Oklahoma County Jury Duty

The county website is pretty sparse on information. Recounting my experience will provide a snapshot for early 2014.

The County Courthouse is right downtown OKC, and the maps are good enough to get you there. I was coming in from the eastern side of the county, so I took I-40. Traffic was fairly light until the merge with I-35. I drifted over and took the I-235 exit which was pretty thick and slow, but not intolerable. The simplest route for me was to drop off on Lincoln Blvd. (second exit on 235) and run north to NE 8th Street. A left turn and the street drifts back south and you can keep doing that until you hit NE 4th and cross under the railroad tracks into the city center. I ran along 4th to Harvey, cut left two blocks to Robert S. Kerr. A right turn put me right in front of the county annex and the entrance to the parking garage was down on the right. There really isn’t much reason to chase all the other parking options unless you simply have a preference. You pull in, push the button and grab a ticket and park. You don’t pay until you leave, so don’t lose that ticket.

The street crossing gives you legal priority over vehicular traffic and the lines painted on the street point you to the proper entrance. Inside, you’ll see the security station. To your right is one of those snaking paths between guides. Jurors must enter that route. You can grab a blue bowl (they call it a “tray”) men and empty your pockets. Purses and lunch bags are okay. My fanny pack went right through their X-ray conveyer. I was surprised the big framed metal detector picked up the clips on my gloves, so it’s pretty sensitive. Belt buckles and such will set it off. However, I saw folks dragging in substantial backpacks, briefcases, tablet computers, etc. through the conveyor. What they are looking for is sharp implements and weapons, not all that other stuff.

Once inside, you can wait for an elevator directly beyond the security entrance there in the main corridor that runs south. Or, you can turn down the hallway on your left and find the stair entrance half-way down on the right wall and climb five floors. Most floors have a slight drop from the annex building down to the courthouse in that wide corridor. On jury days there is a cluster of folks waiting in the elevator corridor on 5th floor, with more down near the ramp to the courthouse, but the actual jury room inside a bit. There are big double glass doors between the elevator lobby ramp down to the courthouse. Through those doors and then around a walled section to the left is a big steel door. It opens at 7:30, just as the instructions say. There’s an anteroom/hallway, then another door and a large open room with what looks like church pews. There are cushions on the seat portion.

They want you to walk along that south wall of the Jury Room to the front with your summons letter. They scan the bar code and give you a form to fill out. You can pick up a tiny golf pencil from the basket, too. You’ll need the six-digit number as your Juror Number. That’s how you get paid, by the way. They also give you a clear plastic badge sleeve. You are supposed to tear off the portion of your summons where the bar code is; it has tiny perforations for this purpose. Stick that in your badge and pin it on. You have to wear that during your entire duty time.

There was time for more folks to come in, and we had the place nearly packed at about 385, from what I overheard. With heavy coats and stuff, the place was just a little tight. The assistant in charge of this whole thing was Gail Bowlby, an older fellow who had been running it six years at that time. He uses humor to keep a relaxed atmosphere. He’ll run through a spiel, then the County Clerk, Tim Rhodes himself comes in and does his spiel. Eventually the acting Chief Judge comes in. They rotate this job monthly between some fourteen judges. It’s like a courtroom session: “All rise!” We got a badly rehearsed spiel from this judge but it wasn’t intolerable. Eventually he left.

We were informed that five judges had requested a jury pull. Each pull varied from 25-30 bodies. We were told the pay was $20/day, including any part of the day. The IRS says they can reimburse mileage at the rate of $0.56/mile both ways, as I recall, and they said something about reimbursing for parking fees. The checks are mailed a few days later. Having arrived for duty on one call, you were off the roster for five years. Should you get a summons before that, let them know and you’ll be released. A handful went home for that, plus a few others who must have convinced Mr. Bowlby they should be released for some reason. When the time comes, he starts calling the names. The computer draws them at random from the pool that has reported for duty, then alphabetizes the resulting list.

Around 9:40 the first pull was called and I was included. You really should be ready to answer to your name loud and visually. I pulled the old military thing, jumping to me feet with a firm, “Here, Sir!” He loved it. We were directed to gather in the anteroom where a bailiff waited for us. She said we could bring our drinks if they had lids. It’s probably a good idea to bring at least one lidded drink. I carried a large sport bottle with good water from home, because I hate city water. I also schlepped my lunch and coat with me, too. The bailiff led us down the stairs two flights to third floor and around and down the ramp. The ramp ends in another elevator corridor with a railing and an open view to the main foyer of the courthouse below. At the bottom of the ramp two hallways run away in opposite directions. It appeared there was a courtroom and offices on each corridor. The big fancy courtroom double doors are the first thing you see looking down those two hallways.

