The Stories Do Not Age Well

It’s getting old already. Several items grab my attention, but I’ve already addressed them extensively. Not that I expect anyone to pay attention to me — sometimes I don’t pay attention to me, either. 😉

While I wasn’t fully informed of the bubble effect in real estate six years ago, I did know by then the economy was ready to collapse at any moment. Sure enough, here we are. I’ve already addressed how we should be utterly surprised if anyone in government admits how bad it is. We now have folks like Geithner on the hot seat for covering up information of interest to the public, but nothing will happen to him. It’s all theater, meant to keep the masses in the dark. Accountability does not exist within the government, only on those who are not part of the ruling clique.

I also promised we would see local governments scrambling to maintain the high level of tax income regardless how bad it hurts the governed. So today we learn Oregon has passed laws which will serve to drive out every small business which isn’t making obscene/criminal profits. They are taxing gross receipts, not profits. So if a business is actually losing at the bottom line, this will increase the loss. Naturally, you can be sure there’s some fine print to exempt or offer inducements (targeted tax relief) to really big businesses, but you probably won’t hear about it. Don’t move to Oregon unless you like Old Soviet style socialism, where everyone who isn’t serving in government gets the fair and equal distribution of poverty.

Major religious institutions are taking a hit, too. Those few who build on the assumption they’ll have only what little the Father of Heaven supplies, and start with a budget of zero as the basic operating assumption, will probably do fine. Those which rely too much on the corporate style management of assets and resources will suffer to the point many will simply cease to operate. But this will not prevent them tossing out the most manipulative appeals possible so your misery is increased, and your sense of peace with God is totally removed through false guilt.

But this is entirely consistent with the goals of the national ruling regime. Crush what little remains of citizen liberties and make them fear to the point they are driven to prostitute themselves to the all-powerful state. You aren’t a person with a will, desires and plans; you are a resource, property of the state, and what you may have in your heart means nothing. No, government does not hate you, per se, but simply doesn’t care at all either way. The only way you’ll get much attention at all is to shut you up when you make too much noise. So we now have an official policy that calls for extra-judicial execution of any American anywhere in the world who dares to embarrass the ruling regime. Judges are now saying, while corporations are persons, people who annoy the state are not persons, and there is no such thing as human rights.

And aside from the recent flash of sanity warning policemen about the overuse of tasers, the courts consistently favor the notion you must be utterly obsequious in whatever madness any cop demands for whatever reason suits their whims. You can be sure the police will never be held to the same standards as the rest of us. We are right behind the UK, where you can now be ticketed for simply wiping your nose while driving. And the state can decide you should not get married for whatever reason some half-wit bureaucrat dreams up regardless of written policy, so that any children will have to be de jure illegitimate and the social services can kidnap them. Then they get to rake off fees for the adoption by someone who happens to be wealthy. And don’t you dare suggest as an employer you would like to have hard-working and reliable employees, because that’s discrimination; it might offend the lazy louts who want a paycheck without working. Yes, these actions have been in the news.

When the people who govern your daily lives are not related to you by blood or covenant, you are under occupation by a foreign enemy. This has been true since before written history, and the story of oppression has not changed. It’s old already.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Stories Do Not Age Well

Linux Failed Me

First off, you need to realize this is not an angry rant. I have loved Linux from the first experience, when I installed RedHat 5.0 on an old 486. Once I understood it, and some of the philosophy behind it, this was where I wanted to be. I still wish it were so, but it’s not.

There has been an on-going issue for the particular hardware I run, a Dell 545 MT. I have used Vista, Win7, openSUSE 11.1 and 11.2, Ubuntu 9.04 and 9.10, and was unable to install my preferred CentOS 5.4. I managed to get SUSE 11.2 and Ubuntu 9.10 working rather well, except for one thing: burning disks. This machine features the ICH9 chipset, and my DVD-RW is SATA. When I try to burn disks larger than, say 250MB, it always fails. I read the logs, every log file I could find. There are over a dozen bug reports about this issue, and I tested every solution offered on every distro buglist which discussed it.

I don’t pretend to understand it, but I believe it has something to do with the interaction between udev and the burn process. Seems udev is polling the device during the burn, and somehow that interferes, and the burn stops. Brasero and other wodim front-ends fail consistently without useful error messages. K3B as a frontend for cdrecord works better, but still can’t finish anything much above 250MB. It seems to make a difference whether the settings include TAO or SAO, with the latter allowing a bigger ISO, but still failing at some point. Again, it’s over my head. I’ve spent hours reading about it on lists ranging from Ubuntu to Fedora, and too many had no useful discussion at all. Sometimes the submitter reports the issue resolved itself, but nothing they write helps me.

Among those who seem to understand it best, it would seem coordinating between the udev developers and the kernel driver developers is not straightforward. Each side seems to blame the other, though I don’t understand it well enough to be sure. What I do know is this has been reported as a problem starting two years ago, and is still unresolved. Now, it seems to me quite reasonable to assume it isn’t ever going to be fixed. It’s not a huge problem, because there are only a few of us using this particular hardware combination. At any rate, it’s not the hardware, because I burn flawless ISOs of all sizes, both CD and DVD, using Roxio under Vista.

I’m not at all happy running Vista, but I can’t afford to run out and buy new hardware. This expensive machine was a gift from someone who could afford it. I don’t have access to much else, except far older hardware. Nor do I have room to maintain a bank of different systems, even if I could afford them. I don’t have any real choices here. At this point I’m waiting to see if the BSDs will get all the drivers for my system, and may give one of them a try. Right now it seems bug reports indicate they are having issues, too. But this is Intel, which I believe is fully open to Open Source developers, so I can’t imagine why this remains broken two years after the first reports.

At any rate, I won’t be trying Linux any more on this machine.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

National Chutzpah

This is not about a race or ethnic group. People still argue today what the term “Jew” should mean, and I’m not addressing that. If I were to discuss the term “American” it would hardly mean a race or ethnic identity, and the same might be said of a great many other nation-states today. I am addressing Judea as a term referring to a national political identity, or a particular political agenda. Today, while the center of gravity is located in a place we know as Israel, that’s also not precisely equivalent to the term Judea. Judea is active among residents of several states today, but hardly includes all those who claim to be Jews.

We can trace the history of this nation with relative ease. It began as a portion of the Twelve Tribes of biblical Israel. At some point, ten of those tribes broke away from the others. The northern portion became known as the Kingdom of Israel, and the southern was the Kingdom of Judah. That Israel disappeared in history, captured and exiled, scattered across the ancient Assyrian Empire. We have no way of knowing how many of them reunited with their people in Judah, but surely there were some. So we are left with a couple of augmented tribes in the Kingdom of Judah. According to their own prophets, their sins were only slightly lesser than those of the northerners. Thus, they were also exiled, but allowed to retain their national unity, after a fashion, in the land we call Babylon. Another empire rose to challenge Babylon and this one we usually identify as the Medo-Persians, who had this oddball religion which demanded every nation return to their ancestral lands and rebuild the temples to their gods and pray for the emperor.

None of this is particularly new to anyone with a little Bible education. What may not be obvious is what shifted within the culture of the people during this time. When they first invaded Canaan Land, the local tribes practiced a collection of pagan religions which are universally condemned as utterly depraved. One of the tamer rituals was parents tossing their first-born into the arms of an idol built over a blazing furnace. Oddly, though, some elements and key terms were familiar to Hebrew tribal religion. Keep in mind, the notion of there being only One True God was just too foreign, too revolutionary for these people. Their religious and national identity was fairly new, comprised a great many familiar elements, but with many new things, including this crazy idea of there being only one God, and the others all frauds and demons. It just never did take root in their minds.

Part of this was the simple fact the majority of any given population can never be fully mystical, can never have a fully raised living spirit, so they were suffering from a vast load of superstition. That would be a quasi-mystical emotional fear of things unknown. True mystics would know better, because a live spirit would enable a greater clarity on the spiritual level. Dead spirits cannot grasp spiritual truth, and the intellect surely can’t grasp it. So in the midst of this horde of superstitious, yet skeptical and cynical nation were a tiny minority who had the real insight. It was they who harassed the majority about the constant tendency to compromise and incorporate a little local Baal and Ashtarte cultic worship along with their ritual worship of Jehovah.

It remains possible to grasp some measure of mystical truth without a living spirit, but it would mean wanting to know these things, embracing mysticism as the true nature of things intellectually. You can surely gain an academic understanding of how mysticism works, so it’s not as if you just can’t swallow that without a living spirit. But idolatry was too easy, because it was reflexive with a superstitious people who tended to ignorance, in the sense of a very low grade mysticism education.

When they came into their own, and the former empires off in every direction declined all together at once, their king gave them a unity and prosperity which brought a much higher level of education, at least at the higher strata of society, by virtue of an acquaintance with other nations. The third monarch, named Solomon, suffered massive pride in his wisdom and ability to understand the nature of things intellectually. With that pride came a crushing level of taxation. When his son took his place on the throne, he was all the same arrogance but none of the wisdom, so he lost control of the northern tribes. The northerners had long been a different people, anyway, and quickly absorbed all sorts of idolatry, even while clinging to the official religious terminology. Fearing the Temple next to the southern palace of Judah would weaken their separate throne in the north, the rulers of Israel tried to supplant the official religion. It failed, and in the end, the royal household adopted the religion of the neighboring Phoenicians. When the Assyrians came and took them away, that was the end of Israel.

Judah remained, and just barely escaped the same fate by a miracle. Assyria went home, then fell apart. But Judah had been deeply infected with this grand human intellectual culture, and became less faithful. Their spiritual fortunes waxed and waned with kings of varying faithfulness. Essentially, the ruling families got too smart for their own good, turning more to humanly wise statecraft and neglecting the simplistic trust in their God. They, too, were taken away, to Babylon. While there, they drank deeply of the ancient literature and religions of the Mesopotamian Valley. At the heart of that ancient culture was the notion man could do it. That is, going back to the ancient Tower of Babel, they were certain if they just applied themselves, it would be the work of God. So they became fairly rigid about the Law, losing much of the mystical flexibility. Then the absorbed the Persian obsession with material wealth as the mark of divine favor. They eventually sent a tiny remnant home, while the majority stayed and pretended the land there was actually more blessed because the cream of the nation’s religious experts were still gathered there ferreting out the last quantum of understanding of their Law in the synagogue system.

So the Returnees were deeply infected with this twisted, broken mysticism, and in the process of rebuilding the ancient capital, developed yet another twist on their ancient religion. They were told a Messiah was coming, but rejected the mystical meaning, and insisted that meant a political ruler who would bring them a Persian grade of prosperity. Then, when the Greeks overran the Persian Empire, with the lofty Hellenistic man-centered philosophical traditions, the Judeans were completely sucked in by it. The thrill of Western rational logic was just too seductive. Meanwhile, that notion of the Messiah was so far removed from the actual mystical promises, they really didn’t have a clue. Rome took over from the Greeks.

So when the Messiah showed up and bluntly pointed out their mistakes, they killed Him. Then, in their impatience with God for taking too long to grant them the promised political deliverance, they got involved in revolts and Rome crushed them. Now, when Babylon took them out, they did at least learn to quit being superstitious and didn’t mix with idolatry any more. But it came at the price of losing their mystical edge, as they substituted a very naked impersonal legalism for the original personal faithfulness and love for God. But when Rome took them down, they only became hardened in their preference for Western rationalism. They no longer understood much of their ancient religious heritage because they were utterly lacking in the intellectual basis which gave birth to that religion.

But the idea of Judea never died, even though the land of Judah was taken away. This idea had become a very grand political aspiration to reclaim that land, but even more, to reclaim the former glory under their first few monarchs. They ruled the world, as it were, and gloated in it. The Messiah who sought to take them back to the Spirit Realm was rejected as their eternal enemy for daring to suggest this very worldly dream was not what God promised. So they fled the slaughter at the hands of the Roman legions in Judea, all the while nursing a grudge at the whole world for daring to reject Judea the Nation as the center of all mankind. No, not in the sense of wanting all mankind to convert, though that might be nice. No, it was that all mankind who were not Judean should be their willing slaves. Further, this vision assumed all the world must joyfully bring their wealth and lay it at the feet of the Judean nation.

You can’t call it “racism” despite how close it comes to it. It’s not about race. Indeed, it’s quite likely the folks who regard themselves today as Judea have almost no Hebrew DNA at all. Nor are they particularly observant of even their Hellenized brand of religion. No, it’s pretty much been stripped down to this political aspiration to rule the world as superior beings. So when you hear a political rabbi saying “thou shalt not kill” means only Jews should not kill Jews (whatever “Jew” means), you understand the chutzpah. When the modern nation-state of Israel acts with such incredible arrogance toward the rest of the world, you realize this is really nothing new. In their minds, God promised the rules which apply to the rest of the world would not apply to Judea.

God is not through judging them yet. That’s because they keep coming back and poking their fingers in His eyes again, and again, and again. Just guessing, I would say during the next year or so, things will start coming apart of Modern Israel. But at some point, you can be sure whatever was meant by John in Revelation with the term “Anti-Christ,” it’s something which will arise from whatever Judea has become.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on National Chutzpah

The Fiction of Control

There is a sense in which no man can be ruled who does not permit it. People in the aggregate prefer the results of letting governments take charge of things, and a host of cultural and contextual factors affect that, all of which are subject to some manipulation. So governments, once they have folks convinced they are legitimate, can proceed to change the rules later. Should anyone notice and object, they are likely to suffer. Should too many of them object, the game is over; the state will suffer.

The most free man of all is the one who knows what is really important, and has no trouble rendering to Caesar what is his, but can easily bear the consequences when Caesar objects to withholding things Caesar should not claim.

If you use the Internet, you might expect a modicum of privacy. Most of the time, you get it simply because you are one of billions and the snoops have time to examine only those few they target. Government would love to have endless capacity to monitor and enforce, but simply cannot. The state may come close at times, but this too shall pass. So even with the massive store rooms of server space and whole yottabytes of data, they still have to process it, and if anything actionable is detected, someone has to make the decision to execute that action. Knowing about you and doing something about it are two entirely different projects. Only so much can be automated. But keeping them out of your business simply won’t happen, for pretty much the same reason you can’t really enforce copyrights on the Net.

Once digitized, endless copying is just too easy. Once you encode your thoughts as digitized words, it’s wide open. Ditto for pictures, voice and video. The only way to keep it private is keep it off the Net. If you use the Net, it’s not private; that’s the nature of the beast. Indeed, there is no such thing as pure privacy, since every sound or action can be recorded, should someone take the time to place the devices for it in enough locations. We approach that now, at least in terms of the surveillance equipment now in place publicly, but planting such devices in private space is all too easy these days. Consider how little is the portion of your cellphone which includes the capacity for taking snapshots and videos. You’ll also notice the rush to pass laws to prevent private individuals from turning those weapons against agents of the state. Laws don’t mean much in a digital world, though.

So when the state demands digital access, no one should be surprised when the state can’t control all the uses of that access. Why do agents of the state somehow imagine they alone can do this stuff? Why are they always surprised when some clever cracker gets past their barriers? There are some really intelligent people in government service, but in the main, there aren’t that many. And it seems every time some new effort is made to grant the state more power through its agents, it soon turns out they have less competence in using that power than someone who would refuse to work for the government.

Do not fear the state. The power of government is always limited by the competence of those who wield its power. Truly competent people tend to avoid such power because it means compromising their competence by submitting to the bureaucracy which dehumanizes and deadens everything it touches. The secular state is organized death, and that death feeds upon itself. The secular state carries the seeds of its own destruction. You can refuse to live under such a thing.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Fiction of Control

Justified Target of Wrath: Wikipedia

It was a noble idea. Let everyone with an interest be allowed to add their knowledge regarding a topic, and the intelligence of the common man will shine through in creating an online encyclopedia. Let the differing opinions work out a compromise, and we’ll have nice, even-handed articles. It might have worked, except the people running the show were themselves unable to grasp the vision they stated. For whatever reasons, they allowed the worst sort of propagandists to run things.

I dearly love how Tim Bolen describes it:

People work hard in their lives to accomplish things. They don’t need to have some homeless, muttering, schizophrenic wander into a public library, plop their reeking selves down in front of the public internet, and log onto Wikipedia with a “private” name, to take out their resentments against their betters, by re-writing articles with so-called facts that were born in their drug-soaked, in-and-out of consciousness, mind. Nobody needs that.

But that’s one of the opportunities you provide. You call it “privacy,” and you actually think it is a good thing. Grow up.

Wikipedia has become one of the best places to find lies not fully covered by the mainstream media. Because slander and such is actionable, Mr. Bolen encourages people to sue Wikimedia, the company behind Wikipedia. I love it.

Lest we forget, the world is fallen. Your average human doesn’t have time to mess up your life, so it works out pretty well most of the time. It’s the people who have nothing better to do who make up the activist portion. When something truly horrific happens, you’ll get a rise out of just about everyone, but for daily evil, all it takes is a relatively tiny group of hateful sinners to ruin it for the rest of us. Since these people lack the physical courage to be predators in a gang, they instead form a pack of liars who dominate what used to be once regarded as a good source of information.

Wikipedia’s reputation is justly foul.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Justified Target of Wrath: Wikipedia

Transcending the Law Covenants

If I teach the Laws of God (Noah and Moses inclusive) and don’t live by them, I’m a hypocrite. If I teach the Laws and tell you I obey them, it would probably sound arrogant. So I won’t tell you that. I’m transcending the Laws by communion with the Lawgiver.

Most of the time we can ascertain without much difficulty the why behind some portion of the Laws. Moses warned about boiling a baby goat in its mother’s milk because that was a pagan practice, not because it was bad for you. He warned about sexual promiscuity partly because it destabilizes the community. It’s also something God takes very seriously, and has since the Garden. There were a lot of provisions which were almost entirely about respecting your fellow humans, about being civilized.

Other things are entirely fundamental to human nature. Torture is altogether evil, and nothing justifies it, even with lesser creatures. Homosexual relations fits in there, too. Nobody is surprised when a carnally minded fellow seeks his pleasure just about anywhere, but we still keep in our minds this truly threatens something fundamental to human existence. Promoting art forms which desensitize and expose us to repulsive and shocking experiences are also in that box.

If you don’t see it from the Lawgiver’s perspective, you don’t quite grasp how it opens the doors to the deepest darkness. Just about anything normally regarded as simply naughty can be taken to extremes, so that it becomes just downright nasty and evil. When you invite Satan to join your party, he will surely oblige you. God’s justice has bumpers laid out in the Law Covenants to provide some practical limits. It’s one thing to use good logic and education in ANE culture to deduce the intent of the Laws. You should certainly be doing that. It’s another thing entirely when you rise through mysticism to the level of consciousness which defies words and laws, to the place where a part of you simply knows instinctively when you, in that time and context, are too near the invisible spiritual bumper.

When you get there, something inside you rebels, and won’t go any farther without some effort to silence the warning. Most of the time, people are so wired into the obvious logic, they aren’t ready to be told something so apparently harmless is actually evil at that particular time and place. So they don’t hear the spirit cry out until, perhaps, it’s too late. So while you certainly train to think broadly in terms of God’s sense of justice as revealed, be aware you simply never will have a full appraisal of every factor involved. There are spiritual factors tied into the entire universe. They aren’t easily seen, even for people with a mystical bent.

It can’t be taught; it has to be caught. You have to hang out with people who tend to catch these things, and don’t react with mere superstition. We have a jillion religious idiots out there assuming they have this spiritual gift of discernment and it’s bogus. I can’t imagine what is driving their reactions, but in end, I am under no obligation to take them seriously. Too often they say things which are preposterous, usually to draw attention to themselves. It’s the old “follow the money” — see the trends, and you can usually figure it out when someone is full of themselves instead of the Spirit.

There are no shortcuts, no magic formulas, no books of rules. The Laws were written because the majority of humanity will never reach the spiritual plane of existence. Those who take Laws seriously will often be your biggest problems. Still, that’s the best they can do, so we try to avoid conflict. It could be a whole lot worse. But if you have any part of your soul connected to that other side, that Spiritual Realm, then by all means, it’s worth anything you have and all you are to make the most of it.

Evil days are coming, when just being spiritually honest is going to cause you trouble, and might get you killed. God’s wrath will fall on most of this world very soon, and that last dying spasm of sin is going to make an awful mess. Many of us will be caught as collateral damage, simply because we are called by God to be where the action is. We don’t fear that end, but we have to keep a spiritual perspective, keep seeing with mystical faith-eyes so we understand and can walk and talk according to the Living Lawgiver.

Posted in religion | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Busted: NetBSD 5.01

No, there is nothing really wrong with the OS, but with me.

I’m not the hobbyist any more. Back when I first dove into FreeBSD I was determined to get it. I bought a couple of books, bugged some people on a forum, some Usenet groups, etc. I installed it several times on different machines. Eventually I got pretty comfortable with it, and wrote a series of articles about installing it for those who were even more clueless than I. But FreeBSD documentation is really good, and it’s promoters are generally friendly, and it’s not all that hard to do.

NetBSD people have said they don’t want me mucking about their OS. Their documentation is scant, and if you aren’t an experienced technician, it’s full of ambiguities which will drive you nuts. I don’t complain about the manual configuration, since FreeBSD was that way when I started back with 4.6. But the installation directions are not simple, just simplified. There is no simplified walk-through, and I’ve been told there will not be one. But I tried it anyway.

It took me two tries to figure out how to make the partitions. I thought it was nice you could just dump it all in a single partition, with a swap on the side. I did manage to install, but it failed to write my network settings. That was a bear. In fact, I never did quite understand what was required, and didn’t get it working. It didn’t help I had to make out this tiny 80×25 display in the center of my screen. Finally, after looking all around and discovering I would have to rebuild the kernel to get a full size display on my laptop screen, I gave up.

Before I did that, I realized it was pretty snappy on my Inspiron 4100 laptop, at least as quick as CentOS 5.4, and boots a lot quicker. Still, I’m just not interested in digging and experimenting. It’s not worth it any more. I think I’m going to try QNX.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Busted: NetBSD 5.01

Anarchy Is Logical

After all I’ve written about the Covenant of Noah, the requirement for a civil government, you’d have to know I’m not anti-government. Actually, I’m anti-state. That is, I find the Modern State, born and defined by the Treaty of Westphalia, is utterly abhorrent to God. Westphalia was an arrow aimed at the heart of God’s Word, and is one of Satan’s greatest triumphs in human history. So the term “anarchy” typically means anti-state, not anti-government.

Even among those who embrace Aristsotelian epistemology, you can find plenty of good logic to back up this position. Take a look at this older article from 2002, by Joseph Sobran: The Reluctant Anarchist. He tells how he slowly came to that position by conviction, not by choice.

So the people are bound to obey the government even when the rulers betray their oath to uphold the Constitution. The door to escape is barred. Lincoln in effect claimed that it is not our rights but the state that is “unalienable.” And he made it stick by force of arms. No transgression of the Constitution can impair the Union’s inherited legitimacy. Once established on specific and limited terms, the US Government is forever, even if it refuses to abide by those terms.

As Hoppe argues, this is the flaw in thinking the state can be controlled by a constitution. Once granted, state power naturally becomes absolute. Obedience is a one-way street. Notionally, “We the People” create a government and specify the powers it is allowed to exercise over us; our rulers swear before God that they will respect the limits we impose on them; but when they trample down those limits, our duty to obey them remains….

For most people, “anarchy” is a disturbing word, suggesting chaos, violence, antinomianism – things they hope the state can control or prevent. The term “state,” despite its bloody history, doesn’t disturb them. Yet it’s the state that is truly chaotic, because it means the rule of the strong and cunning. They imagine that anarchy would naturally terminate in the rule of thugs. But mere thugs can’t assert a plausible right to rule. Only the state, with its propaganda apparatus, can do that. This is what “legitimacy” means. Anarchists obviously need a more seductive label.

“But what would you replace the state with?” The question reveals an inability to imagine human society without the state. Yet it would seem that an institution that can take 200,000,000 lives within a century hardly needs to be “replaced.”

He shows it’s only logical to realize the bludgeons used to keep Christians in their place — “render unto Caesar” and “the powers that be are ordained by God” — can’t mean what most people assume they mean. The people who spoke these words defied their governments and died in the process. If we assume the Son of God suffered the same intellectual inconsistency of most fallen humans, then we have nothing to discuss, and the world is a very dark, dark place indeed. Don’t forget He openly claimed to be the Son of God, so you can’t cherry pick and say He was pretty smart, just mistaken on that one point. Claiming to be God Incarnate is either madness or pure hucksterism, unless it’s true.

Sobran came to the same position as I on government — in that the modern state is illegitimate by definition — even without the benefit of biblical epistemology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Anarchy Is Logical

Generous Considerations

Who wants to be regarded unfeeling and selfish? I won’t say it’s all a band-wagon effect, but there is a ton of stuff about aiding the Haitians on blogs and news sites. I will say far, far too many of them are self-serving, but when you deal mainly in public notice of things, it’s part of the baggage you bear. So the best we can hope for is something honest and fitting in how they cover the story.

The whole thing is one mixed bag of truly insane behavior. First, we have this Western obsession with extending help from the ivory tower. We want to do good things for the people, but we don’t want to actually have to experience part of their misery. “I need to keep my Mercedes for a run to the first class meals offered only to us aid workers.” I don’t get that at all. You can’t lift the fallen if you don’t get down next to them where they have fallen. At a minimum, your feet and hands will get dirty.

Second, look at how other nations handle similar emergencies, and how they recover… or don’t. Can we examine the results with an eye to underlying conditions, and come up with a workable explanation of how it ought to be done? I don’t have room to write a long dissertation on it, but I agree loudly with those who remind readers we are going about this all wrong. What is going on with foreign aid in Haiti right now is just more of what has been going on there for several generations.

There have been all sorts of aid agencies there for quite some time. I keep running across the number 10,000 in reports. That’s one for every 1000 residents of Haiti (10 million). It’s a veritable sink hole. Yet, on the other hand, the God of Heaven says you had better care, so don’t act like we can’t get involved. But obviously in our zeal — the US alone has given something like $30 per Haitian in the past year — we have failed the mission. But the aid establishment is deeply entrenched, and I would say precious little is actually making life better in the long run. It’s not as if nothing grows there, nor is the issue purely one of population pressure, though we note Haiti’s population has tripled during my lifetime, while the world’s population as a whole merely doubled. If whatever it was which encouraged having babies went away, so would having babies.

But you won’t find any simple formula for that, either. Mission work? Most of the people claim Christian faith, something like 80%. Just because Voodoo is an officially recognized religion doesn’t make Haiti any less civilized than Americans, who often recognize Jedi (from a movie, for goodness sake) as a valid religion. No, the problem is we have never allowed Haiti to leave the plantation. We keep sending troops every time things don’t go like we want, and we force them to accept a communist thug as their ruler, a guy by the name of Aristide. Just as here, popular vote means nothing, given election processes with rigged voting, manipulation and bribes are so common. So instead of real aid by genuine disaster recover experts, we send in the Marines!

Jarheads are fine people, for the most part, and will work hard at what they can understand is the mission. But because it’s the easiest group we can assemble and move quickly, it shows we haven’t planned very well for such things in the first place. So the best we can do is going to look about like the aftermath of Katrina. Massive organizations with massive budgets do not automatically result in good assistance. Here in the US, it almost guarantees a disaster will be made worse. That’s because nothing — nothing — in our system of government is ready to do good or right. We could teach the Haitians a thing or two about banana republic corruption. The only bright spot in this whole fiasco is the Marines are less likely to complain and whine about conditions they way the UN folks do.

How come we don’t have an industrious Haiti simply seeking temporary assistance? Why is it such a mess we just brush aside their government and do what we want? It’s because we have been doing that for so long, it’s just our customary response. Everything we do in that country is carefully calibrated to prevent any change in the situation. We need Haiti to be pitiful, because it allows us to cover up so very many sins. I can’t pretend to calculate numbers on this, but the vast majority of what you will see and hear about efforts to relieve their suffering is pure grandstanding, propaganda, a way of diverting attention from gross and unconscionable sins here at home, or in other places from which some pittance of aid is sent.

You want to solve Haiti’s problems? Leave them alone. Not just in their suffering, but in their relative good times — leave them be. Let them fight it out amongst themselves what they will be and what they will do. As long as we keep them as a plantation of children and slaves, we will always have this pitiful disaster in the Caribbean backroom to trot out when we need a diversion.

Private aid is another matter entirely. Any time any organization with the least little tie to any human government anywhere gets involved, the process is property of Satan already. Get the governments out of it. Governments are not simply unable to do good; they refuse to do good. None — not a one — will do what’s right or even harmless. This is not what governments are supposed to do, and they should never, ever try. Don’t you dare call for governments to do anything about this. For those who give, you had better check carefully the agency you trust with that money. Red Cross? Forget it; they consume more than they pass along, never you mind the official lying numbers. No, look for someone who was there before, some private group who is still there, hasn’t fled the scene of chaos, but lives right there with the people. Of, something like Doctors Without Borders, or other organizations which have actually earned respect by their record of conduct and accountability. Not a single government on this earth has such a record.

Posted in social sciences | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Generous Considerations

More Death-of-the-Net?

As more of our economy is pulled in under the corporate and government controls, we risk a form of utterly heedless oppression. It’s called fascism — government operating on behalf the soulless corporation. We have gotten to the point the two are hardly distinguishable.

So when the FCC says it wants more say over the Internet, and the courts look askance at such a thing, we should not imagine either the courts or the FCC are looking after out best interests. What appears to be a very good thing by the FCC slapping Comcast for something which every technician knows constitutes a violation of the open protocols which make the Net possible, is probably a set up. Let’s face it: Comcast lied outright about this business of throttling BitTorrent connections. That should be a crime if it’s not, but this will surely be the lever government uses to throttle free speech.

The World of Ends is going away, in one sense. More and more of the Net is owned by corporations. They will be held back by the geek gatekeepers, but for how long? We already know the current ruling regime intends to shut down all dissent, even if oh-so carefully to prevent appearing to do so.

This matters to me because the Net is my primary outlet right now. I have a message, and a mandate from God to share what He has given me, to participate in His revelation. But for now, I have a tiny audience for that message. When I write about Linux, I get tons of hits. When I write about mysticism and faith, I get almost none. I’m not subject to much overt monitoring right now, and certainly precious little interference, because I’m not making enough noise in the sense that it would draw attention from anyone, good or bad.

At the same time, it is wholly unlikely I would try to hide behind pseudonyms and proxies. I take no effort to hide the pertinent facts about my existence, nor about what I teach. I’ve never hidden my contempt for the US government, as well as every other Western government. I’ll say it again: Not a single government in the modern world, as far as I can determine, is legitimate in the eyes of God. As a matter of conscience, I proclaim all who follow Jesus are free to disobey anything which hampers their calling from God. As long as your conscience is clean before Him, do what you must. It will not be counted against you as sin.

But the underlying assumptions are not to pick a fight with anyone. We don’t have a crusade to tear down any human government, but we ignore them all. Not blithely and stupidly, but wise as serpents and harmless as doves, in the final analysis we discount the worldly consequences as a part of the Cross. I can’t predict if those consequences will include a need for seeking ways to bypass all the Net controls planned and plotted against common users. As I survey the situation, I realize so long as God sees fit to keep me in the background, it simply means I don’t have to sweat learning more about networking and clandestine communications; I don’t have to worry about a bunch of off-shore shell accounts or whatever.

Yet.

Posted in computers | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on More Death-of-the-Net?