camp or Basic Training so much as the increasing probability of sexual assault. Their leaders in the field may be competent, but the generals are all MBAs and CPAs with not an ounce of real leadership talent. Thus, the Millennials get sorry equipment, stupid missions, and everyone without the same uniform will hate them. Oh my! What will that do for their inflated self-esteem? Meanwhile, those who survive the meat-grinder will come home quite willing to kill their fellow citizens.

Well, perhaps the next generation won’t survive long enough to become so stupid. You see, all that melamine killing the Chinese babies is in almost all US brands of baby formula. And you should know the FDA is run by the very companies they are supposed to regulate, so no one should be surprised they decided contrary to all evidence to reverse their previous position regarding melamine. Used to be they said no amount was safe, but now it’s okay to have… oh, whatever level is just above the amount found in US baby formula. Yeah, that’s it.

I may be a lot safer wandering off down one of my trails and covering my tracks behind me.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged | Comments Off on Good Trails, Bad Path

Shoppers Not Totally Insane

The big “Black Friday” weekend went off mostly with a whimper. The only stampedes of shoppers were at places like Wal-Mart and other discount stores. While some folks did fight over choice popular merchandise, over all the mood was restrained. Wise choice.

This is the time to be buying necessities and durable goods. This will be a rather rough winter as more people lose their homes to foreclosures, but even worse as businesses are foreclosed. Any operation providing necessities will probably survive, but those who offer middling grade luxury goods will will likely shut down in the next few months. Also, any store which imports most of its necessities from the Asia-Pacific area may be forced to close, since there’s good reason to expect those sources of goods will dry up. That is, they would wisely stop taking the US dollar.

The powers that be have declared their intent to devalue the dollar on purpose, as if that were really news. This is simply a matter of coming clean. Indeed, about the only place where a brisk market can be expected is locally supplied necessities. Any grocer which can obtain food from local farmers and ranchers will do quite well. Any general merchandiser who can find a local manufacturer for things people want will do well. Any enterprising small production shop will quickly notice where demand is higher than supply, and start making stuff now imported. When local manufacturing re-enters the market for stuff now unanimously produced off-shore, we stand a chance of at least surviving.

We can be sure our current level of creature comfort will fade greatly. Folks will stop throwing out furniture and appliances they really need simply because the old one broke down. They’ll invest a lot more energy in repair. Look for the local repair shops to re-appear. Naturally the prices for these things will be much higher, since we’ve been essentially living off the backs of folks who would gladly work for less per day than most of us made in an hour. For obvious reasons, look for barter to return, since a lot of folks who can’t figure out how to create their own jobs will remain unemployed. Look for an awful lot of property crime, too.

You may know there was a bonanza for gun dealers. Not merely because the new president and his friends will likely move to make future sales nearly impossible, but because his term in office will surely see a huge increase in social unrest and violence. Decide for yourself whether you want to blame him, but he will preside over a very difficult time, and his political allies don’t include too many wiser heads. The statements these people have made in the past indicate they would rather destroy the country and kill millions than surrender their political dreams. Of course, we could say that for either of the two major candidates.

I think the bulk of shoppers sense things are not getting better, but worse. Keep your eye on the local buying trends, and don’t listen to the media hype.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged | Comments Off on Shoppers Not Totally Insane

Jungle Stomping

Back when I first enlisted in the US Army (1979), I had been at my first assigned unit for only a few weeks when I found out a few of us were scheduled to make a trip to Panama for Jungle School. We weren’t authorized jungle boots as an issue item, and couldn’t wear them in that unit. But those rules didn’t apply when we went to schools like that. I’d never been to a tropical place, but I knew what it was like to have feet roasting in hot boots, so I went out and invested in jungle boots. They weren’t exactly the Army issue kind, but close enough to serve the purpose. My feet did rather well in Panama, but just about everything else went wrong.

