The banking crisis is just another part of an ongoing, long-term plan of passive-aggressive conquest. From Paul Craig Roberts:
To summarize, smaller conservative and prudent banks that invested in “safe” assets such as US Treasury bonds face bank runs. Larger banks with massive derivative risks are one bond trader’s mistake away from exploding the financial system. The 2008 crisis and the potential for more crises rests entirely on the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the enactment of Frank-Dodd. We are looking at the total, complete failure of intelligence on the part of the US government and economists. Their handiwork has the capability of collapsing the existing financial system of the world. It was the work of total idiots.
There is, of course, the question: Is this real stupidity or is a plot unfolding to collapse the financial system as we have known it in order to “save” us with the introduction of central bank digital currency? Are we passing from the remnants of democracy and self-government into total tyranny?
A study finds that 200 US banks face the same risk as those that destroyed Silicon Valley Bank. The Federal Reserve’s higher interest rates are destroying the banks’ solvency. Yet the Federal Reserve has not backed off its disastrous policy, and with Credit Suisse’s failure looming, the EU central bank raised interest rates! Yes, people are stupid. But are they this stupid? Could this be intentional with a secret agenda in mind such as digital currency?
I believe it is a secret agenda. The implementation of a bank-controlled digital currency means the government gets to decide how you spend your money, and eventually, whether you get to keep it in the first place.
This is part of a larger pattern. Let’s put it into perspective.
Biblical Law is not reasonable; it’s a matter of faith. You can gin up all kinds of reasoning, and maybe even some practical outcomes, as the motivation for accepting something that resembles Biblical Law, but only at the cost of ignoring the miraculous hand of God in that law.
A core element in neocon policy is the cynical embrace of a moral code to bring about a stable and prosperous society, thus enabling a military conquest policy over any foreign government that dares to refuse their imperial economic and political dominance. They don’t actually believe in the God of the Bible, but raise up some body of law and custom based on human reason and traditions, and they call it Judeo-Christian values, making it a false god. It bears only a superficial resemblance to the Covenant of Moses or the teachings of Christ.
But there are too many people who resist such a value system, and not merely because it’s bogus. Rather, they are morally rebellious and promote an alternative that is either secular or pagan, but the result is about the same; it’s feminist at heart. Thus, we have globalism rising from the roots of feminism. The neocons were once part of that crowd, but as the left became more radical, the neocons left to form their own agenda. Instead, the neocons hijacked the conservative movement. They tolerate the dominance of the Zionist Christian voting block.
You really need to understand that neocons are not Zionist, but are using Zionists to get things done. Yes, “neocon” is a label that points back to the Jewish ethnic agenda, but they would prefer not to have a home state for Jews. It’s pure elitism. Their moral cover depends on Jews having no “home” for refuge from persecution. The claim to being a poor, persecuted minority (essential to their manipulation) is weakened by the existence of a political entity like Israel.
Get this: Jews and the Jewish elite are two different things. The Pharisees have always been contemptuous of the peasants; “these people are accursed, not knowing the Law” (referring to the Talmud). This attitude is part of the Jewish elite ethnic agenda, which no longer includes such a strong religious element. It’s not exactly Talmudic, but is influenced by Talmudic ambitions as expressed in the False Messianic Expectations (see the Wilderness Temptations of Christ). At any rate, most Jews worldwide (the peasants) are leftist, and some are Zionist, whereas the core elite leadership is mostly neocon, a separate ideology. The stated neocon agenda is, for the most part, the expression of the Jewish ethnic agenda — manipulate the Gentile world into chaos and then take over as the saviors.
Thus, a neocon like Netanyahu can appear to be Zionist friendly, but in the long run, he’s trying to destroy the modern State of Israel as it has existed until now. That state has a very strong leftist voting block, and a competing orthodox voting block. Neither is amenable to neocon leadership. Netanyahu will at the least remake government so that the neocons can dominate without resistance. Thus, it can become the home of the neocon agenda, using military force to undermine and destroy any government that resists neocon global dominance. It makes Israel the single biggest thorn in the side of the whole world. If his policy destroys Israel, so much the better, to restore the image of Jews as having no refuge in this world.
It may not have started out that way, but in practice, the neocons are herding the globalists, preparing to push them out of the way at some point down the road. They also herd Zionists to get a voting block with money to support their agenda without really having to promote their agenda openly as neocon, which was somewhat discredited under Bush II.
Thus, globalist policy agenda items are often steered by neocons under various guises, because the neocons will use those same oppressive controls for their own policies later down the road. The Jewish elite agenda is not precisely to destroy the West, but to humble it under their authority by destroying the Gentile resistance to Jewish dominance. Jews hate us, but want very much to enslave us.
The globalist agenda to censor anything that isn’t “woke” enough is just what the neocons hope to hijack later. The effects of seizing banking will work a whole lot better if everything, including banking, is controlled via the Net. It’s the power of a deep conviction that fires one’s whole life, but without the messiness of having to inculcate such a fire by personal interaction. It simply becomes impossible to do anything that isn’t controlled by those beliefs, never mind what is inside your soul. You will have no leverage whatsoever to resist.