We had a fifteen minute break. We were told there was a coffee shop down in the foyer of each of the two buildings and smoking was outside, to include folks with e-cigarettes. The restrooms were pointed out and we wandered around in the open area there for a while.

We were called into the courtroom and told to sit in the spectator gallery first. The two parties of the case were already sitting at their tables. We came in and sat until the judge entered. Again, the ceremony of being before a judge. We were sworn in and seated. The clerk shook a box with stiff paper slips inside. Our names were on the slips. We were called until 19 were seated. I was in this group. The judge went around to each asking questions. Are you married? Do you work? Got kids? The point of the questions was to see if anything might affect our deliberations. Part of it was checking to see if you lived with anyone who might know about the case, etc.

The process of lawyers chatting with the jury pool before selection is called voir dire. It’s part science and part art. You get a feel for the attorneys and hints of what the case is about. This is your last chance to get out of jury duty by making it obvious you are biased or simply cannot bring yourself to judge at all. Anyone with a strong character is likely to be sent off simply because most trials work best with jurors who don’t know enough to have a strong understanding of the matter at hand.

Most cases take that day and maybe part of the next.

At any rate, I was dismissed and sent back to the Jury Room — pretty much what I had expected anyway. You get your name slip from the clerk and walk back on your own. You then turn in your slip to whomever is manning the desk in the Jury Room. This was around 12:15 and lunch was until 1:30. If you don’t like coffee shops, Leadership Square has a food court just a block away and there are other fast food joints nearby. I had brought my lunch.

Folks filtered back in and sat doing whatever entertained them, including several folks napping. It’s okay. By now it was probably less than a hundred still hanging around. Shortly before 3:00 PM Gail called a few names to stay, then began processing the rest of us out. We were called by sections from the seating and turned in our badges. If anyone needed a letter stating where they had been, etc., they could ask and wait for a form letter to be printed with their name on it. It was a mad dash to the parking garage and to get out of the city before traffic picked up.

The parking garage pedestrian entrance is a long foot ramp down to two pay machines. You insert your ticket, then cash in bills smaller than $20. One lady just had to try a $100-bill; no dice. Correct change works best. Folks who came early like me paid the full $8, but some must have come a bit late and only paid $6. The machine will tell you to take your ticket back and use it for an exit token. The parking garage is a bit confusing trying to leave. You drive around to the west-bound ramp up, and at halfway, turn left and back down to the exit lane. Climbing up puts you on even-numbered floors, and coming down is odd-numbered floors. There are several exit lanes where you insert your paid ticket. The bar goes up and you head out one of two exits. There is one last bar, but that raises automatically. It’s there to prevent folks coming in without passing the ticket process.

Final note: Oklahoma officially recognizes the right of jury nullification. They don’t call it that, but you’ll be informed you can, as jurors, tell the government it is wrong about the law and the judge has to go with that. Lawyers generally do not like that. Most of the people I saw stricken from a jury pool were people with strong character, outspoken leader types.

Update: The county does not reimburse for parking, but they do pay the mileage and daily duty. It took nearly three weeks.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fanboy Folly

Computers are just a tool, not the prime mover of human future.

If we could stuff a soft, fat rubber ball in the mouths of the world’s mindless fanboys, the silence would be suddenly deafening. That includes the vast majority of Linux users I encounter online. Somebody take away their keyboards — please! There are easily millions of Linux users who aren’t making that much noise, and I wish I could make their lives better. Fanboys make everything worse for everyone regardless of what sort of interest we are discussing.

So we have some good thoughtful articles about why Linux hasn’t hit the mainstream of computer use. Without fail, the stupid fanboys — and sadly way too many developers — pop up insisting that the real problem is users are afraid of change or something equally insipid. People don’t fear change; they don’t give a damn. That is, they don’t care enough about what drives the fanboys to have any kind of strong emotion at all. They don’t adopt Linux because Linux is too strange and — horror! — it’s not worth the trouble to change.

That’s what I was trying to say when I wrote about how wrong Open Source GUIs are. In the first place, they are not user friendly or intuitive. They might be intuitive in the sense that fanboys can quickly figure it out, but to common users the interface is alien. Unlike Windows 95, it does not answer the crying need of a billion users who are pretty much forced to learn how to run a computer or suffer major consequnces. They don’t love computers; they can’t escape them. So when Microsoft spent that millions of dollars testing ordinary humans, they found out what works. It bores the fanboys and developers who eat, sleep and live computers. When fanboys design a computer, the world can’t be bothered.