About a decade later, I was stationed in the Netherlands. I found out we were authorized to wear jungle boots and I bought a pair from the Army uniform store. They were okay for regular duty wear, but I decided to try them on a volksmarch. Having tested jogging shoes, hiking boots, and a few other kinds of footwear, I found jungle boots were the single best choice for hilly hikes cross-country. While fairly stiff and hard on the soles, they were extremely durable and light, and my feet recovered rather well the next day. Even better was when I replaced the issue-style insoles with carbon-foam cushioned insoles. Those boots lasted several years of hard use.

As our economy grinds to a halt, and the US Treasury prepares to devalue the dollar, it occured to me it might be a while before I could afford to get good footwear if I didn’t get them soon. I had hoped I might hit a military surplus store and get another pair of jungle boots. I would be okay with regular decent hiking boots, but those are less versatile. Still, in the midst of other shopping for necessities, we stopped at Academy. After poking around for a half-hour, I stumbled across a pair of regular styled jungle boots. Not exactly the issue kind, but better. These have a real welt, instead of a hard rubber sole injected around a leather upper. Otherwise, the same ultra-light unpadded design. Amazingly, they were only about $20.

I’m not crazy enough to think there is no way we can avoid some descent into chaos in the US. It could happen, and I feel certain there will be some rioting and unrest in certain locations, mostly urban, as things get tighter. The price of fuel may not rise to such great heights again as in the recent past, but it won’t matter if you simply have no income at all, or not enough. I suspect a great many people will become unemployed, and it will snowball as businesses in every sector will close because people won’t have money to spend, and those folks join the ranks of the unemployed, and more business close, etc. There might be a lot of people walking wherever it is they have to go, and I’ll probably be one of them at least part of the time. I wonder how many folks will wear out their flip-flops and cheap athletic shoes in the first few months of 2009.

Posted in personal | Tagged , | Comments Off on Jungle Stomping

Questions of Legitimacy

There seems to be an awful lot of noise lately, attempting to silence dissent, about how we must reconcile ourselves to legitimate government. “So-n-so won the election and that’s that!” No, it isn’t. Merely raising the issue brings along whole ship-loads of baggage.

If you want to suggest “might makes right,” then be prepared for a great amount of bloodshed, including your own blood. There is none so awesome in battle there isn’t someone out there who will beat him, sooner or later. If we rely merely on the acquiescence of the majority, we can at least point out very blunt statements from our founding fathers, not to mention a huge bunch of folks pushing “hate crimes” legislation, who would suggest the will of the majority alone does not confer legitimacy. To appeal to some body of work proposing to enunciate the moral rights and responsibilities of modern humanity will quickly bring us back to the issue of a dissenting minority — including folks like me — who reject such arrogant nonsense. We weren’t consulted — we were excluded — in the formation of these presumptive landmark declarations. You can’t have it both ways.

Western governments did not rise to their current place from a vacuum. There are precedents which conferred legitimacy. There is a steady drift from those precedents, at least culturally and intellectually, and people discussing politics today assume such a drift does not, or should not, exist. It does. Take it into account or you have no right to debate at any table where I sit. Ignoring history in general seems a virtue in these modern times, so obviously I am ignoring a lot of loud-mouthed idiots. What follows are some of the most fundamental issues which must be addressed when you want to demand I grant Bush or Obama any legitimacy.

Aside from questions of legitimacy of current processes (a huge and important question in its own right), we have to remember the current USA is not a nation, by definition. A “nation” is a single people, held together by cultural bonds, if not plain of racial-ethnic identity. We do not have a culture, and we have not been united as a country for at least a century. The loudest voices in our world today have intentionally prevented any peaceful unity. Instead, we have a massive lie about vague threats to force us to unify on a wartime footing. Well, the war is not against some outside enemy, but against us, for your information. Whether anyone likes it or not, we cannot use the term “nation” to refer to the USA; we are an empire of many disparate nations within our borders. Most are subject nations, tributaries forced to support the conquering imperial government against their will and against their best interests.

We are a State. This modern State arose as result of a revolt against some prior imperial government elsewhere. While there are claims of violations on both sides, it seems those on this side were relatively minor, and mostly a reaction to far more egregious violations by the ruling regime we fought. That revolt was recognized by other States as legitimate because it ostensibly followed established principles for such things. Those principles arise from the Treaty of Westphalia. That event gave birth to the Modern State.

