The Other Side: 1 – The Prison

We don’t belong here. We weren’t designed for this, but we are stuck in it. Nobody escapes without first embracing this.

The English language, and the entire thought process behind it, lacks the facility for handling this discussion properly. So it is with most European tongues. It’s quite a chore to put this discussion in plain terms, which is why I often resort to fiction to introduce the underlying concepts. But today we are going to try our best to make sense of it in somewhat clinical terms.

Our current plane of existence is a mess. Worse, it can’t be fixed. It’s basically a prison, so it’s not supposed to be nice. Any effort we expend in making it nicer must be sensibly limited to things we can actually do. The problem is primarily one of perception. There is another plane of existence, but everything around us militates against that idea, never mind how to access it.

If the notion of another plane of existence finds root in your mind, there is some hope for you. It shows some part of you has been awakened to the inherent conflict in each of us, making us long for something better. It shows you also possess sufficient skepticism to avoid being suckered into thinking that “better” has to be here. The next step is helping you realize just about everything around you is built to keep that other plane, that Other Side, away from you.

The easiest thing about keeping it away from us is mixing. Any amount of truth in the matter, plus one single plausible falsehood, is all it takes. It’s as if someone is presenting any number of combinations, each indicating some sort of parallel universe, none of which actually exist. Each is offered as “The Way of Truth” and each has its own mix of flaws, designed to soothe the haunting question born in each of us in our many varieties of needs. Any way you can be channeled into an acceptable failure will do, because the most dangerous thing of all is escaping the channels.

The primary reason this works so well is all of us instinctively fear being alone, so we keep seeking some sense of inclusion somewhere. We even get deluded about that, given there is any number of classical Loner channels to make us feel accepted and recognized in our fake uniqueness. That’s just one example of channeling and herding. Nobody escapes that easily. We all have vulnerabilities, subject to endless ways of manipulation, keeping us in the prison.

So the first step is something in you recognizing you are in prison, as it were. Until you embrace that fully, you can’t possibly consider escape.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Other Side: 1 – The Prison

What We Accomplished in Iraq

We allowed almost the entire Jewish and Christian communities to be decimated and driven out. Their protection under Hussein was good, but now no one cares. We also replaced a secular regime with one which relies on Sharia Law. Isn’t it wonderful?

Meanwhile, over a million civilians are dead, mostly killed by our troops, and we have enforced the divisions which will keep the place in permanent turmoil. The infrastructure is shattered and disease is rampant.

Aren’t you proud, Americans?

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on What We Accomplished in Iraq

Israeli Madness

First, I don’t consider modern Israel any part of Bible Prophecy. That is, they utterly fail every test of what God promised to do, chiefly because there is no significant adherence to the Covenant of Moses. Please note, Jesus, the Son of God, said the Talmud was man-made trash and contrary to Moses, so having a minority of Orthodox and observant Jews won’t get it, since those are all Talmudic. No, it has to be the Law of Moses as taught by Jesus. But modern Israel can’t even do the Talmud right, never mind Moses.

Second, it won’t matter if they are genetic Hebrews or not. There is strong evidence they are mostly not, but the point from the biblical standard is Children of the Law, not Children of Israel. Several Old Testament prophets indicate they can’t even claim the name of Israel if they don’t obey the Law.

No, modern Israel is entirely artificial. I’ve often said in the past, they are also not really that important to the Rothschilds, except as a distraction for the rest of us. Keeping us all stirred up at the impossible claims, ramming them down our throats by legislation, and the entire Holocaust Industry, has never been anything but a huge mirage designed to keep everyone on edge. It naturally divides nations and keeps them at war. The whole point for the Rothschilds was endless war, because that’s where the money is. The Rothschilds are all about money and power, but not direct political power.

So while the Rothschilds have spent considerable sums grabbing Israel, building it into a fake democracy, populating it with compliant Jews who don’t know they are tools, it’s not really where their heart is. When things have run their course and Israel no longer serves their purpose, it will be allowed to fall. More specifically, it will be destroyed in one more grand act of inhumane war. They don’t really care about all those people, neither Israelis nor the Palestinians, nor anyone else in this world.