The problem is not with the common user, but with the developers and fanboys. The code monkeys are dismissive, if not spiteful, toward common user concerns. You would think they designed all this out of some dark hatred for ordinary people, as if ordinary is somehow evil. This is why Game considers computer nerds Gamma; they can be useful when they decide to interact with humans, but they don’t have a clue what makes humans tick. Worst of all, some fanboys and coders are outright Omega, the damaged and twisted perverts who are lucky no one has killed them yet.

Granted, plenty of developers keep their heads down and do good work. I’m sitting here typing this on my Debian Wheezy desktop. I love it, but I’m not a fanboy. For good or ill, the God I serve has called me to watch over and meet the needs of the common folks out there who have to deal with the complexities of real life. I’ll teach them Linux if they feel the need, but most of the time I help them fix Windows and try to keep it secure. That’s sacrilege to the fanboys. They can’t stop me from learning and using their precious Linux for my own needs, but I can surely stop them from harassing me. They haven’t been around much this past year.

Oh, and I have Windows XP running in a virtual machine on this system for stuff that Linux can’t or won’t do. And Windows 7 running on another system around here. Win7 is the new XP in the marketplace, because it’s close enough to the original human default UI that people can still instinctively figure out most of it. Open Source UI developers are too arrogant to take advice from common users, so they keep coming up with lots of computer cool, but nothing anyone can tolerate. This is what happens with developer-centric software.

Somehow I seriously doubt the Linux UI projects will ever figure it out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fanboy Folly

Job 24

God is not like mere men. It’s not as if you should expect Him to come around like a circuit riding judge with a seasonal schedule of visitation.

So there are people out there who get away with moving survey markers so they can encroach on someone else’s land. They seize someone else’s domestic animals for their own herds. They deprive orphans of their only means of support and create a pretext for taking some poor widow’s only possession. They won’t let beggars take up a post on any place near town, but drive them out into the wilderness. Whatever these miserable poor can scratch from the barren open lands is all they can get. Maybe they pick the rotting little grapes from a cleaned out vineyard.

Job says he can take them to show people who sleep in the rough without so much as a thin cloak against the cold night. When it rains, they get wet, unless they can hide behind a large stone when the wind blows. Fatherless children are seized from their mothers and children are taken as a pledge against their own starvation. Maybe someone hires the poor, but somehow forgets to pay them their share of the harvest. Think of it: rich crops picked by those not allowed to enjoy any part of it.

Those who suffer great injustice are weeping aloud and yet God does not judge the perpetrators with anything resembling our human sense of justice. There are always plenty of people who reject the light of truth. Day and night the just suffer injustice. Adulterous people sneak around at night. The only time they see the daylight is to stake out the next house they will sneak into when it’s dark.

Job then mocks their pious ranting about how quickly and surely justice falls on the wicked of the earth. They liken evil men to mere sea foam, easily dispatched. Does the trio actually believe poor people would refuse to work a wicked man’s harvest? They aren’t going to wait on God’s judgment to take that man away; they need to eat today. Nor should anyone expect the wicked to melt away like snow on a warm day. Justice does not grow in trees. The evil still prey on the weak and Job’s friends are just so certain God will drag them away any minute now.

Sure, God is watching; He watches all mankind. But the wicked often do not die quicker than anyone else. When death comes, it apparently does not distinguish between those good and evil. Job demands they show actual proof that he is wrong. This world is fallen and God has never promised to fix everything.

Posted in bible | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Job 24

Connecting Ancient Dots

The sheer arrogance of the insular modern Western mind makes the Devil giggle.

It flows from the essential nature of the Fall, of the “boastful pride of life” elsewhere called “hubris.” We stole from the Greco-Roman Civilization all the things of least value and forgot what few virtues they offered. We forget the lesson God taught Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 4).

Why would Daniel in the second chapter prophesy that the pinnacle ruler of Babylon represented the most valuable portion of the symbolic statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream? Daniel had an opportunity to make of it what he would, but honestly told the emperor that, in that ancient context, Nebuchadnezzar was gold compared to the lesser value of what was to follow in the march of empires. It’s more than the emperor’s obvious intelligence. Given what little we can know of the ancient Mesopotamian scholarship of that time, we can be sure the emperor was already educated above Daniel’s level.