Prior to the Peace of Westphalia, feudalism was the order of the day. Legitimacy was based wholly upon claims of inherited title. Feudalism operated under a rather fluid philosophy of chivalry, and generally depended on the ancient Roman Catholic Church to interpret legitimacy, at least in part. That the Church had a direct interest in the outcome of such questions served to raise the question her own legitimacy, and that was what led to Westphalia. However, much of what passed for a guiding set of principles arose in part from the ancient Roman Church, mixed with Teutonic cultural foundations.

A strong element in these antecedents requires a ruling family or class perform due diligence in protecting life, property and prosperity. Lacking the power to execute such a duty brings into question the legitimacy of their rule. At the heart of the matter, feudal powers accrued by voluntary surrender of freeholders to any warlord capable of maintaining stability of life and social order against external threats and internal predators.

The US government built upon the principle of the Modern State, but pulled in some philosophical elements of Classical Civilization, mostly Greece and Rome. The Roman Church brought forward an awful lot of that, too, so it was not entirely new, but at the time of our Founding Fathers, it was quite fashionable as “new” to claim some adherence to the Classics. By all rights, our US Constitution, more honored by abuse than by obedience, was not legitimate. You see, not a single member of the Constitutional Committee was authorized to replace the Articles of Confederation. That the states adopted it is still subject to questions of legitimacy, since more than one withdrew after passing it. Further, most of Lincoln’s rhetoric was a blatant violation of even that Constitution, not to mention plain logic. Frankly, there is a good solid foundation for questioning the legitimacy of the current ruling regime of the USA by its own internal documents.

Again, that citizens of this empire acquiesce does not settle the issue. Frankly, the whole mess fails the most fundamental question of legitimacy of all: The Bible. According to that book, there are two kinds of people in the world — servants of Christ and others. Notice I didn’t use the term “born-again.” We cannot possibly know whether another person is born-again; we can only observe whether we see the Fruits of the Spirit. There’s plenty of debate what that means, but I’ll set that aside for the moment to continue the academic thread. The point is, we have a whole world of humans who don’t follow Jesus. The Bible says they fall under the Covenant of Noah. In case it’s not too obvious what that means, we have a singular application of that covenant in history, commonly referred to as the Kingdom of Israel. Whatever else you might want to say about that kingdom, it was an example of what Noah looked like when applied in those specific circumstances. We can abstract some basic principles from that example by which we can safely assume all governments are held accountable to God.

First of all, not a single Modern State is safe. The principles of Noah assume feudalism. Further, they assume tribal living, and a clear and distinct division of power between social government and civil government. The latter has one primary function: defense. There attaches a limited function of maintaining internal order, but that is highly limited. Your clan and tribe are the only government with any real legitimate interest in your daily affairs.

Not a single Modern State is legitimate in God’s eyes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Questions of Legitimacy

Restoring the eMac

For a few months while my current system was down, I was forced to use the eMac. After a time exploring how it worked and making it as much like Linux as I could, it got old. I really don’t much care for the Zen of Mac. So I installed SUSE, but that wasn’t too good. Then I tried Debian Etch for the PPC hardware, and it ran just dandy. There were some shortcomings, but it was Linux and it was faster than Leopard.

Now that I have my main system back and running Debian Lenny, I have no need for a second Linux machine nobody else will touch. Today I broke out the disks and restored Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5.5). I’m still getting it set up to suit me, but it will serve well as a guest system. Then there will be no excuse for everyone jumping on my wife’s XP system. I’ll have her turn on the screensaver password and that will end the nonsense of her not having a chance to use her own computer.

I still don’t like Mac, but it is tolerable until I can trade it for something I like better.

Posted in computers | Tagged | Comments Off on Restoring the eMac

More Trail Finding

The biblical perspective of natural resource use says people are the reason for Creation, and the most important part of it. That gives their needs precedence over just about everything else. That’s not the same as human whims and wishes. Our duty to the Creator is to keep in mind we are just borrowing His creation.

