Linux Failed Me

First off, you need to realize this is not an angry rant. I have loved Linux from the first experience, when I installed RedHat 5.0 on an old 486. Once I understood it, and some of the philosophy behind it, this was where I wanted to be. I still wish it were so, but it’s not.

There has been an on-going issue for the particular hardware I run, a Dell 545 MT. I have used Vista, Win7, openSUSE 11.1 and 11.2, Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10, and was unable to install my preferred CentOS 5.4. I managed to get SUSE 11.2 and Ubuntu 9.10 working rather well, except for one thing: burning disks. This machine features the ICH9 chipset, and my DVD-RW is SATA. When I try to burn disks larger than, say 250MB, it always fails. I read the logs, every log file I could find. There are over a dozen bug reports about this issue, and I tested every solution offered on every distro buglist which discussed it.

I don’t pretend to understand it, but I believe it has something to do with the interaction between udev and the burn process. Seems udev is polling the device during the burn, and somehow that interferes, and the burn stops. Brasero and other wodim front-ends fail consistently without useful error messages. K3B as a frontend for cdrecord works better, but still can’t finish anything much above 250MB. It seems to make a difference whether the settings include TAO or SAO, with the latter allowing a bigger ISO, but still failing at some point. Again, it’s over my head. I’ve spent hours reading about it on lists ranging from Ubuntu to Fedora, and too many had no useful discussion at all. Sometimes the submitter reports the issue resolved itself, but nothing they write helps me.

Among those who seem to understand it best, it would seem coordinating between the udev developers and the kernel driver developers is not straightforward. Each side seems to blame the other, though I don’t understand it well enough to be sure. What I do know is this has been reported as a problem starting two years ago, and is still unresolved. Now, it seems to me quite reasonable to assume it isn’t ever going to be fixed. It’s not a huge problem, because there are only a few of us using this particular hardware combination. At any rate, it’s not the hardware, because I burn flawless ISOs of all sizes, both CD and DVD, using Roxio under Vista.

I’m not at all happy running Vista, but I can’t afford to run out and buy new hardware. This expensive machine was a gift from someone who could afford it. I don’t have access to much else, except far older hardware. Nor do I have room to maintain a bank of different systems, even if I could afford them. I don’t have any real choices here. At this point I’m waiting to see if the BSDs will get all the drivers for my system, and may give one of them a try. Right now it seems bug reports indicate they are having issues, too. But this is Intel, which I believe is fully open to Open Source developers, so I can’t imagine why this remains broken two years after the first reports.

At any rate, I won’t be trying Linux any more on this machine.

This entry was posted in computers and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Linux Failed Me

  1. pererik87 says:

    This is not linux fault its the company you bought the hardware from. They do not make real linux drivers, nor do they open the source code. Buy a pc from someone else next time. Take one from the compatibility list to be sure.

    • Ed Hurst says:

      You aren’t paying attention, friend. The hardware is open specs. Nothing in it is closed to Linux developers. They have had the specs for two years, and can bug Dell anytime they like, with every expectation of cooperation. The one time the Open Source community gets full access they refuse to take advantage of it. The list of hardware components — specific chipsets, general hardware drivers (SATA), every part of this system — is listed as working under Linux. It most certainly is the fault of Linux developers.

  2. p4nd1-p4nd4 says:

    If you speak french, please visit my site where I explain why Linux is foolish and will fail

    • Ed Hurst says:

      It’s easy enough to use Google Translate, p4nd1-p4nd4. Your review is superficial. Having used Linux for years, I can tell you the greatest weakness is the utter lack of interest developers generally have in users who aren’t hobbyists. As a whole, the Linux community is just a big hobby, and Linux is a toy operating system. The best parts are those parts which have heavy commercial support, but those parts are of no interest to common home users. So Linux makes a great server, but will never, ever be good as a desktop system for the general public.

  3. Samantha says:

    Nice blog, i like it, its informative,
    i will visit his blog more often.
    i like your article specially about
    Linux Failed Me

    Cheers

Comments are closed.