The Bible takes seriously the notion that the dream came from God, but was more than Nebuchadnezzar could handle. Daniel got a message from God that revealed the dream and what it meant. As soon as Daniel spoke, the emperor recognized it all as obvious truth. That ancient scholarship carried a high level of awareness in areas of the human mind we consider far below the intellect. Our shallow culture sneers at such things, but wiser minds are more respectful. God Himself said Nebuchadnezzar was far wiser than the Greeks and Romans whom we prefer as nearer kin. What made him so much better in God’s view of things?

It could easily occupy a book to chase down all the things they already had in common. Our lightweight American education glosses over the many ways even Rome was better than later Western Civilization because it is utterly lacking the frame of reference for discerning such things. We want it all quantified objectively and think that’s enough to decide. We have all the things Western minds consider “good” and cannot imagine any other frame of reference could possibly matter. We cannot imagine that all of the ancient civilizations before us shared certain conceptions, took certain things for granted, things we don’t even grasp.

We talk of the trio gods-gold-glory that seemed to characterize what drove ancient adventurers. Our Western culture is dismissive of that first item, but ancient men universally took that more seriously than the rest. Such indicates the first of our many failures to understand. Babylon demanded her servants bow the knee to imperial deities, those various gods the ruling family felt sponsored them and whose power enabled their dominance. The primary source of conflict Daniel and his friends had to satisfy was specifically what they could do to meet that demand without violating the demands of their own God. It hardly required the degree of separation we might expect from our distant perspective. The Covenant of Moses was peculiar in some ways, but not entirely foreign to Babylonian sensibilities. The Hebrew boys had to negotiate a clear conscience far more complex than anything we are prepared to acknowledge. They took for granted God put them there and sought to meet His moral requirements without provoking their hosts.

Daniel’s answer to Nebuchadnezzar was not just sucking up as we might view it. We so easily ignore the wider context of this whole scene. The Babylonian court would have been aware of Hebrew prickly peculiarities and powerful sense of honor by now, so were expecting the young man to either wow the emperor or be summarily executed. With all the thousands of people coming and going, it would take something special to accomplish the former, while many were hoping for the latter. In the context, Daniel’s God was able to carry His servant through. While many in that imperial court would have viewed Jehovah as the minor deity of a troublesome people, they didn’t pretend to understand politics among gods, only among themselves. If Daniel’s God kept Daniel alive, that didn’t stop them trying to trap Daniel in his own religious peculiarities against those of the emperor. It would take an awful lot of successes for Daniel to become significant to Nebuchadnezzar. Yet we know from Daniel 4 that Nebuchadnezzar’s value system rejected hubris.

Obviously Daniel had met his own God’s requirements, because he kept succeeding long past the lifetime of the Babylonian imperial family and the empire itself. And Daniel said Nebuchadnezzar was actually superior to those who conquered him. In what way? Given the nature of what God tends to talk about in the Old Testament narrative, we can be sure it has something to do with moral justice. While God’s plans might be inscrutible, it wasn’t gross immorality from Nebuchadnezzar that caused his empire’s fall. And while we clearly see that Belshazzar himself was judged, nowhere does it say his personal debauchery was the whole story. So far as we know, he was only playing at regent temporarily at that time. We suffer greatly from this distance reading the Bible with a silly literalism against the historical records. Still, the primary mistake here was hubris against deity, the Hebrew deity in particular. While Nebuchadnezzar came to terms with Jehovah, whatever those terms migth be, Belshazzar was too good for that. In contrast we notice the imperial house of Medo-Persia was careful not to insult anyone’s gods. Is it too obvious that Daniel never slandered anyone else’s gods, only clung to his own faithfully?

But the Persian religion, complex though it was, contained too much of chasing gold and not enough of the gods. This figures large later on as an influence in a specific heresy of Pharisaism. Thus, it was considered silver against Babylon’s gold in the statue image. But to shortcut a lot of other endless chatter and not make a book of this post, let’s cut to the chase: If we examine the rest of ancient history through the lense of God’s revealed standards of morality, the single thread that glows brightly in this broad tapestry is respect for the tribal structure. It was considered a sacred bond, a major element in the moral fabric of the universe. Babylon honored it, not just reflexively, but with a will. We see in Chaldean literature the high regard for the integrity of the social stability contained within the extended family political and social structure. The government dealt only with whomever the family-clan-tribe followed as their chief. The Persians were noticebly somewhat less careful about this, the Greeks less so, and Rome only pretended to care with mere lip service.