The aim in trail making is to minimize human impact. The number one consideration is to avoid erosion. Current four-wheeler paths in the woods near my home have already had a negative impact. Wishing to avoid this mistake, there are several measure I take in choosing and clearing alternate trails.

1. Mulch in place. The idea is not to remove foliage but trim it back. I use a limb-lopper, which resembles a bolt-cutter, but designed for cutting tree limbs. Instead of cutting and removing, I take the extra time to chop up the limbs where they hang, nibbling it down in short pieces until it’s out of the way. I let the clippings drop to the ground. The act of riding bikes through the grassy undergrowth will probably kill some of it, and expose the ground in places. We want to minimize this. The next best ground cover is leaves and twigs, pushed into the soil to hold it in place. This allows riding when the ground is wet and minimizes the wallowing effect we have seen with four-wheeler tracks.

2. Path of least resistance. My ax should see little use, and the limb-loppers the most. Most of the time I detect a natural route, and the only major cutting is thickets of vines. The thorny stuff will get cut and tossed off away from the path for obvious reasons. They serve a natural purpose but are a serious problem for human usage. Other vines will be nibbled down like limbs, along with small shrubs. To avoid having the four-wheeler spoil the bike paths, we will weave a path too narrow for them between large trees. Curvy, zig-zagging trails are more fun, anyway. At the same time, paths cut by previous land owners will be used as much a possible.

3. Flatter is better. It’s a lot of fun riding over hilly terrain, but sudden climbs or drops are hard on my old joints. They are even worse for controlling erosion. By taking a route which runs alongside the slope for a slower change in elevation, we minimize creating a wash where fast water flow strips the soil face. Besides, a longer trail is more fun; we aren’t in a hurry to get to the other end since we aren’t really going anywhere.

4. Recover exposed soil areas. There is a portion of the area which was stripped for sand excavation. It’s right in the middle, and no path can avoid it. There is a sort of earthen dam to permit trucks to cross the lowest part where the water table is high which we will use. As one might expect, some of this has eroded, but the thing has been there so long it’s now part of the landscape. On the crown of this dam we’ll be spreading chopped deadfall wood, bark and some dead grasses to keep the soil stable as possible. Riding across this will help grind it into the surface for a solid path. The loose powdery sand in this area is really hard to ride through, anyway.

We hope to establish a trail system which will serve as good recreation for as long as the property remains undeveloped.

Posted in cycling | Tagged , , | Comments Off on More Trail Finding

Trail Finding

One of the numerous personality inventories I took when learning psychology and counseling left me with the label of “trailblazer.” There wasn’t room in the inventory to note that’s only an approximation. I don’t cut many paths through raw wilderness, but tend to rediscover old trails long neglected.

Here in Central Oklahoma, there is precious little land in its natural state. Indeed, a century ago, most of this area was open grassland, with a few copses of scrub oak and cedar. Over the last hundred years, the natural moisture level here has risen some, but man-made ponds have exploded in numbers. There is not a single natural lake in this state. Almost every ranch or farm has a pond made at one time by damming a flow, even if that flow is purely seasonal. We also have a penchant for open lagoon sewage treatment. Thus, available ground water has risen sharply in the last few decades.

Where there is more water, there are more trees. Thus, fallow land here, especially where it is hilly, is covered with young forest and attendant underbrush. Much of the land near me has been cultivated at one time or another within the last 50 years. While the expensive housing developments are exploding faster than farm ponds, the current economic pinch has halted a lot of speculation in that area. The trailer park where I live uses a lagoon system, and adjacent is an abandoned farm, which runs into a hilly forest that at one time had a few paths bulldozed in those cutesy curvy street layouts. Those paths are now head-high in grasses, shrubs and thorny vine thickets.

The property is already currently being invaded by four-wheelers and some kids leaving litter here and there. I try to pack out the trash when I pass through, but my primary intent was to detect much older trails now overgrown. I don’t intend to cut new trails, but simply clear the ones already existing for mountain bike use.

Tomorrow, I’ll lay out a few principles involved in minimal impact trail finding.

Posted in cycling | Tagged , , | 1 Comment