One Nation Under Satan

By no means have my convictions regarding torture changed: Torture is inherently Satanic. When any nation allows anyone in their service to torture, the entire nation comes under the control demonic forces, and justly merits God’s wrath.

Just in case you forgot the previous evidence, take a look at Chris Floyd’s review of the latest release from Wikileaks. Despite the god-awful drama and silly posturing, not to mention irresponsible and secretive squandering of donations by Julian Assange, there is some good coming from Wikileaks. This is a fresh uncovering of how thoroughly our government has decided the god we should serve is Old Scratch himself. Yes, I mean that literally.

We can abstract principles of God’s justice from the Old Testament narrative. On the one hand, God pulled Israel’s fat out of the fire for His own reasons in the case of Assyria. However, He had a distinct message which warned that might be the last time if things didn’t change. They did not change. So when the next threat, Babylon, began moving in the region, He actively aided her in taking down His own Temple. We noote He promised Babylon will get hers, but He will most certainly use one evil tool to crush other evil, particularly those who claim Him. The point is it won’t matter what excuse you offer, when you use evil, evil owns you. The door is wide open and there is no help from God.

American evangelicals in particular make all this noise about clinging to God’s Word, but willingly embrace the methods of Hell. Guess what, America? We are under God’s wrath. We have driven Him out and embraced His enemy. Torture is a blasphemous poke in God’s eye. Had we chosen the path of God’s justice, no enemy could stand before us, nor have any hope of attacking us. Remember how that Israeli Temple choir defeated three armies by simply singing as the marched? Instead, we have put our trust in human power. It will fail.

Here I sit in the middle of an empire fully devoted to evil. It’s too late to lay any blame; the wrath is on its way. My calling is not to take up arms against her, but simply to declare the reason for the impending doom. Then, because God’s Word requires I align myself with His intentions, I am praying this nation’s troops lose in battle, and some other empire destroy ours. My nation serves Satan.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on One Nation Under Satan

Why Copyright Is Unjust Before God

(This is a follow-up to my post on Operation Payback.)

A critical element in God’s justice is whether enforcement is inherently oppressive. There is plenty of precedent in Scripture to answer the question of whether something is oppressive. For example, when the punishment is not proportionate with the crime, the law and/or enforcement is unjust. Hitting a file sharer with thousands of dollars in settlement costs in inherently unjust. If it were hundreds of dollars, it would still be unjust.

The question does not hinge on what value the complainant puts on their losses. The value is calculated by the free market, as it were, not the monopoly market price. If I can buy the song online for 99¢, then it’s value in settlement is 99¢. Scripture does not authorize punitive damages above 20% of value. I won’t bother with court costs because those are entirely fraudulent in every case throughout the West, if we judge by Scripture. The point is current enforcement is entirely unjust.

That’s about as far as anyone has to go to establish the current system is damned in the literal sense. The more substantive issue is the question of digital property: There is no such thing as digital property. To put anything in digital format removes the fundamental element in economic exchange — controlled access.

A live performance of any art can be constrained by limited access. You can put the thing inside a structure and charge admission. If someone wants to record it, you cannot justly stop them. On the other hand, everyone knows the quality of any such “pirate” recording will be poor and of very low value. Cheap devices cannot make quality recordings for simple acoustic reasons. Dragging in a better recording device requires substantial costs and can’t be hidden, so you can charge extra. It still won’t be the same as studio quality, and won’t command the same price.

The question in performance art is not preserving total control, because that is not possible without being unjust. Yes, studio sessions cost lots of money, but if you release any such recording on a common format, you have lost control of it. Don’t make them if you don’t like duplications. Or, you can be reasonable and intelligent and realize people who like your work will voluntarily pay for quality recordings in sufficient numbers for you to make a living. The question is not dollar value artificially derived, but whether you can afford to keep doing the art; that’s how God sees it. You aren’t deprived of your living when people share digital copies of your performances, because if your performances have any market value at all, your fans will cough up to see you live, buy your stuff, and keep you happy.

TV and movies are inherently evil in the first place. The product itself cannot avoid adversely affecting the brains of those who consume them; it cannot be rendered safe. I have zero sympathy for the entire mess. Live theater is fine, but electronic video cannot be made non-hypnotic. There is no valid moral reason for that media. End of discussion.