Consider how God judges the governments of today by that standard. If you think this isn’t a major element in Satan’s pleasure, you cannot pretend to understand anything Christ Himself said.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Connecting Ancient Dots

NOT a Graphics Artist

A friend asked me to help him produce a logo and some other stuff from a pretty rough sketch he made. I told him I would try.WillLogo1

It was a painful experience. That is, I had to use a combination of LibreOffice Draw, GIMP and Inkscape. The latter was primarily because it was by far the simplest tool for pasting text and making it follow the curves of the circles. GIMP’s method was so convoluted I didn’t understand it — at all. LO Draw had the same idiot word-art stuff you get from the big named software houses in their word processors and just about as useless. Those require a level of skill and patience I’ll never have, nudging and adjusting a jillion times to get what you want. Inkscape was pretty easy, since any simple geometric shape you draw is already considered a “path” for something like text to follow. So the same image was built up in stages, adding one piece at a time and exporting to some commonly recognized file format. It took me two hours to produce this ugly thing.

Hope he likes it, because I am not trying again.

Posted in meta | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on NOT a Graphics Artist

Dead Game

There is devastation all around me.

On the one side, I see vast nations of men who languish under the lash of feminism. Worst of all, a vast carpet of Christian men who cannot possibly walk fully in the power of Christ because they serve that same heathen goddess of Jezebel. On the other side, even those who have broken free of servitude to that vile goddess are still enslaved to other Western assumptions and don’t see the full power of what their freedom could mean. They are still stuck inside their little rational world where God’s voice does not reach beyond a mere whisper.

After Eden, when God began the long path of divulging the truth about Himself and His Creation, mankind quickly drifted away from the fundamental assumptions that gave His revelation a voice. Our fallen nature constantly fled from that flaming Sword of Truth, unwilling to die so that we could be free. You see, the Sword of Revelation must first be driven through our own hearts before we can lay our hands upon the hilt. We must serve the death warrant to our fleshly nature or we remain a prisoner of this Fallen Realm.

The Sword of Truth carves away the fat to reveal the point of separation between death and life. The moral standard by which God breathed His own life into this world still animates all things. Unless men turn to that moral vision of what is and is not, they walk in shadows of darkness, stumbling along and never seeing the escape. God’s divine justice breathes fire on the fundamental human choice to trust his own resources to understand reality. What man’s senses can discover, and his reason can discern, is not enough. Divine moral justice stands beyond the reach of such capabilities.

So along the path God strewed various covenants, oral and written expressions of His divine justice. Men who clung to them did, at least, find the best this life had to offer. With some effort and devotion to these revelations, they might perceive a call to something higher than their own reasoning minds. At the last signpost on this path, God came Himself in human form and forced the issue by defying all logic and calling it “salvation.” He said He was Himself the summation of that had been written and spoken from God.

If you dig into the Law Covenants, you will see written between the lines a raft of assumptions about human nature. You will see things that shock the modern conscience of Western people because Western Civilization is a shocking rejection of God’s salvation. Not just the rational mechanisms, but all the non-rational assumptions about reality itself are all wrong in the West. Our gut instincts about what is good and moral are inherently flawed, so we either choke on revelation and reject it, or we twist it and pervert it until it meets our assumptions. As a civilization, we aren’t even aware that we do this until someone lays it out in detail. Even then, rejection is highly probable. People still flee that flaming Sword of Truth.

The shepherd in me aches to see the whole world flailing away in vanity. Not just the men, because when men are wrong, women suffer, too. Nobody gets even the merciful measure of good God promised for this life alone, much less do they find the path out of this life. They stand in the far distance, blindly smelling the rich aroma and somehow imagine they have found the banquet of God without having tasted a single bite of His wide open table.

Yesterday evening I checked on my book, A Christian Guide to the Sexual Marketplace — 504 copies downloaded. Plus, I’ve answered one request for a printed copy at my own expense. I’m considering preprinting a few more copies to give away (but I think I’ll rework the cover image first). So there must be some hunger for a better approach when some obscure author can give away that many copies of something that looks so cheesy. I’d be only too glad if someone with better publicity took my stuff and ran off with it, in the sense of using my ideas. My human side worries that the purity of the message might get polluted that way, but it’s got to be better than what I see going on around me.

But my long experience has taught me that the only way folks will hear this message and actually change their path is when something inside of them recognizes in me something they need. If that voice doesn’t call them from beyond this world, there’s nothing I can do but watch in sorrow.

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

GUI Races (Updated)

I’m watching.

The current trend in computer user interface is racing up a dead end street. I could be entirely wrong about this, but we’ll see. I am certain the current leadership in development projects are almost uniformly stupid about it. That is, they are too focused on the “cool” factor, as if that were their only hope of market survival. Granted, that “cool” factor does have strong vibes with the consumer market. It’s trendy; gotta run with the trends to stay in business, no?