They use their power behind the scenes to manage the politics of Israel, just as they do here in the US. They don’t care which party wins, just as long as events stay within the acceptable limits. So they’ll all this or that party to gain control for a limited time, but no one wins anything unless they promote the wishes of the Rothschilds.

When you read suggestions Israel would not use nukes against Iran, don’t believe it. If Israel were sane, she wouldn’t, but the Rothschilds make sure sanity is only apparent in a very limited quantity. Look at most of their claims regarding the Flotilla Massacre; reasonableness is simply not part of it. Sheer chutzpah and “reality is whatever we say it is” are the order of the day, and is fully characteristic of Israeli government. If the Rothschilds tell them to nuke Iran, they will, with relish. Defying all the rest of humanity is pre-programmed, just as defying God.

While I don’t necessarily believe they plan to do so, I would hardly discount the idea of Israel employing nukes or other weapons of mass destruction anytime they think it will serve their purposes. Their mission in life is to raise impossible demands on all the world and provoke everyone to fury. Once we all focus on them, we aren’t paying attention to the real evil. So don’t let anyone tell you Israel won’t do this or that, especially if it makes no sense at all. They probably will, sooner or later, and laugh about it. Their arrogance is unlimited.

Let’s just pretend for a moment Israel actually manages to grab all the land they say they want, and everyone else is dead or moved out. What then? They’ll demand everyone serve them. All their neighbors must become tributaries. If not, those neighbors will suffer endless warfare and turmoil. Israel will demand it. Peace will come only on Israel’s terms. Negotiating with Israel means lying on the ground and letting them walk on you first, then we talk.

For as long as the US is useful to Israel, the government and economy will be propped up by the bankers, who are themselves all servants of the Rothschilds, most unknowingly. The Fed will continue to keep us on life support until it’s pointless. But as long as we have bodies to send to war on Israel’s behalf, they’ll try to keep us alive. When that has run its course, look for the props to disappear. You can’t imagine how fast things can fall when the banks stop cooperating. Really; you can’t imagine.

All these reasonable analyses are missing the point. Major events are manipulated, and things will not be allowed to follow their natural course unless they don’t matter.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Israeli Madness

Tough Eating

Given the horrific practices behind the industrial food production in the US, I’m darn near a vegetarian. While I love good animal flesh, the problem is there is so little of it which appears safe.

Every day Monsanto tries a new trick to grab total monopoly control. It won’t matter if they are so deeply evil they would cynically push poisons on us; that’s hard to prove. But monopoly ambitions in “efficient food production” is evil enough. And if it’s poisonous, they don’t want to know, or us to know.

So I spend a lot of money at so-called “health food” stores, and a few local providers I have come to trust. We get bison meat from Wichita, Kansas, because we can’t find anything suggesting they do evil with the animals. We sometimes get grass-fed beef, and I wish I could afford goat’s milk, but we settle for cow’s milk guaranteed produced without hormone injections. I realize there are some things we simply cannot get that is actually pure and natural. I probably couldn’t afford some of it if I could find it.

Fast food and most restaurants are out. I no longer eat sweets, except stuff made at home — with a lot less sugar. I’ve become very fond of beans and rice. I’ll buy a lot of stuff made in Europe or other places which restrict GMOs and such.

These are habits on the way, because I still believe we are headed for a painful situation where pretty much all imports will cease. That’s because the dollar will be worthless and no one will take it. Since we make so little here these days, that will be a real shock. We may be lucky to eat anything at all, soon.

Posted in health | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Tough Eating

Eden and the Conspiracy Theory Sampler

Everyone wants to go back to Eden. But there is this problem with that flaming sword.

Okay, so we realize what really matters in the Eden narratives is not the facts themselves, but the symbolism, and what it tell us about our situation today. Eternal truths cannot be communicated in words, so God uses symbols. We did have a much better situation at one time, the one for which we were designed, but something in us just can’t quite play along with the requirements. So we find all humanity in this broken state, and it’s not fun. Surely we can do better?

Yep, but the narrative more or less ends with that flaming sword guarding the entrance. It doesn’t actually deny you entrance, just reasserts the original requirements. I cover that on my other blog, and focus here on how everyone is trying so very hard to get back to Eden some other way. In modern parlance we discuss Utopia (“No Place”), aptly named since there won’t ever be such a place until we get past that flaming sword.