Books are an obvious safe market. Someone wishing to pirate books will have to put a lot effort into typing or scanning, and it’s not the same. Reading a book is not simply a matter of the information contained in it, but a tactile experience as well. Being able to physically flip back to previous pages in itself is a major factor hard to quantify. People who really like books don’t want to read them on a screen. The technology just is not that good, and it may never be. Books on paper cost more to make, and I assure you folks will pay more get them. The cost of a reader is very high compared to books, and reliability and convenience is not comparable at all. Yet, even where a market exists for the electronic version, it is working quite well. Again, paper books can be shared from person to person without harming the publisher and writer. No one complains about the used book market.

In the background I distinguish between Spirit and Law. I cannot hold the world accountable to spiritual principles, but God’s Laws are binding on anyone still breathing. Pirates and information radicals as activists are discerned according to God’s Laws, as are every government and corporation. I can point out when one is more just than another, even as I refuse to participate for spiritual reasons. It absolutely guaranteed I will eventually run afoul of someone else’s rules, regulations and laws when I faithfully obey the Holy Spirit as read in my convictions. But when I stand before God, their opinions and demands matter not a whit.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Operation Payback Is about Morals

You can read the manifesto of Operation Payback. Don’t pretend you can’t understand, or that the tiny handful of incidents they cite are insufficient justification. They are examples of a massive and unacceptable trend altogether consistent with the current global trend of all things toward tyranny and oppression.

I cannot find a single example of any government anywhere struggling to increase liberty, and only a tiny minority of corporations (or any other business) trying to make the world a better place. Plenty claim they are, but it doesn’t take much to prove they are lying. However, Operation Payback is carefully targeted to the worst of the worst in the particular issue of denying access even while they tyrannize the entire marketplace, robbing their own slaves client artists. Forced monopoly is a sin, whether it be a labor union, a church, a government service, or a corporation.

Nor is it a sin to cheer on the likes of Anonymous, the name the activists give their group. I’ve already said when something is digitized, you cannot pretend to control access to it, whether it be your personal information or an expensive performance piece. The choice to participate in piracy and reprisals is merely a matter of calling, strategy and tactics. The foundation of modern copyright laws, practices and policies regarding digital materials is Satanic, and I won’t debate that. I’ll be glad to explain it, and have offered plenty of that in previous posts. Attacking electronically the Internet portals of evil is not a sin.

I won’t participate, either. It’s not my calling. Explaining how it serves the Kingdom is my calling. For far too long the forces of oppression, serving Satan, have tried to monopolize the discussions of morals and theology. It matters not whether they do so from the capitalist or communist foundations; they are all wrong. Control of things God contrary to Gods Laws is oppressive by definition, and I have no trouble explaining how most of what we take for granted today as “law” is not just by His standards. Yes, that puts me on the ground of saying there has to be a standard which is not objective. No one should be surprised by that; God has never pretended to be objective. Any pretense of objectivity is a slap at God. I’m quite certain there are flaws in my understanding, but I will boldly proclaim my morality is higher than others, more consistent with God’s revelation.

You would get the same message from any prophet in Scripture. The one thing to which they can point is the record of revelation, and the mandate they have from God. People outside the argument may not be able to tell which prophet is telling the truth when two disagreed, but that’s the problem with pretending to be objective — it’s not possible, and is wrong from the start. These are my convictions; I have no choice but to follow them. And if I’m wrong, you can be sure God will judge me in His own way, but were I not already certain of His approval, I’d avoid the whole topic. A few years ago I would have been on the opposite side of this, so come back in a few more years if you find my chatter entertaining.

In the meantime, today I declare Operation Payback is at least reaching for the justice of God as revealed in Scripture. They are by far closer to that justice than those they attack, so far as I can discern. God bless Anonymous.

——–

Note: I realize the Internet is mostly the property of governments and corporations, most of which openly support the targets of Anonymous. So it is with roads and buildings and all sorts of other things controlled by governments and corporations. Yes, I realize this could easily result in governments and corporations working to block such efforts and control the Internet more tightly. Chances are the technology will not support most of those efforts, because even the owners tend to be ignorant of how it all works. Regardless of the area of human knowledge, the very best will refuse to be bound by oppression, and won’t work for the government nor corporations. But in the end, this could be the cause of the destruction the Internet as we know it. Such is life. I don’t pretend the Internet is the whole of my life, simply the facility I use to present my message.

Paul traveled the Roman Roads, used Roman law and Roman currency to present a gospel message Rome hated. Eventually Rome fell, and the gospel did not. (The gospel was perverted by many, but that’s another story.) You can pretend Rome’s hostility to the gospel had no connection to her fall, but God’s Word indicated a hostility to Rome, and promised her demise in real time and in eternal terms of the spirit behind what Rome was. God is not bound by our silly rules of logic, so crushing Rome by any means is attributable to His divine hand, since He controls everything in existence at His whim. The issue here is not the Internet but those who depend on it, who use it for evil means. Their own weapon is turned against them, and thus shall it be generation upon generation, until That Day when Christ returns.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Google Chrome Going Bad

I’ve been using Chrome on several different OSes the past few months, and have been recommending it to some other folks. In general, it was faster, did Flash objects much better, and so forth.

Recently I noticed it uses almost twice the resources as Firefox for anything with heavy JScript on the page. That’s not a good sign. It used to be just the opposite a few months ago. I don’t know enough to suggest whether Firefox improved of Chrome got worse, but I suspect the latter.

The latest release (7.0) broke me, though. The developers removed the option for making it ask about cookies on every domain that tries to plant them. Now all you can do is blanket “yes” or “no.” Naturally, a blanket “no” cripples your browser on some very common websites. So you are pretty much forced to say “yes” to all of them.

This is Google doing evil; it’s reducing the user’s control and choices. It’s bad enough I never had the fine-grained control of choosing per site whether to accept session cookies without digging around in the menu system. That trick is a way to pacify those nasty webmasters who want to force you to accept tracking cookies, but now Google is on their side completely. You will accept tracking or you can’t play.

Of course, on Ubuntu and some other distros you can choose the Chromium version, which is the development branch. It still offers that option to set site cookie preferences on the fly. But on Fedora, you have to use an oddball repository, and on RHEL 6 your only option is to build it. I find it hard to understand how such a small executable requires 88MB of source code. I decided it wasn’t worth it.

Google Chrome has gone bad, and I’m not recommending it any more.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Google Chrome Going Bad

Recommended Reading: Chris Floyd

It is not possible, nor desirable, to find another writer who thinks exactly as I do on all things. Better I should seek those who write about stuff I need to read, whose work draws and calls to me from the that same higher plane where Christ dwells.

I’m not going to pretend Chris Floyd is a spiritual mystic such as myself, since I can’t really know that. Chris is whatever he is, and I am what I am, but I’ll tell you his blog is more important than mine. Not because other people say so, but because I say so. If you have time for only one good read, see his blog first.

I especially recommend his most recent post: Obama’s Finest Hour: Killing Innocent People For “Made-Up Crap”. He gets it.

I don’t do blogrolling here, but if I did, his would be one of the first links. And his music is pretty good, too.

Posted in personal, sanity | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Recommended Reading: Chris Floyd

Monergism and Coexistence

I’m not planning to go out and get one of those bumper stickers which sports a collection of various religious symbols to spell out the word “coexist.” It’s a little more complicated than that, but it does point us in the right direction.

For Christians, at least, it points back to the old heresy of synergism. It’s the same heresy which corrupts almost the entire range of Western Christianity. As a refugee from evangelical Protestantism I can assure you synergism reigns supreme, and is a primary element behind the war mongering children of Satan who embrace the neocon message. Obviously this means I have no use for Zionists and their Christian allies, which underlines why I say it’s not that simple. It is a religion, and it’s an evil one.

I make no bones about what I see wrong in other religions, but none of them seem interested in attacking me, and I see no point in railing at them endlessly. The issue is not syncretism and pretending it doesn’t matter; it’s tactics. If I’m going to win my world to Christ, it won’t come at the point of a gun backing laws against those other religions. Some of those other religions use that tactic in other places, and that’s part of what makes them false religions. They aren’t interested much in coexistence, either.

Synergism as a Christian heresy is any suggestion God can’t get the job done without us, or even that He won’t. Monergism is the term for the correct theology. This is the recognition God has been at this long before there was any organized religion or written revelation. His revelation bluntly says, and quite often, those of us who embrace it are merely along for the ride. We are blessed beyond words He has any interest in us at all, given we are all universally unfit from birth. Monergists take the theology of the Fall very seriously, and God does not hire out His divine power to co-redemptors, as none are qualified. Nor are they qualified after He breathes life into their spirits.

We aren’t adopted into Christ because He needs us, but simply wants us. The big problem starts with this false assumption the revelation of God somehow requires our help. Even worse, it assumes anyone on earth is capable of making the choice, when Paul says in no uncertain terms we cannot (take a look at Romans). Dead in our sins, we cannot even want righteousness. Spiritual birth is a divine miracle, not some logical choice. It’s demands are utterly illogical, based on claims which no one can prove, not even partially. Being a Christian is not a reasonable choice.

It follows there is most certainly no reasonable basis for pretending I know when and under what terms anyone else receives their own spiritual awakening. The only thing I can do with my logic and reason is organize how I’ll comply with divine decisions made before I was born. Evangelism is not persuasion; persuasion comes only after the spirit is born. The Persuasion part is for people to get their lifetime of rational and emotional habits out the way, and embrace those eternal mandates. I cannot teach something for which there are no words; “propositional truth” is blasphemy. God is truth, the whole substance and essence of truth is a living being.

Doing the right thing is letting other people pursue their own convictions until they bump up against something God says I must protect, and no part of politics and human accomplishment is included in that. If His Word is truth, I don’t have to enforce it. I don’t have to make rules and laws to protect my narrative from insults, arguments, debate or ignorance. The truth of God is written into the very fabric of the cosmos, and the least effort on my part to simply live that truth makes Him blazingly obvious. But since it requires His hand to open the reception channels in every case, in every human, there is nothing much to protect on this plane beyond the safety of a few God has called me to watch over.

Since God knows better than I how every apparent threat to those lives is currently centered in my own government, and not a single credible threat exists except those secretly or openly provided by that government, it would be spitting in His face to join the hordes committing murder around the world in the service of that same government. Anyone who suggests it is my duty to fight imaginary threats is speaking for Satan.

Where I stand today is not threatened by any other religious group except the allied Zionist camps. If there is anyone to likely to encroach on my duty to God, it is they. A mixed collection of atheists, Muslims, pagans, Hindus, Buddhists, and all the rest are not a problem. To the degree what they promote is false, God is more than adequate to handle it. He does not call people to perform proxy warfare on a human level for Him since His Son came to earth. Our battle is escaping this world, not fixing it. In the process of escaping it, we have to fight through our own tendencies to cling to it, even while we have to face a hostile world trying to keep us imprisoned in madness. All of this requires miraculous intervention from God, not laws and weapons of the flesh.

Posted in religion, sanity | Tagged , | Comments Off on Monergism and Coexistence

Christian Mysticism: Esoteric and Elite?

No, utterly open and free — but admittedly very hard to swallow.

I continue to test my vision of a biblical faith community against the world I see around me today. I test it because I don’t pretend my vision is the one right way to do things. The very lack of detail should indicate such, but I’ve been accused by some that I’m trying to create my own little cult.

Any community of faith which is honest and open will naturally include a significant number who aren’t really part of it all. When working in mainstream churches, I consistently ran up against this obsession with “born-again” membership. I call it obsession because (1) Jesus didn’t use the term “born again” that way and (2) currently He and the Trinity are the only ones who know, or can know, whether anyone is truly spiritually alive. A community of faith aims at being spiritually receptive and responsive, but there is no pretense of goal-oriented record keeping and management.

Every church I’ve been involved with has always been obsessed with increasing membership. Not a single word in the New Testament supports that obsession. Becoming bigger and more noticeable is not a valid objective. Getting together so as to strengthen the resolve to leave all that behind is more like it. Notice how carefully the New Testament writers refer to God adding to their numbers. By implication He can also subtract from their numbers by guiding His own to disassociate from those who insist on dragging worldly concerns into a spiritual haven. His agenda has nothing to do with corporate growth goals.

But of necessity, when following the biblical model, every congregation will include some who just don’t get it. They may or may not pretend to be really involved, but such will always show up. We don’t have to make any great effort to accommodate them, at least in the sense of offering inducements to stay. The whole point is that they come because they want to be there when we do naturally what the Spirit directs.

More likely, the majority of spiritually dead members are there because it’s just a social structure they like for some reason. That is entirely valid. Ancient Israel always had a large entourage of hangers-on who simply felt safe, happy and comfortable in the company of a Covenant Community they couldn’t bring themselves to join. Their presence received due honor; they had their place in the scheme of things. A true New Testament church would also attract many like that.

Some would come simply because of social pressures, embarrassment, etc. Not good, but there is little anyone can do about that. We don’t pick on them, nor do we turn them into projects for renovation. We simply welcome them as we would the spiritually alive, since we have no way of knowing which is which. We have to always watch out we don’t create our own little sub-culture which blinds us to oddball things God may want for us, and those who don’t seem to fit may well be God’s chosen leadership in some particular mission.

What we can know is when folks manifest an interest in other-worldly concerns, which is the very nature of the Kingdom of Heaven. A driving desire to disassociate oneself from this world and a longing desire to be in the Presence of God gives rise to certain predictable behavior patterns, and this is what we hope to encourage. Never mind whether it’s fake; the nature of a person is not for us to know. All we need to know is whether that person at this moment reflects our best understanding of what those other-worldly concerns should be in the context.

True Christian Mysticism is self-selecting. You can’t sell it, can’t build big organizations around it. Only those willing and able to ignore convention in search of something far better will even take a second look. We can’t quantify that desire because it can be faked for a thousand different motives. It appears elitist and esoteric because few have any interest. A genuine interest can only be inspired by God. Further, only He can make it workable for them. So there is not a whit of secrecy in that sense of the word “esoteric,” but the nature of Ultimate Truth is self-obscuring. He reveals Himself to whom He wishes.

A gathering of Christian Mystics includes people who believe He has revealed Himself to them and would like to strengthen the grip of that revelation on their lives by sharing what little of it can actually be shared. There are no rituals, no memberships, just a desire to participate. We’ll miss you if you don’t make the next meeting, but nobody is going to count noses and mark rosters. That revelation cannot be organized; it is the substance of Christian compassion and warm fellowship. Want some?

Posted in religion, sanity | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

A Manifestation of Fascism

I doubt I could say it any better: Big Pharma: Keeping You on Dope.

What I can do is remind folks this is the quintessence of fascism: Government power compelling behavior profitable to big corporations. It is the ultimate expression of materialism. There is nothing but piling up stuff and enjoying the benefits at the expense of all humanity, and the moguls of Big Pharma lie when they suggest anything else matters to them.

Welcome to the dark dystopia, worse than all the movies you may have seen.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A Manifestation of Fascism

Unfixable World

The System is always wrong. It is wrong simply because it is a system, an organization. When anything involving people gets organized, it must of necessity walk on someone. I reject categorically the notion that is necessary. It is simply evil.

So Staughton Lynd opposed the system, but made the awful mistake of promoting another system. He sincerely believed it was possible to change evil by political means; he didn’t understand politics is evil personified.

But you have to give him one thing: He knows what commitment means. He walked his talk, which makes him ten times the man almost everyone in US government today. He was willing to live among the people he claimed to help and defend. This is consistent at least to the form of Christian Mysticism in that he clings radically to the truth he knows. It is a natural extension of the Quaker religion he claimed.

He also understood the necessity of compassion, but only partially understood the necessity of not being wound up in the results. He was willing to take on cases in court which he expected to lose, but it was only a tactic.

For me, it is the whole thing.

We are seeing a great many expressions by increasingly mainstream writers who point out the all too obvious failure of American government:

This is where lawlessness leads us – to more lawlessness. Once you commit a lawless act against someone and are not punished for it you have invited them to retaliate with complete disregard for the law in their response. You are only required to deal ethically and morally with an ethical and moral entity across the table – one who ignores the law loses their right to demand that respect in return.

Many in the fringe associations have been agitating for this since before I was born, claiming the rule of law was dead long ago. So it was, but you and I know the sheeple aren’t going to wake up to this soon enough. Indeed, that moment has been long past, too. Still, a high probability of revolt still lies ahead of us. To some degree it has already begun, but whether it will flower into mass bloodshed soon is known only to God. That it eventually will later seems obvious.

I want no part of it. It signifies simply trading one system for another, one set of victims becoming the oppressors of other new victims. Nobody wants to talk about resolving this finally by building something according to our human natures. No, this idiocy runs in cycles until God gets tired of it, getting steadily worse.

What will those true radicals like me do? The same thing we always did. We will continue living in sanity in the mad world, sometimes briefly their pet, most of the time beneath their notice, and occasionally their enemy. The world system will never, ever accept what we are committed to, only bits and pieces of what we might say or do.

I’ll be glad when my time is up and I can go Home.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Unfixable World

Program Note: RHEL Projects on Hold

This morning I awoke to the sound of my desktop system moaning. Seems the CPU fan is dying, so I had to shut it down before it failed and let things overheat. It will be a week until we get paid, so I’m using the laptop (I traded something for a nice Inspiron 1525). Laptops seem to work better with Ubuntu than with industrial grade stuff like RHEL.

Meanwhile, my standard brain spew on other topics will continue.

Posted in personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Program Note: RHEL Projects on Hold