No. It’s an old myth by now, but still a myth. Any economy, macro or micro, that depends solely on consumer tastes, is dead where it stands. Not simply because someone else will come along with a cooler idea and steal your market share, but the consumer market itself is entirely too fragile. The underlying economic system is rather like an impossibly tall structure with a high center of gravity. It will eventually become unbalanced. While it won’t fall quickly, it will crash very hard. (Hint: It’s being done to us intentionally by those who control the banking system.)

We are just about there. Whatever it was the computer GUI designers thought they were chasing five years ago, it’s just about to evaporate. The consumer economy is going to shrink to insignificance for anything not essential. People will do their best to keep the devices they have, or maybe seek a used one when they break the older one. Sales of new tablets and cellphones will probably fade before this year is out. Pretty soon the biggest market for computing devices will be business and government. That is, it will be a PC workstation market.

Even if the market is only somewhat reduced, it will be catastrophic for any vendor heavily invested in consumer grade products that aren’t on the bottom edge of the price range. The consume-only device will cease to dominate unless it becomes dirt cheap. Barring some earth-shattering technology discovery that can replace current devices for less than the buying power of $50 (US) today, that market will fade or die.

Way back when the home PC first became possible for what was then a prosperous consumer class, a couple of big outfits came up with the Graphical User Interface. Their market share was small, but surging on the GUI. Someone at Microsoft realized the only way they could dominate was to do it better than anyone else. So they invested millions of dollars hiring genuine human behavior PhDs and tested hundreds of ordinary people with no computer experience for months. They sat them down in front of a computer and let them do whatever it was they would naturally do without any instructions. Then they refined the interface and did it again. They repeated the process until what they had was as close as they could possibly get to instinctual human behavior — Windows 95.

By any useful meaning of the term, it was an intuitive GUI. Go ahead and snicker, but it worked.

Granted, the exposure of almost every human on the planet to that and other GUIs since then means we no longer have a pool of inexperienced users to test. You could suggest that the consumers have moved on from that first intuitive model. But if you’ve ever visited any corporate or government workplace, the first thing you’ll notice is that they have not moved on. So if you take away the Win9x/Win7 style interface, productivity sags very quickly in most offices. Something about that basic design still reflects fundamental human wiring, not just current habit. Right now, HP is getting a boost in sales because they realized there was such a big demand for Win7 over Win8 that they could make lots of money. So if you go to their sales sites, you’ll find lots of Win7 stuff prominently featured. And sales are good.

So long as almost no one but a few computer nerds and dweebs are using Linux, the GUI doesn’t matter. But when you start looking at corporate-friendly distributions of Linux, they all look somewhat like that basic Win95 layout with minor variations. There are numerous other factors involved, but there will not be a year of the Linux desktop until the dominant offering looks like Win95. It also has to work about the same, with all the convenient features right there in easy-to-discover “intuitive” locations in the menus.

GNOME Project? Those people must be from another planet. It’s almost Orwellian how they use the same words to describes things no ordinary human would recognize. That whole project treats ordinary computer users as a species that should be wiped off the earth. KDE Project? They aren’t quite so hostile, but they still try to reprogram humans into something non-human. They abandoned the intuitive model. LXDE is the project that will never be finished because they keep arguing amongst themselves over insignificant details like academic communists. XFCE is workable, but still not very responsive to basic human expectations. You can make it look like Win95, but it’s not fully integrated into the underlying system the way even Win95 was. There are no other viable contenders for the comfort of common computer users. You would think it was a part of your Open Source licensing that you first commit to hostility against ordinary computer users.

Don’t get me wrong; I still run Linux. There’s nothing like the Linux command line. And these days it runs on just about every piece of hardware and is easier to install than Windows. Best of all, you need not concern yourself with activation and licensing (unless you purchase commercial tech support). Most of the essential applications and suites are approaching parity in most areas, clearly better in just a few points. Server setup and configuration is much easier to find on Linux than on Windows, and much simpler to do. If you follow all the rules for both, Linux is still incomparably more secure and stable than Windows Server, and considerably more flexible in ways that really count. Yeah, Linux is that good.

Until you look at the GUI. It sucks. And all the people running the show are literally unable to hear when you tell them so. Should you actually get their attention to the nature of the problem, you’ll be lucky if all they do is snicker like you were some kind of idiot. Who gives a flying f*** about ordinary computer users? Not the Open Source guys, that’s for sure.

