Curmudgeon on RHEL 6.0 Beta 2

I’ve lived long enough to know my own answer to most questions. I can afford to ignore progress in some areas because some things will never get any better — not really.

Over the past year I’ve tested a wide range of operating systems on my home-built machine. That includes Windows XP, Vista and 7; openSUSE 11. and 11.3; Ubuntu Karmic and Lucid (and the Trinity KDE packages on both); CentOS 5 and RHEL 6 Beta. I’ve also played with a few more on a Dell laptop which is now gone, to include Debian Etch, Lenny and Squeeze; QNX 6, Syllable, NetBSD, and some others. But I feel comfortable saying on my main desktop RHEL 6.0 Beta 2 indicates the gold release is likely to stick for a long time. It appeals to my curmudgeon instincts.

I am not a technician in the sense I know how to run scads of tests. I’m just a retiree who has played with computers since the days of DOS 5 and Red Hat 5 (the old series before Enterprise Linux). I pretend I’m a technician when I operate my computer help ministry. For most of my clients, I recommend Ubuntu Lucid because they hate rolling release, but love easy-to-use. For myself, RHEL 6 is much better. As a user experience, this is the fast OS I’ve ever run on this hardware. All other things being comparable, this thing has never been so responsive. It even compiles faster. I don’t pretend to know what optimizations have been done by the developers, but it works for me.

Because it is pretty much the same API as Fedora Core 13, I can chase down source RPMs and compile almost anything which doesn’t already wait in the official repositories. There are a few things which are better outside the RPM system, because they tend to have critical updates more frequently than the packagers can keep up. For example, I greatly prefer Firefox built directly from source. I know just enough to tweak it at the same time to get it just as I want. I also like Elinks for some uses, and it works best simply built from source.

I like Lynx and other Xterm applications, such as MC and Vim. I’m slowly drifting away from using Joe as much, simply because it gets harder and harder to match what I’m learning to do with Vim, and I’m into things I can’t understand how to tweak on Joe. It’s actually easier to learn Vim’s esoteric keystrokes. I especially like using Vim with Alpine.

A few months back I explained how I learned to setup Alpine for multiple accounts and all about drop boxes, but the page to which I linked disappeared. The whole domain is gone. I didn’t remember the complex instructions, so I came up with a quick-n-dirty HOWTO for hacking the configuration file directly. I wrote it up as a plain text file to encourage others to simply save it for future reference. It’s public domain, so steal it and do what you like.

But it’s not all dreary console stuff. I also built Mplayer and all the supporting SRPMs from scattered sources, more or less matching Fedora 13. So far, it has played everything I throw at it. I also made sure to build ffmpeg. I don’t bother with piracy to make money, but when I need something which is available in a proprietary format, I don’t hesitate to rip it apart or change it to suit my tastes. I’ve already stated clearly I feel utterly certain my God condemns most copyright laws. Not so much in principle, but in the way it tends to get applied by idiots who don’t understand the necessity of electronic data being utterly free and unencumbered. They are the immoral ones (RIAA, MPAA, etc.), shaking down the artists and their fans, and offering nothing of value in return. The whole idea of copyright has long been perverted and abused.

And if I really wanted to run something from Microsoft, I might pay if it’s feasible, but I see nothing immoral about running a hacked and cracked ISO. You’d be wise to make sure it was clean, but the very design of the OS itself prevents any real hope of security and privacy. The whole point everyone wants to ignore in the argument about free information, particularly in electronic formats, is it applies both ways. I don’t expect to have any real security against whatever lies on the other side of my cable modem. My own privacy is gone once any item gets recorded as information on my computer. I don’t pretend it will be sacrosanct, because the whole thing is merely a matter of voluntary honor and personal ethics. I can’t decide for someone else what they really ought to do about my information, my Internet profile, etc. And they can’t decide for me, either. All those laws about it simply reflect the common assumptions, which are then twisted through the criminal process we call “legislation” and forced upon the world by a vast army of mostly incompetent boobs on folks who are even more incompetent.

It’s not a question of might (or ability) makes right, but since too few people in this world grasp my morality, and the underlying theology, there is little point in arguing what it means to be moral regarding digital rights. I’m quite the radical and make no bones about it. If you know your way around this stuff, you get to take advantage of how ever much you know, and I won’t pontificate about digital rights.

I know just enough about such matters to decide I really do prefer RHEL over all other Linux distros, and Linux over other operating systems — for now. I’m not an OS zealot, and if Cupertino or Redmond actually meet my needs in some future day, and it’s closer to my wishes than the alternatives, I’ll switch. (But it’s unlikely.) Curmudgeon I may be, but threats and needs do change. RHEL 6 is pretty secure as Linux goes, while still offering a very high usability quotient, particularly for those inclined to learn DIY. I can get almost anything I actually use this way. Once the CentOS team turns out their version of this, I’ll be writing a migration guide for those equally so inclined who want something vastly superior to Windows whatever.

I find RHEL 6 a major turning point in the technology game.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Mortgage Fraud Is About to Crumble

It’s so huge, I’m wondering how long it will take to finally hit the dirt.

I don’t understand high finance and mortgages and banking very well, but I can understand this marvelous explanation of why the mess we have seen so far is just a puddle splash compared to the impending tsunami. I invite your attention to: TheDC OP-ED: One Nation Under Fraud, by By Joseph Tauke of The Daily Caller. It’s a long read, but well worth it.

You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Mortgage Fraud Is About to Crumble

Liberally Non-Liberal

I read a lot of lefty news sites. They have a lot less intrusive and stupid advertising than the righties. But I don’t believe the lefties any better than I do the righties.

To restate what I say often: Until every official state completely shifts its fundamental government philosophy over the Ancient Near Eastern feudalism, none of them can claim legitimacy in God’s courts. That means as a servant of the Most High God (AKA Jehovah, Yahweh, etc.) and under His government, I am under no obligation from Him to take any human government seriously. Yes, the only proper government according to God’s Laws is tribal government, arising from a tribal social structure. Not the truculent version of “tribal” most people include in their propaganda, but the live-and-let-live tribal peaceful government where everyone minds their own business. That is the first and most basic requirement for any government hoping for His approval.

Work that out in all the implications and you end up with a guy who feels for the poor and oppressed the way liberals do, but utterly rejects every solution they have proposed. The conservatives are so wrapped up in materialism (like Pharisees) their solutions are even more wrong. Liberals at least have the right idea, but most of those in their leadership are just as corrupt as anyone in leadership of communism, socialism, fascism, nazism, and anything else you can name. As noted previously on this blog, the mere existence of leadership as we know it today is uniformly immoral. When something needs leadership, it’s already wrong, because it always means someone gets run over.

You should never accept leadership from anyone who isn’t linked to you by blood kinship or by covenant. A contract is not a covenant, but a Western parody of a covenant. Contract is between parties which may not even be people, and a covenant is between persons, binding for life and beyond. It binds families because the head of household has the right, and duty, to make such commitments. Without this entirely personal element, nothing in this world is valid. If people are involved, objectivity is a sin. The pretense of objectivity becomes the excuse for every imaginable inhumanity we see before us today, and a lot we haven’t seen because it’s hidden. Thus, I am clearly at odds with everyone who claims any brand of conservatism. But it also cripples the progressives, because you aren’t permitted to use government to accomplish the mission, either.

That is, government as we know it today. The idea a conglomeration of wildly different folks in one location can somehow be bound together under some objective fair laws is from Satan. All the more so if that notion envisions laws affecting how people conduct their private business. Yes, God made it universal for all mankind to respect the property of another, but the enforcement is the issue. The first line of defense is your family head of household, and their sense of proper response, when you believe your prerogatives of ownership are threatened. Behind that is a wealth of assumptions about how such disputes are settled, and no one system fits all the people everywhere. The notion someone is smart enough to figure it out for everyone is a slap at God. He put us on earth in families, households, clans and tribes because it was the best of all possible worlds after the Fall. It was His idea, and keeping folks cloistered in clans and tribes is the single best way to prevent crime.

So I’m stuck, because I realize precious few people in this world see it that way here in the West. I’m able to spread my crazy ideas because of this thing called the Internet. It has become the greatest threat to centralized government — by definition, evil government — the world has ever known. Now the Net is under threat, but this comes about the same time the very same government trying to kill it is about to dissolve itself as God Himself is ripping it apart for all that sin.

Am I alone in realizing this a is good thing? The whole foundation of Western Civilization is an insult to God, and it’s about time the thing collapsed under its own dead weight. Welcome to tomorrow. If you dare, consider preparing yourself and those you know for rebuilding things properly.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Liberally Non-Liberal

Sins of Our Nation: Murder for Fun

It’s news because the majority of Americans still think it is. It’s not news to anyone who has spent much time in the military. The secrecy is not to protect the innocent; the military has no comprehension of that. It is to protect the select hides of a large number fully deserving of scathing criticism.

The US military has never been good and decent. I don’t say that because I’m a pacifist with regrets about serving. I have no quarrel with genuine national defense, but our troops have never been used that way. So far, we have only ever defended our offensive actions with other nations. The propaganda to the contrary has drawn a great many decent and innocent fools into something they still regret, provided they are still alive.

I was one of those fools. My first tour of service began in 1979, and was frankly a matter of needing a job and a way out of a very difficult situation. The military had interested me for a long time, so here was my best chance to see it up close. In my ignorance I made a long string of bad choices. I take my lumps, but no one made any effort to help me understand what I was up against, so it’s no surprise my exit in 1982 was not on the best of terms (called “Compassionate” because it made the military look good, when the real reason was they couldn’t use me but refused to fix the problem).

But the second time I went back in there were few delusions. In 1988 I was burdened with a sense of uncompleted mission. I had to do it right simply for myself. Fighting through the bureaucratic memory of my previous departure, I was allowed only one choice: Military Police. This and a handful of other specialties provide a unique opportunity to see the underbelly of the beast. While I did complete my personal mission and felt sure God was pleased, there was nothing about the military service itself which makes me proud. I remain deeply embarrassed about a lot of things.

Most of the accolades and awards were the routine garbage guys could get just for showing up and going through the motions. The only attention I actually earned was for giving my heart to the DARE Program in Europe. I have since learned what a massively stupid and perverted philosophy was behind it, but I honestly managed to make more of it than the program itself entailed. God gets the glory for keeping me sane enough to ignore the bureaucratic limits and do the right thing. I took full advantage of being the first DARE Officer in the area, and in the schools I served. But I still regret the insidious lies I supported in that program, and the context of military corruption only made it worse.

The business of soldiers committing thuggery in Afghanistan and Iraq, or anywhere else for that matter, is simply what soldiers do. It’s built into the military. The very nature of how the system operates is an open invitation to the worst of humanity. I was part of the lower ranks of leadership and the entire philosophy claims high morals, but those morals are twisted beyond recognition. Those morals make Abu Ghraib and the PFC Stoner case the norm; don’t believe lies the contrary.

Not the norm in the sense it’s like that everywhere all the time, but in the sense of well within the limits you reasonably expect. For example, one of the biggest events of my police service in the Netherlands was a major drug bust, which took down a huge chunk of an already poorly manned nuclear missile unit to our north (the place was hardly a secret). This, even though the whole thing was poorly staged and too many had ample warning to dispose of evidence. The average Joe Doper isn’t smart enough to take advantage of that. But we would have never known about the problem had not the big dealer in the barracks come to the attention of the Dutch federal police who were wiretapping the dealer’s supplier over other crimes. The deep plastic facade of military competence hides a stinking corpse which succeeds only where the enemy is equally corrupt.

It works both ways when secrecy and head games are built into the system. Within my own associates at the MP station were a few thugs, but they took advantage of the system and limited their grisly pleasures enough to avoid discipline. That it left them enough room to feel comfortable is what stinks. Simple open honesty is frankly forbidden, because pretense is everything.

When you pretend your nation never commits any fouls, and anything the leaders want is always paradise for everyone involved, you end up sticking your nose into all the world’s business. That means having a million or so troops to intimidate anyone who might object to that skewed vision of paradise. That is a lot of troops, and scooping in a huge portion of the morally unfit is a necessity. Consider the self-evident principle government service seldom attracts good moral people with any sense. They are either fools who remain fools, or they decide to adopt the lies and bash their conscience into silence. The few others simply leave as soon as possible. The military is hardly any different. Being a close friend to people working in the highest levels of NATO Military Intelligence and security, I know without a doubt people of conscience can barely stand it.

So let’s get this straight: The government as a whole, and the military in particular, is loaded with some of the worst examples of humanity. Not because I want you to have some simplistic vision of what constitutes human evil, but to realize none of us are more than a step or two away from it. Change a few key individuals here and there, and a whole brigade becomes a living breathing crime wave. Circumstances and context are all it takes for the vast majority of us to become the most hideous and inhumane beasts you can imagine, but we have this cultural psychosis which hides that truth. Your only defense is striving to uncover the awful truth, and then dealing with that truth.

In one of my favorite fiction readings, the hero of the story turns the symbolic sword of truth on himself. It does not kill him, but it hurt more than words could say. This act was necessary as the price for wielding that sword against a far greater evil.

I look back in retrospect, and realize I could have become one of those foul murderers. That still frightens me. It is quite certain I would have eventually committed suicide. I’m not convinced those who have taken the path of suicide during our current military misadventures are the weak ones. Most of the rest simply go along with the evil. God help us; we are doomed.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sins of Our Nation: Murder for Fun

RHEL 6.0 Beta2

With the first beta I ran into problems I could not resolve, having to do with display instability. So I wiped the drive and used it to test a few other things. Yet, I was haunted by what I knew could have been. So yesterday I decided to give it a second try.

The Beta2 came out back in July, and developers still haven’t fixed a bug in the installer. On Dells in particular, but other system like mine as well, the installer freezes at some point and refuses to proceed. With Dells at least there seems to be a way to bypass this using the mem=[number of bytes] on the boot line. You calculate your RAM in gigabytes times 1024 cubed to get the correct amount. On my system, none of the various incantations I tried did any good. It froze every time right before the big blue console screen comes up and allows you to choose your language, etc.

So I installed the older Beta1. Of course, it would not update. That’s because the product has been split between workstation and server package sets. After installing and getting things set to my liking, I changed the lines in my /etc/yum.repos.d/rhel-beta.repo file like this:

#baseurl=ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/$releasever/$basearch/os/
baseurl=ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/6Workstation-beta2/$basearch/os/

This allowed me to download the Beta2 as an update, which amounted to a huge 850+ packages. According to posts on the Red Hat lists, this is because Beta2 is now based off Fedora Core 13, instead of FC12 used on the first beta.

I decided to test it by building mostly FC13 SRPMs to get Xine, a much shorter route than going with the Gstreamer stuff and rebuilding Totem. However, the build on Xine-libs puked. I’m not a developer, but the errors indicated to me something was missing from the source packages I could get, so the build was incomplete. So I switched to Mplayer, which was only slightly longer in terms of how many packages it required. I noticed some of what I had to build previously is now included in the RHEL repo. It all seemed a lot less painful, and works just fine. I discovered I had to build gnome-mplayer and gecko-mplayer (replaces mplayerplug-in) to get Firefox to recognize Mplayer.

My point is RHEL 6.0 runs faster than anything I’ve tried on this hardware. As noted previously, it also offers the sharpest font rendering I’ve ever had on my LCD monitor, once I rebuilt the Freetype library with bytecode hinting, and tweaked the fonts-conf stuff. For those of you impressed with eye-candy, the Beta2 has much better artwork, too. They’ve also stabilized the mesa-dri-drivers-experimental package and it works very well. Finally, I’ve not had to tweak a thing to play CDs without a hint of popping, distortion or any other problems.

I’ve made a couple of missteps following the wrong advice on setting up Sun/Oracle Java (crashed the system; wouldn’t reboot until I undid it using Ubuntu), but it’s working fine now, and I intend to do my best to keep this working as my preferred workstation OS. Don’t know if I will be able to afford the annual minimal support contract, but I’m pretty sure I can track the updates on the RHSA mailing list and build them from SRPMs. I think it would be worth it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on RHEL 6.0 Beta2

Doing Justice: Foreclosures and Evictions

God’s Word is pretty clear about some things, particularly in regards to His divine sense of justice on the earth. It’s bad enough not a single nation shows much interest in building on His laws, but some things are particularly egregious. Every nation flouting His commands will eventually be crushed in His wrath.

The Bible does not use the term, but most certainly addresses something now called “predatory lending.” In general, the accusation behind that term refers to suckering someone into believing they can safely borrow to purchase something, when the lender knows without any doubt the borrower cannot pay. The objective is to build up a mass of debt instruments, making the loan department appear productive and worthy of some extra bonus money at the end of the accounting period. Then the loans were bundled, sliced and diced and sold off as things of value to suckers for even more money.

Meanwhile, the poor borrower soon enough comes to the end of their ability to pay and loses far more than they ever had in the first place. God is not pleased with such lending practices. We read and hear a lot about honesty and accepting the consequences directed at borrowers, while the slimy lender gets off with a golden handshake. It’s nothing but bankers’ propaganda to keep the suckers on the hook. God calls it “lying.”

Without writing a book or two tracing through all the mistakes made getting us into this mess (it’s a sin to charge interest, for example), let’s note the Bible offers in terms utterly clear certain things which will invite God’s wrath staring right now. Eviction is a sin. Sure, you can reclaim your justly owned property if someone is tearing it up. But even if they simply live a trashy lifestyle, that does not justify eviction. The Bible makes a big deal out of having a roof over your head (unless you are a tent dwelling nomad) and how no one can justify taking that roof, or removing you from under it, without an extraordinarily good reason.

Simply failing to pay what is due is not a good reason. Yes, the Bible says that. You have to discern why they don’t pay. The Bible makes much of protecting orphans and widows. In a cross-cultural translation, that means folks who are disabled in the sense they cannot simply go out and get a job, at least not one which pays a living. You have to absorb the loss in their case.

The primary reason folks bite off more than they can chew is because someone else took advantage of common human weaknesses. I’d say here in the US, maybe 2% or 3% of commerce is approaching righteousness, and the rest just pretends they are (if that). Manipulation is a sin, and I have yet to see more than that tiny margin of advertising which isn’t manipulative, dishonest, aimed to suckering people into wanting something they don’t need and shouldn’t have. There is this command about not setting a stumbling block before others.

That applies to the entire residential market. Again, we have centuries of sin to clean up, but let’s start with one thing, and that should be a moratorium on evictions until we get this reworked into something which at least vaguely resembles God’s justice. I know; it won’t happen. I’m just offering a warning, so when it all comes apart and blood runs in the streets, there won’t be any excuses. God left plenty of prominent warnings long ago.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Doing Justice: Foreclosures and Evictions

Truth Is Free; Lies Are Expensive

The Tea Party movement threatens to be a very big presence in the coming mid-term elections. The people at the rallies are true believers, come at their own expense, and wave homemade signs. Some slogans are really very clever. You may not know the gatherings are heavily sponsored by major corporate donors. There is a lot of money spent on advertising. This does not mean those corporations started it, but they sure do like it. I’m sure they do have a lot to say about what is addressed, the main concerns raised, but I don’t think we can say they control it. They are probably taking advantage of something which is quite real as a grass roots movement. However, the movement has been compromised, and it will get worse.

Back when the radical progressives wedged open the representation of their viewpoints in the Democratic Party, it was pretty much the same. Except, the money came from typical liberal sources — foundations, limousine liberals, news organizations, etc. Today virtually every cause which clings to the progressive-socialist-communist axis is funded that way, though a few corporations have been more open about it.

The whole thing of political activism is long studied organization, heavy investment by something with a big bank account, and carefully planned attention getting activities to sell their message. There is not a single voice in the political arena which isn’t funded by deep pockets. The few without such funding are simply not heard. They don’t get any press coverage, and only the most obscure blogs, and the various groups of ditto heads of whatever stripe don’t echo their talking points.

Those who get the press are professional liars. All of them. That is, in one sense or another, they are struggling to steer money and power back to some thing which is most certainly going to hurt us. Most of “we the people” have no idea just how badly we are being hurt until way late in the game.

The truth is so very much simpler. You can offer it all day long, but you’ll find precious few takers. At the same time, truth which is heard — really heard — requires no funding and pushing to be accepted. Our biggest problem is getting it heard. In this world of vast resources buying earth-shattering noise which drowns out truth, and doing it for so very long, most people can’t recognize it.

The sad part is it matters. You see, the truth is written into the very cosmos. The lies are like an attack on reality. Reality has this strange tendency to hit back. Yes, it takes a long time as humans measure such things. And frankly there is no PR team to clarify things, so most folks won’t recognize just why their world is coming apart. But truth will not be denied.

Lies are very expensive, indeed.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Truth Is Free; Lies Are Expensive

Gloom and Doom Reality

We are already in Great Depression 2. The mental image of total chaos, a cessation of all economic activity, etc., is entirely false. People are not controlled by government and corporate policies, rather herded by them. Let’s clarify this image.

First, it will get significantly worse. No one in their right mind doubts that, but they also wouldn’t pretend to know exactly how it will play out, particularly in terms of your everyday experience. I can’t even offer meaningful statistics. Some of my readers will hurt badly; others will hardly notice. There are too many variables, and the study of Economics cannot rightly apply itself to individuals. It’s a part of the Social Sciences; it is intended to explain vast sweeps of human behavior. It is very poor at projecting trends, but not so bad at cleaning up afterward. Thus, only in retrospect would any of us have a decent explanation for our individual experiences. All we can say for now is most people in most parts of the world will notice a change in their fortunes for the worse.

There is plenty of this which is not a matter of Economics, but more of Criminal Justice. The first crime was the concerted effort from long, long ago to deceive the masses. It’s really nothing new; conspiracy is not a mere theory, but a word to describe a particular approach to understanding human history itself. Every government is a conspiracy to rule, and they have uniformly been untrustworthy, differing only in the degree of harm to various groups affected by their power. The second crime has always been nearly every government official ever born ended up seeking only their personal benefit. The difference between democratic governments and naked tyranny is the the necessity of deception with the latter. You are either find yourself bluntly forced or slyly manipulated. The Great Depression 2 is the result of the latter.

Nor is it all one thing, with everyone in the ruling class in on some vast secret. I doubt whatever the Illuminati actually are knows nearly so much as is alleged, but I do know their goals are not what most people expect. Whatever it is they may be, their primary mission is to control the debt of the world. Everything else is allowed to run its course, with all sorts of powerful people simply chasing their own personal pleasures and whims, regardless what noble and fine things they may say or write. A significant element in that package of personal pleasures and whims are various dreams unconnected with reality, which grand delusions they fondly pursue to assuage some personal insecurity, some sense of “I matter, dog gone it.” That they often want such wonderful things for the rest of us selectively excludes how frustrating it is for our deep desire for something else. But their vision trumps ours because — well, theirs has to be better simply because they gained the power to make theirs happen, see?

Here is an ugly secret about our entire global economic system: It steals from the future. You see, if we all followed our instincts, we would naturally find some rhythm of ebb and flow in economics. That is the nature of things, resulting from our very human inability to always allocate resources where they do the most good. This business of borrowing against future productivity is designed to smooth out that wavy business and keep everything on the upward trend. Advertising is designed to promote a bottomless sense of false need for the next new thing. It works for awhile. Eventually the borrowing outpaces the natural production and we have one huge crash, because we keep pushing off the obligatory drops until they are all bunched together.

We know the stimulus funds to boost car sales and home sales this past year were nothing more than borrowing heavily from an already declining future productivity. This gives the impending crash a much sharper drop when it comes. The whole point is we need to allow our consumption to drop back until it matches our production, which has been pretty poor for quite some time. It was masked by shifting around the borrowing so quickly the consequences couldn’t keep up — for awhile. They have caught up. What we have been doing instead of producing is employing an awful lot of people to find new ways to shuffle that debt in bigger, faster and more complicated ways. We called it “Information Based Economy,” as if there were anything productive and economic about shuffling economic information.

The Illuminati, such as they are, control the debt we have piled up to the moon. My cynicism about their actual brilliance is linked to my skepticism they can actually enforce their control of all that debt. Never mind how complicated it is with the mix of government and private obligations. If the common productive folks who have been suckered into all this obligation don’t embrace ownership of that debt, there is no way to collect. Once they lose that fear, it’s game over. I don’t mean common default, which simply shifts the debt to other hands and lowers the value, but simply denying they owe it, deny the whole system. I am not addressing this from a moral point of view, but the much more brutish reality of how people act. The Social Sciences are not about solutions, but about describing what has been happening all along so we have some realistic notion of what to expect. The Illuminati will have a tough time keeping together the system which would allow them to hold it over our heads.

It need not be a universal annulment of the debt obligation. There is some invisible tipping point at which the whole thing collapses, and I doubt it even requires a majority, either in terms of value amount or parties involved. Yes, there are key players who form choke points affecting everyone on either side of the flow, and they are hardly uniformly in bed with the Illuminati Debt Masters. It’s not a question of good or bad, and “Who will save us?” It’s that this thing is too complicated and messy for anyone to figure out so long as they are merely human, and grouping intelligence won’t help much. If your assumptions are all wrong, genius means little. All the manipulation in the world can’t keep the whole world in line.

Don’t think they aren’t trying. Part of the game is creating such a bogey man out of the coming collapse so as to scare folks into obeying government dictates. The whole thing rests on dependency. If you believe you need it, government owns you. If you know for certain you don’t, you will simply bide your time and break free when the coast looks clear. If you are crazy enough to believe you’ve been free all along, you’re the easiest of all to control. Let’s make this clear: The Illuminati — such as they are — were in control of framing the US Constitution, and ran the Revolution before that. They didn’t much care whether America won or lost, only wanted to ensure there was a catastrophic war to create debt and gain control of it. It is actually a bit more complicated, but that’s the essence of it. The one revolution they don’t want is the one where everyone simply starts over, in such a way it excludes dependency on anyone who isn’t your close kin.

Not exactly blood-kin, but a kinship of trust which means nobody has to be in charge. The very human bond of fellowship which defies all logic and law is the greatest threat to the Illuminati, and thus to every government in the world. We are all fully capable of agreeing to common expectations because we naturally prefer a fair and just society. We self-regulate just fine for the most part. Most regulation is built on lies about some desperate need which doesn’t exist. Humans who get along without leadership are the very last thing they want to see, and is the single thread of interest behind every attack they make on us. You see, this impending gloom and doom will hurt, but not nearly so much as we tend to imagine. If our imagination of such things is restrained by the reality of a very good interdependence of reliable kin, we are already free from most of the pain. The misery depends much on your level of dependence, on your sense of how badly you need the fraud sold to us as our grand American identity.

Stop trying to be American, or Canadian, Australian, or whatever. Try being a human instead.

The Great Depression 2 will hurt, but it will hurt a lot less if we understand certain things about what got us into it in the first place. That includes being a sucker for too much material junk, and borrowing from tomorrow, and dependence on a system which enslaves you to your insecurities. Learn to be secure on other terms.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Gloom and Doom Reality

Raising Radical Peace-maker Children

As always, what follows is strictly advisory, my own exploration of the idea. The finest works of art in the world are each a singular product, something which cannot be duplicated, and which draws you by its beauty. Our children can be works of art.

When bouncing off what I see done wrong all around me, it serves as the starting place. The first and most important element is taking them seriously. A soul of peace takes everyone seriously, and children are people, too. Your own particularly deserve your full attention. Most people aren’t really paying attention to their kids when they interact. The adults are too full of their own insecurities and needs, and they project them onto the children. While guiding them is necessary, and the only time leadership is good and right, if you are lost yourself, it works out poorly.

To raise peacemakers requires you are first committed to making peace in yourself and your world. Children can model only the degree of sanity you bring to the task. As always, there are no absolutes, and you will most certainly see them reach adulthood while nursing a big pile of regrets. It is a work of art, passion, something far more than mere knowledge, not science. Your children will seldom turn out better than you are at your best. If you are a peacemaker, they will know it matters and it will matter to them.

Radical sanity and peacemaking requires you ditch most of what other people in this world consider important. Indeed, you basically have to ditch this world, itself. Not as the doper and fantasy gamer, addicted to something which cannot ever exist, but ditching it as the place where your heart lives. We can’t be sane if we want more of this mess, just a different flavor. We have to want something far, far better, so much better it won’t actually happen here, something for which we were designed. It will come in its own time, but not on this plane.

Examine it yourself: The mainstream of our society demands conformity. People of peace and sanity demand their children stop and consider before committing to a choice. We don’t pretend to know how they will turn out, how they should turn out. What we should hate most is removing from consideration genuinely sane possibilities. Common sense is generally the term others use to keep us from doing things they don’t like. There is a great deal we don’t like which is purely a personal preference, and no reflection at all of cosmic truth. So when you examine the process, examine yourself. You won’t perfect the results ever, but if you aren’t in the process, there is no hope at all for the results. Remove constraints in your own mind for your children.

The likes of Timothy Leary on child rearing is simply a piece of truth blown all out of proportion. He went too far in saying children should find their own restraints in all things. Let them learn fire is hot and will hurt them, but don’t let them jump into it. Somewhere in the reality of daily child rearing, you have to have some sense of how far is too far. Don’t let them destroy what matters because that’s not peace, it’s not concern for others. The essence of peace is not simply a lack of conflict, but reducing conflict actively when it’s in your power. Leary and his fellow travelers don’t comprehend empathy, the need to build security in a child because you are reliable about keeping them from unnecessary pain.

There are plenty of things which can’t be taught, only caught. You have to portray it, exemplify it, be fully conscious of their natural tendency to emulate. Let them explore what you do, knowing some day they must inevitably turn from some it. You aren’t turning out carbon copies of mom and dad; cloning is not natural, not peaceful nor sane.

You’ll notice I’m only addressing generalities. That is merely self-consistency. By awakening the spirit of peaceful sanity in the question of child rearing, you’ll operate under a far higher level of awareness, and the details will fall into place. And when you just can’t figure something out, trust the kid. Truly, this works better than you realize. No, there is no unfailing principle here, just a raft of suggestions which indicate a better way of looking at things. If you face some conflict in the process for which you lack the tools to resolve, what makes you think the child won’t realize that, and discover something truly important about the limitations of humanity?

Most importantly is your honesty. The one thing which makes me angry about the whole business of education and training, and regardless of the age or mission of the learners, is dishonesty. Keep private things private, but always offer all pertinent information. No, don’t overload them with extraneous detail, but never, ever hide things you would want to know in their place. Playing head games is cruel and hateful, a manifestation of insecurity. So it is with any form of entertaining yourself at the expense of others. Call it “sin” if that brings clarity, but it’s simply another way of saying any form of deception is totally inconsistent with peace and sanity. If someone does not agree to a round of head games, you are enslaving them and creating conflict if you slip it into the mix. Be utterly transparent to everyone, especially your children.

Peaceful and secure children become peace makers.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Raising Radical Peace-maker Children

Radical Peace and Sanity

Given insecurity is the cause of all human conflict, the only possible path to reducing war and conflict is promoting sanity and peace. Perhaps with the best intentions, thousands have tried for a great many years at this, but mostly with all the wrong assumptions about human nature.

You cannot gain peace and reduce violence by political action. Fixing politics will not bring peace. The problem is not bad politics but the existence of politics at all. Nor do I imagine we can simply stop that, either. We can’t go back and start over unless Jesus comes back, and His brand of starting over means this current world and reality itself will be gone. Barring that, we need to work for peace some other way.

Peace is merely the result of sanity. Sanity is defined in part as people breaking free from pretty much all human culture. Yes, you read that right. Stop being, or trying to be, this or that kind of person. Just be yourself, utterly individual, radically and completely leaving behind all the conforming you know. Granted, that’s a tall order, but that’s what it takes. You aren’t going to do this through some single great leap, but as a commitment to pull up out of this foul human existence and rise to another level. This calls for dismissing all loyalties on this plane, and embracing something at the cosmic level.

Nobody can do it for you, but when you see someone able to make peace everywhere they go, you realize something there is well above understanding. If peace and sanity do not find you, if they do not awaken in you a desire for them when you encounter someone like that, peace is not available for you. So long as you make peace an objective, a goal, something which must be planned and which requires organization and leadership, it will never happen.

When this radical peace and sanity is your commitment, the very nature of the cosmos itself tends to support that pursuit. People will find themselves drawn to cooperate in ways they can’t understand, in ways which aren’t entirely conscious, and the very air, water and ground around you — down to the smallest particle of matter — will also cooperate. By no means should you be silly enough to expect absolutes; but it remains unmistakable. Reality recognizes sanity and peace, and is crying out to support it. There will remain factors which inhibit that support, but it’s there, and peaceful souls can sense it.

It’s nice when I can run across people who want to share these things, talk about them, spend time with me because of them. What a relief to not have to play games, just be yourself and know it’s good enough, justifies acceptance in itself. But more important is that we carry that with us all around this insane world. The biggest favor my readers can do me is simply indicate in some way they get it, and are doing their own thing to make peace and sanity painfully obvious in their world.

I am a pacifist, a peace radical, but by no means a peace activist. Activism of any sort places you under control of another, because it requires surrendering part of your sanity to pursue someone else’s choices for you. Activism is politics, and politics always and inevitably leads to conflict, if only internally among those who feel the only way to get things done is by concerted action in pressure groups. Internal conflict cripples your intentions. Sure, you can steer some political responses, but you can’t change anything that matters. Participating in any way is surrender to insanity and conflict. People who don’t love peace and sanity won’t appreciate your yelling demands, and you’ll be just one more enemy, another source of conflict. You don’t make peace by creating conflict.

So I sincerely press for leaderless resistance to insanity and conflict, which can’t be called “activism.” Peace and sanity can only exist where no two of us do exactly the same thing, except by accident, and then only in appearance. Yes, there are some strong common grounds of action which our tortured reality wants to see, but that’s another discussion. You have to want it because of something within you, drawing you on your own terms to something which escapes full explanation. It has to be utterly voluntary, every step of the way, every breath, every heartbeat. It has to drive you; it drives me.

Posted in sanity | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Radical Peace and Sanity