But even a great big slice of Christianity wants to ignore that sword, and this business of we are fallen, and we can’t fix it ourselves. So every effort to produce some sort of earthly Nirvana is doomed to failure. Instead of recognizing that, everyone keeps looking for a way to slip past that sword. Some will simply break all the rules and force people to do what they believe will bring Utopia. Others know better, but still insist Eden is our birthright, so they concoct a lot of explanations for why we aren’t getting there. We call them “conspiracy theories.”

Just a reminder: Every government is a conspiracy — a conspiracy to rule. That is, unless it arises directly from God’s Laws, and we don’t have any of that kind right now. So all we have are genuine conspiracies, and a lot of them include creating misinformation so that we have conspiracy theories. People running around putting out the lies, and others collecting them and trying to make sense of them. Meanwhile, nobody is paying attention to the real government behind the apparent government, so most theories are wrong. That doesn’t make theorizing a mistake, but it does require you not be so gullible.

For example, you have guys like Greg Szymanski and his “Arctic Beacon” site. I’m not linking to it; look it up. Greg is a theorist, but a liar, too. He may not really know what’s going on, but he promotes some ideas he knows are false. I’m willing to bet he’s a government shill, but that’s another matter. Mostly he promotes some crazy stuff about the Catholic Church, Jesuits, etc. He’s not too far distant from the stuff spouted by Lyndon LaRouche.

First, let’s get one thing out of the way: The Pope is not Antichrist, per se. That is, the position itself is not inherently evil. The whole church arose as the natural by-product of political development and the compromise of the early churches with civil power. Popes are neither particularly holy nor especially evil, but men who rose through the process to take the role. Natural human variation within the system brings good and bad, and mostly just people being people. And while I’ve never met a Jesuit priest I liked, I find a lot of Catholics aren’t that fond of them, either. Their whole mission is wrong-headed, but not diabolical. So like any other truly large organization, the Catholic Church has bad apples, some truly rotten to the core, but the organization is just one more human organization.

Every organization is subject to infiltration, and the Illuminati have their people everywhere, including just about every Protestant church, as well. That’s because there are so very many people who are fooled about what is and isn’t dangerous. So if the Illuminati use the Catholic Church, the Catholics are hardly alone in that. If you want to avoid infiltration, don’t organize — at least, not the way most everyone in the West does it.

Szymanski loves to pick on the Catholics, particularly Jesuits, as do a large number of other theorists. It’s an attempt to get you focused on the wrong thing. It is plausible, of course, since you can find some nefarious deeds in the hands of the hierarchy. But Szymanski seems tied to a pretty nefarious religious organization himself: Cloverdale Bibleway. Again, look it up for yourself. You’ll find a fair description on Wikipedia under “Branhamism”. You’ll notice the patriarch of this particular organization sounds a bit like a Christianized clone of Mohamed — the One True Prophet syndrome. It’s a lot less organized than Islam (yes, that’s supposed to be funny), but it’s still a cult group.

The crazy part is Szymanski does cover some issues quite accurately. That’s how it works: Do a lot of noisy truth-telling, then slip in that one package of lies. Like Alex Jones, who seems to get some things right, but then he defends Israel tooth and nail. It’s possible our CIA, FBI and the rest of the alphabet soup gang aren’t quite that competent, but these guys work just the same as someone paid to confuse things. The simplest answer is the alphabet soup is just another conspiracy, with real Illuminati servants in pivotal positions, and the rest are just dupes. Let them grind along in their usual mix of oppression, make sure they bumble a few things, but when it really counts, use them to keep the real conspiracy on track.

You may remember that wild Neonazi, Hal Turner, who was an FBI shill. Frankly, almost the entire Neonazi movement is run by the FBI, at least indirectly. That’s rather like the CIA and al-Qaeda. Most of the loudest yelling about anything is probably, at best, only half true.

Mosque at Ground Zero? No. It’s a community center across town from it. Iran building nukes? Nuclear power and medicine, yes, but not bombs. Iran has fulfilled obligations under the NNPT; Israel won’t sign it. Obama’s birth certificate? His mom worked for the CIA helping overthrow the government of Indonesia, and Obama himself worked for them, too, visiting Pakistan and other places, and they paid off his student loans. At a college which most certainly serves the Illuminati.

Yes, there are real conspiracies to take over the world, and we might as well call the insiders the Illuminati, since it properly characterizes their net actions. But they may not succeed. That really depends on a higher power. The whole question may not interest you, and that’s fine. Some of us are driven by curiosity for all different kinds of things. I don’t pretend to have everything nailed down, but I am quite curious about this stuff. It always amazes me the different ways people seek return to Eden, when the answer is in plain sight.

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Eden and the Conspiracy Theory Sampler

Most Economic Growth Is Rooted in Sin

Think about it. What is it burns so brightly as to fire the economic engines of growth? You can give it a lot of different names, but it boils down to folks wanting stuff they don’t have.

Granted, wanting more than the berries, bugs, roots and animals you can catch or kill is not evil in itself. With rare exceptions, none of us have faced that. Oh, I suppose if you took some survival training you might have experienced moments of it, but I can’t imagine too many of my readers ever actually lived it. But improving your odds of survival against natural forces isn’t a bad thing in itself.

It’s not a bad thing to want covering for your tender hide against those natural forces, too. Indeed, let’s throw in shelter from the weather. None of it requires economic growth, as we know it, but simply requires cooperation with sufficient numbers of folks to exchange the products of their simple labors. Like a small tribe or extended household. If you can stand to be around your kin, you can probably get by and have time left over to notice.

Up to that point, God is smiling and His Laws have got you covered. You can do all that and be obedient to Him. But how about some of those modern conveniences? Okay, but how much convenience? At some point, you are wanting things you really don’t need. Yes, I use a nice computer. I’m blessed with the ability to share my thoughts with billions of humans, should they stumble across those words, displayed via the magic of computer technology. Yes, and Paul used the Roman roads and shipping traffic, but we know he most certainly did not approve of Roman government, which took his life unjustly. He simply took what was at hand and used it as a tool for obedience to His real King.

You can use any excuse to dodge the underlying question: Why? Why do you believe you need all that stuff? Is your life so empty you would not have a life if, say, a sudden EMP pulse from the Sun wiped out the entire electrical grid? It would be years coming back, and you still would need appliances that weren’t fried.

Meanwhile, all electronic communications would come to a halt. How else do we communicate? All of it depends on electricity. And food storage, and transportation, and climate controls, and — for those of you who still have one — your job. Aside from a relatively tiny stack of currency, almost all existing money is actually just numbers in a computer.

Okay, so maybe it won’t come to that. But that doesn’t matter, because the question remains: What do you really need? Because frankly, anything not covered in God’s Laws will tend to make Him pretty unhappy. Do you suppose this has nothing to do with the entire economic system of the West is coming apart? Just how much of the stuff we make, buy and sell is really consistent with His intentions for us? So maybe He’s cool with your laundry machines, but I have no trouble saying He’s not pleased with TV, movies, and most video games. Encouraging immorality is sin.

No, not liberal American morals, nor conservative, nor even libertarian and certainly not populist morals. God help us. If all you see in your world are neat political categories, you really do need to be shaken out of your artificial environment. All that stuff came up after folks rejected everything God said, except for a tiny slice of words which could be perverted to mean something else. No, this refers to morals rooted in the dawn of mankind. In case you are wondering, they still apply. God has not somehow grown up since then, and come up with a more sophisticated standard.

We are in sooooooo much trouble!

Posted in religion, social sciences | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Chill; It’s Just a Game

Perhaps you’ve seen it, since there are multiple copies on YouTube and other video sites: Protester runs on the field waving a sign, gets tackled by cops who proceed to get entirely too rough, which provokes the fans to attack the cops. If you haven’t seen it, go here and watch it yourself.

What ever happened to the old de-escalation ethics of police? When I was in uniform, had I been on duty on the field that day, it would not have been anything like that. Okay, so some goon interrupts the play of the game. In a free society, we tolerate such things as the norm, in that the occasional hijinks for whatever tragic cause by itself is within the envelope of what civil society expects and tolerates. It’s not a personal insult.

So I would have been laughing as I tackled the guy. I’m bigger than him, I assure you, so I would have taken advantage of that. But with at least one other, I can promise we would eventually have cuffs on him. If he struggles, it’s still part of the game. We were trained to do it against resistance and two can always defeat one struggling resistor. Six? Too easy.

Get the cuffs on, lift him off the ground and carry him out. What’s the big deal? I’d still be laughing, even joking with the guy. Only if he tried to strike any of us would there be any fighting. Just catch him and get him off the field. Turn him over to a police patrol dispatched to take him away. Job done; nobody harmed.

This notion folks have to comply with your personal whims or be punished for the grand insult to your authoritah fully warrants the reaction of the fans. The cops were wrong, and while I am sorry the one was knocked unconscious, the defense of the running protester was absolutely right. That’s not hooliganism, that’s justice as the Bible defines it. Thus saith the Lord.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Chill; It’s Just a Game

Fear Itself

It’s not so much the fear mongering, but the mongering of false fears. That is, stirring up excitement over things which don’t exist (like Iran’s nuclear weapons) or which don’t matter (gay marriage). But the politics of fear is the politics of oppression.

So let me offer you something else. Here’s some not-fear.

We’re all going to die. Some day. It’s not a matter of how we go, or what takes us down. None of those matter. What matters is whether you are walking self-honestly right now. It does no good to talk about truth as if it were some objective reality, since no two of us are likely to agree on it. So let’s talk about something we can do, and which actually requires no two of us be alike. Be self-honest.

That is, at all times assert the very real necessity of what your real identity requires of you. No, I can’t get any more clear than that because words can’t bear up under the load. If you are going to find anything worth living and dying for, it must be inside yourself.

Emotions aren’t it, nor is it intellect. It’s beyond that.

For example, did you know virtually every act of so-called Islamic terrorism was the result of work by the CIA, Mossad, MI6, or allied agencies? Most of it was paid for by secret budgets with your tax dollars. What you may not have known was we even provided the neocon theorists who created the current violent trends in Islam such as they exist.

For the past six decades, the Anglo-American elite (with Washington assuming the senior partner role after World War II) has assiduously promoted the most violent strains of revolutionary Islam, often — but not exclusively — as a strategic weapon in the context of the Cold War.

The Muslim Brotherhood — which grew out of the late-19th Century agitation of Persian-born professional revolutionary Jamal Eddine al-Afghani — has long been one of the Anglo-American elite’s most important strategic assets, as well as the talent pool that was used to staff the deadliest terrorist network in the Muslim world.

While he was superficially the most devout and pious of Muslim believers, Al-Afghani, writes Robert Dreyfuss in his valuable book The Devil’s Game, “a heterodox thinker who was a Freemason, a mystic, a political operative, and above all … someone who believed in the ‘social utility of religion.'”

That belief in “the social utility of religion” is a bedrock principle of the necon agenda. No, they didn’t create that notion, but have used it in ways no one else ever did, and the politics of radical Islam bears that precise trademark.

Facts, and they reflect something of truth. Given this, what does your inner bedrock of conviction require? Can we stop yakking about the Muslim invading the West already?

Or how about the lies regarding that spewing well in the Gulf? I don’t know where to begin, but maybe you can recognize the altogether unprecedented massive fish kills all up the Atlantic Coast? Do you suppose the hidden oil drifting along well below the surface of the sea has already hit the Gulf Stream current? The folks who know aren’t telling, because it might cost them a buck or two. Gotta protect that bottom line, ya know.

I’m not one for boycotts because they seldom have the intended effect. I’m not into feel-good moralistic nonsense. I reckon the least we can do is toss the whole barrel of public information on the oil disaster in the trash. Whether the alternative news sources are telling the truth or missing by a mile is not the point. The lies are massive, so withhold judgment. Meanwhile, how about we start thinking of how we are going to prepare for some future horrors arising from this unspeakable destruction of our natural environment? Don’t panic, just know it’s coming.

Now, we managed to pass August 10 without anyone bombing Iran, so that date was a bad guess. I thought it was too close, myself. I believe Half Past Human says it’s going to be in early November. That strikes me as more plausible. But whenever it may be, the likelihood Israel is going to back off is less than zero. The likelihood they will succeed without a huge loss is also pretty small. I can’t say what the politics here will be like then, because I keep thinking the economy will officially collapse any day now. If it does, I can only guess it means we can’t fund any more warfare. If we lift a finger to cover Israel while attacking Iran, it could easily become WW3 really fast.

At any rate, things are going downhill all over, and in very many, very big ways. Don’t panic. Keep your eye on the facts, never ever trust anyone who supports or works for the government, and plan on facing rough times. If you die, you die. It’s what follows that matters.

Posted in globalism, social sciences | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Fear Itself

Our Pimp Has a New Bottom Lady

If you are old enough, you might recognize the slang in the title. If the language seems crude, it is at least more accurate than is typically offered us.

For some decades now, the US has been Israel’s bitch. It’s hard to call it in other terms. Israel is the pimp who has used us, milked us, and as our charms age, has sought more exciting flesh. That would be India.

I am usually ambivalent about what Gordon Duff has to say, but I believe he does have something this time. It works out like this: What two countries never have leaks show up on Wikileaks? Israel and India. Cui bono? The longer this runs, the more right Duff looks on this.

So the US, sensing a loss of prestige and position with our pimp, has made ugly noises about Assange. It’s all for show. Everybody with a brain knows it. My initial reaction was thinking the leaks were the CIA mostly, since it looked like the sort of perverse stuff they do, but it’s much bigger. I think Duff’s analysis is more careful, more accurate, and Assange is Israel’s boy. The US government is at least partially angry, but not about the leaks. It’s about India getting all the love from Mossad. We are aging, about to collapse, while India is growing and is the primary workforce for so many US companies, they might as well be there, not here.

So we are being milked for the last penny, and when it’s gone, so is the doting attention from Israel. As long as we keep performing, doing all the wars for Israel, we can stay on the chain. But eventually we’ll be out on the street.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Our Pimp Has a New Bottom Lady

Flogging a Wooden Horse: Law and Title Case

It happened today again. I ran across a posting on some website where someone was gibbering about the government, legal authority, and using all capital letters on legal documents. It won’t matter how many times someone tells me of a serious conversation with some government functionary who suddenly became worried that a commoner would know the secrets about capitalizing and such. It’s a lie. Whether some government document shows your name in all caps or not makes not a bit of difference, and it never has.

For those who are at least acquainted with the history of this wild notion, it’s referred to as “nom de guerre” — a French term (“name of combatant”) referring to some sinister act of the US Congress in the 1930s which rendered all citizens legally as enemies of the government. Putting the names of citizens in all caps makes them a corporation and thus subject to some supposed international law of warfare.

This silliness comes in the same package with a bunch of other manure regarding the question of whether, for example, the former British Commonwealth dependencies (Australia, New Zealand, Canada) are actually independent, whether the US is for completely different reasons, etc.

First, don’t try to use this capitalization business in a court of law in the US. It’s been rejected repeatedly. It won’t matter if you are right in some objective absolute sense, because the current powers-that-be won’t allow it. You might fool a cop or clerk somewhere, but it won’t work with any judge.

Second, it is also pure hogwash in terms of history and law. Try this law historian or the famous Devvy Kidd, ultimate expert of all things regarding the Patriot/Liberty Movement. In short, the use of all caps on legal documents is simply the accretion of habits from several centuries of lawyers dragging their feet when technology advanced for producing their voluminous case filings. Using all caps meets a simple legal requirement for something to be conspicuous amongst the sea of printed characters.

Third, in the absolutist sense, the vast majority of all governments today are illegitimate. I have yet to find a one which meets the ultimate and final standards published by God Almighty, so long ago, we can’t even assign a date. But we know it all goes back to the one family which populated the entire earth: Noah. Yeah, that ancient Deluge which wiped the earth of all but eight folks in a boat. I’m one of those who could care less what “science” you have for arguing in favor of other narratives of human origin. None of  us were there, but God was. The whole point is not Noah nor even his boat and where you can find the remains of it today. The point is God revealed what He wanted us to know about human social structure after the Fall, and all humanity are accountable to that revelation. It doesn’t get any more absolute than that.

So if you run across any fool patriot types who yak about all caps and so forth on legal documents, tell them flogging a wooden horse won’t make it run. It just makes you tired, angry, and you still get no where.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , | 1 Comment