I’m waiting to see how this turns out.

Update: Stated in different terms, Matt Asay says the same thing, in that Linux is not an alternative if people have to learn from scratch all over again. If Linux developers are too arrogant to accept standard computer UI conventions for whatever reason, they clearly have no interest in wider adoption. If she has to learn different habits, you cannot sell it to the Valeries of the world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Otherworldly Agenda

You must understand this: The US government treats its own people as the single greatest threat. We are the enemy. You can find benevolent individuals serving in the US government bureaucracy, but the overall trend is hatred for the citizenry. The people who actually steer the decision making process are a mixed group of plutocrats who agree only that some god has appointed them to plunder us all. There is a wide variation in their various agendas, aims and methods, but they are unified in the intent to enslave and/or kill most of us. This is reality.

We cannot help those who honestly believe our government can be reformed or steered to better ends. We also cannot help those determined even now to resist with violent force at some undefined point of no return. We cannot avoid the conclusion that the resistors can easily win if they choose. Today’s US military has proved itself woefully incapable of much beyond purposeless death and destruction. They are better at making enemies than defeating them. However, the same deep level of incompetence that cripples our military is also present in those who intend to resist. Only a tiny slice of any human population ever really understands how this stuff works, and almost no one listens to them.

From this grand diverse mix of idiots, we can on rare occasions rescue a few souls. That rescue consists mostly of disengaging the passions of partisan politics on the grounds that not a single part of Western Civilization is pleasing to our Creator. Or, if you prefer, the entire range of Western social and philosophical assumptions are utterly contrary to cosmic moral truth. We don’t merely opt out of the current political matrix in favor of a different or better party, but from the entire structure itself. Western political theory is built wholly on sand, lies of the Devil. If you engage any part of it, Satan has victory over you.

We do not offer a hostile confrontation to any of the players in this apocalyptic scene. We opt out of the scene itself.

Not in the sense we could hope to escape unscathed by the growing conflagration, but we opt out in the sense of no longer caring, of expecting no good from any part of it. Rather, we despair of human safety. For the flesh, that means fatalism, but for the spirit it means life and freedom. A critical element in moral victory is embracing mortality as a blessing from God. We aspire and desire to leave this world at the earliest opportunity from the hand of God. With the Apostles, we cry “Maranatha!” Much more than the simple words “Come Lord Jesus” in the sense of the Second Coming, it speaks volumes about wanting so very much to see first hand the justice of God played out in full in His Creation. Yes, we would love to be alive on Planet Earth when Jesus returns to claim His own out of the world so He can remake all things from scratch.

We don’t have words to convey what that would look like. But if you lose sight of that goal, you’ll get lost on the way. You’ll be hammered by a host of cares that do not belong in the Spirit Realm. You have to divorce yourself from such cares. This is what the New Testament means by making yourself ready for His Return in glory. That means you seldom comment on politics except to find ways to point out how silly and pointless it all is. We can embrace an honest and hard-headed truth about the evils of the US government, but it means making sure we understand the citizens are evil, too. Had the citizens turned to the right path, a path almost universally condemned in all of Western Civilization, we would not see this evil government preparing to make war on its own people.

That war is coming. In a broad sense, there will be no winners among humans. The plutocrats imagine themselves as godlike in their swaggering power and knowledge. They have no idea how insecure their position is. When the bloodbath starts, they’ll be shocked at their own vulnerability.

It’s not as if the war has not yet started. Our government has been murdering and disappearing people for quite some time. Now we have a broad cultural perversion among law enforcement agencies that have begun open slaughter of those who have the temerity to annoy any officer. This will surely escalate in the coming days. This thing has already started. It’s not as if you’ll see it when it reaches critical mass; this thing will be one long, painful slide into chaos. Even then it won’t be obvious chaos like you see in movies or read about in fiction books. The point here is to tear you away from a damnable trust in human nature, and most especially to help you see that your government is the single greatest threat to your human existence, and not for any justifiable reason.

Once you break free from the myth of trusting any government agent, it’s less difficult to drop your trust in your own flesh, or any human agency at all. Then you are ready to begin investing your resources into concerns that will outlive this universe.

Addenda: In response to an offline question — When was the right moment to have fought back? In my humble opinion, it was at Waco. Had the militiamen attacked the Feds from the rear once it was on TV, there might have been a slim chance of changing the course of things. Naturally, there won’t be another Ruby Ridge or Waco incident, but that doesn’t prevent me asserting it’s too late. That is, there will be bloodshed and war here in the US, but only God knows what it will look like. Brother against brother…

Posted in eldercraft | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Otherworldly Agenda

Sickness Post-mortem

I’m still feeling crappy. Intermittent fever and sinus allergies have ruled the last couple of days for me. This morning I thought it was all gone after such a hard sleep, but it came back. So I took a good nasal flush with a few drops of hydrogen peroxide solution to make sure there could be no infection in the sinus cavities.