In other words, the neocons have learned from at least some of their mistakes. What we see in the Netanyahu takeover of Israel’s government is their dream for the entire world. But if the globalists will implement the mechanism for them, why not let them run with it? Once the insane wokism becomes intolerable, the neocons can swoop in and bring us some relief. The pattern has already been established by using various “sane” lefties as foils to the insane wokism, like Jordan Peterson. He’s a lefty globalist, but everyone ignores that because he promotes a saner brand of leftism. Neocons only pretend to be right-wing; they are still secretly lefty, just the “sane” version that dominated Democrats before they were radicalized by the New Left.
As we’ve often noted before: The Radix Fidem way is to step back from all of this. We have an otherworldly message, not a competing political agenda. Yes, we could come up with better policies, but the foundation of any better human government is Biblical Law, or what Catacomb Resident calls “the Covenant” — AKA, the Code of Noah. Anything less does not warrant our involvement.
Instead, we must pray and prepare for ways to get around the human political agenda and still present our message to the world.
NT Doctrine — Acts 14
While it was certain the Gentiles would respond more strongly, Paul and Barnabas continued the same standard approach in each city, when possible. They would start with the Jewish synagogue and offer the gospel message to Jews first. So they did at Iconium.
As usual, the message that welcomed Gentiles without having to convert to Judaism first caused trouble, but it took a while in Iconium. Meanwhile, there were plenty of signs and miracles to support the message. Those Jews who still rejected the gospel eventually stirred up a mob against Paul and Barnabas. This time, the city itself was just about evenly divided between those who hated the missionaries and those who favored them. When the haters had a firm plan to stone the two, the plot leaked and the two left town.
This time they headed south and a bit west over rolling hills to Lystra. It would have been about a day’s hike. The unexcavated mound today stands among farm fields to the west outside the village of Hatunsaray, in the Meram District of Turkey. Here I’ll quote a couple of paragraphs from my previous commentary:
This was a distinctly Phrygian city, with almost no Jews, so no synagogue. The preaching took place in the public forum, probably the city square just inside the main gates. While preaching, Paul realized that a man born crippled had gained complete trust in Christ, sufficient to be healed. Paul directed the man to stand, which the man did with great enthusiasm. The problem was the context. These folks had a pagan temple outside the city gates, and at some point had simply renamed it as a temple of Zeus/Jupiter, the closest from the Greek/Roman pantheon to their ancient deity. There had been some legends about Zeus, with his spokesman Hermes, visiting the area and performing miracles. The locals seized upon this association, and began chattering excitedly in their native dialect, which Paul and Barnabas didn’t understand. Since Paul was younger and speaking, they assumed he was Hermes the Messenger, while the older Barnabas was Zeus, the King of gods. A few went off to fetch the temple priests and a sacrifice fit for their patron deity. When Paul and Barnabas realized what was happening, they reacted as typical Jews, tearing their garments to symbolize distress over blasphemy.
The approach Paul used was tailored to those lacking knowledge of Jewish religion. They first protested that they were mere men. The whole point of their message was to turn them away from useless animal sacrifices to dead gods, and to embrace the One True Living God. He is described as the one who made all things, who tolerated the nations wandering from the true revelation. We note in passing God’s tolerance was in part due to the failure of Israel to get the message out. Meanwhile, He made sure nature testified of Him, by having regular seasons and predictable crops. This hearkens back to the Covenant of Noah, which remained in force among all Gentile nations. It was still difficult to dissuade the local priests from leading a sacrificial celebration for the city residents, as Paul surely taught them that Christ had become the final and eternal sacrifice under all covenants.
The two stayed for some time, but eventually the Jewish troublemakers from Antioch and Iconium caught up with them. Taking advantage of the residual tension from the misunderstanding with the local priests, these agitators stirred up a mob to stone Paul and drag him out of the city. As Barnabas and some Christians gathered around what they thought was Paul’s dead body, he simply rose to his feet and went back into the city.
The next day they traveled several days toward the border of the Roman province of Cilicia. They would have passed an extinct volcano, a ring of snow-capped peaks with a high bowl valley nestled in the middle. East of there was the city of Derbe, whose ruins have been partially excavated. The mound stands today just below the Cilician mountain range that separated Paul from his homeland and the city of Tarsus. In Derbe there was no drama, and they stayed quite some time.
This has now been at least a couple of months since the two left the church at Antioch. There was no way they could have traveled on the main road through the Cilician Gates (a narrow pass, the only way through the range). At that time, western Cilicia was ruled by local kings who had vigorously guarded their pagan religions under Roman protection. It seems Jews did not travel that route, and just passing through would have been pretty risky for Christian preachers. So they retraced their journey, stopping to encourage the new churches they had planted along the way and ordaining elders.
As was typical of the church in Jerusalem, elders were administrative leaders, rather like heads of households. Each church was organized like a synagogue under one or more elders, and the members were taught to regard each other as one family. Eventually they would have added men playing a priestly role, and called them pastors, but that came later. It was critical to encourage the churches to become strong family units to face the persecution that was just getting started.
Thus, Luke tells us how they eventually made their way back to the home church of Antioch. When they delivered their report, it brought considerable rejoicing over the strong response from among Gentiles. The two missionaries stayed home for at least a year.