There was no stomach troubles of note, but it just a lot like clinical depression. I didn’t want to do anything, I was dead tired all the time, and still rather sore from my last workout Friday. That’s because the muscles weren’t allowed to recover, since all the food was going to fight this thing. I lost a few pounds; oddly, it was the fat weight, because I look like I made it to the gym today and burned off bit more.

Depression is very familiar ground with me. It’s part of my psychic structure. I wasn’t even grouchy, just didn’t feel anything much at all. I suppose I can blame my DNA for both the depression tendency and for the allergies; I’ve always had both in fair measure since I can remember. The one thing that has completely disappeared is the suicidal thoughts. Then again, just a couple of generations back I would have been dead already because there simply was no good treatment for sinus infections. In my youth, it was all complicated with constant ear infections.

Oddly, now that I’ve already come to terms with my morality, I’m unlikely to think about killing myself.

The fever broke a little while ago; we’ll see if it stays gone.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sickness Post-mortem

Death of the Internet Revisited

This builds on a previous blog post, Death of the Internet?

The surge in smartphone and tablet computing is not entirely consumer directed. It is in part the result of long hopes and dreams held by plutocrats everywhere. The Internet, as it now exists, remains the single biggest threat to plutocrat control. It is currently the only means of communication they do not yet control fully. If they can succeed in channeling the urge to write and speak into false concerns and silly nonsense, they have won. But some of us aren’t easily seduced into that, and stopping us requires a different approach.

Part of that approach is simply making the hardware unavailable, in the sense of raising the threshold for getting and keeping it. Read any number of magazine type sites and you see the trends pushing, pushing, pushing everyone over to a consumption based Internet and hindering, if not disabling, independent production of content. An article from RT notes that Big Telecom wants to help with this process. They want the Internet to be another form of cable TV, where the entire delivery process is controlled from the top. The court case regarding the FCC rules almost misses the point, yet is making so very much news, splashed all over the faux opposition sites. This is not a trend easily resisted.

Even the bulk of Open Source has been seduced by this nonsense. Get the picture here: The early efforts at constructing a full desktop GUI were aimed at integrating hardware functions into simple and convenient access. You shouldn’t have to manually mount a CD-ROM and then get access to the contents. You shouldn’t have to manually pick through the file system and organize a batch for burning to a DVD, carefully noting a dozen parameters you don’t even understand. So when Open Source folks realized they actually could and should do this, several projects formed to create competing desktop environments. At about the time GNOME and KDE were just pulling even with Windows for user convenience, the whole thing was hijacked into tablet and cellphone interface development.

The current fallback position is XFCE, which has yet to become as fully integrated as the others were some years ago. The folks at XFCE are trying, but their resources are limited. This whole business of touch is not about convenience for the user, but about suckering consumers into surrendering control, and more to the point, surrendering their voices. You cannot write much using your thumbs only. You’ll never be able to do any real work that way; that’s the nature of human output. Human development, moral development in particular, is very language intensive. More than one Social Science professor has loudly noted as much in regards to their academic disciplines. The only way you can understand where we are today is by seeing how we got here. The only way you can understand that is by reading tons of materials written by folks who did the research. If you don’t know where you are, you can’t move to a better place.

If you are happy with where you are, then your moral development is already dead. Without that sense of yearning for a better understanding, we are damned. Without the facility for written language, the task of learning is beyond the reach of human life span. God said bluntly that He uses the lives and words of His people to awaken that call in human hearts. I’ve already written broadly about how videos are inherently deceptive because they are based on squelching the human rational evaluative process. If you can’t read, you can’t think. If you can’t express yourself freely, you cannot give full shape to your thoughts. You cannot possibly live independently without a facility in written language. If all your expressions are soundbites from your thumbs, you have said nothing; you only make senseless noise.

It falls to a very narrow slice of us to keep doing what’s right in this regard. We can’t estimate the tipping point, but it only takes a few of us to keep good things alive. God has promised to use however many are willing to keep the door to truth open. We need to keep the door open for however many are moved by our efforts. “But the gate is narrow and the way is difficult that leads to life, and there are few who find it” (Matthew 7:14, NET). This verse most certainly applies here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment